
Can Jadeja reduce pace of his deliveries in English conditions to remain effective?
The fifth day of the opening Test saw unhinged Ben Duckett reverse sweep Jadeja out of the match in a chase of 371. He could not turn the ball from the rough created outside the left-hander's off-stump by the Indian pacers.
As India team is pondering over best combination, question arises if Jadeja will play at Edgbaston after a match-haul of 1/172 in 47 overs across both innings. He managed 1/102 in 24 overs on the fifth day track.
If India are without Jasprit Bumrah, then logically, they shouldn't be playing two finger spinners in Jadeja and Washington Sundar. In that case Kuldeep Yadav and Washington (whose batting skills match Jadeja's) can play as it would be difficult to stop rampaging English batters on a good batting surface.
If one takes a cursory look at Jadeja's track record in Test matches in England, it is pretty deflating. 28 wickets in 13 Tests and not a single five-wicket haul. His strike-rate is a dismal 102.6 which is more than 17 overs for one wicket.
So what ails Jadeja on technical front?
In the second innings, Ducket attempted more than 30 reverse sweeps with fair degree of success and it can be attributed to the natural speed of Jadeja's deliveries.
If one looks at classical left-arm Test spinners from India - from legendary Bishan Singh Bedi to the talented duo of Maninder Singh and Murali Kartik, all of them gave more revolutions to the ball and imparted a lot of side-spin while bowling in in England or while playing in English County cricket or league cricket.
In case of Jadeja his natural speed while landing the ball on the rough is becoming a problem, feels a lot of analysts.
"If a batter is intent on playing reverse sweep, he always likes pace on the deliveries. It then becomes easy to execute when those deliveries land on the rough outside the left-handed batter's off-stump," a former left-arm spinner, who has extensive knowledge of English conditions but did not wish to be named, told PTI.
"If you observe minutely, deliveries bowled with a certain speed on the rough won't turn. That was specifically what happened with Jadeja. He never reduced the pace on deliveries."
Why Bishan Bedi or even Maninder Singh were successful at Leeds on the 1986 tour? Maninder had figures of 4/26 in little over 16 overs on a damp fourth morning.
The reason was that their natural speed was on the slower side.
That allowed them to put more revs on the ball, keep it hanging in the air to create deception. To execute reverse sweep, the batter had to fetch the ball. If the pace is slow, the ball will jump and turn after hitting the rough, denying the batter any chance to use the pace.
In case of Jadeja, the problem is his muscle memory. He is so used to hitting the same area with more or less identical speeds, slowing it down considerably can lead to losing the length and bowling for hittable balls.
His arm speed needs to remain same as slowing the arm speed will also lead to slower release which isn't permissable.
On rank turners, a bowler just need to land the ball in one spot on the stump channel and let the pitch do the rest. Even Jadeja won't be able to tell which ball would come in with angle, and which one would turn away (from right handers) and which one would go straight.
During the 2013 Australia series then skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni wanted spinners to take lead from first hour. The whole pitch, not just sides becomes scuffed up and Jadeja became unplayable.
But in England, one needs to extract turn and not have set plans as conditions change so rapidly over five days.
Edgbaston will be a different challenge and Jadeja knows it too well as in 2022, Jonny Bairstow and Joe Root flayed him in the second innings where he went for 62 in 18.4 wicket-less overs.
Edgbaston is primarily a good batting strip and this is one ground where the team management might think twice before playing Jadeja. Lord's brings with itself, a different set of challenges due to the famous slope on the Nursery end.
Left-arm spinners can historically face challenges while bowling up slope and have problems with landing.
Someone as crafty as Murali Kartik played three seasons for Middlesex and whenever he played Championship matches (red ball), he would prefer bowling from the Nursery End.
The best surface for Jadeja in the series could be Manchester where the surface on fourth and fifth day could aid spin at a higher pace.
