‘DWI King' cashing in while his cases crumble
LOS LUNAS, N.M. (KRQE) – He was known as the 'DWI King,' making hundreds of drunk driving arrests for the state's largest police force, before his name was connected to the ongoing federal DWI corruption investigation. KRQE Investigative Reporter Gabrielle Burkhart reveals how this is impacting recent drunk driving cases, and how much the officer is getting paid to stay off the force.
Latest from KRQE Investigates
Former APD officer tied to DWI scandal now working in Durango
'DWI King' cashing in while his cases crumble
Behind The Story: Kids Sleeping In CYFD Offices
8th officer pleads guilty for role in DWI Unit scandal
KRQE Investigates: Can CYFD finally end kids sleeping in offices?
New Mexico State Police Sergeant Toby Lafave is known for cracking down on drunk driving in New Mexico. 'I love this uniform, I like serving the public,' he told KRQE News 13 during a 2019 interview.
Lafave held a long reputation for holding people accountable. His own dash and lapel police cameras capture his hundreds of arrests over the years.
The so-called 'DWI King' joined the force more than 20 years ago, and was featured on billboards for the state's 'ENDWI' campaign.
'By the time someone is arrested for DWI, it's not usually their first time,' explained Barbara Romo, District Attorney for the 13th Judicial District. 'It's just the first time they get caught, right?'
The idea that Lafave was a straight shooter — one who upheld the law and kept the streets safer — made it all the more shocking when his name got tied to the ongoing federal investigation into the state's biggest DWI corruption scandal.
It's a scheme involving officers working with a now-disgraced defense attorney, accepting cash to get DWI cases dismissed. Thomas Clear III and his paralegal, Ricardo 'Rick' Mendez, have since pleaded guilty in federal court to RICO conspiracy charges.
Lafave's name was placed on the Bernalillo County District Attorney's 'Giglio list' in February, joining more than a dozen other law enforcement officers who are no longer considered credible witnesses in court. It's part of the pending federal investigation into officers participating in the corruption scheme.
'If you're betrayed by a stranger, it's like, well, that's that person – what can you do?' Romo explained. 'But then it starts getting, it hurts a lot more. It stabs you a little bit deeper when it's someone that you should be able to trust with these cases,' she added.
DA Romo is responsible for prosecuting cases in Cibola, Valencia, and Sandoval counties. But without an arresting officer's testimony, a conviction, especially in a DWI case, isn't possible.
'We can't prosecute any of his cases where he's the primary officer,' Romo explained.
'I've been doing this a long time, so you think that you've seen it all, but then something like this happens and you realize that you haven't,' New Mexico State Police Chief Troy Weisler told KRQE in a February interview. Chief Weisler said he got a call from the FBI and immediately placed Lafave on administrative leave on February 13th.
The pending cases Lafave handled were automatically dismissed in court, with no consequences for the accused.
'I've never been to jail, please, sir! Please!' One driver pleaded with Lafave during her DWI arrest in December. The woman admitted to drinking and driving, confessing to her arresting officer, Sgt. Lafave, 'I drink sending my kids to school.'
She's heard on lapel video telling the Sgt., 'I need to contact my father because honestly, he's probably super mad at me.' Lafave replied, 'At least you're alive, you know?'
What could have been a harsh lesson for that young mom is now a lucky break. It's a similar story again and again.
'I'd rather you be late for curfew than me scrape your body off the roadway because someone chose to drive drunk,' Lafave is heard on lapel video telling young passengers during a recent DWI stop. Dozens of Lafave's most recent encounters with apparent drunk drivers – many of them young – now amount to dozens of free passes in court.
In one traffic stop, Sgt. Lafave made in September, he asked the young driver how old she was. 'I'm 19,' she replied. 'I was trying to catch up to you,' Lafave told her. 'You actually reached a speed of 98 miles an hour.'
The teenage driver he stopped from flying on the freeway around 4 a.m. that day is seen on lapel video failing field sobriety tests. Below is a transcript from a portion of her field sobriety test administered by Lafave, as he attempts to have her recite a portion of the alphabet:
Lafave: Starting with the letter H as in Henry, stopping at the letter R as in Robert.Teen driver: I can't do that.Lafave: You can't do that test? Why not?Teen driver: Wait, H?Lafave: start at H and stop at R.Teen driver: I can't.Lafave: Why not?Teen driver: I've never had to count backwards by H.Lafave: Okay. One, you're not counting. You are reciting the alphabet forward.
Lafave arrested the 19-year-old for DWI. While handcuffed in the backseat, the teenage driver gives Lafave attitude.
'It's gonna automatically get duh-missed,' she shouted from the backseat. 'Duh-missed?' He replied.
'I ain't gonna get charged with s***!' She told Lafave, while calling him names during the remainder of her arrest. As fate would have it, she was right. Her case was dismissed this year, but not because she proved to anyone that she wasn't driving drunk that night.
