
China stake in CK Hutchison port sale could ease Beijing pressure but US geopolitical risks remain
Since the deal was announced on March 4 to sell 43 of CK Hutchison's ports in 23 countries, including two along the Panama Canal, to a consortium led by U.S. firm BlackRock, (BLK.N), opens new tab and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping company MSC, it has sparked a firestorm of criticism from China.
While the U.S. government might oppose the inclusion of state-run COSCO over perceived geopolitical risks posed by Chinese influence, bringing in the shipping giant could provide a more level playing field rather than one company being dominant, said a person with knowledge of the deal.
The complex deal would require approval from around 50 jurisdictions involved, and it would take at least two years for the process to be completed, sources and analysts said.
There was no immediate response from the White House, COSCO and CK Hutchison to Reuters' requests for comment.
At a time of festering global trade tensions between China and the U.S., the deal showcases the growing rivalry between both sides for maritime influence in the strategic commercial shipping sector that has been dominated by China in recent decades.
U.S. President Donald Trump had earlier called for the removal of Chinese ownership in the Panama Canal - now used for more than 40% of U.S. container traffic valued at $270 billion annually.
Following months of pressure from Beijing, including Chinese state media lambasting the move as a betrayal, and various Chinese government departments saying they would conduct a legal review, CK Hutchison announced on July 28 that a Chinese investor was being courted.
It also said changes to the composition of the consortium and structure of the transaction would be necessary to secure regulatory approval.
Two sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters the investor was COSCO (1199.HK), opens new tab - a shipping and ports conglomerate that is now one of the world's dominant, vertically integrated marine transportation firms.
While any stake by COSCO is not yet clear, a triparty agreement with BlackRock and MSC would alleviate China's national security concerns and have its blessing, the sources said.
"The potential acquisition of Hutchison Ports is driven by the strategic need to secure key port resources amid global competition and U.S.-China tensions," JPMorgan wrote in a research report.
The report also noted that while the inclusion of COSCO would "relieve some concerns by the Chinese government, thus boosting the likelihood of a green-light scenario", not all ports in the original agreement might be included.
COSCO is requesting a bigger stake while the other parties in the consortium are keen to keep it a minority, the sources said.
China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters on Monday in response to a question on the deal that Beijing "will conduct lawful regulation, firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, and uphold justice and fairness in the market."
A deal involving COSCO would be a "loud reaffirmation of China's geopolitical influence across the global maritime trade and transport sector, and of its effective leverage in trade negotiations with the U.S.," Isaac Kardon, Senior Fellow for China Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Reuters.
"Beijing's disapproval clearly forced Hutchison to back off and change tack — and not merely in the optics of the transaction, but in its basic structure and national ownership."
Should the deal proceed, it would be a crucial off-ramp for CK Hutchison, with the Americans wary of COSCO's growing maritime heft that could undermine U.S. national security. There could also be further blowback amid ongoing and complex bilateral trade talks.
Some analysts say the Panama ports, in particular, will be a focus for the Trump administration, and could be taken out of the transaction to meet U.S. strategic interests.
"The inclusion of this behemoth Chinese central state-owned enterprise as an owner seems like it should be a non-starter for the Trump administration seeking to strip Chinese control and restore some kind of American suzerainty over the Canal Zone," added Kardon.
The CK Hutchison assets up for sale span the globe, including ports in Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Barcelona in Spain, Felixstowe in the United Kingdom, Mexico, Poland and the Bahamas - enlarging Beijing's global shipping networks and options at a time of great trade and tariff uncertainties.
"At the moment they (Beijing) are in a place generally where they want to assert themselves and say, hey, don't mess with us," said Andrew Cainey, a senior associate fellow with the defence and security thinktank RUSI (Royal United Services Institute) in London.
