Government Supports Tairāwhiti Marae To Relocate To Safer Ground
The Marae Trustees of Puketawai, Hinemaurea ki Mangatuna, Okuri, Takip, and Rangatira Marae supported by their whnau and hap have made the difficult decision to relocate and re-establish their respective marae in new locations.
Hon Mark Mitchell
Minister for Emergency Management and Recovery
Five Tairāwhiti marae impacted by the North Island weather events of early 2023, are moving to safer locations with support from the Crown,' said Mark Mitchell, Minister for Emergency Management and Recovery and Tama Potaka, Minister for Māori Development.
'The Marae Trustees of Puketawai, Hinemaurea ki Mangatuna, Okuri, Takipū, and Rangatira Marae – supported by their whānau and hapū – have made the difficult decision to relocate and re-establish their respective marae in new locations.
'The local council designated these marae, as Category 3 – High Risk, and not safe to occupy because of unacceptable risk to life from future extreme weather.
'Each of the marae have accepted the Crown's support package and have acquired new sites to relocate to. The new sites are in close proximity within, or close to, their respective tribal boundaries,' says Mark Mitchell.
'The impact of the severe weather on the marae was devastating for the many whānau and hapū connected to these marae and their wider community.
'The decision to relocate is not an easy one and has come from the desire of the Marae Trustees to keep their marae, and their respective whānau, safe and secure, protecting the lives of those who might otherwise be at real risk from any future severe weather events.'
Minister for Māori Development, Tama Potaka says relocating the individual marae will take time.
'We expect the relocation works, including the rebuild of wharenui and whare kai where required due to the damage, will take place over the next two or so years. For some of the marae, the project is a complete rebuild.
'Reaching this point is a significant milestone. Most importantly, it will provide affected whanau and hapu peace of mind, and will have the added benefit of creating opportunities for SMEs and jobs. This augments the growing construction capability on the East Coast as a result of the mahi at Toitū Tairāwhiti and others,' says Mr Potaka.
Of the five marae three are located in the Uawa – Tolaga Bay area and the other two are in Te Karaka.
'The Crown is also working with two Kahungunu Marae, Tangoio and Petāne in Hawke's Bay with support packages available to both marae so they too can reestablish in safer locations. These marae were also designated, by their local council, as having an unacceptable risk to life.'
A total of $136.215m, allocated from Budgets 23 and 24 will fund the entire Whenua Māori and Marae relocation Programme after North Island weather events. It includes the costs to relocate owners of 24 whenua Māori properties to safety as well as demolition of residential structures and covers some assistance to support affected sites of cultural significance, principally urūpa.
'The Crown recognises moving a marae requires careful navigation. This is not an easy journey, and we would like to thank the Marae Trustees for working with us to ensure the safety of people on marae,' Mr Potaka says.
Notes:
In all cases ownership of the whenua remains with the existing owners.
The cost for each Marae relocation is commercially sensitive due to procurement undertakings.
Geographic location of all Category 3 Marae in Tairāwhiti:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Gisborne hapū blocks road in bid to reclaim ancestral lands
Te Owaina Gibson, Te Kotuku Irwin-Stainon, Ngati Oneone Chairperson Charlotte Gibson and Tahea Gibson stand by the "Reclamation of whenua" fire, which has been burning for 101 days. Photo: ZITA CAMPBELL / LDR A Gisborne hapū blocked a road and attempted to stop work at the wharf in their latest move to reclaim ancestral lands. Since a hīkoi on May 5, the hapū Ngāti Oneone have been calling on the council, Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port to return ancestral lands not used for core business. Photo: For over three months, they have taken day and night shifts to keep a fire burning at a shed they inhabit as part of their movement, "Reclamation of Whenua". Yesterday, at the dawn of the 101st day, the hapū blocked Hirini St from 5.15am until 7am. Chairwoman Charlotte Gibson said they blocked the road, as well as access to the log yard entrance and the wharf, "so the port could not go to work". She described the blockade as a "soft block" to remind officials and leaders that the hapū was still there. Gibson said the hapū had been in negotiations with Trust Tairāwhiti over the past two months to create the Kawenata, which is an agreement on how to settle and move forward together. Gisborne Hapū Ngati Oneone blocked Hirini Street on Wednesday morning as part of their latest move to reclaim ancestral lands. Photo: supplied / LDR Gibson said Trust Tairawhiti will meet on Thursday and the blockade was "to say, we're still here, and it's not just us, there are a lot of us that think this is right, and you should consider that before signing off [on the Kawenata],". The hapū originally committed to pursuing the movement for two months, up until July 5, before weighing up their approach depending on the outcomes. However, over a month has passed since the two-month mark and the "Reclamation of Whenua" fire is still burning. The hapū are inhabiting a warehouse-sized property on Hirini St, known as Te Pā Eketū shed. Eastland Port owns the shed and several others on Hirini St, where the original Ngāti Oneone Te Poho Rawiri Marae and pā once stood before being removed to develop Gisborne harbour under the Public Works Act nearly a century ago. Trust Tairāwhiti has a funding partnership with the council and functions as the region's economic development and tourism agency, and is the sole shareholder of Eastland Port. On June 26, the council voted to create a Statement of Intent to investigate the possibility of land return to Ngāti Oneone. The statement will be considered for adoption at a council meeting on Thursday next week. Gibson told Local Democracy Reporting that the fire will remain burning until whatever is signed off by Trust Tairāwhiti on Thursday is agreed to by all parties. After the sign-off, they have two months to make the exchanges, said Gibson, who noted the hapū wanted the outcome completed by Labour Weekend. Trust Tairāwhiti chairman David Battin said it had worked closely with Ngāti Oneone to understand their concerns and explore how it can support their aspirations. "We are optimistic about reaching a positive resolution and will share any outcome jointly with Ngāti Oneone," said Battin. Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said that in June, the council agreed to progress the kaupapa in a manner that upholds Te Tiriti o Waitangi. "Engaging in good faith with Ngāti Oneone - exploring the return or vesting of land where there is no longer a genuine public need, and ensuring the process is transparent, timely and respectful of all parties." Thatcher Swann said since then the council had worked with the hapū and the statement of intent was ready for the council's consideration at a council meeting on August 21. "The statement provides a clear framework for investigating the future of specific council-owned lands and reflects the shared commitment of council and Ngāti Oneone to balance mana whenua aspirations with our statutory responsibilities and community obligations." As of Wednesday afternoon, 3106 people had signed an online petition created by the hapū that called for their ancestral lands to be returned. On June 3, the hapū started inhabiting another tented spot on the esplanade, one street over from Hirini St, called Pā Kāinga. The movement had been a "mammoth commitment" from a lot of people to do night shifts, and "it hasn't been easy", said Gibson. "One day I got here at 7.15am, and it was zero degrees... but then you get the really rough, howling winds that are blowing all the walls around." LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
1News
21 hours ago
- 1News
Iwi anger at law change which would strip customary rights in harbour
Coastal iwi could soon be stripped of their customary rights over Aotea Harbour, west of Hamilton, as the Government presses ahead with its plan to amend the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. The legislative move would overturn recent decisions in the High Court to award customary marine title to iwi. In November 2024, the court recognised Ngāti Te Wehi and Ngāti Whakamarurangi's customary marine title over the harbour and protected its customary rights. But the Government wants to toughen up the test for customary marine title and its proposed law change would overturn the court's decision. Aotea Harbour (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Negotiated by New Zealand First as part of the coalition agreement, the party's deputy leader Shane Jones said the courts have made the test too easy. "The law from time to time needs to be refined when it falls into the hands of adventurous jurists," said Jones. However, Ngāti Te Wehi has vowed to fight on. 'We'll keep fighting, mō ake, ake, ake tonu (for as long as it takes),' said iwi claimant Miki Apiti. He said iwi members 'were up in arms in joy' at the court ruling at the time, but now it could all be for nothing. And fellow claimant lawyer Harry Clatworthy said a significant amount of time and effort has gone into their case. 'To make all these kaumātua who have spent hundreds of hours of time and effort, and three weeks in court, to possibly go back, and at a base level to tell them their customary rights don't exist after living here for 800 years, it's shocking.' ADVERTISEMENT 'Important to get this right' Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith said he understands the frustration. 'But we believe it's very important to get this right, because it affects the whole of New Zealand and everybody has an interest on what goes on in the coastline,' he said. Māori currently need to prove they have exclusively 'used and occupied' an area of coastline from 1840 to the present day without substantial interruption. 'What the new test does,' said Clatworthy, 'it makes it easier for the Attorney-General or Crown to say there was substantial interruption to the use and occupation of the harbour.' Goldsmith argued that everybody in the country has an interest in the coastline and that they are working on getting the 'balance right'. Under existing law there are already protections in place for the general public allowing for public access and recreational fishing and Apiti said the iwi has 'never, ever' stopped anyone from entering the harbour. ADVERTISEMENT Claimant Miki Apiti and lawyer Harry Clatworthy (Source: 1News) Clatworthy added: 'For the Crown to tell them their rights don't exist because people have fished the area, because boats have driven through the area – something they have no ability to stop – is wrong.' 'Every inlet is a wāhi tapu' - Aotea Harbour steeped in significance Apiti said the area is of particular importance to Ngāti Te Wehi. 'This is where our tūpuna lived… this used to be an old pā site, pā tuwatawata, around this particular area, until the, I would say, the late 1800s. Then they shifted from here,' he said. He pointed out other areas where there were pā sites, as well as the place where the korotangi bird artefact – a sacred taonga that is said to have been brought over on Tainui waka – was found. He added the ancestral waka Aotea, which the harbour is named for, is buried in the sand dunes of Oioroa at the northern entrance to the harbour. ADVERTISEMENT 'You might as well say every inlet is a wāhi tapu to us,' Apiti said. Today, Aotea Harbour is surrounded by a substantial amount of Māori freehold land and has four marae on its shores. The Government intends to pass the legislation by the end of October.
