NCLAT rejects EY partner's plea in Byju's-Aakash case
Ajmera challenged an April 30 order by the NCLT Bengaluru that directed all parties to maintain the status quo on Byju's 25% stake in AESL. The NCLAT held that the order was interim and passed with the consent of all parties, making it ineligible for appeal. The tribunal's bench, comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and technical member Jatindranath Swain, sided with arguments presented by senior counsels for AESL and the Manipal Group, which is the largest shareholder in AESL.
They said Ajmera's appeal was not legally maintainable and that the underlying company petition under Sections 241–242 of the Companies Act was itself questionable given the ongoing insolvency proceedings.
The appellate bench also noted that the April 30 order stemmed from a prior arrangement recorded by the Karnataka High Court on April 8, following the quashing of an earlier NCLT order that was passed without hearing all stakeholders. The matter will now return to the NCLT Bengaluru for a full hearing. Among the issues to be decided are whether the interim arrangement should continue, whether EY should be made a party to the proceedings due to its advisory role to multiple stakeholders, and whether Ajmera's petition is maintainable.
The dispute follows a series of transactions that led to the Manipal Group acquiring a controlling stake in AESL. Byju's acquired AESL in 2021 in a deal valued at around $1 billion.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Eid wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
PlayStore billing policy: Google appeals NCLAT order in Supreme Court
Google approached the Supreme Court on July 21 Almost three years after the Competition Commission of India (CCI) held that Google leveraged its dominance in the Android ecosystem, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) partially upheld the order later, the matter has now reached the Supreme Court with the US technology giant challenging the appellate tribunal's ruling. Google approached the Supreme Court on July 21. On March 28 this year, NCLAT partially upheld the CCI ruling against Google for misuse of its dominant position by imposing unfair Play Store policies and promoting its own payments app. The appellate tribunal had said that Google shall allow, and not restrict app developers from using any third party billing services; shall not impose any anti-steering provisions on app developers or restrict them from communicating with their users to promote their apps; and shall not discriminate against other apps facilitating payment through Unified Payments Interface (UPI) in India vis-à-vis its own UPI app, in any manner. The NCLAT, however, overruled several of the more stringent behavioural remedies imposed on Google by the CCI. The CCI had, in its ruling, asked Google to allow third-party app stores within the Play Store, uninstallation of pre-installed apps, and side-loading of apps. In May this year, NCLAT reinstated two CCI directions that obligated Google to disclose data policies and remove advantages for Google Play Billing System (GPBS). In the petition moved now in the apex court, Google has challenged the changes approved by the NCLAT in May.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
V-Mart posts strong profit jump in June quarter even as small town demand lags
Bengaluru: V-Mart Retail Ltd's net profit nearly tripled year-on-year in the April-June quarter, lifted by cost cuts and improved operational efficiency, even as slow sales at existing stores and weak demand in small cities reflected a broader pressure on consumer spending. The Kolkata-based value fashion retailer's revenue rose 13% year-on-year to ₹ 885 crore in the three months through June, its highest quarterly revenue in over two decades. The performance slightly exceeded Motilal Oswal's analyst estimate of a 12% growth. V-Mart's net profit surged 177% to ₹ 34 crore in the April-June quarter of FY26, despite discretionary demand remaining patchy in the country's small towns. Sales at older stores grew just 1% from a year earlier, but the company said this number looks low mainly because the Eid festival shopping happened early this year. 'If you adjust for that shift, the real growth at existing stores was closer to 5%, with both the V-Mart and Unlimited store formats contributing equally,' the company said in an exchange filing on Thursday. 'The operating leverage has clearly kicked in, and these margins will sustain in the coming quarters as well,' said Pratik Prajapati, equity research analyst at Ambit Capital. 'The numbers are pretty strong, and the company has shown meaningful efficiency on the cost side.' The company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization rose 27% y-o-y to ₹ 126 core in the June quarter, up from ₹ 99 crore in the same period a year ago. Investors cheered V-Mart's quarterly results, as the company's shares settled 5.7% higher at ₹ 807.40 apiece on the BSE on Thursday. The subdued same-store sales growth mirrors a broader consumption slowdown in discretionary retail. Avenue Supermarts Ltd (DMart) posted a muted same-store sales growth (SSSG) of just 3.9% in Q1 FY26, while Shoppers Stop's same-store sales contracted 5.9% during the same period, reflecting similar softness in footfalls and demand across organized value and premium retail. Same store sales growth measures the year-on-year revenue growth from stores that have been operational for at least a year, and is a key metric of a company's operational efficiency and financial health. V-Mart added 15 new stores and shut two underperformers during the quarter, taking its total store count to 510 across 27 states and Union Territories. While store expansion continues, the company