logo
Iraq's Election Law debate: Shiite factions at odds, Sunnis and Kurds hold back

Iraq's Election Law debate: Shiite factions at odds, Sunnis and Kurds hold back

Shafaq News05-03-2025

Shafaq News/ Iraq's Shiite camp is divided over proposed Election Law amendments, with some factions advocating for changes while others resist. Kurdish forces maintain a neutral stance, while Sunni leaders deem the discussion premature, contributing to the uncertainty surrounding the country's electoral process.
Division Within the Shiite House
A rift has surfaced within the Coordination Framework (CF,) an alliance of all Shiite political groups and factions in Iraq, excluding the Sadrist Movement, over the proposed amendment to the Election Law and the shift toward a multi-district system. According to informed sources, the debate has divided the Framework into three distinct factions:
-The First Axis: Led by Ammar al-Hakim of the Wisdom Movement (Al-Hikma), this group opposes any changes to the current law, arguing that the existing system has already secured the majority necessary for government formation and reflects the political weight of the involved parties. It believes that amendments could jeopardize political stability, diminish genuine electoral competition, and undermine the entire electoral process.
-The Second Axis: A more cautious group, this faction has yet to make a firm decision on whether to support the proposed changes.
-The Third Axis: The State of Law Coalition (SLC), which advocates for the amendment, has been working to rally support from the undecided factions and has put forth a new proposal to the political forces. However, despite these efforts, clear backing for the amendments remains 'elusive,' and the nature of potential election alliances remains 'uncertain.'
Recently, SLC Leader Nouri al-Maliki made his intentions clear regarding a return to a multi-district system. "Al-Maliki will send representatives to discuss proposals for amending the Election Law," our sources confirmed.
Differences Do Not Equal Division
Hassan Al-Janabi, a leader in the Wisdom Movement (Al-Hikma), clarified to Shafaq News that the differing views on amending the law within the CF should not be seen as a division. 'It's simply a difference of opinion,' he said.
While some factions have called for amendments, Al-Janabi pointed out that "there is currently no genuine desire within the CF to amend the law." He also noted that Shiite national forces have neither discussed nor proposed any changes.
Kurdish Forces' View
No proposals or requests for changes or amendments to the Election Law have come from the Kurdish forces, according to Wafa Mohammed Karim, a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP).
However, he acknowledged to our agency that reinstating the multi-district system could provide voters with 'greater freedom' in choosing their candidates.
Sunni Coalition's Stance
"It is too early to discuss amending the provisions of the Election Law," sources within the Unified Sunni Leadership Coalition told Shafaq News Agency. They emphasized that political parties have yet to agree on potential changes, and their electoral agendas remain undetermined. "In other words, the future roadmap has not yet become clear," they added.
Concerns were raised over "unacceptable" attempts to shift the focus and impose new leadership to guide the electoral process. 'All parties are primarily focused on securing gains for their citizens,' they explained, noting that proposing legal amendments during Ramadan, the Muslim fasting month, is "inappropriate" due to the parliamentary slowdown that typically accompanies the holy month.
Ballot Battles: Rewriting Iraq's Power Map
Since 2003, Iraq's electoral laws have undergone several revisions to adapt to the country's shifting political landscape. In 2005, Election Law No. 16 established a system based on electoral quotient calculations, dividing Iraq into 18 districts. Subsequent reforms in 2010 and 2014 aimed to consolidate power among major political blocs. The 2019 protests, driven by discontent with corruption and political stagnation, spurred significant reforms, including the introduction of a multi-district system.
The 2021 elections, held under the 2020 electoral law, marked a turning point, as the Shiite National Movement emerged as a dominant force, while other factions, including Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law Coalition, argued for a return to larger electoral districts. Maliki's senior adviser, Hatem al-Tai, contended that larger districts would provide a stronger mandate for major political parties.
However, the election law was amended again in 2023, reverting to the pre-2019 system, with a single-district system for each province. This change, seen as an effort to curb Muqtada al-Sadr's influence, allowed Shiite Coordination Framework parties to secure key positions in the December 2023 provincial elections.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

425,000 Syrians return since Al-Assad's fall
425,000 Syrians return since Al-Assad's fall

