Are there enough places for you to play outdoors?
What is the report calling for?
The report is asking the government to improve access to activities outside of school. Their recommendations to the government include: A national ban on "no ball games" signs Updating planning policy so developers have to get views from kids on any new developments like new parksProtecting play at break time and lunch time at school and banning teachers being able to take play time away as a punishmentOpening up school playgrounds to the whole community outside of school hoursRaise the digital age of consent to 16 and ban phones in schools
According to the report, there are more than 7,000 signs in London stopping more than half a million children from playing freely. It's already a legal requirement for local authorities to make sure there are enough opportunities for children to play in Scotland and Wales.And the Northern Ireland Executive has also put a focus on play in their Children's and Young People's Strategy 2020-2023. This explored children's opportunities to play in Northern Ireland.Currently, children in England don't have the legal right to play.Chair of the commission, Paul Lindley, says in England "we've made it incredibly hard for children to play"."We need to give our children back the time, space, opportunity, freedom - and the right - to play again."
What has the government said?
A government spokesperson said its Plan for Change was "setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom", and that it is investing in grassroots sports facilities and in a programme to help turn "grey school spaces green".They added: "We recognise the vital importance of play and access to nature as part of children's development and wellbeing as we strive to create the healthiest and happiest generation of children ever."Schools already have the power to completely ban phones in the classroom and the overwhelming majority - 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools - limit or restrict use."And from July, new rules under the Online Safety Act will require social media platforms to protect children in the UK from seeing harmful content online."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
22 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Quiz candidates on user road charges: Michael Enea
Here is one crucial question I would ask all the prospective candidates. Will your political party categorically rule-out a motorway toll or "road user charge" on the M4 around Newport? Why ask this question you may say? After the M4 Relief Road was sensationally scrapped by Mark Drakeford in June 2019, a commission was set-up to look at so-called "alternatives" to tackle the traffic congestion on the motorway around Newport. This commission was chaired by Lord Burns. Section 239 of the final Burns Report stated: 'We are in favour of a comprehensive UK wide pay-per-mile road user charge.' The report continued: 'This could be within 10 to 15 years given the projected trajectory for the decline of traditional motoring tax revenues.' The report also stated: 'We recommend future policy decisions on road user charging in south east Wales reflect our findings, in particular - the case for higher charges in peak times and in places with the worst congestion air quality.' Can it get any worse? The report went on to say: 'We would support local authorities taking earlier steps to implement local charging schemes to address congestion, improve environment outcomes, or raise revenue to invest in public transport schemes.' You may say I'm scaremongering? Well, why not read the Welsh Government's own National Transport Delivery Plan. Section 3.3.3 states: 'We will also motivate people to move away from private car use. The Wales Transport Strategy includes a commitment to develop a national road user charging framework.' So in their own words, they are "committed" to developing road user charges. In November 2023, the Welsh Senedd then passed the Environment (Air Quality and Soundscapes) Act 2024. This gives ministers the power to introduce Clean Air Zones (CAZs) on trunk roads to tackle air pollution hotspots. Could the floodgates now open over the next decade? Well, Cardiff Council has already given serious consideration to the installation of a congestion charge or road user scheme for its city centre. Luckily, after strong opposition, it has since backed away from idea (for now). So will Newport City Council follow Cardiff's lead and look to introduce a "congestion charge" for its city centre? Thankfully, the answer is no. But what of the M4 around Newport? Now that's an entirely different question. It's a valid question you should seriously ask every Senedd candidate when they turn-up on your doorstep pitching for your vote. Can you imagine the utter carnage and chaos on Newport's side-streets and A-roads should a "road user charge" be introduced on the M4? Michael Enea is a Conservative campaigner and blogger
Scotsman
23 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Fishing leaders call for immediate halt to wind farm expansion ‘stampede'
Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a "stampede" and a "gamble" as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents | PA Industry demands no more offshore consents and an end to 'gamble' on renewable energy expansion Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a 'stampede' and a 'gamble' as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents. The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) said Scottish Government plans to install up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040 are 'far too high'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It said achieving the target will cause irreversible damage to the marine environment and displace fishing fleets from grounds they have worked for generations. Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a "stampede" and a "gamble" as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents | PA The call is included in the SFF's official responses to two major Government consultations, the updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement and the draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy. The Government outlines that offshore wind could ensure Scotland meets its net zero target by 2030 and provide scores of green jobs as part of the just transition away from dependence on oil and gas. Last month, First Minister John Swinney visited Scotland's newest wind farm – Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) off the coast of Fife. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During his visit he said offshore wind is 'one of Scotland's greatest modern success stories'. He said: 'Driving economic growth and tackling the climate emergency are two of my Government's priorities, and NnG is a shining example of how these priorities can work hand-in-hand to reshape Scotland's future for the better.' The UK Government has also expressed support for the expansion of Scotland's wind farms. It announced in March that the Port of Cromarty Firth in the Highlands will be a major hub for the UK's world-leading floating offshore wind industry, and it awarded more than £55 million for its expansion. 'Slam on the brakes' Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the SFF – which is Scotland's biggest fishing industry body – said: 'This isn't a plan – it's a stampede. The Government is charging ahead without the faintest idea how to protect the people and places that will be trampled in the rush. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've been telling them for years these plans will seriously damage our industry, but they haven't listened. Now their own assessments show the harm that will be done to fishing, and the environment on which it depends. 'Until they can prove our industry and our seas will be safeguarded, the only responsible choice is to slam on the brakes.' The SFF said current mitigation measures are almost non-existent and there is no credible plan to compensate fishing businesses for the losses they will face. It also says the Government's updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement published in June made repeated references to economic benefits but failed to mention the climate crisis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Macdonald added: 'Fishing is one of Scotland's original green industries. The Scottish fleet has been putting healthy, renewable and sustainable food on plates for generations. 'But we're being shoved aside for projects that feel like a last gamble for a Government to revive an ailing Scottish economy.' Fishing leaders say the cumulative impact of existing and emerging marine conservation policies, renewable energy projects alongside fishing being expected to offset environmental impacts of offshore wind developments, is leaving the industry at 'breaking point'. Environmental damage Ms Macdonald said: 'The Scottish Government's approach is picking winners and losers, and fishing seems to lose every time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We need ministers to step up and support our industry with positive action. 'Renewable food cannot be the price to be paid for renewable energy. Betting the house – and Scotland's fishing industry – on offshore wind that is far from 'clean' and where all the evidence points to both known and not yet fully known environmental damage is a very high-risk strategy.' Shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie said: 'Scotland's fishing industry has been let down by the SNP government for too long. They must finally listen to these legitimate concerns from the Scottish Fishermen's Federation about the impact future offshore wind could have on Scottish fishing activities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Fishermen are already being hit by damaging SNP policies and the threat of Labour's sell-out to the EU as part of their trade deal looms large. They are understandably sick and tired of both SNP and Labour politicians ignoring their interests. 'Ministers must engage with these concerns to guarantee the industry is not damaged by their plans and offshore developments must always be done in ways that minimise the harm to the sector.'
