'Not our war' - Trump's Nato weapons deal for Ukraine sparks MAGA anger
On Monday, Trump said he would send weapons to Ukraine via Nato, while also threatening Russia with more tariffs if a deal to end the war is not reached in 50 days.
Republican Congresswomen Marjorie Taylor Greene, a key Trump ally, and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon are among those who have criticised the decision, with Bannon telling his podcast listeners that Ukraine is a "European war".
The White House has emphasised that Europe will pay for the US-made weapons.
In an interview with the New York Times, Greene - an isolationist member of Congress from Georgia who has been one of the most loyal Trump supporters on Capitol Hill - said the move was at odds with what she had promised voters on the campaign trail.
"It's not just Ukraine; it's all foreign wars in general and a lot of foreign aid," she said. "This is what we campaigned on. This is what I promised also to my district. This is what everybody voted for. And I believe we have to maintain the course."
I'm 'disappointed but not done' with Putin, Trump tells BBC
Trump unveils Ukraine weapons plan at White House
Trump sought to emphasise that the weapons would be paid for rather than given as direct aid, saying on Monday: "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it."
But in a rare public disagreement with the president, Greene expressed scepticism that US taxpayers would ultimately avoid bearing any cost and, in a post on social media, criticised "backdoor deals through Nato".
"Without a shadow of a doubt, our tax dollars are being used," she told the New York Times, arguing that indirect costs such as US training missions and contributions to Nato qualify as US involvement.
"I said it on every rally stage: no more money to Ukraine. We want peace. We just want peace for those people," she said. "And guess what? People haven't changed."
'We still hate it'
One former Trump campaign official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to Politico, said Europe's purchase of the weapons "mitigates" the anger from Trump's isolationist supporters.
"But we still hate it," the official said. "This is not our war, and escalation isn't in America's interest."
Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump, said on his War Room podcast that "Ukraine is getting so dangerous".
"It's a European war. Let Europe deal with it," he said. "They have the resources. They have the manpower."
"We're about to arm people we have literally no control over," Bannon said of Ukraine. "This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the bloodlands of Europe - and we're being dragged into it."
EPA
In a statement quoted by Politico, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said that Trump's MAGA base "aren't panicans like the media".
"They trust in Trump, and they know that this president is restoring peace through strength."
The BBC has contacted the White House for comment.
A White House official who spoke to Politico on the condition of anonymity disagreed that the president's base opposed his moves. They pointed to one recent poll that suggested nearly two-thirds of Trump voters support continuing to send arms to Ukraine.
Officials in the Trump administration have also defended the president's decision, with Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby writing on X that Trump's "America First message is that our alliances have to be fair and equitable".
"This is eminently reasonable but was treated for many years as heresy," he added. "Yet now with the historic Nato commitment we see that it can work."
That recent commitment from Nato leaders to ramp up defence spending to 5% of their economic output was praised by Trump supporters on Monday, who argued that even with the new weapons deal Europe was taking on more responsibility for its defence.
And in an exclusive interview with the BBC on Monday, just hours after he met Nato chief Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump said the alliance was now "paying its own bills".
He affirmed his support for the organisation's common defence principle, and said he was "disappointed but not done" with Russia's Vladimir Putin.
The president said that he had thought a deal to end the war in Ukraine was on the cards with Russia four different times.
Trump threatens Russia with tariffs while unveiling Ukraine weapons plan
Detained in immigration raids, Maga mom still has faith in Trump's mass deportation plan
Trump defends US Attorney General Pam Bondi over Epstein files
War in Ukraine
Russia
Donald Trump
Nato
Vladimir Putin
United States
Ukraine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Dear Keir Starmer, stop cosying up to Donald Trump – or he'll drag Britain down with him
Donald Trump's victory in last November's US presidential election presented Keir Starmer, Britain's Labour prime minister, with a choice – and an opportunity. Either cosy up to a man whose obnoxious, hard-right, ultra-nationalist policies are inimical to UK security and foreign policy interests, economic prosperity and democratic values; or risk a rupture with the US, a longstanding but overbearing ally, and seize the moment to redefine Britain's place in the world, primarily through reintegration in Europe. Starmer made the wrong call – and Britain has paid a heavy price ever since. The cost to national dignity and the public purse will be on painful show this weekend as Trump, pursued by the Epstein scandal and angry protesters, makes an expensively policed, ostensibly private visit to his golf courses in Scotland. On Monday, the prime minister will travel north to kiss the ring. More humiliations loom. In September, Trump will return for an unprecedented second state visit, at Starmer's unctuous behest. At that point, the full, embarrassing extent of Britain's thraldom will be there for all the world to see. Let's be clear. Trump is no friend of Britain's and is, in key respects, a dangerous foe. Efforts to curry favour with this narcissist will ultimately prove futile. Trump always reneges. His unedifying career is littered with broken promises and relationships, personal and political. His only loyalty is to himself. Right now, this wannabe dictator is busy making America not greater but weaker, poorer, less influential and more disliked. Don't let him drag Britain down, too. It's not too late to make the break. US leadership of the western democracies used to be taken for granted. Now it's a problem. Politicians in both Britain's main parties have difficulty accepting this shift. As so often, public opinion is ahead of them. Recent polling by the Pew Research Center found 62% of Britons have no confidence in Trump 'to do the right thing regarding world affairs'. Most of those surveyed in 24 countries viewed him as dangerous, arrogant and dishonest. Thanks to him, the US's international standing is in freefall. Giving Israel a free hand in Gaza is the most egregious example of how Trump's policies conflict with UK interests. Starmer's government has condemned the deliberate killing and starving of