"If the U.S. were to come back and object to it, China could try to block the deal or demand more (from CK Hutchison)."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Economy is getting worse under Trump's leadership, Americans say in new poll on eve of his tariff D-Day
A new poll shows Donald Trump underwater on the issue of his tariff agenda as Friday's enforcement deadline looms for the 'Liberation Day' measures he announced in April. In 2024, Trump won election to a nonconsecutive second term, boosted by the same issues that propelled him to victory the first time around. Concerns over immigration and the economy were at the forefront of voters' minds, though he received a key boost from the implosion of Joe Biden's campaign. But in a Times of London/YouGov poll out Thursday, the president's tariff agenda is one of the biggest anchors driving down his approval numbers. Some 48% of Americans graded Trump's job performance over the first six months of his administration as poor, compared to just 21% who rated it excellent, 16% who rated it good and 11% who rated it as fair. On the core issue of tariffs, Trump is clearly tanking — despite months of pronouncements from the White House of America's impending 'Golden Age.' Four in ten Americans say that Trump's tariffs will make the country poorer and stifle economic growth. Just 26% believe the White House's line about economic prosperity coming down the pike. And most alarmingly for the White House, inflation still ranks as the No. 1 issue for voters. That could prove to be dangerous ground for the president as the summer concludes with potentially sharp increases to consumer prices stemming from the president's reciprocal tariffs, which are currently set as high as 50% with at least one trading partner, Brazil. A CBS News poll further dove into the president's declining numbers on the economy. Six in 10 of voters under 30 now say that Trump's policies are harming the economy, and making them worse off financially. Seven in 10 voters in the same category say that they didn't believe the president is focused enough on lowering prices for consumers. If Donald Trump is losing ground with the younger voters he peeled off from Democrats in 2024, Republicans are set for trouble in the midterm elections next year. Polling isn't yet registering significant voter support for the GOP budget reconciliation package, the 'big, beautiful bill', as it's been overshadowed by the president's tariffs and mass deportation agenda, among other issues. Another factor driving down Trump's numbers with younger voters is Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department blew up the investigation into Epstein, a convicted pedophile and sex criminal who died in 2019, when in early July the agency declared that the billionaire financier died by suicide, as had previously been found, and that no evidence linking him to accomplices, other than Ghislaine Maxwell, was uncovered. The sudden declaration that the 'Epstein Client List', which Vice President JD Vance and others in the administration pledged to release, supposedly did not exist at all erupted into a wildfire on the MAGA right, particularly among Trump's younger supporters. Trump then spent the month of July embracing a series of increasingly obvious attempts at distraction, infuriating many and driving speculation even higher. The Times/YouGov poll found that a much larger share of voters, more than four in ten, think that Trump and his team have partially or completely lied in their public statements regarding the case. Less than 20% of Americans believe them. Immigration has been another issue where the president has lost ground as the White House and Department of Homeland Security have accelerated mass deportation programs under his second term. Images of immigration enforcement raids have caused massive protests in Los Angeles and alarmed many Americans including Trump-supporting independents around the country. Nearly every poll on the Decision Desk HQ Average, with the exception of two surveys conducted by Republican outfits, now shows Trump with popularity ratings in the negative, some by double digits. Some pollsters have speculated that Trump began at a deficit other presidents escaped in their first six months due in large part to the circumstances of his 2024 victory and the rank unpopularity that the Democratic Party encouraged with its jumbled mess of a re-election campaign for Biden and later Kamala Harris. Coming into 2025, the president was already burdened by some of the highest disapproval ratings of any incoming president in history.


