Why Is H&R Block (HRB) Down 1.1% Since Last Earnings Report?
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for H&R Block (HRB). Shares have lost about 1.1% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500.
Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is H&R Block due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers.
It turns out, fresh estimates have trended downward during the past month.
The consensus estimate has shifted -5.07% due to these changes.
At this time, H&R Block has a strong Growth Score of A, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with an F. However, the stock was allocated a grade of A on the value side, putting it in the top quintile for this investment strategy.
Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of A. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in.
Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, H&R Block has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months.
H&R Block is part of the Zacks Consumer Services - Miscellaneous industry. Over the past month, Cimpress (CMPR), a stock from the same industry, has gained 6.5%. The company reported its results for the quarter ended March 2025 more than a month ago.
Cimpress reported revenues of $789.47 million in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +1.1%. EPS of -$0.33 for the same period compares with -$0.15 a year ago.
For the current quarter, Cimpress is expected to post earnings of $0.97 per share, indicating a change of -77.6% from the year-ago quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed -18.9% over the last 30 days.
Cimpress has a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) based on the overall direction and magnitude of estimate revisions. Additionally, the stock has a VGM Score of B.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Cimpress plc (CMPR) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June
The Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF contains hundreds of companies. The fund is not top-heavy, which protects against concentration risk. The ETF sports a dirt cheap valuation along with a high yield. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF › Investment management firm Vanguard Group has over 90 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), many of which offer low-cost fees. The worst-performing in 2025 is the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (NYSEMKT: VIOV) -- which is down just over 12% year to date at the time of this writing. Here are three reasons why the beaten-down ETF may be worth buying now and one factor that may make it worth passing on. The fund includes 460 holdings with a median market capitalization of just $2.3 billion. This is a far different approach than funds that concentrate on just a handful of holdings. Even the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO), which mirrors the performance of the S&P 500, has over 35% of its holdings in just 10 companies. No single company in the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF has more than a 1.1% weighting. Top holdings include semiconductor company Qorvo, medical device company Teleflex, auto parts company BorgWarner, mortgage lender Mr. Cooper Group, and insurance company Jackson Financial, among others. Many of these companies are hardly household names, but their hidden-gem nature could appeal to value investors looking for exposure to companies they don't already own. One of the most appealing attributes of the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF is that it is spread out across stock market sectors. And the sectors it concentrates on tend to be more value-oriented. Here's a look at how its sector concentration stacks up against the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Sector Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Financials 23.9% 14.4% Industrials 15.5% 8.5% Consumer discretionary 13.8% 10.4% Information technology 10% 30.4% Healthcare 8.2% 10.8% Real estate 7.5% 2.2% Materials 6.4% 2% Utilities 4.1% 2.6% Consumer staples 3.9% 6.2% Energy 3.6% 3.2% Communication services 3.1% 9.3% Data source: Vanguard. The composition of the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF is nothing like the S&P 500, which may interest folks looking for more exposure to value-focused and cyclical sectors like financials and industrials and less exposure to growth-focused sectors like tech. What stands out the most about the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF compared to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is valuation. The small-cap value-focused ETF sports a mere 13.7 price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and a 2.2% dividend yield compared to a 25.9 P/E ratio and 1.4% yield for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Granted, small-cap stocks arguably deserve to trade at a discount to their large-cap peers because large-cap companies have numerous advantages over smaller companies. For example, Microsoft benefits from its size and exposure to multiple end markets across hardware, software, gaming, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and more. These advantages give Microsoft network effects, meaning more customers who buy into Microsoft's software suite, use tools like GitHub, or join Microsoft Cloud, benefit Microsoft by making these products and services widespread. Network effects support pricing power and lead to margin expansion, which allows Microsoft to grow profits faster than sales and support a growing stock buyback program and dividend. This snowball effect is powerful when compounded over a multiyear time frame. Many small-cap companies simply don't have these advantages and must work much harder to compound in value. Microsoft is the largest company by market cap in the world, so it is a key holding in the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and many growth-focused funds. It's the kind of stock that can have a high weighting in an ETF, and therefore, play into an investment thesis. But the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF contains no such companies. The Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF could be a useful tool for investors looking to put new capital to work in the market and generate passive income from stocks they don't already own. But there is a glaring disadvantage of the fund compared to other Vanguard ETFs like the S&P 500 ETF, Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard Value ETF, or even the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The small-cap value ETF lacks leadership -- making it difficult to build an investment thesis around companies. With investing, it's important to know what you own and why you own it -- and that applies to individual stocks and ETFs. Even though the S&P 500 ETF contains over 500 components, it's still possible to get a decent grasp of the companies that drive the fund by looking at the top 20 or so holdings. But that's not the case with the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF because the fund is ultra-diversified. Again, this structure may appeal to investors looking for general exposure to small-cap value stocks in key sectors like industrials and financials -- but it may not be the best choice for folks looking to build a portfolio around companies they are confident can grow over time. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft, Teleflex, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Value ETF, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends BorgWarner and Qorvo and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HOOD vs. IBKR: Which Fintech Broker is Poised for More Growth?