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
Why homelessness is worse under this government: a story in 10 graphs
There are more public houses, shorter housing waitlists and fewer people in emergency housing – so why are more people sleeping rough? When the government came into office, it announced a target to reduce the number of households living in emergency housing motels by 75% by 2030. It was a lofty, but important, goal. For any government, getting people out of emergency housing is not just a moral imperative, it's a financial one too. Emergency housing is the lowest rung of the public housing system, a last resort for people with nowhere else to go, while they wait to be placed into transitional housing or public housing. Conditions are often crowded and squalid, with no support systems. It's also really expensive. The government spent $336 million on emergency housing grants in 2023, an average of $273 per night per household, paid directly to motels and commercial accommodation providers. In January 2025, associate housing minister Tama Potaka announced the government had achieved its goal five years early. Between December 2023 and December 2024, the number of households in emergency housing motels fell from 3,141 to 591. Overall use of emergency housing has declined continuously since its peak in November 2021. In isolation, it should have been a massive victory. But the government has found itself dogged by claims that its policies have directly led to increased street homelessness. What really happened? A Ministry of Social Development report credited the fall in emergency housing numbers to 'operational changes' within the ministry and 'increased housing support services to help people out of emergency housing'. This includes the government's Priority One policy, which bumps families with dependent children to the top of the social housing waitlist if they have been in emergency housing for 12 weeks or more. The impact of this policy can be seen in the data. The number of people on the waitlist living in 'temporary accommodation' (emergency housing) has halved between March 2024 and March 2025. Since June 2023, 21,224 applicants have been housed from the social housing waitlist. The trend line shows a general monthly increase, with a particular spike in July 2024, when 1,298 people were placed into homes. New people continue to enter the waitlist every day, but the total size of the list has shrunk roughly a quarter between June 2023 and June 2025, from 24,716 to 19,115. This is mostly explained through an increase in public housing supply, as Kāinga Ora has completed some large-scale new builds. July 2024 set a recent monthly record, with 1,635 new homes coming online. The vast majority of these new homes were funded by the previous Labour government. A Cabinet paper released in February shows the current government does not intend to increase the overall stock of Kāinga Ora homes. National-led governments typically prefer to incentivise community housing providers (CHPs) to provide non-government state houses, rather than investing in Kāinga Ora houses. CHP housing has grown, with 1,677 new houses since June 2023, but still makes up only 16% of overall social housing. There's good news elsewhere, too: the number of individuals receiving Housing First services increased from 2,806 to 3,711 between June 2023 and June 2025. Housing First is generally considered the most effective programme for getting severely homeless people into stable tenancies. There are still 985 people on Housing First waitlists, 37.8% of whom have been homeless for three or more years. So there are more public houses, more people are being offered places in them, and more people are receiving homelessness services. That would usually correlate with lower levels of street homelessness. But that doesn't appear to be the case. The government doesn't have particularly good data on homelessness. The 2023 census found that 112,496 people were 'severely housing deprived' – but just 333 people were counted as 'roofless/rough sleepers'. Stats NZ admits this is almost certainly an undercount. People living at no fixed abode are inherently hard to track and are often suspicious of authority. The government's homelessness insights report for June 2025 said there was 'insufficient data to draw any conclusions' about whether overall homelessness had increased or decreased since 2023. But the report included data collected by charities working with homeless people across several New Zealand cities, which have tracked considerably higher numbers of rough sleepers, and this on-the-ground data is generally more thorough than high-level census data. In Auckland, six community providers found homelessness had risen 90% since September 2024, from 426 people living without shelter to 809. In Wellington, Downtown Community Ministry recorded a 25% increase in people rough sleeping in 2025 compared to 2024, from 114 to 141. Christchurch City Mission recorded 270 new clients in the six months to March 2025, up from 156 in the previous six months. The homelessness insights report suggested this could be the result of wider social and economic factors, including higher