logo
‘Do I need to purchase camels?' Australian preppers have found their voice since Covid, but tough questions remain

‘Do I need to purchase camels?' Australian preppers have found their voice since Covid, but tough questions remain

The Guardian3 days ago
Shortly after Israel announced its attack on Iran in June, Trevor Andrei sent a message to some of his fellow Australian preppers telling them to stock up on petrol and buy a few hundred dollars' worth of groceries.
'I was like, OK, this is super significant, there's going to be a response … shit's going to go down,' Andrei says. 'Most years, [Australia is] lucky if we've got 28 days [of petrol reserve] so … if anything hits the world's oil supply, we can be out of petrol in a month.'
Andrei describes himself as Australia's most famous prepper and is one of the few happy to speak publicly about a famously secretive subculture.
The survivalist runs bushcraft courses (two hours for $299), makes and sells soap with his daughter, makes his own jerky, and has a property with fruit trees and a dam full of rainbow trout. He has great relationships with his farmer neighbours, he says – he'll process lambs mutilated by foxes so that the meat can be shared around the community for pet food, and when a tree comes down on one of their properties, Andrei will chop it up in exchange for some of the haul. He has formerly worked as a landscaper specialising in edible gardens and a tour guide in the outback.
In short, when shit hits the fan (SHTF, in prepper parlance), Andrei is going to be all right.
He's not so sure about the rest of us.
'Shit hits the fan every day,' he says. 'It just matters how close you are to the fan and whether or not it splattered on you, right? But the real shit hits the fan is what we call a fire sale, right? And that's where it's literally everything that could go wrong has gone wrong … So the pointy end of the scale is, you imagine like a cyberwar: there's no gas, there's no water, there's no electricity, you can't flush your toilet, there's no radio.
'Every single day of your life you have expected to … put some food on a plate and stick it in your mouth. So why would you not prepare for that ahead of time? There are so many people who don't do it.'
And yet increasingly, it seems, there are more and more people across Australia who do.
Global instability and the abrupt arrival of AI are among the factors that have pushed prepping towards the mainstream. But the biggest driver was the pandemic, when people experienced empty supermarket shelves and the pain of disrupted global supply chains – some for the first time in their lives.
For preppers such as Andrei, who see how most urban Australians live, this move towards preparedness cannot come soon enough.
'Prepping is becoming super super super popular. I've got schools that want me to teach it,' he says. 'You'd be mad, anybody would be mad if they're not sitting there going, all right, what's going on? And what should we do?'
Sam and Candice Johnson are not preppers, but they deal with preppers almost daily.
'We're just country-prepared, as we say,' Candice says. 'We've always got that little bit of extra in case you get flooded in or you have to leave home quickly in case of fires, but other than that I wouldn't consider ourselves preppers.'
The couple run a camping store in Beaudesert, Queensland, an hour west of the Gold Coast. A little over a decade ago, they saw a gap in the market and began stocking emergency kits – containing items such as wind-up radios, torches, batteries and glowsticks – to have on hand in the event of natural disasters.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
But over the years, customers began asking if they could stock more serious survival supplies. Now the store supplies most of the country with everything from freeze-dried foods to mylar bags, fire-starting kits, camouflage netting, snares and traps.
'The majority of our customers are those who want to be long-term prepared, so they're the people who've got, you know, a couple of months' worth of food stored away, or they've got emergency water filters,' Candice says.
'When we started … [prepping] was a really underground, quiet kind of thing. But that's increased 10-fold, twentyfold, thirtyfold.'
Covid was a big factor, she says. 'People who didn't understand what the whole thing was about previously, now had some kind of context as to why other people were doing it.'
That removed some of the stigma as well. 'People are seeming less quiet about it. Before we'd get lots of customers who wouldn't give us their name and they'd only pay cash and all this sort of stuff, but now, people are much more open and accepting of it and willing to admit that it's something that they do.'
Bradley Garrett, a geographer who has researched preppers around the world, interviewing more than a hundred of them for his book, Bunker, says there is a distinct difference between Australian preppers and those in the US, that seems to stem from a different level of trust in the government.