Robinhood Markets HOOD and Interactive Brokers Group IBKR are prominent online brokerage players offering commission-free trading platforms. Robinhood appeals to newer, mobile-first retail investors, while Interactive Brokers serves more advanced traders with its comprehensive the stock markets witnessing massive volatility and client activity, HOOD and IBKR are expected to benefit from increased trading activities. As such, investors are bullish on both. This year, shares of HOOD have soared 65.8%, while Interactive Brokers is up 18.4%. Also, stocks have fared better than the industry, the Zacks Finance sector and the S&P 500 Index in the same time frame. HOOD & IBKR YTD Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research So, the question arises: which brokerage stock — Robinhood or Interactive Brokers — offers greater upside in the evolving trading market? Let's break down their fundamentals, financial performance, growth prospects and more before taking any decision. Robinhood became extremely popular among younger generations in early 2021, riding on the meme stock wave. Nonetheless, since its IPO in July 2021, a lot has happened on the business front. It has evolved from a brokerage firm primarily trading in digital assets to a more mature and diversified entity, striving to become a one-stop shop for building generational wealth. In this context, HOOD has launched several initiatives to attract more clients and strengthen its market share. Some notable ones are Robinhood Strategies, Robinhood Banking and Robinhood Cortex to boost the wealth management offerings; the prediction markets hub; a credit card and a desktop trading platform. Additionally, Robinhood is expanding via strategic acquisitions, which are helping it foray into new businesses and complement existing ones. On Tuesday, it announced an agreement to buy Canada-based WonderFi Technologies Inc. in a C$250 million all-cash deal, which will help deepen its presence in the Canadian digital asset market. In February 2025, it completed the $300 million acquisition of TradePMR, a custodial and portfolio management platform specializing in services for Registered Investment in July 2024, Robinhood acquired Pluto Capital Inc. With the integration of Pluto's advanced capabilities, the company has revolutionized the investment experience for its users. Further, the impending buyout of Bitstamp (announced in June 2024), a globally recognized cryptocurrency exchange (featuring more than 85 tradable assets and popular in Europe and Asia), will significantly enhance the company's crypto these efforts reflect HOOD's ambition to become a full-spectrum financial services provider. HOOD Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Interactive Brokers' technological superiority remains one of its strongest aspects. The company processes trades in stocks, futures, options and forex on more than 150 exchanges across several countries and technology usage has kept IBKR's compensation expense relative to net revenues (10.8% in the first quarter of 2025) below its industry peers. Further, the company has been emphasizing developing proprietary software to automate broker-dealer functions, leading to a steady rise in Brokers is expanding globally with a series of strategic moves. Earlier this month, it extended trading hours for Forecast Contracts to nearly 24 hours, after having launched them in Canada. In the U.K., it added mutual funds to its ISA offerings, enhancing tax-efficient investing. IBKR also introduced PEA accounts in France and expanded mobile trading via GlobalTrader. Other innovations include almost 24 hours of Overnight Trading on U.S. stocks and ETFs, crypto trading through Paxos with low fees and the launch of IBKR Desktop, a next-gen trading platform for Windows and Mac, underscoring its focus on advanced, global trading company's technological superiority, combined with easier regulations to improve product velocity, will support its net revenues through higher client acquisitions. Net revenues are also expected to strengthen further in the quarters ahead, given the solid Daily Average Revenue Trades (DARTs) numbers and robust trading backdrop driven by higher market participation. IBKR Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HOOD's 2025 and 2026 earnings indicates an 11.9% and 19.4% rise for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Over the past month, earnings estimates for 2025 have remained unchanged, while for 2026, the same have been revised upward. