
US attacks on Iran inflicted major destruction, Pentagon officials say
The surprise overnight US attack on Iran inflicted major damage and destruction on three of its key nuclear sites, senior Pentagon officials said, as the US defense secretary denied that the Trump administration was pursuing a policy of regime change in the Middle East.
In a press conference in Washington, Gen Dan Caine, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, detailed operation 'Midnight Hammer' in which seven B-2 Spirit bombers flew 18 hours from the United States to sites in Iran to drop 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators in strikes that they said caused 'extremely severe damage' to Iranian uranium enrichment facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Caine said it was not clear whether Iran retained some nuclear capability and stopped short of using the same language as Donald Trump, who said that the sites had been 'completely and totally obliterated'.
Trump announced the US intervention last night, directly joining Israel's effort to destroy Iran's nuclear programme in a risky gambit that triggered alarm across the world and raised fears of a wider regional conflict.
Satellite imagery of the attack site from Maxar Technologies showed six fresh craters at the Fordow nuclear enrichment site, probably the entry point for the 'bunker buster' bombs meant to penetrate deep into the facility before detonation.
The scale of the damage underground was not yet confirmed, Caine said. Iranian sources were quick to deny that the country's nuclear programme was devastated, as its leaders condemned the US strikes and warned they would have long-term repercussions for the region and the global order.
Iran launched about 20 ballistic missiles at Israel on Sunday morning, triggering country-wide air raid sirens and injuring 16 people.
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a recorded statement aired on state television after the strikes: 'The Iranian nation is not one to surrender. Americans should know that any military involvement by the US will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them.'
Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said diplomacy was not an option after the US attack and that Iran 'reserves all rights to defend its security, its interests and its people'.
'My country has been under attack, and we have to respond based on our legitimate right to self-defence. We will do that for as long as needed and necessary,' he told reporters at a press conference in Istanbul on Sunday.
Araghchi also said the US had 'blown up diplomacy' that Tehran was engaged in with Europe and said he would meet the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow on Monday.
Iran's parliament on Sunday approved a measure allowing the country's leadership to close the strait of Hormuz, a crucial shipping route from the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea that handles about 26% of the global oil trade. While the final decision rests with the country's leadership and not its pliant legislature, the decision indicated an Iranian threat to disrupt global energy shipping as a potential retaliation to the strike.
It was unclear whether an Iranian response would include its network of proxies across the Middle East, including militias such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. On Saturday, the Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree pledged to attack US ships and warships in the Red Sea if the US intervened in Iran, despite a May ceasefire between the US and the Yemeni militia.
US officials said that they were sending signals to Iran to encourage it to negotiate rather than launch a retaliation that could escalate into a protracted war.
Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, denied that the US was pursuing a policy of regime change in Iran. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said.
'Anything can happen in conflict. We acknowledge that. But the scope of this was intentionally limited. That's the message that we're sending. With the capabilities of the American military nearly unlimited.'
The US vice-president, JD Vance, who has been an outspoken opponent of US military interventions, said during an interview on MSNBC that the US was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme'.
Speaking from the White House last night, Trump said: 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
'There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.'
The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, hailed the strikes. 'Congratulations, President Trump, your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history,' he said in a video statement.
Trump also said that he and Netanyahu had 'worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel'.
Previously, Iranian officials said that any US involvement would trigger an attack on US military bases in the Middle East, which host thousands of US troops across at least eight countries.
After Iran's barrage of missiles, Israeli warplanes began strikes in western Iran, hitting missile launchers and Iranian soldiers, the Israeli military said.
In Iran, the media played down the US strikes, with the state-run IRNA news agency acknowledging early on Sunday an attack on the country's Fordow nuclear site, but saying it was evacuated beforehand. The semi-official Fars news agency, which is close to the Revolutionary Guards, quoted another official saying air defences opened fire near Isfahan and explosions had been heard.
Later, Iran's atomic agency said that the country would carry on with its nuclear activities despite the US attacks on key facilities. The Iranian member of parliament Mohammad Manan Raisi, representing the city of Qom where Fordow is located, said that the damage to the nuclear facility was not major and 'only on the ground, which can be restored'.
The International Atomic Energy Agency said there had been 'no increase in off-site radiation levels' after the attacks on the three nuclear sites.
Israel has been launching strikes on Iran for two weeks. It has sought to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities and damage its nuclear enrichment facilities.
