Why Scott Morrison's King's Birthday honour boils my blood
These are the reasons why the Governor-General of Australia bestowed upon former PM, Scott Morrison, highest honour in the land - the Companion of the Order of Australia on the King's Birthday weekend.
I don't know about you, but when I heard this, I had to go to the official website to confirm because frankly, I just couldn't believe it.
Neither could my 16-year-old son. When I mentioned the award at dinner, his first response was "isn't he the idiot who crapped his pants outside McDonald's that time?"
Not, "oh wasn't he the PM before Albo?" or even "was he the one you were writing so much about during COVID?" This is what the kids these days remember him for.
Says it all, really.
During the pandemic, he deceived the nation by secretly appointing himself to five - FIVE - ministries. The secrecy of these acts undermined democratic accountability and violated principles of responsible government.
The Ministers of State Amendment Act 2023 was passed to prevent this from happening again. Does this smack of "eminent service to the people and Parliament"?
On the topic of COVID, let's acknowledge his total failure to secure sufficient vaccine supplies early on which led to delays in distribution.
Then, when he finally started to get his act together, his over-reliance on AstraZeneca despite the concerns about rare blood clot risks, led to hesitancy and confusion about the safety of vaccines.
Unlike the other world leaders who personally lobbied Pfizer executives to secure Pfizer, Morrison chose not to and as such, our early access to the Pfizer doses was limited.
Hardly a worthy contribution to global leadership.
Then there was the public education campaign around the vaccine that failed to effectively communicate its benefits, and his "it's not a race" messaging, which added fuel to the confusion fire, resulting in misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment.
As a result of all this, we were literally left lagging behind other OECD nation's in our COVID response.
While he did instigate JobKeeper, I found it incredible how JobKeeper overpayments to corporations went unchecked, giving them a choice to pay back the additional funds, but overpayments for JobSeeker?
Phew - send out the debt notices!
Talking of debt notices, the scandalous, harmful robodebt scheme was launched under his leadership when he was the social services minister, and he was the PM at the time of its very timely conclusion. He never took responsibility for it. Instead, he complained that he was a victim of "political lynching".
In my opinion, this program represents the most shameful episode of Australia's political history. I was ashamed of my government then. I remain so.
You know, maybe what won the award for him was the way he kindly and compassionately considered the very real needs of our most vulnerable Australians (note the sarcasm). His "you have to have a go to get a go" response to people struggling below the poverty line on Centrelink, demanding they pull themselves up by their bootstraps - despite them not having the money for said bootstraps - could conceivably be understood by the overprivileged elites as "good leadership".
In reality, it's an entirely different story.
Personally, it was when he divided the nation into "the taxed" and the "taxed nots" that had my blood truly boiling; like our worth as a person is counted only in what the government gets out of us.
And even then, like we don't all pay tax and excise on petrol, registration and GST. Now there's an example of eminent service to the people.
READ MORE:
Perhaps the award should have read "for eminent service to the wealthy people."
Don't even get me started on the Brittany Higgins case and his failure to even recognise the gravity of the situation until his wife talked to him about it.
This is the man who Council for the Order of Australia appointed the highest honour in the land. In my opinion, it's the one case where tradition should have been set aside.
For eminent service to the people and Parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister, to notable contributions to global engagement to leadership of the national COVID-19 response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS.
These are the reasons why the Governor-General of Australia bestowed upon former PM, Scott Morrison, highest honour in the land - the Companion of the Order of Australia on the King's Birthday weekend.
I don't know about you, but when I heard this, I had to go to the official website to confirm because frankly, I just couldn't believe it.
Neither could my 16-year-old son. When I mentioned the award at dinner, his first response was "isn't he the idiot who crapped his pants outside McDonald's that time?"
Not, "oh wasn't he the PM before Albo?" or even "was he the one you were writing so much about during COVID?" This is what the kids these days remember him for.
Says it all, really.