'My experience talking to preppers in Australia is they're much more concerned with practical prepping, as we call it – prepping for a wildfire or a blackout for three days or a week, or the taps turning off, or whatever. It seems to me like there is an expectation that help is going to arrive at some point … whereas with American preppers, they're much more concerned that help is not going to arrive and you're on your own. And that's certainly become exacerbated under the second Trump administration.'
Garrett says there is a lot more openness towards prepping in Australia than in the US, largely because of a culture 'of loading up your overland vehicle and going out to campsites and staying out for multiple days'. But there is also a huge split between the preparedness and resilience of people in cities and those in rural areas.
'In cities, God, there's so many fragile people that are totally dependent upon the next paycheque and systems being in working order … There are a lot of people who really would not fare well in a dire emergency.'
Garrett says when he started researching prepper culture he was one of these typical, fragile, middle-class Sydneysiders.
'When I had my position at the University of Sydney and I had a steady paycheque and we went to the gym and we did all the things that you do as a middle-class Sydney person, it was fine, there was nothing wrong with it, but the more I talked to these people, the more I realised, if something went wrong with this, I couldn't deal with it. Like we had no reserves, we had no resiliency.'
Garrett eventually adopted some prepper practices: he came up with a plan for what to do if he turned the taps on one day and no water came out.
He had a Jeep packed with camping gear and a 'mental map' of his surroundings and a plan for where he could go if his city home became unsafe (drive his Jeep south into the national park) as well as a backup plan – a few kayaks tied up on a nearby beach, so he and his wife could 'take to the water' and get out of the city that way.
'I started thinking more about how much money do we have in the bank, and what resources do we have if suddenly the grocery stores weren't open, you know?
'People don't necessarily need to move, but creating a little elasticity in your existence so you can deal with crisis is a very healthy thing.'
On one of Australia's most popular prepper Facebook pages the discussion bounces from the mundane ('Does anyone have any recommendations for good quality but affordable Mylar bags and oxygen absorbers?') to the portentous: 'When China spits the dummy with Australia, the sea lanes will be cut and our imported food will stop. Stock up on all you can.'
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
In between posts offering advice on the best storage of rice (white apparently stores much better than brown – 'the lesser of two weevils,' a commenter quips) – and the discussion about the battery life of the Nokia 3210, there are questions about the best mode of transport. 'When the lights go out … do I need to purchase horses? Camels?'
Others present detailed plans of how people would or should survive should the worst happen.
One user posts an ominous checklist of what to do on 'day one … immediately after the collapse'. The list runs: secure your perimeter, fill bathtubs and bowls with water while it's still running, radio check your crew and decide whether to 'bug in or bug out', but make that decision early, as 'traffic jams and gunfire don't mix'.
Whether to 'bug in' or 'bug out' is a key question for hardcore preppers. Bugging in means people plan to stay put in their home, which should be well stocked with supplies, well hidden and whose existence should not be disclosed to anyone, lest marauders come.
Bugging out means leaving, with either a 'bug out bag' – a short-term emergency kit – or an Inch (I'm never coming home) bag with supplies to enable indefinite survival.
Andrei plans to bug in, but thinks building a bespoke bunker full of supplies is quite stupid. That would make them a 'soft, high-yield target' for 'wolves' – his term for marauders who would seek out a bunker, smoke out the occupants and steal their supplies.
Holly Robertson, who identifies as a 'bush survivalist' rather than a prepper, agrees.
'So, I don't identify with prepper culture, but I do see myself as someone who's prepared. When people know that you have a stockpile, that's where they're going to go first. But if you're someone who can literally take a knife or a machete and go into the bush and make your own fire friction kit and make your cordage and make your traps, that's powerful. Like, that's a skill set that people really value. They're not going to try and steal from you, they want to have you in their space. So for me, leading with skill set and knowledge is far more powerful than having a stockpile of things.'