Shafaq News

timean hour ago

  • Shafaq News

425,000 Syrians return since Al-Assad's fall

Shafaq News/ More than 425,000 Syrians have returned to neighboring countries since the fall of the former regime, the Director of Public Relations at the Syrian General Authority for Land and Sea Border Crossings, Mazen Alloush, confirmed on Monday. Alloush stated that from December 8, 2024, to June 8, 2025, Syrian border crossings recorded the return of these citizens as part of the voluntary repatriation process, noting that over 250,000 of them are from Turkiye, with significant numbers also coming from Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq. He added that border crossings have also logged the arrival of tens of thousands of expatriates from Europe, the Gulf, and various other countries, either for visits or permanent resettlement in Syria. Alloush reported that since the reopening of the Arida border crossing with Lebanon last Tuesday, more than 20,000 travelers have crossed in both directions. Revealing that work is currently underway to establish a permanent commercial route between Syria and Lebanon through the Arida crossing after the Eid al-Adha holiday, he clarified that 'infrastructure upgrades and full rehabilitation of service facilities at the crossing are also ongoing.' Syria's land border crossings include Kasab, Bab al-Hawa, Hammam, Salama, al-Rai, and Jarablus with Turkiye; Jdeidet Yabous, Jousieh, and Arida with Lebanon; the Nasib crossing with Jordan; and the Al-Bukamal crossing with Iraq.

Kurdistan's $110B gamble: A new front in the Baghdad-Erbil oil war
Kurdistan's $110B gamble: A new front in the Baghdad-Erbil oil war

Shafaq News

time8 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Kurdistan's $110B gamble: A new front in the Baghdad-Erbil oil war

