
Federal court blocks Trump's tariffs imposed under emergency powers
US President Trump (Image credits: AP)
A federal court ruled on Wednesday that US President Trump does not have the authority to impose broad tariffs on imports using emergency powers.
The decision, delivered by a three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade in New York, came after several lawsuits argued that Trump exceeded his legal powers and caused economic disruption by using emergency authority to shape US trade policy, reported AP.
Trump had imposed tariffs on most countries, arguing that the US trade deficit constituted a national emergency. He relied on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs, which targeted goods from countries including Canada, China, and Mexico.
His administration claimed the move was necessary to combat illegal immigration and the flow of drugs into the US.
However, the seven lawsuits challenging the tariffs argue that the law does not permit the use of tariffs and that trade deficits do not meet the law's requirement of an "unusual and extraordinary threat."
The US has run a trade deficit for 49 consecutive years.
Trump's administration contends that the courts upheld the then-President Richard Nixon's use of emergency tariffs in 1971 and argues that only Congress, not the courts, has the authority to decide whether a president's emergency declaration meets legal standards.
Trump's tariffs shook global markets and raised concerns about US economic growth, though economists say the overall impact appears to have been limited.
The White House did not comment on the ruling, but the Trump administration is expected to appeal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
36 minutes ago
- The Print
Tharoor disappointed over Columbia's condolences to Pak after Op Sindoor
At a media briefing in this Colombian capital city on Thursday, Tharoor elaborated India's position on terrorism, spoke about Operation Sindoor and expressed disappointment over Colombia's response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Tharoor is leading the delegation to Colombia as part of India's global outreach to expose Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorist activities and India's policy of zero-tolerance for terrorism. Bogota, May 30 (PTI) Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, leading an all-party delegation, has voiced his deep disappointment over Colombia offering condolences for the loss of lives in Pakistan following Indian strikes in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Tharoor 'reaffirmed India's stance on terrorism and expressed disappointment over Colombia's response which has offered condolences for the loss of lives in Pakistan, rather than sympathizing with the victims of terrorism in India,' said BJP parliamentarian Tejasvi Surya. 'There can be no equivalence between those who attack and those who defend,' he said in a social media post. Surya said India, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will continue to deliver strong responses to terrorism. The BJP Lok Sabha MP is part of the nine-member delegation that already travelled to Guyana and Panama before arriving in Colombia on Thursday. Other members of the delegation include Bhubaneswar Kalita (BJP), Milind Deora (Shiv Sena), Shambhavi (LJP), GM Harish Balayogi (TDP) and former ambassador of India to US Taranjit Singh Sandhu. During their stay in Bogota, the delegation will interact with Members of Congress, ministers and other key interlocutors in think tanks. From Columbia, the delegation would travel to Brazil. It will be in the United States in the last leg of its five-nation trip. India carried out precision strikes on nine terror infrastructures early on May 7 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Following the Indian action, Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9 and 10. The Pakistani attempts were strongly responded to by the Indian side by inflicting heavy damages to a number of key Pakistani military installations including air bases, air defence systems, command and control centres and radar sites. PTI NPK ZH MPB ZH ZH This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump says China ‘totally violated' trade agreement: ‘So much for being Mr Nice Guy!'
US President Donald Trump on Friday accused China of violating its tariff deal with them, and added that he would no longer be 'nice' on trade matters, reigniting tensions between the countries. In a post on TruthSocial, Trump said, 'Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World. We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest.' I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us.' Also Read: Donald Trump calls Elon Musk 'terrific', announces joint Oval Office presser on 'last day' 'I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen. Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump added. Trump's accusations come soon after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that trade talks with China were "a bit stalled," in an interview with Fox News. Also Read: Trump administration may add temporary tariffs of up to 15% using existing law: Report US trade representative Jamieson Greer, in a CNBC interview, echoed Trump's allegation, saying that America was concerned with China's purported non-compliance with the tariff deal. "[The US] did exactly what it was supposed to do, and the Chinese are slow rolling their compliance, "said Greer, adding that China's actions needed to be discussed and addressed.


Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BJP leans in as cracks within Congress on Operation Sindoor show
AS THE Congress's internal contradictions over Operation Sindoor and the events after it play out in public, the BJP is framing its response at multiple levels. If Prime Minister Narendra Modi is leading from the front in driving home a message of the success of the operation against Pakistan, BJP spokespersons and leaders are using statements by the Congress to question the party on its 'nationalism'. The third line of BJP response is playing up the intra-Congress differences, particularly over all-party delegations that are part of the government's global outreach on terrorism, of which some Congress leaders too are a crucial part. 'It seemed in the early stages that the Congress was being careful this time, unlike in 2019 (after the Pulwama terror attack). But its leadership has slipped, leaving it open to political attacks. In these moments of national crisis, the Opposition should stand with the national mood, and wait for a better time and issue to attack the government – something the Congress again failed to do,' a BJP leader said on the condition of anonymity. In his speeches since the ceasefire, PM Modi has largely confined himself to how Pakistan had been defeated. His only mention of the Congress was at a speech in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, on May 27, when he claimed that had Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel not been thwarted in 1947-48 when there was an invasion into Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Occupied Kashmir would have been with India. In the same speech, Modi said in a swipe at the Opposition that every bit of the operation was captured on camera this time, 'taaki hamare ghar mein koi saboot na maange (so that no one at home demands proof)'. In other speeches, Modi has used expressions such as 'hot sindoor running through my veins' and warned Pakistan that his 'bullet was ready' in case of any mischief. The reference to 1947-48 marks a gradual increase of stridency since May 12, when in his first address to the nation following the ceasefire, Modi struck a conciliatory note, saying, 'After this terrorist attack, the entire nation, every citizen, every community, every class, every political party, unitedly stood up for strong action against terrorism.' The targeting of the Opposition has largely been left to other BJP leaders, who have pulled no punches against the Congress since it raised questions over the ceasefire, given US President Donald Trump's claims regarding it. The war of words has only intensified since Rahul Gandhi, who had till then largely kept quiet on Operation Sindoor, decided to go after External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, claiming that his statement suggested India had informed Pakistan 'before' it struck its terror bases. Gandhi wanted to know how many Indian aircraft were 'lost' because Pakistan was expecting an attack. Congress spokespersons took their cues from this, repeating the claims, with Jaishankar even being dubbed a 'mukhbir (informer)'. The MEA said Jaishankar's remarks were being 'misinterpreted' by the Congress. The BJP asked whether the Congress was 'with the government' on terrorism, as it said it was, or helping Pakistan by talking of planes being downed. 'When it is clear that Operation Sindoor is still on, no specific iteration of the word 'ceasefire' has been used… during the course of the operation, if you raise questions, this creates a doubt on your intentions,' BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said. Sambit Patra accused Gandhi of 'giving oxygen' to Pakistan, and claimed that Hafiz Saeed, the Lashkar-e-Taiba founder, had once praised the Congress leader. 'Now we all know why.' The best opening to the BJP has been provided by the Congress's Shashi Tharoor problem. Having made it known that the government picked the names of the delegations against its consent, the Congress has been barely able to conceal its exasperation over Tharoor's articulate exposition of the Modi government's anti-terror stand. Its own spokespersons have gone so far as to suggest that Tharoor, the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, is fit to be the BJP's 'super spokesperson'. Turning the knife in, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju said: 'What does the Congress party want & how much do they really care for the country? Should the Indian MPs go to foreign nations and speak against India and its Prime Minister? There's a limit to political desperation!'