The Pixel Flip is nowhere to be found! Here's why
Now, just a couple of weeks ahead of the official Pixel 10 series debut, we're about to get another iteration of Google's book-style foldable—the Pixel 10 Pro Fold.
But there's no Pixel Flip on the horizon, and with all the commercial success of the Galaxy Z Flip series, one would think Google should've explored this market niche long ago. What's going on?
Here are some reasons why the Pixel Flip might still be years away. Reason 1: Google is playing the waiting game
The screen was peeling off on the first iteration Razr | Image by CNET
Just like the company did with the Pixel Fold , Google seems to be playing the "wait and see" game before committing to a clamshell device. The same approach was adopted with the Pixel Fold , and by doing so, Google was able to avoid many "early age diseases" that plagued devices such as the Galaxy Fold and the Motorola Razr, for example.
Clamshell foldables also had their fair share of issues with durability, hinge mechanisms, cover screen utilization, and software optimization, so Google is learning from others' mistakes before going all-in and launching a Pixel Flip. Reason 2: Focus on the Pixel 10 Pro Fold
The Pixel Fold lineup has been pretty successful | Image by PhoneArena
After committing to the tablet-style foldable with the original Pixel Fold , Google has been focusing a lot of resources on the project, trying to perfect the hardware and software of this first attempt at the foldable market.
Developing a clamshell phone from scratch requires a huge investment not only in money but also in engineering brainpower. Reason 3: Competition. Samsung and Motorola are killing it on the flip scene
Motorola is getting traction with the Razr lineup | Image by PhoneArena
The Galaxy Z Flip series has been quite successful for the past couple of generations. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is outperforming its predecessor, with total pre-orders increasing by more than 25%, according to Bloomberg.
Motorola, on the other hand, gained a lot of market share with the Razr series last year. Motorola saw a 58% growth in European foldable sales between Q1 2024 and Q1 2025, driven by the Razr 50 series, and according to an IDC analyst report, the company's market share in the first quarter of 2025 reached 40.4%, up from 32.6% in the same period the previous year.
Trying to chip away a percentage of that growing market share might not be the best idea right now for Google. People would need a compelling reason to switch from the successful and, in the case of the vanilla Razr clamshell, quite affordable devices that Motorola and Samsung have been offering. Reason 4: Different approach to foldables
Google started tailoring Android for tablets and book-style foldables with the 12L feature drop | Image by Google
Google has been working hard to optimize Android for big-screen tablets and foldables. This push started back with the Android 12L feature drop, trying to offer the best user experience given the unique aspect ratio of foldables, and also a seamless transition from the cover screen to the main display.
Tweaking the software or adapting it to suit a clamshell design might not be as easy as it sounds. It might take some time for Google to figure out the best UI solutions for a flip phone in order to make a useful and competitive device. Is the Pixel Flip doomed?
We might get a Pixel Flip but we will have to wait a couple of years | Image by PhoneArena
It's too early to say. Looking at what the competition is doing, namely Apple, it seems that Google and Apple are fine leaving the flip phone market to Samsung and Motorola and focusing on book-style foldables.
And while the Pixel 10 Pro Fold is just around the corner, and the iPhone Fold is expected to come next year, there are no Pixel Flip or iPhone Flip models on the horizon.
However, we shouldn't rule out a potential attempt at the clamshell form factor by Google in the next couple of years. None of the aforementioned obstacles are unsurpassable; they're just time and market-dependent.
As the foldable market share grows, there might be new opportunities arising, and as the flip design matures, the risk for Google getting it wrong on the first try is decreasing.
What do you think about it? Would you like to see a Pixel Flip phone, and more importantly, would you buy one instead of opting for a Z Flip or a Razr?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
We now know the dessert codename for Android 17
Victor, 09 August 2025 We won't keep you in suspense: Android 17 has the internal codename 'Cinnamon Bun'. The information comes from a trusted source within Google and was originally reported by Android Authority. Here's a convenient table breaking down all the previous dessert codenames for you to check out. Version number Codename Year of release 1.0 No codename 2008 1.1 Petit Four (internal) 2009 1.5 Cupcake 2009 1.6 Donut 2009 2.0, 2.1 Éclair 2009 2.2 Froyo 2010 2.3 Gingerbread 2010 3 Honeycomb 2011 4 Ice Cream Sandwich 2011 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 Jelly Bean 2012 4.4 KitKat 2013 5.0, 5.1 Lollipop 2014 6 Marshmallow 2015 7.0, 7.1 Nougat 2016 8.0, 8.1 Oreo 2017 9 Pie 2018 10 Quince Tart (internal) 2019 11 Red Velvet Cake (internal) 2020 12, 12L Snow Cone (internal) 2021 13 Tiramisu (internal) 2022 14 Upside Down Cake (internal) 2023 15 Vanilla Ice Cream (internal) 2024 16 Baklava (internal) 2025 But, we see you scratching your heads through the screen, wondering how and why Cinnamon Bun. Why not something with 'W' to follow Android 16 'Baklava'? Wait, Android 16 'Baklava'? It actually makes perfect sense. You can head on over to the source link for a more in-depth explanation, but here's the gist of it. Google relatively recently switched Android development from the old branch-based model to a new 'Trunk Stable' model. Instead of merging new release branches back into the stable one like before, the new model has a constantly ideally stable single main code branch with all new features, fixes and APIs developed behind 'feature flags' to keep them disabled until they are ready. You still with us? Good. The important bit here is that Google completed the migration to the new trunk-based dev model with Android 14 QPR2, and to mark the change, the build ID scheme