
Silicon Valley Is Nearing A Breaking Point
The current mood in Silicon Valley seems to be dominated by this sentiment, originally popularized by Facebook. And for many leaders in the tech center of the universe, Silicon Valley, it has spread beyond just information technology innovation and into a sense of how to reinvent all walks of life, all industries, and even politics.
For many of the giants in today's tech and innovation sector, technology is by itself the solution to everything. It is Schumpeterian thinking dialed up to eleven. It is quasi-religious, in that there is a sense that a great technology flood will wash over the economy and society and wash clean the ills, leaving behind efficient, reinvented new industries, regulations (if even needed at all) and personal behavior.
Some of this is a byproduct of ideology and an independent streak – an understandable frustration that today's systems are antiquated and in many cases broken, giving the idea of starting from scratch a romantic appeal. These are brilliant people who think big and so aren't tethered to old 'this is how it's done because this is how it's always been done' thinking.
Some of this is a byproduct of naivety and not ideology – I once sat in a meeting while a very successful individual from Silicon Valley lamented how hard it was to change Sacramento… and concluded that his next step was therefore to go fix Washington, DC. Because of course changing Washington DC would be easier than changing a state government. Sure.
This combination of ideology and naivety has recently impacted how some of the most powerful in Silicon Valley view the climate change challenge, among other 'non-tech' issues. For some of these titans, there is a sense that the people most in need of innovative solutions around issues like climate have rejected them personally, so the heck with those issues, no need to care about all that fluffery anymore. For others, there is a sense that what is needed isn't to try to improve the current infrastructure over time, but simply to effectively start over. For example: Working with today's utilities on energy efficiency is a waste of time, go invent commercially-viable fusion-based nuclear power and the rest (ie, who will finance those plants, who will build those plants, who will maintain those plants, who will distribute the power from those plants) will simply sort itself out. These sentiments may seem in opposition to each other, but in reality they are simply two sides of the same techno-superiority coin.
So, moving fast and breaking things (either ignoring petty issues like a rapidly degrading global climate or undermined political-economic foundations, or assuming they'll be addressed by unnamed others because, you know, 'Innovation') is pretty much how many of the leaders in Silicon Valley are setting their agendas these days.
But here's the thing – they would never think to do this with data center construction. Nor with IT networks or microchips or any of the other hardware and infrastructure that they know they fully depend upon for their own innovations to work.
These giants of the tech industry know full well that they can't 'move fast and break things' when it comes to building out and maintaining the infrastructure that is core to their own operations. They employ huge teams of project developers who are tasked with definitely not being sloppy and letting things break. They pay for the careful maintenance of decades-old communications infrastructure. Unlike fuzzy concepts like climate change and politics, these are very concrete systems that must be built the right way, not just assumed to be built by someone else unnamed, and (of course!) incorporating a lot of 'old tech' alongside innovations rather than replacing it. This infrastructure is very real to these tech leaders, and thus given the respect and investment it deserves.
As a rapidly degrading global climate and increasingly undermined political-economic foundations come to the fore, they will also start to become very real to these same leaders. Natural disasters are already affecting the tech sector's customers, workforces, and infrastructure. Political-economic uncertainty will begin impacting revenues and costs (see Exhibit A: Tariff uncertainty, and Exhibit B: Unforecasted and significant costs recently incurred by various universities, law firms and media companies – will the tech industry be next?). As these risks start to directly impact the day to day business of these tech leaders, they will no longer be able to consider them some distant concepts to be treated academically. They will have to invest into clean energy, climate adaptation and resiliency, clean water, and stable politics. Or their companies, industries and personal wealth will suddenly start to directly suffer the consequences.
The good news is that Silicon Valley has a long and proven history of building great infrastructure. When push comes to shove, 'move fast and break things' quickly gets put aside in favor of professional, thorough, critical infrastructure investments.
All that needs to happen is for their definition of 'critical infrastructure' to be broadened to include the planet they live on and the social and economic foundations that they depend upon.
Silicon Valley may soon be at this breaking point, if not already there. Not abandoning techno-centric viewpoints and big bold ideas. Just no longer naively leaving these other crucial underpinnings like the environment, the economy and society to someone else to deal with.
And when that happens, when the technology Great Flood assumption is abandoned and these brilliant minds are put to work actually pragmatically addressing this 'infrastructure' broadly defined… we will see an amazing resurgence of actual investments and scalable solutions for these mounting challenges. The innovative power of Silicon Valley is one of the most powerful forces humanity has ever built, and harnessed correctly accomplishes amazing things.