US and Israeli officials have said 13,500kg (30,000lb) bunker buster bombs that US stealth bombers alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground at Fordow.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
11 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Incredible satellite pics show the aftermath of ‘devastating' strikes on Iranian nuclear bases after massive US blitz
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ASTONISHING satellite pictures have emerged of the aftermath of the US's "devastating" strikes on Iranian nuclear bases. Operation Midnight saw the US blitz three of Iran's key nuclear facilities in an attack Trump has called a "spectacular success". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 11 A new series of satellite images has revealed the precision of the US attacks on Iran's primary nuclear facility Credit: maxar technologies 11 Two clusters of six craters show where the bombs were dropped Credit: maxar technologies 11 The Isfahan nuclear technology in Iran before U.S. strikes Credit: AP 11 Six B-2 stealth bombers descended over Iran Bunker buster bombs were dropped on the Fordow enrichment plant - a heavily guarded site buried deep beneath a mountain near the city of Qom. Also hit were the nuclear plants at Natanz and Isfahan, which Israel had already targeted with its own missiles. US submarines also launched around 30 Tomahawk missiles in a coordinated air-and-sea operation. Trump declared that the Fordow plant is now "gone" and all the night's targets were "obliterated". Satellite imagery of the destroyed bases has since revealed the extent of the damage. Two clusters of at least six holes are seen at the Fordow nuclear site, where the massive 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs were dropped. Bombs of this kind are believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet below the surface before exploding. Following the bombing, Sir Keir Starmer reinstated his commitment to making Iran nuke-free. He, along with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, released a joint statement following the US bombings on Iran. It read: "We have discussed the latest developments in the Middle East earlier today. We reiterate our commitment to peace and stability for all countries in the region. We affirm our support for the security of Israel. "We have consistently been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and can no longer pose a threat to regional security. "Earlier today, the United States conducted targeted military strikes against nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Our aim continues to be to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. "We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program. We stand ready to contribute to that goal in coordination with all parties. "We urge Iran not to take any further action that could destabilise the region. We will continue our joint diplomatic efforts to defuse tensions and ensure the conflict does not intensify and spread further." US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Operation Midnight Hammer was 'an incredible and overwhelming success' that took months and weeks of planning. He added Trump has been clear that "any retaliation by Iran" against the US would be "met with force far greater" than what was seen on Saturday night. Hegseth said: 'Iran would be smart to heed those words. He's said it before, and he means it.' The Defence Secretary went on to praise the US leader, calling it "bold and brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back". He urged: "When this President speaks, the world should listen." US warns it WILL strike again and world 'should listen to Trump' Iran's foreign minister Abbas Arghchi has said he is going to Russia today to meet mad leader Putin. He revealed: 'I'm going to Moscow this afternoon, and I have a meeting with President Putin tomorrow morning.' Arghchi called Moscow a 'friend of Iran,' adding 'we always consult with each other'. Fears loom that the conflict could spiral into a world war, with Putin puppet Dmitry Medvedev making a veiled threat to supply Iran with nuclear weapons. He said: "A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their nuclear weapons." After declaring the US strikes as being a success, Trump warned that further action could be taken if Tehran doesn't agree to an adequate peace deal. He said in a nationally televised speech at the White House: "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." 11 A closer satellite view shows holes and craters on a ridge at Fordow underground Credit: Reuters 11 President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington after the strikes 11 Trump addressed the world after announcing the strikes 'Remember there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. 'But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. 'Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight." And shortly after speaking on-camera, he posted to Truth Social: "This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. "Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. "But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill." Meanwhile Iran's foreign minister Abbas Arghchi dubbed the strikes "outrageous and will have everlasting consequences". He also called the military action "a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations". 11 Imagery shows where the bombs likely entered before pummelling Credit: maxar technologies 11 The Isfahan nuclear technology center in Iran after U.S. bombardment Credit: AP 11 Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran before the US blitz


The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Islamic State suicide bombing in Damascus church leaves many dead and dozens injured