was reset, so Android 14 QPR2 became build ID AP1A and QPR3 got build ID AP2A. The first time Google released a trunk stable build was in 2024, hence the use of the letter 'A' to preface the build ID. However, presumably by that time Android 14 already had its 'Upside Down Cake' name and Android 15 its 'Vanilla Ice Cream' moniker, so it was too late to 'restart' the names and call Android 15 something with 'A'. Once the year turned over to 2025, however, the build IDs started coming out with the letter 'B' and Google decided to call Android 16: 'Baklava'. The next letter for build IDs is 'C' and hence a dessert with 'C' – enter 'Cinnamon Bun', presumably since 'Cupcake' was already taken. Of course, ultimately, the dessert name doesn't really matter that much, especially since Google decided to move away from it as a public branding. Nowadays, it is a remnant on the development side of things. Still, it is interesting to see what sweets the Google team chooses now that it is essentially the second time around for each letter. As for Android 17, we expect it to land around June 2026. Source
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
We now know the dessert codename for Android 17
We won't keep you in suspense: Android 17 has the internal codename 'Cinnamon Bun'. The information comes from a trusted source within Google and was originally reported by Android Authority. Here's a convenient table breaking down all the previous dessert codenames for you to check out. Version number Codename Year of release 1.0 No codename 2008 1.1 Petit Four (internal) 2009 1.5 Cupcake 2009 1.6 Donut 2009 2.0, 2.1 Éclair 2009 2.2 Froyo 2010 2.3 Gingerbread 2010 3 Honeycomb 2011 4 Ice Cream Sandwich 2011 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 Jelly Bean 2012 4.4 KitKat 2013 5.0, 5.1 Lollipop 2014 6 Marshmallow 2015 7.0, 7.1 Nougat 2016 8.0, 8.1 Oreo 2017 9 Pie 2018 10 Quince Tart (internal) 2019 11 Red Velvet Cake (internal) 2020 12, 12L Snow Cone (internal) 2021 13 Tiramisu (internal) 2022 14 Upside Down Cake (internal) 2023 15 Vanilla Ice Cream (internal) 2024 16 Baklava (internal) 2025 But, we see you scratching your heads through the screen, wondering how and why Cinnamon Bun. Why not something with 'W' to follow Android 16 'Baklava'? Wait, Android 16 'Baklava'? It actually makes perfect sense. You can head on over to the source link for a more in-depth explanation, but here's the gist of it. Google relatively recently switched Android development from the old branch-based model to a new 'Trunk Stable' model. Instead of merging new release branches back into the stable one like before, the new model has a constantly ideally stable single main code branch with all new features, fixes and APIs developed behind 'feature flags' to keep them disabled until they are ready. You still with us? Good. The important bit here is that Google completed the migration to the new trunk-based dev model with Android 14 QPR2, and to mark the change, the build ID scheme was reset, so Android 14 QPR2 became build ID AP1A and QPR3 got build ID AP2A. The first time Google released a trunk stable build was in 2024, hence the use of the letter 'A' to preface the build ID. However, presumably by that time Android 14 already had its 'Upside Down Cake' name and Android 15 its 'Vanilla Ice Cream' moniker, so it was too late to 'restart' the names and call Android 15 something with 'A'. Once the year turned over to 2025, however, the build IDs started coming out with the letter 'B' and Google decided to call Android 16: 'Baklava'. The next letter for build IDs is 'C' and hence a dessert with 'C' – enter 'Cinnamon Bun', presumably since 'Cupcake' was already taken. Of course, ultimately, the dessert name doesn't really matter that much, especially since Google decided to move away from it as a public branding. Nowadays, it is a remnant on the development side of things. Still, it is interesting to see what sweets the Google team chooses now that it is essentially the second time around for each letter. As for Android 17, we expect it to land around June 2026. Source
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Get the Beats Studio Pro for 49% off with this limited-time promo
Why spend an arm and a leg on new high-end wireless Bluetooth headphones when the Beats Studio Pro are down by nearly 50% right now? Yep, these premium headphones that'll typically set you back almost $350 are now available for just under $180. That's a hefty $170 off their original price! $170 off (49%) The Beats Studio Pro might not be the absolute best wireless headphones out there, but they're significantly more affordable right now. At the moment, you can buy them for 49% off in all colors. The promo will only last for a limited time. Buy at Amazon They might not cost as much as the AirPods Max or the Sony WH-1000XM6, but they still offer quality active noise cancellation, immersive audio, and long playtime. Even better, the 49% discount is available in all colors, so you can pick your favorite without missing out on the bargain. That said, the deal will only last for a limited Studio Pro have a premium, lightweight design that allows long-hour wear without ear fatigue. It's not just the comfortable design that makes them a great pick, though — they also have top-class ANC performance. Expect commute sounds to get significantly less annoying with these puppies, though occasional high-pitched noises might still get through. The Beats headphones are just as impressive when it comes to audio quality. Unlike cheaper models, these bad boys don't deliver overpowering bass out of the box. Instead, you get just the right amount of low end, rich and powerful mids, and excellent treble. The highs might sound a bit overpowering at times, but that shouldn't be a dealbreaker for most users. Special features include lossless audio through USB-C and personalized spatial audio with dynamic head tracking. And with a total playtime of 40 hours, they're definitely a great choice for casual listening. At the end of the day, the Beats Studio Pro offer quite a lot for their current asking price. While they may not be your primary pick at their regular price, they're quite attractive at $170. If you agree, hurry up and save with Amazon's limited-time promo because, after all, it won't stay live forever.
