National Reconciliation Week to highlight powerful call for unity and action in the Pilbara
The Pilbara is joining communities across Australia in a powerful reflection on the nation's past and a united push toward a more inclusive future, during National Reconciliation Week.
Speaking with the North West Telegraph, Reconciliation WA chief executive Jody Nunn highlighted the importance of this year's theme: Bridging Now to Next.
'This year's theme really plays into where we're at now, where we just had a State and Federal election and I think what Australians voted for was unity over division, primarily,' she said.
'We've got to think about things differently and really challenge how we go about it, and of course, from a reconciliation perspective, we strongly advocate for Aboriginal people to be at the heart of decision-making.
'In the Pilbara, of all places, how is it that in 2025, we have Save the Children and 54 Reasons working on the ground, in one of the most prosperous areas in the world.
'We've got to ask ourselves some pretty tough questions as we face forward, and how do we create equity and equality for First Nations people and Torres Strait Islander people.'
The Pilbara's legacy of resistance and resilience adds even greater depth to the region's role in Reconciliation Week.
It was here, in 1946, that 800 Aboriginal workers staged the first organised industrial strike since colonisation, challenging decades of indentured labour and demanding fair treatment.
'When we look at the closing the gap statistics, they're not moving even remotely in the direction where we need them to move,' Ms Nunn said.
'But we've also got some really amazing success stories; the Pilbara is one of those.
'There are a range of programs led by Aboriginal organisations, which are fantastic and real examples of how people can stay on country and continue to care for country.
'There is a number of languages that are reawakening and that are being handed on to the next generation.
'So we don't want to just look at the deficit, we want to look at the many success stories there are, and there are many in the Pilbara.'
Ms Nunn said her hope for reconciliation in the future was for all Australians to understand the country's history.
'We've had to learn a lot of lessons along the way and we have had very tough policies; the 1905 Assimilation Act was one of the toughest policies against Aboriginal people globally, still even to this day.
'We have a history we need to understand and if we understand that, then we can be better for the future.
'Sometimes people feel that it's insurmountable; that there's too many challenges but the whole success of the reconciliation model is based on having lots of people nudging the agenda forward, not just one or two, but that a community that cares broadly.'
In Newman, a live stream of the Reconciliation WA Virtual Breakfast from Boorloo Perth will be held on May 27, as well as local activities and guest speakers.
In Port Hedland, there will be a range of free events and activities, including Indigenous Australians' arts and crafts, a traditional Aboriginal dance workshop and an evening of music under the stars with multi-award-winning artists Gina Williams and Guy Ghouse on Friday, May 30 at the JD Hardie Youth and Community Hub.
For more information on National Reconciliation Week, head to
www.recwa.org.au/nrw-2025
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
'A call to remember': First Nations Veterans honoured at ceremony in Sydney
A warning this story contains the name of a First Nations person who has died. At the Anzac Memorial in Hyde Park – a ceremony to remember First Nations veterans. Welcoming those in attendance, is Gadigal Elder, Allan Madden. 'Once again, on behalf of the land council and of the Gadigal mob, welcome, welcome, welcome.' A welcome dance is followed by a guard of honour, a smoking ceremony, and an opening prayer. The Ode, accompanied by a digeridoo. The service shining a light on veterans' stories. Squadron Leader Coen Henry, is a Royal Australian Air Force and Barkindji/Wiradjuri Man. 'The number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples who served in the First and Second World Wars varies greatly. As ethnicity was not noted on enlistment documents an accurate figure will never be known, it has been suggested that more than 3,500 Indigenous people served in these conflicts.' This year's key address was from Lieutenant Colonel Joseph West, an Australian Army and Murrawari Man, whose ancestors died in Kokoda. He joined the military when he was 18. Lieutenant West reflects on the meaning of 'lest we forget'. 'It is more than recalling names and dates, it is a call to remember truthfully, completely and with respect. But in the past we failed this promise with Indigenous soldiers." The heritage of many First Nations service personnel was previously not even recorded. "People from non-European descent were not permitted to join the defence force, in accordance of the Defence Act of 1903. This meant that even though Indigenous soldiers volunteered and fought, they did so without formal recognition." The story of Lieutenants West's great-Uncle, Private Harold West was also told in the 1942 poem 'The Coloured Digger', by H E 'Bert' Beros. Lieutenant Commander Robert Valler is with the Royal Australian Navy. At the service, he read an excerpt from The Coloured Digger. "He'd heard us talk Democracy – They preach it to his face – Yet knows that in our Federal House there's no one of his race. One day he'll leave the Army, Then join the League he shall, And he hopes we'll give a better deal to the Aboriginal." The service was also an opportunity to educate younger Australians about the contributions of First Nations veterans in Defence. Hundreds of school students lined the Pool of Remembrance in front of the Anzac Memorial, and at the end of the service laid wreaths. Attendees of all ages engaged in the event, including multiple local school groups; invited to listen, commemorate, combine tradition, and help right historical wrongs.