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Dozens more Afghan relocation data breaches uncovered by BBC
The Ministry of Defence has admitted there have been 49 separate data breaches in the past four years at the unit handling relocation applications from Afghans seeking safety in the out of the 49 breaches were already publicly known - including the leak in 2022 of a spreadsheet containing details of almost 19,000 people fleeing the mammoth data breach, which led to thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK, was only revealed last month after the High Court lifted a gagging was described by the UK's information watchdog as a "one-off occurrence following a failure to [follow] usual checks, rather than reflecting a wider culture of non-compliance". However, lawyers representing Afghans affected by data breaches said the new figures, released to the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act, raised concerns about a culture of lax security among those working on the resettlement MoD has refused to provide any details of the nature of each breach but incidents which have previously been made public include officials inadvertently revealing the email addresses or other personal details of applicants to third Malik, Head of Data Protection at Barings Law which represents hundreds of Afghans affected by the biggest of the breaches in February 2022, said: "What began as an isolated incident, which the Ministry of Defence initially sought to keep from public view, has now escalated into a series of catastrophic failings."We urge the Ministry of Defence to be fully transparent with both those affected and the wider public. Victims should not be forced to learn the truth through legal action or news reports."The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) was set up in April 2021 to help people who feared their lives were at risk because they had worked with British armed forces in Afghanistan and to resettle eligible applicants and their family members in the UK. It was closed in July this scheme has been dogged by revelations about poor data security, potentially putting the lives of Afghans who worked with British forces at risk. In September 2021, BBC News revealed that more than 250 Afghans seeking relocation to the UK were mistakenly copied into an email from the Ministry of Defence, putting them at risk of reprisals.A total of 265 email addresses were shared in this way across three separate incidents that month, which ultimately led to a £350,000 fine from the breaches were "intensely difficult and embarrassing for the government handling publicly", one defence source Wallace, the then-defence secretary, expressed his personal anger at what had occurred, telling MPs: "I am very keen that it is not just the poor person who drafts the email who is held to account, but the chain upwards, to ensure that this does not happen again."Two months after the incidents, in November 2021, the then Conservative government announced "significant remedial actions", including new data handling procedures and training as well as a new "two pairs of eyes rule" requiring any external email to an ARAP-eligible Afghan national be reviewed by a second member of staff before being government said the measures were taken to "prevent such incidents occurring again".Instead, data breaches continued including, in February 2022, a potentially catastrophic leak which saw a soldier at Regent's Park barracks send a spreadsheet with what they believed to be a small number of applicants' names to trusted Afghan did not realise that hidden data in the spreadsheet in fact contained the names, contact details and some information about family members and associates for nearly 19,000 the leak was discovered some 18 months later, in August 2023, the then-Conservative government sought a gagging order to prevent details of the error being made public. The government successfully argued that lives were at risk and the Taliban would be alerted if an injunction wasn't super injunction which was imposed was not lifted until July this Baines, a senior data protection specialist at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, said the new figures uncovered by the BBC show a "remarkable number of data security incidents in relation to the ARAP scheme"."It is difficult to think of any information more sensitive than that which is involved with the scheme, and it baffles me why there were not better security measures in place," he added. Seven of the 49 data breaches were sufficiently serious to require MoD officials to notify data watchdog the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).This includes three breaches - one in 2021, and two in 2022 - that have not been made public ICO said it was limited in the amount of information it still held on those breaches and why it didn't take further action but that its work with the MoD was "ongoing"."We continue to engage with the MoD, so we can be assured that they have made the required improvements," a spokeswoman watchdog has not taken any action against the MoD over the large spreadsheet data breach which was previously subject to court-imposed reporting restrictions, arguing "there was little we could add in this case that would justify the further allocation of resource away from other priorities".Jon Baines said there were "serious questions firstly as to whether the ICO should have conducted more in-depth investigations previously, and secondly, whether there is now an urgent need for more investigation."What assurance can we all have now that the MoD are properly protecting the highly sensitive personal data it is often entrusted with?", he added.A Labour government source blamed previous Conservative administrations for inadequate data protection measures and said new software has been introduced and other changes made since Labour came to power last year."Current ministers repeatedly highlighted the Tory mismanagement of data around the ARAP scheme while in opposition," the source said."Since last July, we've brought in a host of new measures to improve data security and we've made public the largest Afghan data breach which occurred under the previous government, to allow for parliamentary scrutiny and accountability."A Conservative Party spokesman said: "This data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of data protection secretary of state for defence has issued an apology on behalf of the government, and Conservatives joined in that apology."When this breach came to light, the immediate priority of the then-government was to protect persons in the dataset."An MoD spokesperson said: "We take data security extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that any incidents are dealt with properly, and that we follow our legal duties."All incidents that meet the threshold under UK data protection laws are referred to the Information Commissioner's Office, and any lesser incidents are examined internally to ensure lessons are learned."If you have any information on stories you would like to share with the BBC Politics Investigations team, please get in touch at politicsinvestigations@ Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