is also focusing on improving performance at existing locations. V-Mart's expansion comes at a time when competition in the value fashion segment is intensifying, particularly in smaller towns. Rivals like V2 Retail are scaling rapidly, which has added 26 new outlets in the June quarter alone and is considering revising its FY26 expansion guidance upwards from the earlier target of 100 stores. The company runs over 215 stores, with a stronghold in eastern markets like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha where V-Mart also has a dominant presence. This parallel expansion signals growing competition for wallet share among price-sensitive consumers in India's smaller cities. However, V2 Retail and Vishal Mega Mart have yet to announce their June quarter earnings. Founded in 2002 by Lalit Agarwal, V-Mart Retail has grown into one of India's leading value fashion retailers, catering primarily to middle- and lower-income households in tier-2, tier-3, and tier-4 cities. With a stronghold in North and East India, the company operates a chain of affordable fashion and lifestyle stores offering apparel, footwear and accessories for the entire family. Over the years, V-Mart has built a reputation for serving price-sensitive consumers in small towns with a focus on efficient store operations, localized merchandising and private labels. A key part of V-Mart's broader expansion strategy has been the integration of Unlimited, the retail chain it acquired in 2021 from Arvind Lifestyle in a ₹ 150 crore deal. The acquisition added 74 large-format stores across South India, giving V-Mart a ready presence in urban and semi-urban markets in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana—regions where it previously had little to no footprint. The company said the format has now turned profitable and, in the June quarter, performed on par with its legacy V-Mart outlets, with both contributing equally to adjusted same-store sales growth. Fashion continues to be the core category, with private labels making up 64% of apparel sales. V-Mart's latest collections, targeted at Gen Z consumers, included influencer-led designs and streetwear-inspired styles that performed well in newly-launched store formats. 'The rebound in profit and margin expansion is a direct outcome of the backend optimisation and sharper merchandise curation. We've focused on quality, fit, and trend alignment, particularly for Gen Z shoppers in Tier II and III towns,' said Lalit Agarwal, managing director of V-Mart Retail, in the company's FY25 annual report. 'Our renewed focus on product curation, customer insights and disciplined execution is helping us navigate the market challenges and deliver profitable growth,' the company said.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Google moves SC against NCLAT order on Play Store billing practices
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Google and its related companies have moved the Supreme Court against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's March order that partly upheld some of the Competition Commission of India 's (CCI) findings of unfair practices and abuse of dominant position by them in their Play Store billing and its related companies – Alphabet Inc, Google Ireland, Google India, Google India Digital Services - have challenged the March 28 judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) which largely affirmed the CCI's core findings that Google abused its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem through its Play Store policies and engaged in unfair promotion of Google Pay, thereby violating Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition tech companies have also challenged the NCLAT's May 1 order that corrected its "inadvertent error" in its original judgment, reinstating CCI's two key data-related directives, which require tech gaint to disclose its data policies and refrain from leveraging billing data for competitive appeal that was filed on Monday is expected to be listed soon for spokesperson confirmed that 'we have filed an appeal against the NCLAT's recent decision regarding the CCI's order. We remain committed to supporting the growth of the Indian app ecosystem for both developers and users.'CCI's October 20 order had penalised Google for allegedly exploiting its dominant position in markets such as online search and the Android app store. The competition watchdog had imposed a penalty of Rs 936 crore against the tech giant and its companies for engaging in anti-competitive behaviour by mandating the use of its Google Play Billing System for app purchases, while exempting its own applications like YouTube from similar commission structures. The antitrust body had also directed Google to cease these practices, including allowing third-party billing and ensuring data the appellate tribunal affirmed the CCI's s order that Google imposed unfair and discriminatory conditions on app developers through mandatory use of Google Play billing system for paid apps and in-app purchases, it set aside the competition watchdog's findings regarding denial of market access and restriction of innovation on the grounds that Google's billing services constituted less than 1% of total UPI transactions and that there was insufficient evidence of market foreclosure or hindrance to technical original penalty of Rs 936.44 crore was also reduced by the NCLAT to Rs 216.69 crore by limiting it to Play Store-specific revenues rather than the Google's global startups including People Interactive India (operator of Mebigo Labs (owner of Kuku FM), the Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation and the Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation had moved the CCI seeking probe into the Google's functioning.