Just as when a fever breaks, when Silicon Valley finally reaches this breaking point it will be a very good thing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Why the market is shrugging off Trump's firing of the BLS chief
Trump fired the head of the BLS on Friday, but so far, markets have looked past the shock decision. Sources say there are a variety of other sources investors can use to assess the employment picture. Strong earnings and higher rate-cut odds are powering stocks higher on Monday. August kicked off with a shocker, with Donald Trump firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after a less-than-rosy July employment report. The move sparked prognostications about untrustworthy government data going forward and comparisons to China, which some believe is uninvestable due to issues with data quality. Then why is the market unfazed as trading kicks off on Monday? Stocks rallied to start the week, with the Dow up almost 500 points at midday and the Nasdaq Composite jumping as much as 2%. For now, markets are focused on other things, like the higher odds of a September rate cut after the employment picture suddenly soured. "Obviously, the firing was unconventional. That's pretty much everything with this administration compared to previous administrations, but at this point, there is so much private data that the market can look at other sources," Paul Hickey, cofounder of Bespoke Investment Group, told Business Insider. Apart from the BLS statistics that investors already parse, there's a patchwork of private and public data, including ADP data, hiring and firing data from a range of consulting firms, and labor market sentiment indicators from sources like the Conference Board. "There are private sources of data, and if they are moving in the opposite direction from the government data, then it becomes an indicator that something is off with the statistics,"Aleksandar Tomic, Associate Dean, Strategy, Innovation, & Technology at Boston College, told Business Insider. Trump said Erika McEntarfer's firing was justified and that the July data had been manipulated to make the administration look bad. He did not offer evidence for this claim, though White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said the revisions in the data are "hard evidence." The July revisions were substantial, showing that the US added nearly 260,000 fewer jobs in May and June than had been initially reported. Trump and Republicans have also criticized earlier revisions, including last year's that showed over 800,000 fewer jobs added in the 12 months leading up to March 2024. The irony of Trump's anger over the July jobs numbers is that the weak report has pushed up the odds of the September rate cut to nearly 90%, getting the president closer to seeing the Fed loosen monetary policy as he's been demanding all year. But for investors, things like the robust GDP report for the second quarter and solid corporate earnings, particularly among mega-cap tech giants, are boosting the outlook for the market even as Trump's move stirs some uncertainty. For Sergio Altomare, a former senior enterprise architect at the Fed, the next big question is who will replace McEntarfer at the helm of the BLS. "I think the ultimate impact is going to take time to sort itself out, but I think really the immediate thing is, who gets appointed? What is their background? What does the data show? Is it dramatically different from what we're seeing?" Altomare said that it will be difficult to properly assess the impact of Trump's decision on financial markets until these questions have clear answers. Luckily for markets, some answers could come soon. Trump has said that in the coming days, he'll nominate a new BLS chief, as well as a replacement for Fed Gov. Adriana Kugler, who resigned on Friday. Both positions require confirmation by the Senate. It is also worth noting that some agree with the president's decision. For his part, investing legend Ray Dalio said on Monday that he, too, would probably fire the BLS chief. In a post on X, he described the agency's process for making key economic estimates as "obsolete and error-prone," with no plan to fix it. "The revisions brought the numbers toward private estimates that were in fact much better," Dalio said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Singapore tackles tariffs with bold economic strategy review; Pritam reflects on WP's GE2025 near misses: Singapore live news
Singapore has launched a forward-looking Economic Strategy Review (ESR) to navigate rising global uncertainties, including US-imposed tariffs and technological disruption. Spearheaded by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, the ESR will be driven by five new committees focused on global competitiveness, technology and innovation, entrepreneurship, human capital and economic restructuring. Each committee is co-chaired by political leaders and includes stakeholders from the private sector and unions. The review aims to build on existing strategies while embracing new approaches, especially in areas like AI and workforce transformation. Singapore's baseline tariff with the US now stands at 10 per cent, with further levies expected. The committees will engage widely and publish a final report by mid-2026. The ESR signals Singapore's commitment to staying agile, competitive and resilient. Workers' Party (WP) leader Pritam Singh opened up about the 2025 General Election (GE2025) in a candid radio interview, revealing that the party had hoped to win one or two new constituencies. Despite retaining its strongholds, WP fell short in areas like Punggol and Tampines. Pritam blamed boundary changes for forcing a strategic pivot, including the decision not to contest Marine Parade GRC. That move led to a walkover win for the PAP and criticism from other opposition parties. Pritam praised WP's candidates for their courage and commitment, especially the 14 newcomers. He emphasised the importance of long-term planning over short-term gains. Pritam says WP may not have tipped new seats this time, but the fight for broader representation continues. More on Pritam's GE2025 candid interview here. Read more in our live blog below, including the latest local and international news and updates. Government launches Economic Strategy Review to tackle global shifts Singapore has kicked off a major Economic Strategy Review (ESR) to safeguard its future amid rising US tariffs, geopolitical tensions and rapid technological change. Led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, the review will culminate in a comprehensive report by mid-2026. Five new committees will focus on global competitiveness, technology and innovation, entrepreneurship, human