During the pandemic, he deceived the nation by secretly appointing himself to five - FIVE - ministries. The secrecy of these acts undermined democratic accountability and violated principles of responsible government.
The Ministers of State Amendment Act 2023 was passed to prevent this from happening again. Does this smack of "eminent service to the people and Parliament"?
On the topic of COVID, let's acknowledge his total failure to secure sufficient vaccine supplies early on which led to delays in distribution.
Then, when he finally started to get his act together, his over-reliance on AstraZeneca despite the concerns about rare blood clot risks, led to hesitancy and confusion about the safety of vaccines.
Unlike the other world leaders who personally lobbied Pfizer executives to secure Pfizer, Morrison chose not to and as such, our early access to the Pfizer doses was limited.
Hardly a worthy contribution to global leadership.
Then there was the public education campaign around the vaccine that failed to effectively communicate its benefits, and his "it's not a race" messaging, which added fuel to the confusion fire, resulting in misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment.
As a result of all this, we were literally left lagging behind other OECD nation's in our COVID response.
While he did instigate JobKeeper, I found it incredible how JobKeeper overpayments to corporations went unchecked, giving them a choice to pay back the additional funds, but overpayments for JobSeeker?
Phew - send out the debt notices!
Talking of debt notices, the scandalous, harmful robodebt scheme was launched under his leadership when he was the social services minister, and he was the PM at the time of its very timely conclusion. He never took responsibility for it. Instead, he complained that he was a victim of "political lynching".
In my opinion, this program represents the most shameful episode of Australia's political history. I was ashamed of my government then. I remain so.
You know, maybe what won the award for him was the way he kindly and compassionately considered the very real needs of our most vulnerable Australians (note the sarcasm). His "you have to have a go to get a go" response to people struggling below the poverty line on Centrelink, demanding they pull themselves up by their bootstraps - despite them not having the money for said bootstraps - could conceivably be understood by the overprivileged elites as "good leadership".
In reality, it's an entirely different story.
Personally, it was when he divided the nation into "the taxed" and the "taxed nots" that had my blood truly boiling; like our worth as a person is counted only in what the government gets out of us.
And even then, like we don't all pay tax and excise on petrol, registration and GST. Now there's an example of eminent service to the people.
READ MORE:
Perhaps the award should have read "for eminent service to the wealthy people."
Don't even get me started on the Brittany Higgins case and his failure to even recognise the gravity of the situation until his wife talked to him about it.
This is the man who Council for the Order of Australia appointed the highest honour in the land. In my opinion, it's the one case where tradition should have been set aside.
For eminent service to the people and Parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister, to notable contributions to global engagement to leadership of the national COVID-19 response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS.
These are the reasons why the Governor-General of Australia bestowed upon former PM, Scott Morrison, highest honour in the land - the Companion of the Order of Australia on the King's Birthday weekend.
I don't know about you, but when I heard this, I had to go to the official website to confirm because frankly, I just couldn't believe it.
Neither could my 16-year-old son. When I mentioned the award at dinner, his first response was "isn't he the idiot who crapped his pants outside McDonald's that time?"
Not, "oh wasn't he the PM before Albo?" or even "was he the one you were writing so much about during COVID?" This is what the kids these days remember him for.
Says it all, really.
During the pandemic, he deceived the nation by secretly appointing himself to five - FIVE - ministries. The secrecy of these acts undermined democratic accountability and violated principles of responsible government.
The Ministers of State Amendment Act 2023 was passed to prevent this from happening again. Does this smack of "eminent service to the people and Parliament"?
On the topic of COVID, let's acknowledge his total failure to secure sufficient vaccine supplies early on which led to delays in distribution.
Then, when he finally started to get his act together, his over-reliance on AstraZeneca despite the concerns about rare blood clot risks, led to hesitancy and confusion about the safety of vaccines.
Unlike the other world leaders who personally lobbied Pfizer executives to secure Pfizer, Morrison chose not to and as such, our early access to the Pfizer doses was limited.