A suicide bombing by Islamic State (IS) targeting a church in Damascus has killed 20 people and wounded 52, Syrian authorities have said. The attack on Sunday night was the first major IS operation and the first suicide bombing in Syria since former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad was toppled in December and replaced by an Islamist-led government. A man affiliated with IS entered the Greek Orthodox Saint Elias church in the old Christian quarter of Damascus during prayers, opened fire and then detonated an explosive vest while inside the church, Syria's interior ministry said. Eyewitnesses inside the church reported a second gunman who did not blow himself up, but also shot at the 150 or so worshippers present. Videos of the church's interior show splintered pews overturned by the force of the blast and the bloodied corpses of congregants splayed out across the church. Nearby residents reported hearing a large blast and then the sound of sirens as security forces attempted to establish a cordon around the area and civil defence personnel headed towards the church. The attack came after months of low-level IS activity and propaganda, as the group attempted to exploit the security vacuum created after the fall of Assad to reconstitute itself. Syrian officials have said the group was able to seize weaponry and ammunition left by fleeing Assad regime soldiers to bolster its caches. The Syrian government, led by former leaders of the Islamist rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have been carrying out anti-IS raids throughout the country since taking power. While still a rebel group, HTS had been fighting IS in areas under its control, viewing it as a source of instability and radicalisation for rival rebel groups. Since the fall of the Assad regime, IS has attempted to use the apparent moderation of the former Islamist rebels who now lead the country as a recruitment tool for disaffected Islamist fighters. IS social media channels and propaganda published pictures of the Syrian president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, meeting the US president, Donald Trump, in Riyadh in May, describing it as an apparent betrayal of his jihadist roots. Syrian authorities have stressed religious minorities will be protected under their rule. Security personnel usually are posted at each entrance of the city's Christian quarter, inspecting cars as they come in. The Syrian minister of information, Hamza al-Mustafa, said: 'This cowardly act contradicts the values of citizenship that unite us all. We, as Syrians, emphasise the importance of national unity and civil peace, and call for strengthening the bonds of fraternity between all components of society.' The Damascus municipality said security services were investigating the circumstances of the bombing. Though nominally in power of most of Syria, the country's new government has struggled to extend its control on the ground over the country. Syria is still full of militias, some of them more radical than others. The country's defence ministry is in the process of folding militias into a unified national army and disarming those who refuse to join its ranks. Since the territorial defeat of the so-called caliphate of IS in Syria, it has been mostly the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) that have been leading the anti-IS fight. Cooperation between the SDF and the new Syrian government in fighting IS has been growing but is still in its infancy. The US, as well as the other members of the anti-IS coalition in Iraq and Syria, have cited the resurgence of IS in Syria as one of their key concerns for the country.


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
JD Vance claims US is at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran
JD Vance has said the US is 'not at war' with Iran – but is with its nuclear weapons program, holding out a position that the White House hopes to maintain over the coming days as the Iranian regime considers a retributive response to Saturday's US strike on three of its nuclear installations. In an interview Sunday with NBC News' Meet the Press, the US vice-president was asked if the US was now at war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance replied. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' But Vance declined to confirm with absolute certainty that Iran's nuclear sites were completely destroyed, a position that Donald Trump set out in a Saturday night address when the president stated that the targeted Iranian facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated' in the US strikes. Vance instead said that he believes the US has 'substantially delayed' Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. 'I'm not going to get into sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground there in Iran, but we've seen a lot, and I feel very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon, and that was the goal of this attack,' Vance said. He continued: 'Severely damaged versus obliterated – I'm not exactly sure what the difference is. 'What we know is we set their nuclear program back substantially.' An Iranian member of parliament claimed on Sunday that the Fordo enrichment plant, the focus of seven B-2 bombers armed with 14 premier bunker-busters from the US arsenal, was not seriously damaged. Separately, Bloomberg News said satellite images of the site undermined the Trump administration's claims that Iran's underground nuclear sites at Fordo and Natanz had been destroyed. Satellite images distributed by Maxar Technologies showed new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge. But the main support building at the facility remained undamaged, the report said. Maxar said in a statement that images of Natanz showed a new crater about 5.5 meters (18ft) in diameter over the underground facility – but they did not offer conclusive evidence that the 40-meter-deep nuclear engineering site had been breached. The chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, said at a Pentagon briefing on Sunday: 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' Nuclear non-proliferation analysts are conflicted on whether the strikes will be effective in bringing Iran to the negotiating table or convince them to move more decisively toward enriching uranium stockpiles to weapons-grade, assembling a bomb, and manufacturing a delivery system. In a statement to Bloomberg, Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said there were slim prospects that the US entering the war would convince Iran to increase International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) cooperation. The nuclear watchdog has said it is not sure where Iran's 400lb stockpile of 60% uranium is. 'The more likely scenario is that they convince Iran that cooperation and transparency don't work and that building deeper facilities and ones not declared openly is more sensible to avoid similar targeting in future,' Dolzikova said.