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research On the contrary, analysts are less optimistic about IBKR's prospects. The consensus mark for earnings suggests 0.4% and 7% growth for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Earnings estimates for both years have been revised lower over the past 30 days. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Hence, on earnings growth prospects, HOOD clearly has an edge over Interactive Brokers. Valuation-wise, HOOD is currently trading at the 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 47.17X. The IBKR stock, on the other hand, is currently trading at the 12-month trailing P/TB of 28.86X. Further, both are trading at a premium to the industry average of 13.82X. P/E F12M Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While Robinhood commands a premium over Interactive Brokers, its valuation is justified, given its superior growth trajectory. Additionally, HOOD's return on equity (ROE) of 15.42% is way above IBKR's 4.97%. HOOD also outscores the industry ROE of 11.97%. This reflects Robinhood's efficient use of shareholder funds to generate profits. ROE Image Source: Zacks Investment Research HOOD has undergone a significant transformation since its IPO, evolving from a disruptive trading app into a comprehensive financial services platform. Through strategic acquisitions, it is aggressively expanding its product suite and global reach. It's also investing in advanced tools like Robinhood Cortex and Robinhood Strategies, targeting a broader investor base. These innovations, paired with a robust ROE and accelerating earnings and sales growth estimates through 2026, suggest strong long-term upside the other hand, Interactive Brokers remains a dominant, tech-driven brokerage favored by professional and institutional investors. Its global reach, low-cost model and powerful trading tools continue to support consistent revenue growth. However, while the company's innovation in areas like Forecast Contracts, GlobalTrader and IBKR Desktop is impressive, its earnings outlook is more muted, with only modest growth expected in the next two years. Combined with a lower ROE and downward revisions to earnings estimates, this suggests that while IBKR is a stable, well-run business, it may not match HOOD's upside potential in a growth-focused Robinhood appears to be the better long-term investment for solid returns. At present, Robinhood and Interactive Brokers carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Costco (COST) Hits $1,000-Plus; Investors Renew Stock Split Talk
Costco Wholesale (COST, Financials) is back in the spotlight after its stock climbed above $1,000, sparking fresh debate over whether the warehouse retail giant might finally split its shares. The company hasn't done so since a two-for-one split in 2000. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with COST. The stock has gained roughly 25% over the past 12 months and closed Friday near $1,040, joining a short list of S&P 500 companies with four-digit share prices. Oppenheimer analysts reiterated their bullish stance last week, raising the prospect of a potential split as a near-term catalyst. They assigned a $1,130 price target, above the Wall Street consensus. Costco's management hasn't ruled it out. CEO Ron Vachris said there was nothing to report at the company's January shareholder meeting. Chief Financial Officer Gary Millerchip said on a December earnings call that the availability of fractional shares has reduced the need for a split, but acknowledged it could make the stock feel more accessible to retail investors and employees. Despite the stock's strong performance, Costco remains one of the few companies of its size not to have split shares in over two decades, even as competitors like Walmart (WMT, Financials), and Amazon (AMZN, Financials) have done so more recently. The company did not respond to media inquiries about a potential split. See insider trades for COST. Explore Peter Lynch chart. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