Hardly a worthy contribution to global leadership.
Then there was the public education campaign around the vaccine that failed to effectively communicate its benefits, and his "it's not a race" messaging, which added fuel to the confusion fire, resulting in misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment.
As a result of all this, we were literally left lagging behind other OECD nation's in our COVID response.
While he did instigate JobKeeper, I found it incredible how JobKeeper overpayments to corporations went unchecked, giving them a choice to pay back the additional funds, but overpayments for JobSeeker?
Phew - send out the debt notices!
Talking of debt notices, the scandalous, harmful robodebt scheme was launched under his leadership when he was the social services minister, and he was the PM at the time of its very timely conclusion. He never took responsibility for it. Instead, he complained that he was a victim of "political lynching".
In my opinion, this program represents the most shameful episode of Australia's political history. I was ashamed of my government then. I remain so.
You know, maybe what won the award for him was the way he kindly and compassionately considered the very real needs of our most vulnerable Australians (note the sarcasm). His "you have to have a go to get a go" response to people struggling below the poverty line on Centrelink, demanding they pull themselves up by their bootstraps - despite them not having the money for said bootstraps - could conceivably be understood by the overprivileged elites as "good leadership".
In reality, it's an entirely different story.
Personally, it was when he divided the nation into "the taxed" and the "taxed nots" that had my blood truly boiling; like our worth as a person is counted only in what the government gets out of us.
And even then, like we don't all pay tax and excise on petrol, registration and GST. Now there's an example of eminent service to the people.
READ MORE:
Perhaps the award should have read "for eminent service to the wealthy people."
Don't even get me started on the Brittany Higgins case and his failure to even recognise the gravity of the situation until his wife talked to him about it.
This is the man who Council for the Order of Australia appointed the highest honour in the land. In my opinion, it's the one case where tradition should have been set aside.
For eminent service to the people and Parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister, to notable contributions to global engagement to leadership of the national COVID-19 response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS.
These are the reasons why the Governor-General of Australia bestowed upon former PM, Scott Morrison, highest honour in the land - the Companion of the Order of Australia on the King's Birthday weekend.
I don't know about you, but when I heard this, I had to go to the official website to confirm because frankly, I just couldn't believe it.
Neither could my 16-year-old son. When I mentioned the award at dinner, his first response was "isn't he the idiot who crapped his pants outside McDonald's that time?"
Not, "oh wasn't he the PM before Albo?" or even "was he the one you were writing so much about during COVID?" This is what the kids these days remember him for.
Says it all, really.
During the pandemic, he deceived the nation by secretly appointing himself to five - FIVE - ministries. The secrecy of these acts undermined democratic accountability and violated principles of responsible government.
The Ministers of State Amendment Act 2023 was passed to prevent this from happening again. Does this smack of "eminent service to the people and Parliament"?
On the topic of COVID, let's acknowledge his total failure to secure sufficient vaccine supplies early on which led to delays in distribution.
Then, when he finally started to get his act together, his over-reliance on AstraZeneca despite the concerns about rare blood clot risks, led to hesitancy and confusion about the safety of vaccines.
Unlike the other world leaders who personally lobbied Pfizer executives to secure Pfizer, Morrison chose not to and as such, our early access to the Pfizer doses was limited.
Hardly a worthy contribution to global leadership.
Then there was the public education campaign around the vaccine that failed to effectively communicate its benefits, and his "it's not a race" messaging, which added fuel to the confusion fire, resulting in misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment.
As a result of all this, we were literally left lagging behind other OECD nation's in our COVID response.
While he did instigate JobKeeper, I found it incredible how JobKeeper overpayments to corporations went unchecked, giving them a choice to pay back the additional funds, but overpayments for JobSeeker?
Phew - send out the debt notices!