civilians. Among the 55% of Britons opposed to Israel's actions, 82% believe they amount to genocide, a YouGov poll found last month. A majority backs additional sanctions. Trump's support for forced relocations, opposition to a two-state solution and close collaboration with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli leader charged with war crimes, all contradict stated UK policy. Trump bears significant personal responsibility for what Starmer calls the 'unspeakable and indefensible' horror in Gaza. Starmer warned dramatically last month that the UK was in growing danger of military attack following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Britain and other Nato states have steadfastly supported Kyiv. Not so Trump. Since taking office, he has toadied to Vladimir Putin, vilified Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy, suspended military supplies and questioned Nato's future. Ignoring proliferation fears, Trump is simultaneously fuelling a nuclear arms race. Now the hapless Starmer has been panicked into buying US jets capable of carrying warheads and, it is claimed, has secretly allowed US-owned nukes back into the UK. This is not the Britain Labour voters want. Trump recently reversed himself on Ukraine, patched things up with Nato and criticised Putin. But he could change his mind again tomorrow. Oblivious to the glaring double standard, he congratulates himself meanwhile on 'obliterating' Iran's nuclear facilities – even though last month's illegal US bombing was only partly successful. Britain rightly favours negotiations with Tehran. It wasn't consulted. Trump's tariff wars pose a direct threat to the UK economy, jobs and living standards. Despite Starmer's deal mitigating their impact, 10% tariffs or higher remain on most US-bound exports. Trump's bullying of Canada, Mexico, Greenland, Panama and others over sovereignty, migration and trade feeds uncertainty. His irrational hostility to the EU may gratify the likes of Nigel Farage (and Putin). But endless rows between important allies do not serve Britain's interests. The advance of hard-right, nationalist-populist parties in Europe and, most recently, in Japan suggests the socially divisive, chauvinist agendas championed by Trump's Maga movement have widening international appeal. That augurs ill for democracy in Britain and the world generally. For the same reason, Trump's assaults on US constitutional rights, notably minority and gender rights, attacks on judges, universities and public institutions, and attempts to suppress independent media scrutiny are ominous. Such toxic behaviour is contagious. Trumpism is the new Covid. Britain needs inoculation. By slashing overseas aid, cutting public service broadcasters such as Voice of America, defunding and ostracising UN agencies, flouting international courts and pretending the climate emergency is illusory, Trump inflicts immense harm on the US's reputation, global influence and soft-power armoury. He is wrecking the rules-based order that Britain views as fundamental. It's a gift to China, Russia and authoritarians everywhere. As Pentagon spending rockets to $1tn annually, his crude message is unmistakeable: might makes right. Brute strength rules. Trump is a disaster for the west and all in the UK who respect progressive democratic values. His second term will evidently be more globally perilous, destructive and destabilising than his first. In support of universal principles established centuries before anyone heard of him, Britain should steer clear of this walking, talking catastrophe. Rather than hug Trump close, Starmer should keep him at arm's length for fear of infection. Don't go to Scotland to see him, Prime Minister. Don't waste your breath. Instead, start planning for the post-special-relationship era. Make the break. It's time. Simon Tisdall is a Guardian foreign affairs commentator
Scotsman
33 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Trump visit will stretch Police Scotland resources to the limit
When Donald Trump visited his Turnberry resort midway through his first term in office, there was a heavy Police Scotland presence. Picture:Maybe it's pre-Fringe stress but we seem to have entered some bizarre parallel universe. On Wednesday morning I actually found myself agreeing with The Daily Mail. That's never happened before. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Don't worry, I didn't actually buy a copy. I've not gone totally unhinged. I just happened to glance at its front page headline in my local newsagent It was leading with a story about the scandalous waste of public money being spent this weekend by Police Scotland, who are mounting a massive security operation during Donald Trump's visit. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Around 6000 cops are going to be involved in making sure the giant orange jelly baby comes to no harm when he pops into his golf resorts in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire. 'Hear, hear' I thought. 'This is a national disgrace.' And it is. Shouldn't the polis be doing their day job of catching paedophiles, fraudsters and other criminals? Instead they are providing a protective blue line around one particular criminal, because he happens to be the President of the United States. Police Scotland have themselves admitted that their resources will be tested to the limit this weekend, so if someone stole your bike last night don't expect a bobby to come calling round any time before Tuesday or Wednesday when the human pumpkin flies back home. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How many other offenders get the attention of a whole nation's police force? Unless, of course, the Old Bill are coming out in force to protect the Scottish public from Trump's wandering hands. Of course, Trump is not your average offender. He's also the head of state of a nation with whom the UK enjoys a 'special relationship', but he's not visiting Scotland in that capacity. He's over here to on a golfing holiday. There are a number of reason for this huge police deployment, mainly the numerous demonstrations being held in protest at his visit. At midday today, there will be rallies across Scotland, organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. Huge crowds are expected at the demo here at the American Consulate in Edinburgh, as well as Aberdeen and Dumfries. The fact that Trump is not visiting any of these cities should not stop the public from voicing their anger. Hopefully, if road closures don't keep them out, there will be a huge presence at Turnberry, scene of that famous 2016 protest by the late Janey Godley. Hopefully, many thousands will pay homage by waving banners bearing the slogan 'Trump is a c***'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Humour is an essential weapon against Trump. It's the one thing he can't handle, as can be seen by his attempts to silence American satirists like Jon Stewart and Jimmy Kimmell. CBS announced this week that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will be cancelled when its series ends next May. