High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach
Loading
ShinyHunters, which was formed in 2020 and named after a Pokemon, has claimed credit for some of the most significant data breaches globally, affecting millions of people including Australians. It hasn't yet claimed responsibility for the Louis Vuitton breach.
'ShinyHunters' MO is stealing large datasets. Often, they sell these datasets to other criminals; sometimes, they leak them as a publicity stunt,' Mansted said.
She said CyberCX was seeing far fewer businesses in Australia, and globally, pay ransoms to cybercriminals. The criminals aren't stopping, however, but are instead operating in sectors and places more willing to pay ransoms or changing their service offerings. Some are reverting to stealing and selling data to make money.
'The retail sector is in a sweet spot for cybercriminals,' she said.
'The sector hasn't faced the same regulatory pressure to uplift cyber maturity as banks, telcos and other critical providers. But at the same time, it holds huge consumer datasets. These datasets are highly valuable – whether transacted by powerful data brokers, or unlawfully on the dark web by criminals.
'The high-end retail heist also highlights a growing problem confronting all businesses: third-party cyber risk. We're still understanding these incidents, but it's very possible that the source of at least some of these breaches is a third-party vendor commonly used across the sector.'
Australian companies now face fines of up to $50 million for serious breaches of the Privacy Act, after high-profile data breaches affected Optus and Medibank customers. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner was contacted for comment.
The latest breach comes after 5.7 million Qantas customers had their information accessed by hackers this month, including information on frequent flyer accounts, addresses and food preferences. The airline said last week it had found no evidence yet of stolen data being released, but it was 'actively monitoring'.
Cybersecurity researcher Jamieson O'Reilly said while no passwords or financial data had been taken, the scope of stolen Louis Vuitton data still presented significant opportunities for exploitation.
'That is especially true when the breached entity is a high-profile luxury brand with a highly engaged and brand-loyal customer base,' he said.
Jamieson, who runs cybersecurity consultancy DVULN, said he had already noticed online chatter and victim reports indicating that Louis Vuitton customers had received phishing emails impersonating the company.
'Notably, this email referenced a known artist, Clara Bacou, who previously published conceptual NFT artwork for Louis Vuitton back in 2021,' he said.
Loading
'Anyone who searched the artist's name would find legitimate links tying her to Louis Vuitton, giving the email a false sense of authenticity. Combined with accurate customer data from the breach, the setup is precise enough to fool even security-aware recipients.'
He said it was highly likely that threat actors are already using the stolen data for nefarious purposes.
'While breaches are frequent, that does not make them acceptable,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
28 minutes ago
- West Australian
Inheritance tax wake-up call for all expat Brits in Australia still with private pensions in the UK!
A major tax change in the UK could have serious consequences for thousands of British expats living in Australia with pension savings left behind in the old country. From April 2026, pension pots inherited after the age of 75 will no longer be tax-free for beneficiaries. Instead, they'll be taxed as income, at the recipient's marginal rate — potentially as high as 45 per cent.. And from April 2027, the UK is going a step further — pensions will be brought into the scope of inheritance tax, too. This 2027 change is a fresh move from the UK Treasury. Pensions, which were previously exempt from UK estate taxes, will now potentially face double taxation — income tax plus inheritance tax. If you're an Australian tax resident with a UK pension and you're assuming it'll all pass seamlessly to your family one day, then think again. Historically, UK defined contribution pensions — also known as 'private pensions' — were a handy estate planning tool. If the pension holder died before age 75, the entire pot could pass to beneficiaries tax-free, and even after 75 it was only subject to income tax when withdrawn. More importantly, pensions were excluded from the estate for UK inheritance tax purposes, meaning they avoided the UK's hefty 40 per cent estate tax altogether. But from April 2026, that income tax exemption ends for people who die over age 75. And from April 2027, the pension itself will be counted as part of the estate for inheritance tax purposes. The UK government has confirmed that from April 2027, defined contribution pensions will be reportable for inheritance tax, with the responsibility falling on executors. In some cases, families could have just six months to report and pay tax or face late penalties. If that sounds like a nightmare for grieving families navigating two tax systems, it's because it probably will be. In contrast, Australian superannuation is relatively generous when it comes to estate planning because: Adding further complexity is a lesser-known change to how the UK defines inheritance tax exposure. From April 6 this year, the UK moved to a residence-based system. If you've been a UK tax resident for 10 out of the last 20 tax years, you may be classified as a long-term resident and subject to UK inheritance