Irish woman detained in US after family visit to Ireland due in court
Cliona Ward, the Irish citizen and US green card holder who has been held in an Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centre since returning from a family visit to Ireland, will have a court hearing
in Seattle
on Wednesday morning.
Family members, work colleagues and friends of Ms Ward will gather in solidarity with community and labour allies of hers outside the Northwest Detention Centre in Tacoma, Washington State, before the hearing, which is scheduled for 8.30am local time.
Ms Ward (54) was transferred to the private detention facility after returning to San Francisco following a visit to see her gravely ill father in Cork in April.
She was arrested after reporting, as requested, to an immigration facility with documents proving that records for decades-old drug and motor vehicle convictions had been expunged.
READ MORE
However, she was informed that those expungements, while valid at state level, did not apply at federal level.
Ms Ward moved to California at the age of 12 and has made numerous trips abroad since without any issue.
Providing an update for the case in Washington, DC, on Tuesday afternoon, Democratic congressman for California's 19th district, Jimmy Panetta, revealed Ms Ward's Santa Cruz-based attorney, Michael Mehr, has successfully petitioned the district court to throw the old charges out as his client had not been informed of the consequences in relation to immigration and travel.
'So now the prosecution, or the government's, case against Cliona Ward, really there is nothing to bear,' Mr Panetta said.
'All they were using against her are those three convictions for drug possession that are now no longer applicable. I also want to give credit to district attorney Jeff Rosell, who said: 'we are not going to refile that case', as well.
'So going into tomorrow's hearing, she has been afforded due process so far. She will continue to have due process from the top down and bottom up. Now it is time for the judge there in Seattle to use his or her discretion showing that basically this is the type of Irish immigrant who has been part of our community, has worked hard to contribute to our community and now should stay in our country because of the good things she has done.'
Immediately after Ms Ward's detention, a Gofundme page was established to help with her case by her sister, Orla Holladay, and other family members.
Her family had learned that after her arrest, Ms Ward was flown to Washington State, and had been immediately shackled and led through the airport after alighting the plane.
Her family have described her successful attempt to turn her life around since those convictions. She is now working for a not-for-profit community organisation as well as caring for a son who is dependent on her.
Mr Panetta said that efforts have been made to intercede on her behalf 'from the top down and bottom up'.
'We're banging on the White House, we have been working with them, we are talking with leadership over in Ireland as well. Basically, I have spoken with ICE and the detention lead over there in Seattle.'
The case has been widely publicised as an example of the indiscriminate scrutiny applied at federal level for prior drugs convictions.
Ms Ward's hearing comes up in the midst of the intense scrutiny on the new severity of the immigration and deportation enforcements under the
Trump administration
.
Ms Ward will be represented by attorney Erin T Hall, of the Global Justice Law Group, a consortium of legal professionals that helps immigrants through legal cases.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Appeals court allows Trump to keep National Guard in Los Angeles
A US appeals court on Thursday allowed president Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation. The Ninth US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Mr Trump, but it does leave command of the National Guard with the president for now. Earlier on Thursday, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found that Mr Trump's deployment of the National Guard was unlawful. Mr Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case. It was a short-lived victory for Mr Newsom, as judge Breyer's order was paused about two and a half hours later. READ MORE Asked for a comment, Mr Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it. 'I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand,' Mr Newsom said of the district judge's order. The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Mr Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of judge Breyer's order. The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block judge Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues. Mr Trump summoned the National Guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the US Marines to support the National Guard. A battalion of 700 US Marines is expected to arrive on Friday, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the United States. The troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks. The National Guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents on operations to detain immigrants. In his ruling, judge Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters – a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others – and depriving the state of the ability to use the National Guard for other purposes. Ms Bass on Thursday called on Ice officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets. 'The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids,' Ms Bass told a press conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of 'Stop the raids'. 'Peace begins with Ice leaving Los Angeles,' said Bass, who has imposed a night-time curfew more than 2.5 sq km of downtown Los Angeles. Ms Bass spoke after department of homeland securitysSecretary Kristi Noem said she would 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarisation generated by Mr Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power. Mr Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Mr Trump's authoritarianism. Americans are divided over Mr Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48 per cent of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets' when protests turned violent, while 41 per cent disagreed. Between the rulings, Mr Newsom said the National Guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling judge Breyer's ruling 'an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief.' Mr Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion,' but judge Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' judge Breyer wrote. Mr Trump has said if he had not ordered in the National Guard the city would be in flames. – Reuters
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump says he may ‘have to force' US interest rate change in attack on Jay Powell