Talking of debt notices, the scandalous, harmful robodebt scheme was launched under his leadership when he was the social services minister, and he was the PM at the time of its very timely conclusion. He never took responsibility for it. Instead, he complained that he was a victim of "political lynching".
In my opinion, this program represents the most shameful episode of Australia's political history. I was ashamed of my government then. I remain so.
You know, maybe what won the award for him was the way he kindly and compassionately considered the very real needs of our most vulnerable Australians (note the sarcasm). His "you have to have a go to get a go" response to people struggling below the poverty line on Centrelink, demanding they pull themselves up by their bootstraps - despite them not having the money for said bootstraps - could conceivably be understood by the overprivileged elites as "good leadership".
In reality, it's an entirely different story.
Personally, it was when he divided the nation into "the taxed" and the "taxed nots" that had my blood truly boiling; like our worth as a person is counted only in what the government gets out of us.
And even then, like we don't all pay tax and excise on petrol, registration and GST. Now there's an example of eminent service to the people.
READ MORE:
Perhaps the award should have read "for eminent service to the wealthy people."
Don't even get me started on the Brittany Higgins case and his failure to even recognise the gravity of the situation until his wife talked to him about it.
This is the man who Council for the Order of Australia appointed the highest honour in the land. In my opinion, it's the one case where tradition should have been set aside.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
16 hours ago
- The Age
The system for selling property is broken
AI, something's not right Apropos Waleed Aly's article on AI (8/8), yesterday I asked Google for train times from East Malvern to the city and got an AI Overview saying East Malvern is on the Frankston line and takes about 15minutes to travel to the city. Another attempt gave ″you can take a Glen Waverley line train to Caulfield then transfer to a Frankston line train to Flinders Street″. One answer included a link to Rome2Rio which also contains this wrong information. I was asked to rate the first answer and I said it was wrong, so I was then requested to give the correct answer for the purpose of training AI! Does PTV or Metro Trains know prospective passengers are being given wrong information? It's also not my job to train AI. This is preposterous. Don Jordan, Mt Waverley Legislation not needed Surely, mandating working from home with legislation is cracking a walnut with a sledgehammer. Forward-looking employers are already facilitating working from home arrangements. Those who don't, will be judged by the jobs market as inflexible, and will miss out on recruiting the best talent. Legislating work from home is already redundant. Matthew Hamilton, Kew WFH just a useful tool Working from home is not a hill to die on. Before the arguments get too polarised and confrontational, politically, socially or economically, we need to recognise that it's merely a useful tool that can offer greater flexibility to some people and some workplaces, not all. We all look at work-life balance from different angles, and find the best option in any situation needs to be a matter of sensible negotiation not a battleground. The COVID years provided a glimpse of options we hadn't previously had to try; it would be a pity if this led to insistence on legislated rights that undermine the potential benefits of newfound flexibility. Jenifer Nicholls, Windsor Meaningless roundtable Despite continued calls for change, if Anthony Albanese insists there will be no major overhaul of the tax system, just what is the point of the economic reform roundtable? Annie Wilson, Inverloch Learn from history Benjamin Netanyahu is deluding himself in believing that he can defeat Hamas. The full force of the American military battled the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese army for 10 years and was defeated. The same will happen in Gaza no matter how much destruction and killing the Israeli Defence Force wreak there. Reg Murray, Glen Iris How high the toll? Gaza. How many more will die? Malcolm McDonald, Burwood A military occupation So it's now official Israeli policy to turn Gaza into a demilitarised zone, except for the Israeli military, of course. David Robertson, Wheatsheaf This is not freedom Benjamin Netanyahu says he wants to free the population of Gaza. More likely he'll free Gaza of its population. Richard Wilson, Croydon PM, do something Israel has said the quiet part out loud. It plans to conquer Gaza, fence it in, and decide who can live there and who cannot (″ Israel set on conquering ″ 10/8). After months of bombing, starving, and killing, they call this 'security'. And our government? It nods along with concern written on its face, but its hands stay firmly in its pockets. No sanctions. No arms embargo. Not even the courage to recognise Palestine without strings attached. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Foreign Minister Penny Wong – you know exactly what is happening. You know the siege, the starvation, the expulsions, the massacres, are part of the same story that began in 1948. You know this is the erasure of a people. So what's stopping you? Fear of upsetting Washington? I don't want to hear another word of sympathy from leaders who will not act. Sympathy doesn't feed the starving. It doesn't rebuild the ruins. It doesn't save a single child in Gaza tonight. Lila Malagi, Flinders Premier, do something Thirty years ago, Jeff Kennett sold off government assets to pay down the massive public debt incurred by the Cain and Kirner administrations. We were the rustbucket state going nowhere, largely because the (then) powerful transport unions, supposedly 'supporters″ of Labor, regularly shut down the transport networks. Since then Labor has enthusiastically followed Kennett's playbook, selling off the last remaining government-owned assets. Now Victoria is once again mired in debt but with no 'silver' left to flog to pay it off. Instead of moaning about what the Liberals did a political eon ago, the premier should focus her attention on how she is going to fix the state's dreadful finances. Perhaps she could start by selling off the reconstituted SEC, but would anyone buy it? Greg Hardy, Upper Ferntree Gully A timid country You have to wonder why Anthony Albanese is organising a talkfest about policy when he is spending most of his time ruling policy options out. No increase to GST; no tackling of negative gearing (even for investors with multiple properties); no reforms to capital gains taxes or dividend imputation policies; and importantly no consideration of a carbon tax – the most effective and efficient tool in the fight against climate change. Above all else multinationals continue to exploit our natural resources while paying minimal or no tax. Australia was once a model for reforms – particularly in democratic initiatives – now we are a timid country run by timid people. Noel Turnbull, Port Melbourne
7NEWS
18 hours ago
- 7NEWS
The Issue with Tim Lester: 7NEWS sits down with John Powers, former US soldier and Australian citizen
For John Powers, it's a tough conclusion to reach. ' Australia is a strategic liability because of the waning capabilities that we have.' Powers is uniquely placed to comment on Australia's defence relationship with our great security ally, the United States. 'We have not manned and equipped and sustained our military, our ADF, so that it can keep pace materially and capability-wise with the United States,' he told 7NEWS. At first blush, it sounds self-serving, delivered with Powers' thick American accent. It presses the case US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth put to Defence Minister Richard Marles in late May: that Australia needs to increase its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of our gross domestic product, tens of billions of dollars more in military spending every year. In fact, John Powers is a dual citizen now living in Australia. He also brings extraordinary experience to the question of whether his adopted country is a good ally for his old country. Now retired, his experience as a US special forces soldier, brigade task force commander, and military intelligence specialist stretched across four decades — from Grenada in 1983 right up to the first Trump administration. Among his roles, he was a war planner. 'When we would put together plans, we would start with Australia,' he said. 'We'd always start to figure out how can we get the Aussies into the fray because when it comes to just grit and mettle and the intangibles of being a reliable soldier, sailor, airman ... you could not have a better ally.' These days, he's not trying to recruit Australians. He's speaking as one. 'I think we've underspent on defence from the standpoint of we don't have the capabilities that we need to even defend ourselves,' he said. On other issues, John Powers challenges American views. Loading content... He waves off a Chinese -owned company's contentious 99-year lease of the Port of Darwin. 'I don't think it's that big of a deal,' he said. 'This same company owns and operates ports in the United States.' When news of the 2015 agreement broke, he says he saw it as an intelligence opportunity '... to collect on the Chinese ... see how they do business, to be able to cross-pollinate with the Americans.' Powers cautions Australians who say assets like Pine Gap — the joint satellite surveillance base near Alice Springs — make us indispensable for US military intelligence. 'It's more important to the Australians than it is (to) the United States,' he said. 'We have similar bases or similar facilities in England, Turkey, Germany, places like that.' Powers argues 'with technology nowadays, you can … bend pipe that stuff back to Fort Meade, Maryland, and it all can be collected there'. He sees greater value, from the US point of view, in Perth and its 'very significant' future as a rotational base for American submarines. But on the biggest of defence hardware projects, he's a pessimist. 'I'm not an AUKUS fan,' he said. 'I don't think it's a good deal.' He doubts Australia will ever take delivery of the American nuclear-powered submarines promised under AUKUS. 'I'm not confident we'll ever see those three Virginia-class submarines,' he said. Now watching the friction between the Albanese government and the Trump administration, Powers is animated by one other issue: the tenure of Australia's ambassador in Washington. 'Mr Rudd should do the honorable thing and resign,' he said. According to Powers, his contacts back in the US are utterly clear on the issue. The fact Kevin Rudd is a former Prime Minister and respected voice on matters regarding China is beside the point. 'Mr Trump doesn't like him,' he said. 'And as a result of Mr Trump not liking him, nobody else in his administration is going to give him the time of day. That is a disservice to us as Australians.' For John Powers, any issue causing friction between the country he was born in, and the country he says he plans to die in, is a problem worth solving.