Robertson stands out from many in the bush survivalist community for a few reasons: she is 25, female and has an Instagram account with nearly 55,000 followers.
She became interested in this world a few years ago when she was holidaying near Byron Bay. She went to a bush survival school run by a man known as Cockatoo Paul, who would eventually become both her life and business partner.
Paul died a year ago, and Robertson now runs the Australian Bush Survival School as a mobile business, travelling all over Australia to run everything from children's workshops to corporate retreats, teaching skills such as trapping, tracking, spear throwing, knot-tying, skin tanning, friction fires, water purification and basic navigation.
'At the end of the day, the majority of the skills I teach people, they're probably never going to use again in their life. I hope they're never in a survival situation. But what I do see is a sense of empowerment and confidence through capability. When someone, for the first time in their life, creates a fire out of two sticks, the way their face lights up is phenomenal.
'A lot of people … in my generation … they don't know how to light a fire. And if the power went out, they would have literally no idea what to do whatsoever. A lot of our grandparents, they've lived in the bush and they're super capable … so what I really want to see for my generation is how we can really step up and become more self-reliant.'
While many interviewees stress the importance of resilience, capability and community, some also warn there can be a dangerous element to prepper culture.
'Unfortunately some very vulnerable people fall into that demographic and they find a lot of serious consequences down the line,' says John Scarinci, the secretary general of the Australian Peoples Survival League (formerly the Australian Preppers Survival League).
Scarinci says for some people, prepping can become a 'life-overtaking exercise'.
'They find themselves in trouble later in life because they've just spent their life savings [and] years roll on, decades … and they've amassed a huge amount of preparatory items and they've forgotten about their own health and wellbeing, and the world has not collapsed and they find themselves in a spot of bother.'
Some find they have spent decades preparing for the end of the world, but not for retirement or aged care. For others, prepping comes at huge cost to relationships.
'Their partners may potentially leave them because they're so fixated with their preparations, where they're preparing for the doomsday occurrence and it just engulfs them. They're unable to work, because how are you going to fit in … a career whilst being fixated on preparing your jars of food and your freeze-dried items?'
Garrett says he has also seen people who started prepping on a 'low level', dedicating more and more of their resources and mental energy to it.
'Eventually families start to get frustrated [and ask] 'What are we doing here? We're spending more time anxious about the future than we are worrying about the present, or enjoying the present.'
'It happens a lot, because prepping is a thought experiment, so once you start to think, 'How do we escape from a bushfire?' then you start thinking, well, what if there was a nuclear attack? What if all the cyber systems are down and we have to flee? What if AI turns on us? It can become a bridge to conspiracy theory and the guardrails you have to put in place are just understand that, yeah, it's fine to think about these things, but it's not fine to obsess over them.'
But Garrett says becoming more prepared has made him far more peaceful, rather than anxious.
He eventually moved away from his middle-class Sydney life, returning to his native US, where he lives on a five-acre property in rural California. He and his wife grow their own food, have horses and are gradually taking the property off-grid.
'Things can definitely go wrong in our lives and I'm totally capable of dealing with them … It's given me a sense of solace that not only do we have the resources we need to get through something, but I've spent years now upskilling in various things … I just learned how to lay pipes in the yard … or I learned how to put in an electrical socket or fix our breaker if it goes out. All those sort of DIY practical skills. Every time I learn something, then I think, 'Oh this is fantastic' because if something goes wrong, I don't have to call someone to deal with this – I can deal with it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben and Dino thought they had found the perfect rental... then they were given 24 hours to leave as a glaring issue exposes the dire reality for millions
Ben and Dino thought they had found the perfect rental... then they were given 24 hours to leave as a glaring issue exposes the dire reality for millions