It's a glimpse of the nearly 40 pending DWI cases prosecutors were forced to drop due to Lafave losing credibility. Hers is among the seven case dismissals that reach beyond the metro.
'Yeah, it doesn't send a good message,' explained DA Romo. 'But by the same token, I can honestly say that the vast, vast majority of law enforcement officers I've worked with across the state, they're out there doing their job, and I guarantee you they hate this more than anybody,' she added.
Lafave is still on administrative leave pending the federal and now internal investigation by New Mexico State Police. KRQE Investigates confirmed through public records that Sergeant Lafave is still making a full $54-an-hour paycheck while on leave. That amounts to Lafave getting paid more than $39,000 and counting to stay off the streets.
And while the public has seen at least seven officers criminally charged in the scheme, the feds so far have not charged Lafave. His long-standing crusade against drunk drivers is now clouded with questions about his own conduct.
In Bernalillo County, the District Attorney's Office was forced to dismiss nearly 300 DWI cases as a result of officers losing credibility in court. New Mexico State Police tells KRQE their internal investigation into Lafave is still ongoing.
While DA Romo was forced to dismiss pending cases involving Lafave, she said she will not be going back through adjudicated cases handled by compromised officers. That is, unless a defense attorney files a motion to do so.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Consulting company hired to create plan to redevelop New Mexico State Fairgrounds
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham made it clear she's eyeing the State Fairgrounds for a possible major redevelopment project. Now, we're getting closer at finding out if that will happen with the state now hiring a company tasked with making a master plan on the possibility. 'It's a passionate issue, people have strong feelings, we want to turn the heat down and look at the facts,' said Martin Chavez, spearheading the State Fair Initiative. Story continues below Trending: Consulting company hired to create plan to redevelop New Mexico State Fairgrounds KRQE Investigates: Former APD officer tied to DWI scandal now working in Durango KRQE Investigates: 'DWI King' cashing in while his cases crumble Entertainment: Why is New Mexico a Netflix production hub? Figuring out if the State Fair needs to move from the middle of Albuquerque is the question, now underway for the former Albuquerque Mayor Marty Chavez and a major consulting firm. The state on Wednesday announced Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. has the contract to create a master plan for the fairgrounds that's expected to detail all the potential options, including what can or can't be built on the property. 'We anticipate a range of options from this contractor, including keeping the fair where it is, building the fair up, moving the fair, doing all in-fill, mixed-use mixed-income, building a $400 million arena, and creating an entertainment district in that part of Albuquerque,' said Chavez. Chavez is spearheading the governor's initiative and says community meetings and economic analysis will be a part of it. The idea of a revamp for the 236-acre site sparked in December, but Chavez said nothing has been or will be decided until the master plan is finished. He adds that the project is also majorly focused on Albuquerque's revitalization. 'The target isn't the fairgrounds, the target is the neighborhoods around it and something to change the trajectory of that part of Albuquerque because right now it's not going in the right direction,' said Chavez. City councilor Nicole Rogers said she hopes the fair will stay in her district, and the master plan can detail improvements to the area. 'For me, this is just an opportunity for us to dream big about what's possible and I know from my constituents, like most folks want it to stay in the neighborhood and so let's see how we can activate it and modernize it,' said Nicole Rogers, Albuquerque City Councilor for District 6. The consulting firm the state hired will get over $800,000 for the master plan. Chavez said they'll have a six-month window to finalize their work. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did federal prosecutors prove their case against Sean ‘Diddy' Combs? Legal experts weigh in
Whether prosecutors in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs have proven their case is a question that will be answered by his jury, which soon will start deliberating in the hip-hop mogul's blockbuster sex trafficking trial after hearing from 34 witnesses in testimony over more than six weeks. A conviction certainly is not assured, with lawyers and legal analysts saying there is ample room for jurors to find reasonable doubt – particularly on the racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges. 'This is not a walk in the park case; this is not a home run, at all,' said trial attorney and legal analyst Misty Marris. 'There are a lot of technicalities where I think the prosecution case has vulnerabilities.' Federal prosecutors allege Combs and some of his closest employees comprised a criminal enterprise that used threats, violence, forced labor and bribery to force his ex-girlfriends Cassie Ventura and 'Jane' – a pseudonymous accuser – to participate in sexual acts called 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights,' and to protect his reputation. Those allegations encompass the charge of racketeering conspiracy. Combs also is charged with two counts of sex trafficking Ventura and Jane and two counts of transporting the women and male escorts for the purposes of prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges. If convicted of the most serious charges, Combs could face up to life in prison and a minimum sentence of 15 years. While the evidence supporting charges of transporting people for prostitution is relatively straightforward, it remains to be seen whether prosecutors have effectively linked Combs' alleged criminal activity to an enterprise – and indeed proven such an enterprise existed, legal analysts said. And accusations of sex trafficking and the case more broadly have been undercut by the defense's contention that these acts, while perhaps unseemly, were consensual and separate from his lawful businesses, the analysts said. 