logo
Why MAGA is losing its mind over Zohran Mamdani eating biryani with his hand

Why MAGA is losing its mind over Zohran Mamdani eating biryani with his hand

Time of India18 hours ago
Image: X.com
It's 2025 and eating rice by hand is the new political weapon!
It was just a man eating rice. With his hands. The way millions of people do every single day, across continents, cultures, and kitchens. But in 2025 America, that simple act turned into a political battlefield.
Enter New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a progressive politician and proud South Asian who casually posted a video of himself eating rice and curry with his fingers. No flashy graphics. No soundbites. Just rice, lentils, and quiet dignity. But then came the backlash—loud, swift, and, frankly, ridiculous.
Texas Republican Congressman Brandon Gill responded with what can only be described as textbook cultural xenophobia: 'Go back to the Third World.'
Just like that, eating with your hands was no longer about dinner. It was about identity, dignity, and who gets to belong in America.
So, let's talk about why eating rice—yes, rice—became a political weapon in 2025 in MAGA vs Zohran Mamdani.
A plate full of prejudice
First, let's get one thing straight: eating with your hands isn't dirty, weird, or backward. It's normal. In India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, parts of the Middle East, and even in some parts of Europe, using your hands to eat is a sign of connection—to the food, to your senses, to tradition.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
But in the video of Mamdani eating with his fingers, Gill and his supporters saw something else. They didn't see heritage. They saw a threat. Because in their worldview, anything outside the 'white, Western' norm becomes fair game for mockery or suspicion.
It wasn't about rice. It was about power.
'Go back' is never just a phrase
The phrase 'go back to the Third World' isn't just a casual insult—it's a political dog whistle. It's the same energy as 'go back to where you came from,' just dressed up in geopolitical vocabulary.
It's meant to delegitimize, to humiliate, and to draw a cultural boundary line: You're not one of us.
Never mind that Mamdani is a New York-born elected official. Or that the "Third World" terminology is outdated, inaccurate, and soaked in Cold War-era snobbery. Or that Americans eat burgers, fried chicken, and ribs—with their hands—without being called uncivilized.
In this case, eating with your fingers wasn't seen as personal—it was seen as political.
The double standard is deliciously obvious
Let's play a game: list five foods Americans love eating with their hands.
Go ahead. We'll wait.
Pizza. Burgers. Fried chicken. Fries. Tacos.
All messy. All finger food. All accepted without question. No one tells someone chowing down on a dripping cheeseburger to 'go back to the Third World.' But when a brown man eats rice with his hands? Suddenly, it's a threat to civilization.
The hypocrisy is wild—but not surprising.
When authenticity makes people uneasy
The fallout wasn't just political—it also caused some rumbles within the South Asian diaspora. Some folks felt secondhand embarrassment. Others applauded Mamdani for showing up as his full, unapologetic self.
This tension isn't new. Many second- or third-generation immigrants grow up navigating two worlds: the world of their parents and the world of their peers. That often means editing how they eat, speak, or show up.
Whitewashed lunch boxes. Switched-off accents. Curry smells hidden in sealed containers.
Mamdani's hand-eating wasn't just a cultural moment—it was a reminder that authenticity still makes people uncomfortable. Even within our own communities.
From curry to campaign trail
To understand why Mamdani's rice moment landed so hard, you have to zoom out. He's not just some guy eating lunch—he's a progressive elected official in a country where identity politics and culture wars have taken center stage.
Mamdani, who once ran on a campaign called Roti and Roses, has always tied his politics to food, culture, and justice. His support for food justice programs, housing rights, and labor protections connects with the everyday experiences of working-class communities—including immigrants.
So when he posts a video eating with his hands, it's not just aesthetic. It's a deliberate choice to show solidarity, connection, and pride in his roots.
But for critics on the far right, that pride is interpreted as defiance.
And defiance must be punished.
Food isn't just food. It's identity
Here's the thing: food is never just food. It's memory, heritage, comfort, protest, and politics—all rolled into one.
What we eat, how we eat, and who we eat with sends signals about who we are and where we belong. Mamdani's video did all of that. It was subtle but powerful. A quiet act of defiance that said, This is who I am—and I'm not hiding it for anyone.
And that's what truly scared his critics.
What this moment really says about 2025 America and MAGA
This entire episode—one man, one plate of rice, one racist response—says a lot more about the country than about Mamdani.
It says that cultural insecurity still runs deep. That people will use something as universal as eating to divide and exclude. That even in a so-called melting pot, some flavors are still considered 'too foreign.'
But it also shows something else: people are tired of hiding.
Tired of apologizing. Tired of editing themselves to fit into someone else's idea of 'American.'
Because if America is truly a place where everyone belongs, then eating rice with your hands shouldn't be controversial—it should be celebrated.
So, the next time someone mocks a cultural practice as 'uncivilized,' hand them a mirror—and maybe a biryani.
Because food is power. And in 2025, eating rice with your hands isn't just a meal. It's a message.
Hands, not hate. Always.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Have To Cross That Bridge: Jaishankar On USs 500% Tariff On Russian Oil Imports
Will Have To Cross That Bridge: Jaishankar On USs 500% Tariff On Russian Oil Imports

India.com

time34 minutes ago

  • India.com

Will Have To Cross That Bridge: Jaishankar On USs 500% Tariff On Russian Oil Imports

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Wednesday that India has officially expressed its concerns to US Senator Lindsey Graham regarding a proposed bill that could impose a 500 per cent tariff on the import of Russian oil. Reacting to US plans to impose 500% Tariffs on the import of Russian Oil, EAM said, "Regarding Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, any development which is happening in the US Congress is of interest to us if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest. So we have been in touch with Senator Lindsey Graham. The embassy, ambassador have been in touch." While addressing a press conference, he highligitd that India's concerns and interests on energy, security have been made conversant to Graham. "We'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it," he added. Graham's sanctions bill on Russia would impose a 500 per cent tariff on imports from any nation that purchases Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products, The Hill reported. The bill has over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof. After the war erupted between Russia and Ukraine, the US and Western nations imposed sanctions on Moscow. However, India has continued to purchase oil from Russian.

Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court to hear plea for ban on namaz at disputed site on July 21
Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court to hear plea for ban on namaz at disputed site on July 21

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court to hear plea for ban on namaz at disputed site on July 21

Sambhal (UP): A Chandausi court in Sambhal district on Thursday set July 21 to hear a plea seeking ban on offering of namaz at the disputed Shahi Jama Masjid , which is claimed to be Harihar Temple . The petition sought the ban on offering of Islamic prayers citing its "disputed status". Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aditya Singh took on record the plea filed by one Simran Gupta. Play Video Play Skip Backward Skip Forward Mute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo The dispute had previously reached the Allahabad High Court, where the Muslim side challenged the subordinate court's order for a survey of the mosque premises. On May 19, however, the high court upheld the trial court's decision and directed that proceedings continue there. Live Events The petitioner argued that since the site was deemed disputed by the court, Muslims too should be barred from offering prayers, just as Hindus were restricted from worship. The plea requested that the mosque be sealed and placed under the custody of the Sambhal District Magistrate . Gupta also sought to be made a petitioner on behalf of the Hindu side. Both matters will come up on July 21. The original suit was filed on November 19, 2023, by eight Hindu petitioners, including advocates Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain. On that day, a court-ordered survey was conducted at the mosque. A second round of survey was carried out on November 24, after which the matter was placed before the Chandausi civil court. The last hearing was held on April 28. Advocate Sri Gopal Sharma, representing the Hindu side, told PTI that the high court's order rejecting the Muslim side plea was submitted in court as part of the record. On the other hand, advocate Qasim Jamal, representing the Shahi Jama Masjid, acknowledged that the opposing side had submitted the High Court's ruling and said the mosque's legal team would abide by whatever order the court issues. Advocate Babu Lal Saxena, who filed the petition seeking a stay on namaz, told PTI that his client Gupta believes religious activity by any group should be restricted at the disputed site until a final judgment is passed. The case saw violent clashes in Sambhal on November 24, 2024, during the second survey at the mosque site. The unrest led to the deaths of four individuals and injuries to 29 police personnel. Following the violence, police named Samajwadi Party MP Ziaur Rahman Barq and Shahi Jama Masjid president Zafar Ali in FIRs, along with 2,750 unidentified individuals. To date, 96 people including Zafar Ali and several advocates have been sent to jail in connection with the incident.

'Delhi at its tipping point': Ex Delhi chief secretary warns CM Gupta
'Delhi at its tipping point': Ex Delhi chief secretary warns CM Gupta

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Delhi at its tipping point': Ex Delhi chief secretary warns CM Gupta

Former Delhi chief secretary Shailaja Chandra on Thursday urged Chief Minister Rekha Gupta to show political courage and abandon decades of "appeasement politics" in favour of long-term urban planning. In an open letter in The Indian Express, Chandra, who also served as secretary in the Union Health Ministry, congratulated Gupta on assuming charge of what she referred to as "India's most demanding urban assignment". At 81, Chandra said she had no political agenda and was not seeking an advisory role - only a response from the Chief Minister to what she described as a "moment of reckoning". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nhà tiền chế 2025: Lựa chọn nhà ở giá cả phải chăng (Xem ngay) Nomad's Notebook Nhấp vào đây Undo "You can interrupt the decay - or you can inherit its failed logic. Delhi deserves courage, not administrative tinkering," she wrote. Chandra also opined that the chief minister has a rare opportunity to break with the past and outshine even Delhi's most enduring and popular chief minister, the late Sheila Dikshit, especially with the backing of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Minister of Housing and Urban Affairs Manohar Lal Khattar. Live Events In the letter, the former bureaucrat accused successive governments of choosing vote-bank politics over planning, turning Delhi's migrant influx into a " politics of patronage ". She highlighted the violation of planning and environment norms in legitimising temporary shelter through free utilities and retroactive regularisation. "Seven million people live in unauthorised colonies. Effluent from industries using carcinogens is discharged into storm-water drains. The Yamuna is choking. And yet, the politics of appeasement continues," she wrote. Blaming the continued erosion of urban planning on ad hoc policy, judicial verdict reversals, and legislative actions that allowed large-scale encroachment of public and agricultural land, she called for an "end to endless retrofitting". While asking the chief minister to set a limit on further regularisation of illegal colonies and publicly declare that no further encroachments would be legitimised. She suggested using all available enforcement tools with proper coordination with state administrative machinery. Chandra also recommended the creation of "migration-responsive" housing near employment hubs. Further she called for temporary structures for new migrants, and distribution of services based on need, not political convenience.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store