Daily Mail​

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ben and Dino thought they had found the perfect rental... then they were given 24 hours to leave as a glaring issue exposes the dire reality for millions

Two housemates were evicted from their rental at just a day's notice after part of the ceiling became detached from the walls and the house began to sink. Ben Pierpoint and Dino Dimitriadis were initially happy when they moved into their refurbished home in Marrickville, in Sydney 's Inner West, two years ago. A year later, they started to see small cracks in the walls that they thought were just normal wear and tear. But on July 22 this year, Mr Pierpoint's wall tore away from the ceiling and the house sank by six centimetres. He said there was a 'significant gap' where the wall disconnected from the ceiling. They quickly told their landlord, and an engineer found the house was no longer safe to live in, and they had 24 hours to pack their belongings and leave. The pair wondered if construction work next door, where a 10metre deep hole was dug for a basement car park, had anything to do with their home's damage. They questioned whether the excavation caused a seepage failure, meaning the ground on their side of the building had sunk, causing their walls to separate from the ceilings. They lodged compensation claims with the owner's insurance company, but they were refused because the insurance company argued the damage was just normal wear and tear. Mr Pierpoint said it was a 'traumatic' ordeal which forced them to spend thousands of dollars on removalists, storage units and temporary accommodation, and they were also forced to take time off work. NSW Fair Trading, the Inner West Council and the Building Commission all told them that no one had any legal responsibility to compensate them financially. NSW Fair Trading said the Residential Tenancies Act did not cover relationships with third parties. Mr Pierpoint and Mr Dimitriadis said their situation highlighted a gap in tenancy laws. The law says landlords have a legal duty to provide a safe home, but if it becomes uninhabitable and unsafe to live in, they can cease the lease right away. Mr Pierpoint and Mr Dimitriadis want to be compensated, but a legal fight against their landlord, or a third party, would cost them too much. Tenants' Union of NSW chief executive Leo Patterson Ross told the Sydney Morning Herald that the costs of legal action outstripped the amount people wanted to be compensated. 'Just a filing fee alone could start at $500, and that's before you hire a solicitor – there might be many people who wouldn't pursue it because of the high costs and risk of not being successful,' he said. Mr Pierpoint and Mr Dimitriadis said things would only 'get worse and worse, unless something changes'. They are calling on the government to amend tenancy laws to provide renters with a safety net if they are evicted for reasons beyond their control. 'Or, forcing the landlord's insurance to cover those costs – but we all know insurance companies will do anything to not have to pay anything,' Pierpoint told the Sydney Morning Herald. 'If we didn't have the financial means to move that quickly, our stuff would just be on the street. If we didn't have community and friends around us, we would actually be homeless.' Mr Pierpoint and Mr Dimitriadis who have run into trouble with the quality of their rental. Ksenia Pavlovskaya, 43, previously claimed she was living with health problems because of the mould at her unit in North Curl Curl, on Sydney 's leafy Northern Beaches. Daily Mail Australia contacted Mr Pierpoint and Mr Patterson Ross for further comment.

‘Breaking down the walls': the long journey towards Indigenous inclusion at University of Melbourne
‘Breaking down the walls': the long journey towards Indigenous inclusion at University of Melbourne

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

‘Breaking down the walls': the long journey towards Indigenous inclusion at University of Melbourne