Jadeja's sound batting still makes him a sought after all-rounder but his bowling has to come through in remaining games.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
Ben Stokes Labelled 'Spoilt Kid', Brutally Criticised For Bowling Harry Brook After 'Handshake' Row
Former England captain Nasser Hussain termed Ben Stokes' decision to bring Harry Brook into the attack after India declined his offer to end the fourth Test early as 'silly', stating that Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar fully deserved their centuries. Jadeja and Washington were batting on 89 and 80 respectively before the start of the last hour of play when England skipper Ben Stokes, aware that a result was out of reach, offered to shake hands. However, with milestones around the corner, the Indian batters refused, which didn't amuse Stokes, who then introduced Brook into the attack to bowl some deliberate full-tosses, allowing both to complete their well-deserved tons. "I didn't have a problem with it. England seemed to have a problem with it. They were a bit tired, tired bowlers so they wanted to get off but two lads worked hard to get to 80s and 90s and they wanted to get Test match hundreds," Hussain said on 'Sky Sports'. "Stokes didn't have to bowl Brook and look silly at the end. We make far too much of these things. They played well and all credit to India," Hussain said. When Cheteshwar Pujara asked the same question to Washington Sundar, he sidestepped the issue. "I think everyone saw on TV what happened and they all must have enjoyed it," Washington said on JioHotstar. Former India batter Sanjay Manjrekar felt that Indian batters were well within their rights to continue unless there was an agreement prior that match will be called off before start of last hour of play. "I think Ben Stokes in the end behaved like a spoilt kid," Manjrekar said on 'JioHotstar'. "I would like to see what England would have done if two of their batsmen were nearing Test hundreds?"


NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
Sourav Ganguly Gives Clear Verdict On India-Pakistan Clash In Asia Cup 2025: "Can't Let..."
Former India captain Sourav Ganguly on Sunday said he has no issues with India being placed in the same group as Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup, asserting that while terrorism must end, sport must continue. As per the schedule, arch-rivals India and Pakistan are clubbed in Group A and are set to face off at the Dubai International Stadium on September 14. "I'm okay with the schedule. Sport must continue. What happened in Pahalgam should never happen, but we can't let that stop the game. Terrorism must end. India has taken a firm stand against it, it's in the past now. Sport must go on," Ganguly told PTI. The T20 tournament will be held in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from September 9 to 28. India will begin their campaign against UAE on September 10 and are expected to play all their matches in Dubai. India and Pakistan could also meet again in the Super Four stage on September 21. Group A comprises India, Pakistan, UAE and Oman, while Group B includes Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Hong Kong. #WATCH | Kolkata: On India-Pakistan placed in the same group in the Asia Cup, former Indian cricketer Saurav Ganguly says, "I am okay. The sport must go on. At the same time Pahalgam should not happen, but the sport must go on. Terrorism must not happen; it needs to be stopped.… — ANI (@ANI) July 27, 2025 The Asian Cricket Council (ACC) will allow 17-member squads for the 19-match tournament, with matches scheduled in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. While the BCCI is the official host, the tournament is being held in the UAE as India and Pakistan have agreed to play only at neutral venues till 2027 due to ongoing cross-border tensions. The two countries had come close to the brink of war following the Pahalgam attack, to which India responded with Operation Sindoor.


NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Would England Have Walked Off...": Gautam Gambhir's Blunt Take On 'Handshake' Row
Indian cricket team head coach Gautam Gambhir gave his blunt verdict on the 'handshake' controversy on Day 5 of the fourth Test match between India and England at Old Trafford on Sunday. England skipper Ben Stokes offered to end the match in a draw with 15 overs left on Day 5. However, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar were close to their centuries and India decided to not accept the 'handshake' at that moment. Stokes was not happy but play continued and both Jadeja as well as Sundar was able to slam centuries. Gambhir completely supported the decision to not take the draw at the point and questioned whether England would have left the field if their players were on verge of hundreds. 'If someone's batting on 90 and another on 85, don't they deserve their centuries? Would England have walked off if their own players were close to milestones? No. Our boys weathered the storm. They earned those tons. We're not here to please anyone,' Gambhir said at the post-match press conference. Meanwhile, Gill lauded the batting effort of his side after salvaging a draw in the fourth Test against England and backed the decision to not accept Ben Stokes' offer to end the game early, saying Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar deserved to complete their centuries. India, who started their second innings 311 runs behind, produced a spirited batting display to finish on 425 for four in 143 overs, with Gill (103), KL Rahul (90), Jadeja (107 not out) and Washington (101 not out) leading the resistance. There was a brief moment of drama in the final hour when England skipper Stokes proposed ending the contest early, with both Indian batters approaching individual milestones. But the offer was turned down, allowing Jadeja and Washington to reach their hundreds. 'Definitely it was up to the boys, but we thought they batted brilliantly. Both of them were in their 90s, so we thought they deserved a century,' Gill said at the post-match presentation. India were reduced to 0 for two early in their second innings after openers Yashasvi Jaiswal and Sai Sudharsan fell without scoring, but the middle-order stood firm under pressure. "With our batting effort, the past couple of days I think we were put under a lot of pressure. But I think the way we responded, especially after losing those two early wickets, never easy but a very brave effort," Gill said. "It's all about taking the wicket out of the equation. Day five wicket, the ball is doing, something is happening, every ball is kind of an event. So you just want to play ball by ball and want to take the game as deep as possible."