unemployment, rental inflation and higher rates of family violence and methamphetamine use. If that were the case, we'd expect to see other spikes in housing need over the past year. But we haven't. There hasn't been any discernible increase in the number of people entering the social housing waitlist – in fact, the number is slightly down since 2023, as the below graph shows. Possibly the best explanation for the increase in rough sleeping comes from the following graph, which shows a dramatic increase in the decline rate of emergency housing applications since 2024, from 4% to 32%. That's the result of a government policy called 'Tightening the gateway into emergency housing', which came into effect in August 2024. It's a set of new rules that make it harder for people to get into emergency housing and harder to stay. Emergency housing is available to anyone who does not have adequate accommodation and who comes under income and savings limits. It's initially granted for seven days but can be extended indefinitely. There are certain obligations on people in emergency housing: they must contribute 25% of their income towards housing costs, engage with support services, and make active efforts to find somewhere else to stay. However, under the old rules, the Ministry of Social Development would not decline emergency housing grants if it would 'cause serious hardship' or 'increase or create any risk to the life or welfare of the applicant or the applicant's immediate family'. Emergency housing is a last resort for people who generally have nowhere else to go, so declines were extremely rare. Under the new rules, that is no longer the case. According to the homelessness insights report, since the new policy was put in place, emergency housing applicants have been rejected for reasons including: 'The need can be met another way' (34.3%), 'Circumstances could have been reasonably foreseen' (22.5% – this includes where a person is determined to have contributed to their own homelessness), 'not eligible' (16.7%) and 'not an emergency situation' (14.7%). Modelling provided to ministers by the Ministry of Social Development ahead of the changes estimated that 1,000 fewer households would be able to access emergency housing, which would save the government $350 million over five years. This net saving was reapportioned by the government for Budget 2024. The Salvation Army's State of the Nation report said the changes to emergency housing eligibility were 'a key contributor to rising street homelessness and housing insecurity'. It's difficult to say exactly how many of the people whose emergency housing applications were declined ended up living on the street, because the government doesn't have a good record of them. While most people who leave emergency housing enter transitional housing or social housing, 14% were unknown to the government, according to the homelessness insights report. And that's only people who were accepted into emergency housing in the first place – it doesn't include those who were denied up front. (Access to this data is improving – at its peak under the previous government, up to 50% of emergency housing exits were untracked.) In their analysis of the policy, Ministry of Social Development officials warned ministers Louise Upston, Chris Bishop and Tama Potaka that 'the proposed changes are likely to increase the risk of homelessness, rough sleeping, people living in cars, overcrowding, and could increase the number of people living in unsafe situations'. Similar warnings are repeated multiple times through MSD's report: 'without sufficient housing supply, more people may end up homeless as a result of tightening the [emergency housing] gateway. Costs and risks associated with homelessness are likely to accrue over time, especially in the longer term.' Officials highlighted that the changes were 'likely to disproportionately impact population groups over represented in [emergency housing], including low-income single people, sole parents and their children, Māori and Pacific peoples. It will also not account for those with complex needs who may find it hard to meet responsibilities ( e.g. people in a heightened state of stress, and/or those with poor mental health and/or addiction issues).' The report also warned that the changes could breach the Crown's obligations to Māori under article 3 of te Tiriti o Waitangi and to children under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. When questioned by Jack Tame on Q + A earlier this month, Chris Bishop denied assertions that the policy had kicked more people onto the street, but said he was seeking 'urgent advice' on the issue. The biggest question is whether these changes were necessary at all. The number of people in emergency housing was already on a rapid downward trend and had been for three years. Increased public housing supply, combined with the Priority One policy, successfully gets more people into stable homes and reduces the financial burdens of emergency housing. The government likely would have hit its 75% reduction target ahead of schedule, even without making it harder for people to access emergency housing – and would have done so without such a severe human cost.