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump has declared war on Harvard, but there are degrees of concern in Australia
On April 11, Harvard received a letter from the Trump administration with a series of demands, ordering them to cancel diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, allow in an external auditor to vet the political views of staff and students, and to bar any students found to be 'hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence.' The question then, is if 'American values' are considered to be the same as Trumpian values. What about freedom of speech? Harvard refused. Other universities lined up to support them. Since then, Trump has moved to cancel Harvard's federal contracts, ban foreign students and threatened to cancel the university's tax-exempt status. A temporary order has paused the foreign student ban, but a chill has gone through all future and current Ivy League students. Many Australians are scratching their heads at what seems like, at its heart, a further muffling of any potential critics, along with the media, the courts, various experts and veteran bureaucrats. Why wouldn't you want the best minds in the world working on your problems? Cramping – let alone ideologically controlling – higher research simply undercuts potential economic growth and leadership, productivity, innovation, scientific advances, and a free contest of ideas essential in any pluralistic democracy. Harvard has seeded breakthroughs in health, artificial intelligence, astronomy, and epidemiology, and educated the thinkers and dreamers who have shaped the way we see the world. Loading Harvard has educated eight presidents, Republican and Democrat, as well as Bill Gates, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mark Zuckerberg, T. S. Eliot, Helen Keller, Robert Oppenheimer, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Margaret Atwood, Michael Bloomberg and Ben Shapiro. Australians who have studied there have gone on to be cabinet ministers, premiers, silks, magazine editors, authors, economists, corporate leaders, a president of the World Bank. We cannot be naive about how this might affect us. America is also our most significant research partner, especially in STEM. Last year, Australian research partnerships with the US drew almost $400 million in biomedical and clinical science funding. Ten Australian universities have already had US federal funding for research cut off, following Trump's declaration in March that support must go only to researchers who promote 'American influence, trust, and reputation'. Numerous Australian academics across a range of disciplines have cancelled trips to academic conferences in the US. Loading Here, the problem is not contempt for universities – in the main we do not, thankfully, have the same culture wars – but an erosion of quality and lack of funding. Overall, we spend significantly less than other countries on R&D. The OECD average is 2.7 per cent of GDP – we spend 1.7 per cent. It's not enough. Academics report being stretched, with months regularly wasted crafting research proposals that are routinely rejected, fighting for a narrow pool of funds. Morale is low. Have we too forgotten this is our future? That these are the minds we rely on to cure cancer, combat climate change, forge new ways to solve problems? As the US grows more insular and antagonistic towards creative, diverse global research, we should be throwing open our doors and inviting the brightest minds into our labs, libraries and lecture halls, and creating a climate in which they, and we, can flourish. And we can't flourish if we treat the curious, clever and hungry with suspicion. This week, Chinese graduate Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang, who studied international development, spoke at the Harvard graduations. She said she grew up believing that the 'world was becoming a small village' and that she could become part of the generation that would 'end hunger and poverty for humankind.' At Harvard, surrounded by students from countries around the world, 'global challenges suddenly felt personal'. But now, she said: 'We're starting to believe those who think differently, vote differently or pray differently – whether they are across the ocean or sitting right next to us – are not just wrong: we mistakenly see them as evil,' she said. 'But it doesn't have to be this way.'
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
Trump has declared war on Harvard, but there are degrees of concern in Australia
On April 11, Harvard received a letter from the Trump administration with a series of demands, ordering them to cancel diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, allow in an external auditor to vet the political views of staff and students, and to bar any students found to be 'hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence.' The question then, is if 'American values' are considered to be the same as Trumpian values. What about freedom of speech? Harvard refused. Other universities lined up to support them. Since then, Trump has moved to cancel Harvard's federal contracts, ban foreign students and threatened to cancel the university's tax-exempt status. A temporary order has paused the foreign student ban, but a chill has gone through all future and current Ivy League students. Many Australians are scratching their heads at what seems like, at its heart, a further muffling of any potential critics, along with the media, the courts, various experts and veteran bureaucrats. Why wouldn't you want the best minds in the world working on your problems? Cramping – let alone ideologically controlling – higher research simply undercuts potential economic growth and leadership, productivity, innovation, scientific advances, and a free contest of ideas essential in any pluralistic democracy. Harvard has seeded breakthroughs in health, artificial intelligence, astronomy, and epidemiology, and educated the thinkers and dreamers who have shaped the way we see the world. Loading Harvard has educated eight presidents, Republican and Democrat, as well as Bill Gates, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mark Zuckerberg, T. S. Eliot, Helen Keller, Robert Oppenheimer, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Margaret Atwood, Michael Bloomberg and Ben Shapiro. Australians who have studied there have gone on to be cabinet ministers, premiers, silks, magazine editors, authors, economists, corporate leaders, a president of the World Bank. We cannot be naive about how this might affect us. America is also our most significant research partner, especially in STEM. Last year, Australian research partnerships with the US drew almost $400 million in biomedical and clinical science funding. Ten Australian universities have already had US federal funding for research cut off, following Trump's declaration in March that support must go only to researchers who promote 'American influence, trust, and reputation'. Numerous Australian academics across a range of disciplines have cancelled trips to academic conferences in the US. Loading Here, the problem is not contempt for universities – in the main we do not, thankfully, have the same culture wars – but an erosion of quality and lack of funding. Overall, we spend significantly less than other countries on R&D. The OECD average is 2.7 per cent of GDP – we spend 1.7 per cent. It's not enough. Academics report being stretched, with months regularly wasted crafting research proposals that are routinely rejected, fighting for a narrow pool of funds. Morale is low. Have we too forgotten this is our future? That these are the minds we rely on to cure cancer, combat climate change, forge new ways to solve problems? As the US grows more insular and antagonistic towards creative, diverse global research, we should be throwing open our doors and inviting the brightest minds into our labs, libraries and lecture halls, and creating a climate in which they, and we, can flourish. And we can't flourish if we treat the curious, clever and hungry with suspicion. This week, Chinese graduate Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang, who studied international development, spoke at the Harvard graduations. She said she grew up believing that the 'world was becoming a small village' and that she could become part of the generation that would 'end hunger and poverty for humankind.' At Harvard, surrounded by students from countries around the world, 'global challenges suddenly felt personal'. But now, she said: 'We're starting to believe those who think differently, vote differently or pray differently – whether they are across the ocean or sitting right next to us – are not just wrong: we mistakenly see them as evil,' she said. 'But it doesn't have to be this way.'
