logo
‘We are in danger': Migrants deported from US were locked in hotel and held at remote camp in Panama, lawyers say

‘We are in danger': Migrants deported from US were locked in hotel and held at remote camp in Panama, lawyers say

CNN22-02-2025
For days, they say they were locked inside a hotel in Panama, surrounded by tight security with limited contact with the outside world.
Nearly 300 migrants from Asia, all deported by the US, were held there by Panamanian authorities who agreed to take them in and eventually repatriate them. It's part of the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign, which it has pressured Latin American nations to help with.
Some migrants have been transferred to a remote camp at the edge of a jungle that few can access, lawyers representing some of the migrants told CNN. Now, they wait to learn if they will be sent back to the countries they fled or to another nation willing to receive them.
But the conditions they have faced are distressing and may have violated their rights, the lawyers said.
The migrants started arriving in Panama City last week after being deported from the US. Some didn't even know they were being flown to another country until they actually landed in Panama, according to attorney Ali Herischi, who said 'they were told they're going to Texas.'
The migrants were then sent to the Decapolis Hotel and forced to stay there for days without stepping foot outside.
Jenny Soto Fernández, a Panamanian lawyer who represents about 24 migrants from India and Iran, said her clients were living in isolation, fear and uncertainty.
She said a lot of them didn't know their rights and weren't given orders of removal upon being deported. They also face language barriers and are constantly worried about being repatriated, she added.
One of the migrants is Artemis Ghasemzadeh, an Iranian national who fled her country out of fear of persecution because of her conversion to Christianity.
'Under Islamic law, you cannot convert from Islam to any other religion,' said Herischi, who represents her.
Ghasemzadeh now worries her life will be at risk if she's returned to Iran.
'We are in danger,' she said in text messages to CNN on Tuesday. 'We are waiting for (a) miracle.'
At the hotel, some migrants tried to voice their concerns by sending distress signals to journalists gathered outside. Standing in front of their windows, they held up pieces of paper with handwritten notes begging for support.
'Please help us,' one sign read. 'We are not (safe) in our country.'
Another message was written with lipstick directly on the window. 'HELP US,' it read in bold, red letters.
The migrants were not allowed to leave the hotel 'for their own protection,' Panama's Security Minister Frank Ábrego told a local radio program on Wednesday. He said they were held at the hotel, in part, because officials needed to 'effectively verify who these people are who are arriving in our country.'
Soto argues that the migrants have the right to seek asylum because they're fleeing persecution.
'These people that are requesting refugee (status) — it's not because they want to come here on an adventure or a trip. No, they're escaping. They're victims of violence and persecution,' she told CNN.
Soto said she tried at least four times to meet her clients at the hotel to sign legal documents required by authorities but was blocked by officials and never made it past the lobby.
Soto sent CNN a video filmed by her clients, showing her waving to them from the hotel staircase below, trying to reach them to hand them the paperwork. But the clients were prevented from going down and Soto was told to leave.
'They actually were so emotional, screaming and said, 'I want my lawyer! I want her. I want to talk to her. I don't want to talk to these people here,'' Soto said.
Attorney Susana Sabalza told CNN she represents a family from Taiwan who was held at the hotel for five days without knowing what was happening.
She said that while they had comfortable beds and a place to stay, they were under 'psychological pressure being closed in with security guards, immigration police, (and) officers there.'
CNN has reached out to Panama's security ministry, as well as the International Organization for Migration (IOM), who are involved in the repatriation efforts.
Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino on Thursday denied that authorities have violated any laws.
'These organizations are respectful of human rights. It's false and I deny that we are mistreating them,' Mulino insisted.
Security Minister Ábrego said Wednesday that he hadn't heard of any migrants requesting asylum there.
'But if they think they have the need, as any human being would, to request asylum, we have to pay attention to it and approve or disapprove it,' he added.
CNN has reached out to Panama's National Office for Refugee Assistance to determine if anyone has filed an asylum claim.
The Panamanian government said that from Tuesday to Wednesday, about 97 migrants were taken out of the hotel and bused to a remote holding camp on the outskirts of the Darién Jungle. It happened after a New York Times report exposed the desperation of those stranded in the hotel in Panama City.
The miracle that Ghasemzadeh had hoped for didn't come. Hours after talking to CNN, she became one of those transferred to the camp. Her relatives said she learned late Tuesday night that she would be moved out of the hotel with about 12 other people, and that she didn't know where authorities would take her at the time.
Herischi, who represents Ghasemzadeh and nine other refugees, told CNN that his clients ended up being detained in a 'very bad' camp.
He said they described the site as tough and dirty, with limited access to medication and the internet.
One family has a sick child who could be heard crying in the background during a call between Herischi and Panamanian officials.
Sabalza said the family she represents was also taken to the camp.
'It's complicated because there are children five years old (and) it's a tropical place,' she told CNN.
She said Panamanian authorities had not yet provided them with guidelines on how the attorneys would be able to visit their clients at the camp or if they would need special permits to enter.
'It is urgent for us to have clarity about the mental and physical health status of our (clients),' she said.
When the migrants arrived at the gate on Wednesday morning, Herischi said the situation was so unorganized that the guards didn't even have a list of the migrants' names to identify them upon arrival. The guards later confiscated all the migrants' cell phones.
'It shows that (it's) such an unorganized and never-thought-of (situation,) and just ad hoc political decision to accept this, but they don't know what to do with them,' he told CNN.
He added that he plans to file legal action against Panama and the US in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and US federal court.
More than 100 migrants have asked not to be repatriated, Panamanian officials have said.
The IOM is expected to work with them and try to find a third country that will accept them, Security Minister Ábrego said.
Meanwhile, President Mulino said another group of migrants would be sent to the camp because 'that's where they can be more at ease.'
He added that 175 migrants who are still in the hotel have voluntarily agreed to return to their countries of origin. At least 13 have already been sent back.
Herischi said Panamanian authorities assured him they would not send Ghasemzadeh and other migrants back to Iran if they expressed fear of reprisals. Instead, officials said they would speak with the embassies of other countries to see if they can accept them.
Herischi concluded, 'The only 'luck' that they got is that Panama has no relationship with Iran, so there is no Iranian embassy there.'
'That's a good thing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom fights fire with fire against Republicans and Trump
Newsom fights fire with fire against Republicans and Trump