It took more than 100 years after universities were established in Australia for an Indigenous student to graduate. Margaret Williams-Weir, a Gumbaynggirr and Malera Bundjalung woman, completed a diploma in physical education at the University of Melbourne in 1959. Since Williams-Weir, more than 1,400 Indigenous students have graduated from the sandstone university, and a record 536 were enrolled in 2023. But that is still only 1.27% of students, compared with 3.8% of the general population who are Indigenous. The university has also failed to reach its targets for Indigenous staff. Amid efforts to improve Indigenous representation, the university has released the second volume of Dhoombak Goobgoowana – translated as 'truth-telling' in the Woi Wurrung language of the traditional owners of the land on which the university was built. The first volume, published last year, laid bare the dark side of the university's history, revealing how Nazi apologists, massacre perpetrators, grave robbers, racists and eugenicists had been celebrated as hugely influential heroes of academia. The second volume, Voice, does not shy away from the the university's troubled historical relationship with Indigenous people, but shifts its focus to stories of resilience, resistance and reform, which its editors hope will contribute to reconciliation. The deputy vice-chancellor (Indigenous) , Prof Barry Judd, says Voice is about 'who gets to speak, who gets heard, and what it takes to create space for Indigenous leadership in systems not built for us'. 'This volume documents progress, but also calls us to go further,' he says. 'It is both a record of progress and a foundation for ongoing cultural transformation.' The work was commissioned as part of the university's commitment to truth telling. Both volumes were submitted to the Yoorrook Justice Commission, the first formal truth-telling process into injustices experienced by Indigenous people in Victoria. Prof Marcia Langton, who co-wrote and edited the book, says the works of Indigenous staff and students to turn the university towards respect for Indigenous knowledge 'echo across history and continue to inspire'. When Langton was hired in 2000 to construct an undergraduate program in Australian Indigenous studies, she was the first Aboriginal professor at the university and among only a handful of full-time Indigenous academic staff. She says Dhoombak Goobgoowana would have been 'impossible to write' when her tenure began. 'There were no Indigenous studies programs at all,' she says. 'Today we are the only university in the world that has reckoned with its Indigenous history and its engagement with Indigenous people honestly and truthfully. 'Before we were able to do this, it was a matter of great shame to many Indigenous people that our university had this past and didn't acknowledge it.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email When Williams-Weir began at the university, campus racism was overt. In 1951, the book recounts, first year students were greeted at the university's official welcome by white students in blackface dressed as 'spear-waving 'aborigines''. Six years later, when a fundraising body for Indigenous tertiary education, Abschol, advertised it would sell buttons, a group of students hung an effigy of an Indigenous person from a tree outside Union House. An article published in the student newspaper Farrago in 1959 mocking Abschol's work said attempts to offer charity to Indigenous people produced an 'apathetic, disease-ridden, violent, metho-drinking community who have no other values than the satisfaction of their desires'. Abschol students' own efforts also demonstrated a limited connection to the Indigenous community at the university. Their float for the 1956 Moomba parade featured five white students who had blackened their skin and wore headdresses taken from communities in far north Queensland. This was the environment the university's first Aboriginal liaison officer, Destiny Deacon, entered when she began her role in 1975. She resigned a year later over 'intractable disagreements' about her autonomy and under-resourcing. Deacon went on to complete a bachelor of arts degree in 1979 and became a celebrated artist, broadcaster, academic and political activist, but during her tenure she came up against persistently racist ideas about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Launching the first Black Week of the Students Representative Council in 1974, Deacon lamented: 'Some of us think the dishonest acquisition of our land by the whites happened because we, at the time, had no concept of the white man's irrational notion of his divine right to plunder the lands and property of human beings whom he considers to be 'primitive', 'barbaric' or 'uncivilised',' she told the crowd. 'They conned us into believing that they were superior'. Langton says Deakin did an 'extraordinary job' supporting the students and 'breaking down the walls of exclusion' at the university. '[Her speech] represents the tipping point from the view of Aboriginal people as primitives, which had been the subject of so much pseudoscience at the university,' she says. 'Change really began to accelerate from the advocacy of a few enlightened individuals.' Despite the efforts of students such as Deakin, the university's colonial past remained evidenced in the names of buildings promoting eugenicists, and tucked behind closed doors. In 2002, a collection of more than 800 Indigenous remains was discovered by chance in a locked basement storeroom. The remains had been collected by Richard Berry, a professor of anatomy at the university in the early 1900s and prominent eugenicist. He was one of multiple academics who took remains from Indigenous communities as late as the 1950s. After amendments to the Victorian government's Relics Preservation Act in the 1980s, Gunditjmara elder Uncle Jim Berg arrived at the UoM with the legal injunction to repatriate the stolen items. The book recounts Berg's recollection that the then vice-chancellor, David Caro, met him in his office and shouted: 'Who in the hell do you think you are, taking on the University of Melbourne?' A collection of about 800 Indigenous remains, excavated from gravesites on the Murray River by George Murray Black, was returned. But despite the injunction explicitly including Berry's collection as well as Black's, it would sit in the Medical Building for another two decades, and even now families are waiting for their ancestors to be repatriated. A subsequent audit by the university found about two dozen Aboriginal remains and cultural artefacts, including the skull of a tribal leader stored alongside animal specimens and Aboriginal stone artefacts stored in a service duct. There were some academics who championed Indigenous knowledge, including Dr Leonhard Adam, Baldwin Spencer and Donald Thomson, whose collection consists of more than 10,000 Indigenous objects. This year, the university's Potter Museum unveiled the jestingly-titled exhibition 65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Art, featuring more than 400 artworks and cultural objects from the university's collection, many of which had rarely been seen by the public, including segments of Thomson's collection. Co-curated by Langton, the exhibition confronts Australia's colonial history and the process of collection from Indigenous lands, as well as the belated acceptance of Aboriginal art into the fine art canon. Langton says academics such as Thomson were 'collecting vast amounts of Aboriginal cultural heritage, but after they retired or passed, those collections sat in storerooms and were rarely seen by the public … Our exhibition puts their collections in their historical context.' This, co-editor Dr James Waghorne says, is what a history of inclusion looks like: 'Imperfect, overdue and then often painfully slow, but marked by stories of courage and hope. 'Dhoombak Goobgoowana traces a series of beginnings,' he says. 'When academic leaders repudiated race science with growing insistence, when pioneering Indigenous students made the most of their chances, and their allies in student clubs and societies championed their cause. 'When the first staff broke through, and when the university established partnerships with Indigenous groups beyond its gates.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store