'Was (Combs) running a criminal enterprise?' asked CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson. 'Or was he running a legitimate, iconic business that was overwhelmingly successful, and he was just a very flawed and broken person who was doing some personal things on his personal time, and not using an organization to further criminality?' 'Those are the competing narratives in the courtroom.' Prosecutors' toughest challenge will likely be securing a conviction on the racketeering conspiracy charge, experts agreed, citing its complexity and the novelty of its application in the Combs case. The charge stems from the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, which was created to prosecute organized crime, like the mafia. Any racketeering case is focused on a so-called 'enterprise,' or a group of people engaged in the alleged misconduct. To secure a conviction, prosecutors must prove Combs and at least one other person committed at least two crimes known as 'predicate acts' within a 10-year window to further the enterprise. They specifically sought to prove transportation for purposes of prostitution, witness tampering, bribery, forced labor and drug-related offenses, but on Wednesday indicated they would not argue attempted arson and attempted kidnapping, according to a letter prosecutors submitted to the judge. Combs has been charged alone, despite prosecutors alleging the enterprise included Combs and members of his inner circle, including his bodyguards and high-ranking employees. In fact, jurors did not hear directly from many of these people – and that will be 'one of the biggest uphill battles for this particular prosecution,' said CNN anchor and chief legal analyst Laura Coates. For example, prosecutors have referred to Combs' former chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, as 'an agent and co-conspirator' of the defendant. Though she was mentioned by multiple witnesses and her messages with Combs were presented in court, she was not called to testify. Khorram has denied wrongdoing, and her attorney has not responded to CNN's requests for comment throughout the trial. 'The absence of that testimony does leave some room for a seed of doubt to be planted that the defense will undoubtedly exploit,' said Coates, who hosts the CNN podcast 'Trial By Jury: Diddy.' In a typical RICO prosecution, one might expect to see multiple defendants, like a mobster and his underbosses, Jackson said. But that's not the case in Combs' trial. Prosecutors have suggested employees obtained drugs, baby oil and arranged hotel rooms and flights. 'The issue for that is going to be, were they really aware?' he said. 'You could be an employee getting baby oil, you can be an employee getting hotel rooms … Do you know what your boss is doing, or do you do what you're told?' To convict Combs of the two sex trafficking charges – one each for Ventura and Jane – jurors must find that prosecutors proved he compelled them to participate in commercial sex acts through force, fraud or coercion. Some of these elements are evident, the legal experts indicated. In Ventura's case, physical force was viscerally illustrated by the InterContinental Hotel surveillance footage showing Combs assault Ventura in 2016 – first published by CNN. Physical violence was constant throughout Ventura and Combs' 11-year relationship, according to Ventura's testimony and that of other corroborating witnesses, who told the jury they witnessed Combs assaulting Ventura on numerous occasions. The jury also saw photographs of bruises and gashes on Ventura's body, which were injuries she testified she sustained on dates separate from the 2016 hotel incident. Prosecutors worked to use that evidence to establish a pattern of physical violence they argue shows she was forced and coerced into 'Freak Offs.' In the cases of both women, experts said, there was a degree of financial coercion: Aside from being his girlfriend, Ventura was signed to Combs' Bad Boy record label when she was 19 years old, and he wielded great power over her career. Jane, meanwhile, testified she and Combs entered into a 'love contract' where he agreed to pay her $10,000 rent, but that he threatened to cut her off financially if she stopped participating in 'hotel nights.' Marris believes the sex trafficking case for Ventura is stronger, she said, pointing to the video and Combs' control over her professional career. Combs had also allegedly threatened to release sexually explicit videos of Ventura, and her mother testified she wired $20,000 to Bad Boy Entertainment out of fear for her daughter's safety. The money was later returned, she said. Still, the prosecution will face another challenge: Combs' defense leveraged the women's testimony and text messages with the defendant to undermine the suggestion of coercion, and they pointed out both women at times helped coordinate the sexual encounters, texting with escorts and buying supplies for the room. Both women said during their testimony they were asked by Combs to make these arrangements. The jury also saw text messages between Combs and male escorts arranging their travel, and Combs and his employee booking flights, as well as American Express and bank statements tied to those expenses, indicating Combs paid the bills. Jane expressed in some messages she did not want to participate in 'hotel nights,' but she would acquiesce and testified she wanted to make Combs happy. And she admitted on the stand Combs continues to pay her for rent and her legal representation to this day, even as she testifies against Combs, who is being held in the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York. Texts showed Ventura at times expressed a willingness to participate in the 'Freak Offs,' and that her relationship with Combs was at times loving: 'I'm always ready to Freak Off lolol,' she wrote in August 2009, toward the beginning of their relationship. In March 2017 she said she enjoyed the encounters 'when we both want it.' But, she testified, 'I would say that loving 'Freak Offs' were just words at that point.' 