Los Angeles Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Newsom fights fire with fire against Republicans and Trump

As Texas Republicans seek to redraw their congressional maps in favor of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives, Gov. Gavin Newsom has a power play of his own: redraw California's congressional districts to favor Democrats. With a new special election campaign, Newsom is proposing to temporarily scrap California's independently-drawn congressional lines in favor of districts that support Democrats. Could this political gerrymandering be the thing that saves democracy from Trump's increasingly authoritarian impulses? It's a boundary-pushing gamble that will undoubtedly supercharge Newsom's political star in the short-term, my colleague Julia Wick writes. But a ballot-box flop would be brutal for both the California governor and the Democrats. The 'Election Rigging Response Act,' as Newsom has named his ballot measure, would temporarily scrap the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Under the proposal, Democrats could pick up five seats currently held by Republicans while bolstering vulnerable Democratic incumbent Reps. Adam Gray, Josh Harder, George Whitesides, Derek Tran and Dave Min, which would save the party millions of dollars in costly reelection fights. But first the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote to place the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot and then it must be approved by voters. If passed, the initiative would have a 'trigger,' meaning the redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own gerrymandering effort. For Democrats like Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who appeared alongside Newsom to kick off the special election campaign, there is 'some heartbreak' to temporarily shelving their commitment to independent redistricting. California voters have twice rallied for independent redistricting at the ballot box in the last two decades and many may struggle to abandon those beliefs. A POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll found that voters prefer keeping an independent panel in place to draw district lines by a nearly two-to-one margin, and that independent redistricting is broadly popular in the state. Still, Friedman told the Times she was hearing overwhelmingly positive reactions to the proposal from all kinds of Democratic groups on the ground. 'The response that I get is, 'Finally, we're fighting. We have a way to fight back that's tangible.'' Newsom isn't using political gerrymandering as his only method of combating Trump and the Republicans. His digital team has resorted to trolling Trump on X, mimicking the president's own social media vernacular. Think petty insults and hyperbole with a heavy reliance on the 'caps lock' key. 'DONALD IS FINISHED — HE IS NO LONGER 'HOT.' FIRST THE HANDS (SO TINY) AND NOW ME — GAVIN C. NEWSOM — HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS 'STEP,' ' one of the posts read last week. Newsom's actions are notably different from how he spent the first months of the new administration. In an attempt to reshape the California-vs.-Trump narrative, the governor hosted MAGA leaders on his podcast and contradicted the Democratic orthodoxy on the participation of transgender athletes in women's sports. But after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid immigration sweeps and ensuing protests in June, Newsom's MAGA conciliation ended. Now he's making a big gamble with his new special election campaign, the kind of big play that could redefine how voters across the country see him. Read the full story here. Today's great photo is from Times intern Annie Goodykoontz at a vigil honoring a man who died while fleeing an immigration raid at a SoCal Home Depot. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newslettersJim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience intern How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on

Swalwell: ‘Putin completely played Trump'
Swalwell: ‘Putin completely played Trump'

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Swalwell: ‘Putin completely played Trump'