capital, and economic restructuring. Each is co-chaired by political office holders and includes private sector and union representatives. The Global Competitiveness committee aims to reinforce Singapore's status as a trusted investment hub. The Technology and Innovation group will explore AI adoption and digital transformation. Meanwhile, the Entrepreneurship committee will strengthen the startup ecosystem, and the Human Capital team will equip workers for career mobility and resilience. The final committee will address the social and economic fallout of restructuring. Pritam Singh shares WP's GE2025 lessons learned Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh hoped to 'tip one or two more constituencies' in Singapore's May 2025 General Election (GE2025). Despite strong efforts, the party retained its seats in Aljunied GRC, Sengkang GRC and Hougang, but couldn't break into new ground like Punggol and Tampines. Pritam cited boundary changes as a major factor, saying the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee's adjustments forced WP to pivot its strategy. The party had previously contested Marine Parade GRC but chose not to this time, drawing criticism from other opposition groups. Pritam praised WP's 26 candidates, including 14 newcomers, for their grit and character. He emphasised the uphill battle smaller parties face due to limited resources. For Pritam and WP, the fight continues. 'We came close, not close enough. But that just tells you there's still work to do,' he said. Read on Pritam's GE2025 reflections here. Government launches Economic Strategy Review to tackle global shifts Singapore has kicked off a major Economic Strategy Review (ESR) to safeguard its future amid rising US tariffs, geopolitical tensions and rapid technological change. Led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, the review will culminate in a comprehensive report by mid-2026. Five new committees will focus on global competitiveness, technology and innovation, entrepreneurship, human capital, and economic restructuring. Each is co-chaired by political office holders and includes private sector and union representatives. The Global Competitiveness committee aims to reinforce Singapore's status as a trusted investment hub. The Technology and Innovation group will explore AI adoption and digital transformation. Meanwhile, the Entrepreneurship committee will strengthen the startup ecosystem, and the Human Capital team will equip workers for career mobility and resilience. The final committee will address the social and economic fallout of restructuring. Singapore has kicked off a major Economic Strategy Review (ESR) to safeguard its future amid rising US tariffs, geopolitical tensions and rapid technological change. Led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, the review will culminate in a comprehensive report by mid-2026. Five new committees will focus on global competitiveness, technology and innovation, entrepreneurship, human capital, and economic restructuring. Each is co-chaired by political office holders and includes private sector and union representatives. The Global Competitiveness committee aims to reinforce Singapore's status as a trusted investment hub. The Technology and Innovation group will explore AI adoption and digital transformation. Meanwhile, the Entrepreneurship committee will strengthen the startup ecosystem, and the Human Capital team will equip workers for career mobility and resilience. The final committee will address the social and economic fallout of restructuring. Pritam Singh shares WP's GE2025 lessons learned Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh hoped to 'tip one or two more constituencies' in Singapore's May 2025 General Election (GE2025). Despite strong efforts, the party retained its seats in Aljunied GRC, Sengkang GRC and Hougang, but couldn't break into new ground like Punggol and Tampines. Pritam cited boundary changes as a major factor, saying the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee's adjustments forced WP to pivot its strategy. The party had previously contested Marine Parade GRC but chose not to this time, drawing criticism from other opposition groups. Pritam praised WP's 26 candidates, including 14 newcomers, for their grit and character. He emphasised the uphill battle smaller parties face due to limited resources. For Pritam and WP, the fight continues. 'We came close, not close enough. But that just tells you there's still work to do,' he said. Read on Pritam's GE2025 reflections here. Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh hoped to 'tip one or two more constituencies' in Singapore's May 2025 General Election (GE2025). Despite strong efforts, the party retained its seats in Aljunied GRC, Sengkang GRC and Hougang, but couldn't break into new ground like Punggol and Tampines. Pritam cited boundary changes as a major factor, saying the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee's adjustments forced WP to pivot its strategy. The party had previously contested Marine Parade GRC but chose not to this time, drawing criticism from other opposition groups. Pritam praised WP's 26 candidates, including 14 newcomers, for their grit and character. He emphasised the uphill battle smaller parties face due to limited resources. For Pritam and WP, the fight continues. 'We came close, not close enough. But that just tells you there's still work to do,' he said. Read on Pritam's GE2025 reflections here.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Here's What Key Metrics Tell Us About Agilon (AGL) Q2 Earnings
Agilon Health (AGL) reported $1.39 billion in revenue for the quarter ended June 2025, representing a year-over-year decline of 5.9%. EPS of -$0.25 for the same period compares to -$0.07 a year ago. The reported revenue represents a surprise of -4.98% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.47 billion. With the consensus EPS estimate being -$0.11, the EPS surprise was -127.27%. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance. Here is how Agilon performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Avg. Medicare Advantage Members: 498,000 compared to the 493,100 average estimate based on two analysts. Revenues- Other operating: $2.94 million versus $3.16 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -7.4% change. Revenues- Medical services: $1.39 billion compared to the $1.46 billion average estimate based on five analysts. The reported number represents a change of -5.9% year over year. View all Key Company Metrics for Agilon here>>> Shares of Agilon have returned -30% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.6% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data