tax on your worldwide assets. So, even if you've been living in Australia for years, you may still be caught by UK inheritance tax, because the new rules apply a 'tail' period of up to 10 years after you leave. For many, transferring UK pensions to Australia via a Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme has for a long time — and in the right circumstances — made financial sense. It consolidates retirement savings, aligns your money with your tax residency and gives you more control. Now, with the emergence of this new tax regime, the argument for a transfer grows stronger. It also removes the burden from your family of having to deal with HM Revenue and Customs, complex executor responsibilities and international tax reporting. Of course, it's not always straightforward because: But with professional advice, the process can often be navigated smoothly and the long-term benefits can be significant. The UK's planned tax changes are a wake-up call for British expats in Australia because: So, if you have UK pension savings and live in Australia, it's time to reassess your strategy. A well-considered pension transfer, in the right circumstances and with the right personalised advice, could mean more of your hard-earned savings stay in the hands of your family — and not in the UK tax office. Nicholas Hart is a financial adviser and UK Pensions expert at Empire Financial Group
West Australian
28 minutes ago
- West Australian
Nick Bruining: An over 55s guide to accessing JobSeeker and superannuation before you get the age pension
With Australia's unemployment rate edging up slightly in June, many older people not yet eligible for an age pension will be weighing up their options. That can include using up their savings or tapping into their superannuation to carry them over until the age pension eligibility age of 67. Ceasing employment after turning 60 and not intending to return to work at the time you access your super is a valid 'condition of release' and allows full access to all of your nest egg. One other option is the poorly understood JobSeeker allowance payment from Centrelink. JobSeeker is a means-tested allowance benefit. Allowances are different to pension payments because they are regarded as a temporary support payment to carry you over until you return to paid employment. While the normal JobSeeker payment for a single is $789.90 a fortnight, a single over 55 receives a higher rate of $850.60 if they have been on a JobSeeker payment for nine consecutive months. Eligible couples receive $725.70 each, and as with other income support payments couples are assessed as a single entity under the means test system. JobSeeker payments form part of your taxable income for the year. For those under 60, receiving JobSeeker can also open the door to accessing some of your super before retirement. If you've been in receipt of a Centrelink income support payment for at least 26 weeks, you can apply to have up to $10,000 released from your super every 12 months. Be aware that this withdrawal is taxable. JobSeekers are subject to an asset and income test — but with big differences compared to the age and disability support pension rules. While the asset means test lower limits are identical to the pension figures, once you exceed the limit no benefit is payable. It does not taper down in the same way as a pension. For a single homeowner, the asset test limit is $321,500, excluding the value of the home. For a couple, it's $481,500. Note that Centrelink will accept the second-hand or scrap value for fixed assets, so don't calculate this number based on insured values. Importantly, all money held in superannuation accumulation phase is exempt from means testing until you hit 67. Non-homeowners are allowed an additional $252,000 in assets, whether as a single or a couple. The income test is complex and is calculated in the same way as the age pension. It is not the same as the Australian Taxation Office's method. In essence, if your Centrelink-assessable income exceeds $150 a fortnight, your allowance will start to reduce. The cut-off limits vary considerably based on your family situation, but for many older kid-free Australians, it is around the $1500-a-fortnight mark — and higher once you've been on benefits for more than nine months. Importantly, the 'mutual obligation' requirements for over 55s is quite different to younger recipients of JobSeeker. Mutual obligations require you to demonstrate some activity that makes you job ready. While ideally you'll continue to seek paid employment, you can meet your obligations through other activities such as formal study or approved voluntary work. In both cases, this needs to take up at least 30 hours a fortnight of your time if you are over 60. Between 55 and 60, you must continue to seek work with a maximum of 15 hours doing voluntary work in the first 12 months of unemployment. After 12 months, the same rules for over 60s apply. One important point to note: if you are over 60 and claiming JobSeeker at the same time and not simply doing voluntary work or study, you probably cannot access your super. The rules are, you can access your super once you cease any employment after turning 60. If you don't have a job to cease then, by definition you haven't satisfied this condition of release. Nick Bruining is an independent financial adviser and a member of the Certified Independent Financial Advisers Association
The Advertiser
28 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Emissions reduction 'central' to boosting productivity
An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals.