Shafaq News/ More than two years after the suspension of Kurdish oil exports following an international arbitration ruling, tensions between Baghdad and Erbil have reignited once again. This time, the dispute centers on a $110B oil and gas agreement between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and two American companies. Signed during a high-profile visit by KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani to Washington, the deals target the development of strategic gas fields in the Region's al-Sulaymaniyah province. The first contract involves HKN Energy, a US-based company active in Kurdistan since 2007. HKN holds a 62% majority stake in the Sarsang block in northern Kurdistan, alongside ShaMaran (18%) and the KRG (20%), and has extracted over 63 million barrels of oil from the Swara Tika and East Swara Tika fields and employs between 200 and 500 staff across its offices in Erbil and Texas. The second company, WesternZagros, is a Canadian energy firm founded in 2003 and operating in Kurdistan since 2005. Headquartered in Calgary, it manages operations from Erbil and al-Sulaymaniyah and has invested more than $1B in the Region, with main assets including the Kormir and Karmian fields, estimated to contain 5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 900 million barrels of recoverable oil. According to KRG officials, the Miran and Topkhana-Kormir fields covered by the agreements are expected to supply 24-hour electricity to the Region and potentially export surplus power to the rest of Iraq. 'This is not just about energy security—it's about political leverage,' local energy analyst Kovand Sherwani told Shafaq News. 'If implemented, these projects could drastically reduce the Region's reliance on Iranian fuel and grant it more bargaining power with Baghdad.' The United States welcomed the deals as a step toward enhancing Iraq's energy sovereignty. A senior State Department official told Shafaq News, 'The United States believes that Iraq will be more stable and sovereign by achieving energy independence and distancing itself from Iran's harmful influence,' the official stated. 'We encourage Baghdad and Erbil to work together to begin gas production as soon as possible,' he added. American energy expert Dr. Paul Sullivan of Johns Hopkins University also told Shafaq News that 'Erbil's decision to strike massive deals with US companies signals closer ties between Kurdistan and Washington in a vital sector, and may imply implicit American support for the Region.' However, he cautioned that 'unless constitutional disputes are resolved through a federal oil and gas law, this move will only deepen the crisis with Baghdad.' The Iraqi government responded swiftly to the deal. The Oil Ministry issued a statement rejecting the deals as 'null and void,' asserting that they violate Iraq's laws and the authority of the federal government. Citing the constitutional status of Iraq's natural resources, Baghdad argued that the KRG has no right to unilaterally sign contracts, especially while operating under a caretaker government awaiting elections, due to possible obligations on future administrations. MP Basim Naghamish, a member of the Parliamentary Oil and Gas Committee, echoed the ministry's stance. 'It is unacceptable for any party to operate independently of the federal government on the oil file. What Erbil has done—signing contracts with foreign companies unilaterally—constitutes a serious constitutional and financial violation. We will use all legal means to stop this unilateral move and protect Iraq's national wealth,' he stated. The deals also triggered a backlash in Parliament, including from some of the KRG's traditional allies, with several Baghdad-based parties within the governed Shiite Coordination Framework accusing the Region of violating revenue-sharing agreements, warning that such unilateral moves could derail national budget negotiations and legislative cooperation. In response, Kurdish officials defended the deals as essential to securing energy stability and financial sustainability in the face of continued delays in federal budget transfers and the suspension of oil exports through Turkiye. The Region has faced mounting liquidity pressures since March 2023, when the International Chamber of Commerce ruled against Turkiye's unilateral export of Kurdish crude, leading to losses exceeding $20B in potential revenue. Economist Mustafa Faraj told Shafaq News the deal could be a 'double-edged sword' for the KRG. 'There's no doubt these agreements represent a major investment opportunity. They could revitalize Kurdistan's economy through infrastructure development, job creation, and expanded power generation.' But, he added, 'They're not a magic bullet. Their success hinges on legal clarity and political stability. If the dispute with Baghdad remains unresolved, investors may hesitate, and implementation could be delayed.' At the same time, the KRG garnered support from Kurdish and American lawmakers, who pointed to Baghdad's repeated delays in disbursing the Region's financial entitlements, including unpaid May salaries, leaving Erbil with no choice but to seek independent solutions to meet its basic energy and fiscal needs. At the core of the legal conflict is Iraq's 'failure' to enact a federal oil and gas law. Article 112 of the 2005 Constitution calls for cooperative management of natural resources between Baghdad and the regions, yet in the absence of binding legislation, both sides have adopted clashing interpretations of the constitution. 'The legislative vacuum has created a constitutional gray zone,' political analyst Yassin Aziz told Shafaq News. 'There is no operational clarity between the center and the regions—especially regarding who oversees which stage of oil production, from exploration to export.' He added that divergent views on federalism itself exacerbate the conflict. 'While Kurdistan believes the constitution grants it real and broad powers, many in Baghdad remain committed to a centralist mindset, viewing any independent economic initiative as a challenge to state authority.' Observers agree that the only long-term solution lies in passing a comprehensive federal oil and gas law that balances regional rights with federal oversight. Yet after nearly two decades of impasse, that breakthrough remains out of reach. In the meantime, Erbil appears determined to proceed, leveraging US backing and investor confidence to solidify its energy sector, though Baghdad must decide whether to double down on legal confrontation—or return to the negotiating table.

Trump warns Iran: Enrichment demands risk dangerous consequences
Trump warns Iran: Enrichment demands risk dangerous consequences

Shafaq News

time8 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Trump warns Iran: Enrichment demands risk dangerous consequences

Shafaq News/ On Monday, US President Donald Trump rejected Iran's latest reply to a nuclear proposal, warning that Tehran's demands could collapse the negotiations. 'We're trying to reach an agreement with Iran to avoid destruction and death,' Trump said, but stressed that 'their response is unacceptable.' A meeting with Iranian negotiators is scheduled for Thursday, he announced, adding that 'they're asking for things that simply can't be done.' He reiterated Washington's core objection, 'Iran is pursuing enrichment. That's what we don't want,' warning that failure to reach a deal would carry 'extremely dangerous' consequences. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization had said it would 'never accept zero-percent uranium enrichment,' calling the US demands excessive. Trump also confirmed a recent call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during which they discussed Iran and Lebanon amid other regional developments. Since the US withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018, efforts to revive or replace the agreement have repeatedly stalled. The latest indirect round, held in Rome and mediated by Oman, focused on limiting enrichment levels, which Iran has raised to 60%—far above the JCPOA's 3.67% cap. While Tehran insists its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes, Western officials argue the current enrichment levels lack a plausible civilian justification. Trump's remarks come following Iran's claims that it breached Israeli nuclear facilities and extracted thousands of classified documents, after which theSupreme National Security Council has warned that any Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities would trigger an immediate and proportionate retaliation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store