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Trump administration pressures Albanese government over defence budget, warning AUKUS goals at risk without 3.5 per cent of GDP
The United States has issued its most forceful warning yet to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, with the Pentagon urging Canberra to significantly increase defence expenditure or risk undermining its AUKUS commitments and overall military readiness. In what shapes as a critical test for the Labor government, senior US defence officials are now calling for Australia to adopt a spending benchmark of 3.5 per cent of GDP, labelled by Washington as the new international norm in the era of strategic competition and rising global instability. 'For Australia in particular, it is vitally important that they are able to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP,' a US Defence official told The Australian. 'That will allow them to generate and field the kind of forces required not just to defend themselves but work together closely with us to maintain deterrence in the region.' The comments come ahead of a demanding period of international diplomacy for Mr Albanese, who is set to attend the United Nations General Assembly in New York next month and is working towards an in-person meeting with US President Donald Trump. There's growing speculation that the planned Quad leaders' summit may be shifted from India to the US to align with the UN gathering. While the AUKUS pact promises to deliver at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the 2030s, that arrangement is contingent on US national security assessments and whether the transfer would erode America's own naval capabilities. Washington now signalling frustration at what it sees as underwhelming fiscal commitment from Canberra. 'It is not an abstraction. This is a concrete objective. AUKUS is an expensive thing. Increasing defence spending is going to be vitally important for Australia to achieve its stated objectives under AUKUS while also modernising the rest of the ADF,' the US official continued. 'At a certain point, it's just maths. They need to spend more on defence.' Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers' most recent budget forecasts military spending reaching nearly $59 billion this financial year, equivalent to just over 2 per cent of GDP. However, only about a third of that funding is allocated to acquiring new weaponry and systems. The government's long-term plan includes an increase of $50.3 billion in defence spending over the next 10 years, but the bulk of that funding is deferred until 2028–29 and beyond. 'I think we can say with confidence that if Australia does not raise defence spending it is going to struggle to field the forces required to defend Australia but also to make good on its commitments to others,' the Pentagon official warned. 'But we are hopeful that Australia will be able to lean in and make these decisions - 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence spending; that is the new global standard.' The US call echoes recent developments in NATO, where member states agreed in June to boost collective defence outlays to 5 per cent of GDP. Mr Albanese has expressed reluctance to pad out Australia's defence numbers by including civilian infrastructure, despite some of those investments directly supporting military capability. He has instead highlighted Australia's direct contribution of over $US1 billion to the US submarine industrial base as a clear signal of commitment to the AUKUS framework. The pressure from Washington arrives just as Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby leads a review of the trilateral security pact, with concerns mounting that Australia's budget settings may fall short of what's needed to deliver on the ambitious goals of AUKUS and meet the demands of a changing Indo-Pacific region.