Donald Trump has called Federal Reserve chairman Jay Powell a 'numbskull' for not cutting interest rates , saying the White House may 'have to force something' if the US central bank does not reduce borrowing costs. The president on Thursday repeated his calls for the Fed to cut borrowing costs by a full percentage point – a measure Trump said would save the US hundreds of billions of dollars a year on its debt. 'We are going to spend $600 billion (€520 billion) a year because of one numbskull that sits there, [saying] 'I don't see enough reason to cut the rates',' Mr Trump told reporters, referring to Mr Powell, who he has nicknamed 'too late'. The president added: 'I may have to force something.' Mr Trump did not specify what he meant by force – and said he would not fire the Fed chairman ahead of the end of his term in May 2026. READ MORE The president's comments came less than a week before the central bank's June meeting, in which policymakers are expected to hold rates steady. The Fed has this year halted a rate-cutting cycle that began in 2024 over concerns that Trump's trade tariffs could fuel a fresh bout of inflation. At 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent, the Fed's benchmark target range is more than double the main European Central Bank interest rate, following several moves by euro zone rate-setters this year. Mr Powell has repeatedly said the Fed will set rates based on data, rather than Mr Trump's wishes for lower borrowing costs, including at a meeting late last month that was held at the president's request. Mr Trump's repeated attacks on Mr Powell over his reluctance to cut rates this year have sparked speculation that he could speed up the nomination process for Mr Powell's successor. Remarks last Friday from Mr Trump that he could make a decision on a potential successor 'very soon' have led to speculation among some economists that he could nominate a 'shadow Fed chair' in a bid to massage expectations of future rate cuts once his preferred candidate takes charge of the central bank. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, who is seen as one of the leading candidates to replace Mr Powell, proposed the idea of creating a shadow Fed chief in an interview in October. Stanford academic and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, National Economic Council head Kevin Hassett and current Fed governor Christopher Waller are also considered potential candidates for the job. The 'shadow' role could, in theory, move expectations of where interest rates will be years from now, which would – if credible – lead to immediate movements in US borrowing costs. However, Fed-watchers are sceptical on whether a shadow Fed chairman could influence expectations of future rate cuts in an environment of heightened economic uncertainty. 'Markets are not going to defer to an individual who is not yet confirmed as a member of the Fed board, much less the chair,' said Doug Rediker, managing partner at International Capital Strategies. 'If you want to make sure you are upending investor confidence in an already tense treasury market, then make sure you have competing voices on what the Fed is going to do.' He added: 'The earlier Trump names someone, the more opportunity he or she has to say or do something that puts a bullseye on their head and for people to find reasons to oppose them.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump defends deployment of Marines to LA amid immigration protests
Hundreds of US Marines arrived in the Los Angeles area on Tuesday under orders from US president Donald Trump , who defended the deployment as he sought to quell protests in the city despite objections from California governor Gavin Newsom and other local leaders. The president has also activated 4,000 National Guard troops. The city has seen days of public protests since the Trump administration launched a series of immigration raids on Friday. State officials said Mr Trump's response was an overreaction to mostly peaceful demonstrations. About 700 Marines were in a staging area awaiting deployment to specific locations, a US official said. READ MORE The Marines do not have arrest authority and will protect federal property and personnel, according to military officials. There were approximately 2,100 National Guard troops in greater Los Angeles on Tuesday, with more on the way, the official said. [ Explainer: is it legal for Trump to use US troops to suppress protests? Opens in new window ] A plywood door is installed outside a damaged pharmacy in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday. Photograph: Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP via Getty Images [ Analysis: Trump tests limits of presidential authority Opens in new window ] [ Trump's US travel ban on citizens from 12 countries comes into effect Opens in new window ] Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said more than 100 people had been arrested on Monday but that the majority of protesters were non-violent. Mr Trump has justified his decision to deploy active military troops to Los Angeles by describing the protests as a violent occupation, a characterisation that Mr Newsom and Ms Bass have said is grossly exaggerated. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday, the president said Los Angeles would be 'burning right now' if not for the deployments, and that National Guard troops would remain until there is no danger. Mr Trump also left open the possibility of invoking the centuries-old Insurrection Act, which would allow the military to take part directly in civilian law enforcement, saying one could argue that parts of the city were already seeing an insurrection. Mr Newsom accused Trump of sending troops to deliberately inflame the situation for political reasons. 'It's a blatant abuse of power,' the governor wrote on X. Police advance on protesters who had shut down Highway 101 in Los Angeles on Sunday, June 8th, 2025. Photograph: Philip Cheung/New York Times Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi had just delivered a piece to camera on the LA riots when a police officer shot her with a rubber bullet. Video: Reuters The protests since Friday have been largely peaceful and mostly concentrated in downtown Los Angeles. But there have been clashes, with some demonstrators throwing rocks and other objects at officers, blocking an interstate highway and setting cars ablaze. Mr Trump's Marine deployment escalated his confrontation with Mr Newsom, who filed a lawsuit on Monday asserting that Mr Trump's activation of National Guard troops without the governor's consent was illegal. The deployment was the first time in decades that a president did so without a request from a sitting governor. The use of active military to respond to civil disturbances is extremely rare. The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, senator Jack Reed, said he was 'gravely troubled' by Mr Trump's deployment of active-duty Marines. 'Since our nation's founding, the American people have been perfectly clear: we do not want the military conducting law enforcement on US soil,' he said. US Marines are trained for conflicts around the world – from the Middle East to Africa – and are also used for rapid deployments in case of emergencies, such as threats to US embassies. The raids are part of Mr Trump's sweeping immigration crackdown, which Democrats and immigrant advocates have said are indiscriminately breaking up families. US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem pledged on Monday to carry out more operations to round up suspected immigration violators. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on Monday outside a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where immigrants have been held, chanting 'free them all' and waving Mexican and Central American flags. National Guard forces formed a human barricade to keep people out of the building. Police dispersed the crowd using gas canisters and arrested some protesters. At dusk, officers had running confrontations with protesters who had scattered into the Little Tokyo section of the city. Protests also sprang up in at least nine other US cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to local news reports. In Austin, Texas, police fired less-lethal munitions and detained several people as they clashed with a crowd of several hundred protesters. – Reuters Tear gas fills Los Angeles streets as protesters clash with police after a raid was conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Video: Reuters
