South Africa's human rights crisis: Calls for action ahead of National Dialogue
Civil rights organisation, Amnesty International South Africa, has urged President Cyril Ramaphosa to redirect the R700 million allocated for the National Dialogue.
The organisation advocates for this budget to be invested instead in safeguarding and fulfilling the basic human rights of South African citizens.
Ramaphosa formally announced the National Dialogue last month. It is intended to be a platform for reflection on the nation's current state, envisioning its future, and establishing the foundation for the upcoming National Development Plan.
The process, scheduled for August 15, 2025, will unfold in phases, including local consultations and sectoral engagements, to provincial and national gatherings, over the period of a year.
Ramaphosa also pointed out that this is a chance for South Africans to shape the next chapter of democracy, adding that it is an opportunity to forge a new social compact for the development of the country.
While South Africa's transition to democracy years ago was a landmark event, the country continues to grapple with significant challenges stemming from its past and present realities.
Despite progress in some areas, deep-seated issues such as poverty, inequality and unemployment persist, often linked to the legacy of apartheid and the slow pace of land reform.
Furthermore, corruption and state capture have undermined public institutions and service delivery, impacting basic services like water, electricity, and healthcare.
Amnesty International South Africa's executive director, Shenilla Mohamed, said that while nation-building and social cohesion are important, the government should ensure that the budget allocated does not come at the expense of addressing the country's most pressing challenges.
'Most of the country's population lives in dire conditions and does not have access to basic essential services such as water and sanitation,' said Mohamed.
'Repeatedly, we hear people complaining of raw sewerage flowing through townships, inadequate housing, poor medical services, lack of quality education, high rates of gender-based violence, crime, and the list goes on. To address these violations and ensure the fulfilment of basic human rights, we need more government action and increased investment,' she said.
Asked to comment on the statement, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya did not respond.
Amnesty stated that, despite a progressive legal landscape, rates of sexual and gender-based violence remain staggeringly high, with the number of reported offences in 2023/2024 sitting at 53,285, adding that the South African Police Service continues to fail in ensuring quality investigations.
The organisation said that when it comes to basic services, over 3 million people have no access to basic water supply service, while 5.3 million households do not have access to safe and reliable drinking water.
'Decades of corruption and the mismanagement of public funds have weakened the government's ability to safeguard the country's water security, especially in the face of climate change and extreme weather events. Climate change is another threat to a wide range of human rights and will continue to impact the rights to life, health, housing, water, and sanitation. Without proper investment in climate-resilient infrastructure, we will continue to see destruction and loss of life during floods and other extreme weather events.
'There are a number of ways to spend R700 million. We urge the South African government to invest in the protection and fulfilment of people's human rights,' said Mohamed.
Meanwhile, political analyst Professor Sipho Seepe said the National Dialogue is a costly distraction meant to give the impression that Ramaphosa's administration is doing something.
He said this is all about smoke and mirrors, something that Ramaphosa has mastered and perfected.
'The National Dialogue has no legal and constitutional standing. Its recommendations are not legally binding. To that extent, it is just another talkshop that is meant to cover up Ramaphosa's glaring failures,' he said.
Another political analyst, Ntsikelelo Breakfast, said there is no need for the National Dialogue to uncover challenges facing the country, adding that they are well-known.
[email protected]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
5 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Churches must face corruption demons — SACC president Sipuka
South Africa's churches should reflect on their own challenges with corruption, SA Council of Churches (SACC) president Bishop Sithembile Sipuka said on Wednesday. The SACC is holding an anti-corruption conference after allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi implicating the minister of police and other high-ranking police officials in wrongdoing. The allegations led to President Cyril Ramaphosa establishing a commission of inquiry in the security cluster. Sipuka lauded Mkhwanazi for displaying courage in speaking out, arguing this shows that ordinary South Africans are tired of this complicity. 'His willingness to risk everything reminds us of the often-quoted expression that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Every rand stolen from public coffers is a rand that should have been used to build a clinic, feed a child or provide clean water to a community. 'Every investigation sabotaged is justice denied to the families of murder victims. In my role as a bishop of a rural region, I live and work with people whose dignity is compromised by a lack of service, not due to a shortage of resources, but rather due to mismanagement and corruption,' Sipuka said. Mkhwanazi's revelations presented an opportunity not only to expose corruption in government and business but a chance for churches to reflect on attitudes and practices that resemble corruption, he said.


The South African
5 minutes ago
- The South African
US bill to sanction South Africa - and ANC officials
A controversial bill that calls for a sweeping review of US-South Africa relations – including the possible sanctioning of senior ANC officials – has passed a key stage in the United States Congress. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 (H.R.2633), introduced by Republican Representative Ronny Jackson, was approved by the House Foreign Affairs Committee this week, with 34 members voting in favour and 16 against. The bill directs the US government to re-evaluate diplomatic, trade, and military ties with South Africa, citing Pretoria's recent engagements with global powers such as Russia, China, and Iran, as well as its controversial interactions with Hamas. In his statement following the vote, Jackson said: 'South Africa made its choice when it abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists. My bill gives President Trump the tools to hold their corrupt government accountable.' The bill comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Pretoria, largely fuelled by: South Africa's joint military drills with Russia and China Engagement with Hamas leadership The International Court of Justice genocide case against Israel, led by South Africa South Africa's decision to downgrade diplomatic ties with Taiwan While supporters of the bill described it as a necessary step to restore 'accountability' in the US-South Africa relationship, critics warned that the proposed measures are disproportionate and could further strain an already fragile relationship. 'Differences between allies should be resolved through diplomacy, not punitive legislation,' said one committee member opposed to the bill. The bill must now be debated and approved by the full House of Representatives, then proceed to the Senate before it can be signed into law by President Donald Trump. However, experts are sceptical about its prospects. This is not the first time such legislation has been proposed. A similar bill introduced in 2023 passed the House, but failed in the Senate. If enacted, the bill could lead to sanctions against ANC officials, disrupt trade talks, and affect South Africa's standing under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a key trade agreement with the US. South African officials have not yet issued a formal response to the committee's decision. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Big move in US Bill's bid to sanction ANC officials
The Bill was introduced by Republican representative Ronny Jackson, who took to social media on Tuesday to celebrate the milestone. US President Donald Trump meets with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 May 2025. Picture: AFP A Bill to review the bilateral relationship between the United States (US) and South Africa, and to impose sanctions on government and ANC officials, has made significant progress. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 (H.R.2633) was introduced in April and this week moved through US Congress' foreign affairs committee with minor amendments. This paves the way for the Bill to be debated and voted upon. It was introduced by Republican representative Ronny Jackson, who took to social media on Tuesday to celebrate the milestone. 'Today, my Bill to fully review America's relationship with South Africa and give President Trump the tools necessary to hold their corrupt government accountable passed through committee. The days of allowing our so-called 'allies' to walk all over us are over!' Afriforum welcomes the move In reaction, head of public relations at AfriForum, Ernst van Zyl, said the ANC's 'years of reckless and extremist diplomatic actions and rhetoric are now bearing bitter fruit'. 'AfriForum maintains that ordinary citizens of the country should not be punished for the extremism and corruption of politicians. 'AfriForum has never advocated for sanctions that target South Africa as a whole. Therefore, the introduction of targeted sanctions against these politicians will be a welcome development,' Van Zyl added. This is a developing story