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's bill comes due: Tariff day is here ... but if TACO's on the menu, the charade is over
Donald Trump's tariff deadline is once again coming down to the wire but now, the bill is due — and Trump has a choice before him: enforce the levies against the nation's trading partners or TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out). The president said in July that the end of his 90-day pause would be marked by a month of last-minute dealmaking, as countries attempted to get agreements in place before the resumption of tariff enforcement on Aug. 1. As Wednesday morning dawned in DC, the president seemingly indicated that his days of 'pauses' were over. In a Truth Social post, Trump declared: 'THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED.' Yet, at the same time, he undermined that message. A separate announcement from his Truth account declared progress in talks with Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico. Greasing the wheels for those talks, Trump said, would be what he just said wouldn't happen: a tariff pause (sort of). The president wrote (in lowercase this time) that tariffs with Mexico would continue at current rates for another 90 days. 'The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border,' Trump offered as explanation. So where does that leave American businesses, and the White House itself as it pertains to Trump's credibility on trade issues? Some experts were flummoxed on how businesses should plan for the future after enforcement begins on Friday. They pointed to the president's preference for informal trade agreements, which many argue do not constitute real agreements at all, to wit: — The White House has not released specific details or produced written agreements to back up many of the president's claims. — Because they did not receive congressional approval, there's no formal enforcement measures. — And Trump's own proclamations often differ from those of his foreign negotiating partners. David Townsend, a trade-focused litigator with Dorsey & Whitney, also noted the lack of details governing rules of origin for imported products. 'There could be different rules of origin for different products, or across the different trade agreements. From an investment and trade standpoint, it is very difficult to tell how these rules of origin will operate, what the impact will be on investments, and to particular industries. Companies will need to wait until the details are released of how the particular agreements will operate,' he told The Independent. 'In short, it is not possible to predict how these trade agreements will work in practice, how certain businesses will be impacted by them, and what kind of import compliance challenges will arise under the new agreements,' Townsend said. CNN's Richard Quest summed up his own feelings: 'I stand by my comment that the trade deals being announced are largely garbage because they are so uncertain with no mechanisms for enforcement or even any idea of how to make them happen.' The uncertainty around what the trade landscape will look like come Monday could be the reason why the Dow Jones Industrial Average stalled this week and didn't seem to react upon news of Trump's tariff extension with Mexico. But experts across the board agree that it seems as if Trump's reciprocal tariffs are now here to stay in some fashion — the only question remaining is how high they will go. Trade groups representing industries targeted by individual tariff rates continue to push for zero-to-zero tariff rates, but those seem out of reach after the announcements of recent handshake-deals with the EU and UK. With those new tariff rates, it's also a certainty that consumers will continue to feel the price hikes that American retailers began exhibiting over the summer, only to a higher degree. The bill is finally coming due. Gemma Thompson, a senior consultant with a firm specializing on supply-chain logisitics, explained: " For EU exporters, the challenge now is how to absorb or pass on the additional cost. Where margins are tighter, we're likely to see knock-on effects to US consumers.' Given the murkiness around enforcement measures and the unequal 'reciprocal rates,' Thompson noted, US importers will also likely explore routing goods through lower-tariff countries acting as middlemen. With Trump putting his foot down on Thursday, it's clear that the coverage of Wall Street's derisive 'TACO' nickname irked the president, or at the very least drove home the notion that he risked his credibility crossing further self-drawn red lines. But what remains to be seen is how much damage was already done by the president's 90-day pause and the general campaign to keep his supporters on his side Trump has launched since January. Amid a firestorm around Jeffrey Epstein and after the exhausting marathon fight to pass the 'big, beautiful' budget reconciliation package, many businesses and even some trading partners around the world could be gambling that the US president is running low on political capital. A sudden downturn in the markets or painful consumer price hikes could be more than the president can handle, in the view of his critics.


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Tesla is unable to launch robotaxi service in US state
Tesla is currently unable to launch its Robotaxi service in California due to a lack of required permits from state regulators. The company has engaged in multiple discussions with the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regarding the expansion of its autonomous services. Despite Elon Musk 's promotion of Robotaxis, Tesla has been warned by the DMV and another oversight body against an unauthorised rollout in the Bay Area. Tesla's senior counsel has acknowledged the need for additional permits for both drivered and driverless autonomous rideshare operations in California. Critics, including a California Assembly member, accuse Tesla of attempting to bypass regulations, while the company states it is taking a phased approach to its ride-hailing service.