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) said President Trump was 'completely played' by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the leaders' historic summit in Alaska on Friday. In an interview on 'CNN Newsroom' on Saturday, Swalwell criticized Trump's treatment of Putin at the meeting and said world leaders fear the U.S. is 'shirking its responsibility' to defend democracy globally. 'Putin completely played Trump. This is entirely about Donald Trump refusing to release the Epstein files and putting forward this scripted counterprogramming to that,' Swalwell said in the interview. 'He made America weaker, as perceived by the rest of the world, and he humiliated himself.' Trump greeted Putin on Friday on a red carpet spread across the runway of a U.S. airbase and clapped as the Russian leader approached. The two men shook hands, and Putin joined Trump in his presidential limo as they traveled to the summit to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. Swalwell said on CNN he would have liked to see Trump greet Putin with a show of strength. 'I want peace in the region, and the best way to achieve peace is to band together and show strength against a bully like Russia. Instead, yesterday, we saw Donald Trump toast Vladimir Putin like he was receiving some lifetime achievement award,' Swalwell said. 'That doesn't make us stronger.' 'And right now, having talked already today and yesterday to leaders over in Europe, they are very worried about what's next — not just for Ukraine, but for democracies across the West — because the United States is shirking its responsibility to stand up and defend democracy everywhere,' he added. The remarks came ahead of Monday's meeting at the White House, where Trump will huddle with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders to discuss the Putin summit and next steps in peace negotiations. Trump sparked criticism on Saturday when he said after a call with Zelensky and European leaders that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.'

The plot to destroy Black political power
The plot to destroy Black political power

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The plot to destroy Black political power

Get ready for the rage: The conservative majority on the Supreme Court looks likely to gut the last remaining parts of the Voting Rights Act. Prompted by a Black conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas, the high court will consider in October a question that answers itself — whether it is wrong to stop openly racist tactics in drawing congressional districts. Even if the right-wing justices manage to close their eyes to the racial politics involved, they will feel the heat and hear the explosive impact of the backlash to a one-sided ruling. The fuse will be lit in several Republican-controlled states, largely in the South, as white politicians begin diluting votes in Black-majority districts to silence Black voices in Congress. Deep-red state legislatures — think of South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi — will be free to demolish their Black-majority congressional districts. Those white-majority, Trump-backing state legislatures aim to bring an end to the careers of several Black Democrats in Congress, such as Reps. Cleo Fields (D-La.), Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). As a purely political exercise, Trump and his Republican allies have wanted to eliminate these districts for years, because Black voters are key to the Democratic Party's congressional strength. The Voting Rights Act allows for federal courts to look for racial damage done by gerrymandering districts. In the case now before the high court, involving redistricting in Louisiana, the state was forced to add a second Black-majority district. A federal court ruled that, with 33 percent of the state being Black, it was wrong for only one of its six congressional districts to be majority Black. But that led to a lawsuit over the new map. Along the lines of Thomas's recent call for a total end to the Voting Rights Act, the challengers contend that the law — which was created to protect equal voting rights for Black Americans — now prohibits the court from stopping white Republicans from playing politics and crushing Black power as a proportional representation of a state's racial makeup. Thomas makes the case that attention to 'race-based' construction of congressional districts is out of touch with recent history. He argues that 'specific identified instances' of racial bias, including violent voter suppression, are now distant and amount to relics of the nation's past. Last week, a federal appeals court disagreed. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Louisiana's congressional district map 'packed' and 'cracked' Black populations to limit their political power. The ruling stated there are 'decades of binding precedent' under the 15th Amendment allowing Congress to contest racial bias in redistricting. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was written in response to the nation's long history of keeping political power in white hands. Even after Black men gained the right to vote, it was common for that vote to be suppressed through violence. For perspective, South Carolina is 26 percent Black and 67 percent white. But white-majority Republican congressional districts are 86 percent of South Carolina's seven congressional districts. Only one of seven districts has a majority of Democrats and Black voters — Clyburn's district. The Supreme Court plans to hear arguments on racial redistricting on Oct. 15 — early enough for a decision that could affect the 2026 midterms. If the Black vote is diluted, the Democratic Party's ability to win seats in Congress shrinks, increasing Republican chances of retaining majorities in the House and Senate in 2026. That would keep Trump from becoming a lame duck facing a divided Congress. The Republicans' goal is to maintain majorities in Congress for Trump's last two years in the White House. Then Republicans can appoint more judges to issue more rulings that further weaken Democrats. The downward spiral for Black political power will go on and on. Trump is not hiding his interest in the outcome of gerrymandering efforts in Texas. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' Trump told CNBC earlier this month. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas … and we are entitled to five more seats.' Excuse me, Mr. President? Neither you nor the Republican Party is entitled to any seats. Those seats belong to Americans of all colors and parties. Texas Republicans' threats to send law enforcement to forcibly return Texas Democratic legislators to the state capitol to provide a quorum for passing gerrymandered maps are a sideshow. They distract from the real effect that racially-designed gerrymandering can have on race relations and politics for decades to come. Comedian Dave Chappelle famously called Trump 'an honest liar.' In the fight over Texas redistricting, the 'honest liar' is saying that the people looking at redistricting's racial impact are themselves racist. Don't let Trump or his partisans on the high court fool you. Racial justice in Congress is at stake. Democrats will have to fight fire with fire to prevent Trump from diminishing Black voting power. Democrats owe that much to Black voters, who have carried them to electoral victories over the last 60 years. They owe it to the memory of the brave people who marched, were beaten and even died to demand voting rights only 60 years ago.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store