'The text messages are really the star of the show in this case,' Marris said. 'Text messages that Cassie exchanged with Combs at the time are really important for the defense and do undercut the prosecution narrative and their argument.' Establishing Combs as a horrible and abusive romantic partner, she said, is not enough to prove sex trafficking: Indeed, the defense on Tuesday acknowledged Combs' and Ventura's relationship was 'toxic for many reasons' but argued domestic violence is not sex trafficking. Prosecutors tried to combat this idea through psychologist Dawn Hughes, who offered context to the behavior of victims of abuse. Hughes had not assessed the victims or witnesses in Combs' case but testified it's common for victims to remain in abusive relationships. Financial dependence, she said, also plays an important role – and sexual abuse can make it difficult to seek help and leave. Experts largely agreed the two charges of transportation for the purposes of prostitution, stemming from the Mann Act, are likely the easiest for the prosecution to prove, with clearer evidence and less ambiguity than the others. 'That has been proved by leaps and bounds by prosecutors,' said Marris, adding: 'It's truly very simple: Did individuals cross state lines with the intent to engage in prostitution?' Jane testified she and Combs had 'hotel nights' between May 2021 and October 2023 in a variety of locales, including Los Angeles, New York, Miami and Turks and Caicos. Similarly, Ventura said 'Freak Offs' were held in some of those locations and other cities, like Atlanta and Las Vegas. Ventura testified some escorts participated in 'Freak Offs' in multiple states. They were paid between $1,500 and $6,000 afterwards in cash provided by Combs, she said. Her testimony was bolstered by various records presented in court, including flight records, American Express charges and hotel invoices. The jury also watched sexually explicit video footage of Ventura and Jane engaging in sexual acts with male escorts. The videos line up with the dates of many flight records and hotel invoices. 'They've got the names of the people,' Jackson said. 'They've got the hotel records. They know that they were commercial sex workers or escorts. That's more clear cut.' The defense has argued there's not sufficient evidence that the escorts and entertainers were paid for prostitution as opposed to for their time. The defense rested its half-hour case Tuesday, calling no witnesses. But Combs' attorneys have been laying out their case all along, through the cross-examination of the government's witnesses. Combs did not testify. 'The defense does not have the burden (of proof), and they are 1,000% aware of it,' Coates said. 'And they're trying to capitalize on what they don't have to prove.' 'Overall, their theme has been, this is a money grab, full stop. There are people who have free choice and free will and they exercised it,' she said, channeling the defense theory. Ventura filed a lawsuit against Combs in November 2023, alleging he assaulted, raped and sex trafficked her. Combs denied wrongdoing, but they settled the lawsuit a day later – for $20 million, Ventura testified. 'I'd give that money back if I never had to have 'Freak Offs,'' she testified on redirect. Crying, she added, 'If I never had to have 'Freak Offs' I would have had agency and autonomy.' A friend of Ventura's, Bryana Bongolan, had also testified about an encounter with Combs in which he allegedly physically assaulted and threatened her, claiming he dangled her over the balcony railing at Ventura's apartment. Bongolan, too, has filed a lawsuit against Combs seeking $10 million. The defense has tried to use these and other civil lawsuits against their client 'as their star witness,' Coates said. 'They have painted this case as jealous money grabs – and kinky, not criminal.' CNN's Kara Scannell, Elizabeth Wagmeister, Lauren del Valle, Nicki Brown, Laura Dolan and Eric Levenson contributed to this report.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Mexico Supreme Court orders a pause in the trial for two former firefighters accused of rape
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – The rape trial against two former Albuquerque firefighters was scheduled to last all week, but has now been put on pause while the New Mexico Supreme Court determines whether the charges against them are valid. Aden Heyman and Anthony Martin are accused of sexually abusing a woman while off duty at a party. Story continues below Trending: Consulting company hired to create plan to redevelop New Mexico State Fairgrounds KRQE Investigates: Former APD officer tied to DWI scandal now working in Durango KRQE Investigates: 'DWI King' cashing in while his cases crumble Entertainment: Why is New Mexico a Netflix production hub? Investigators said Heyman, Martin and another former firefighter, Angel Portillo, took turns raping the woman in Martin's home before she escaped out of a window. Wednesday morning, Judge Britt Baca informed the court about the supreme court's decision. The jury has been put in recess until Friday, but as of now there is no mistrial. The supreme court is reviewing a claim by the defense, alleging the grand jury that indicted the defendants, did so based on flawed instructions by the state. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
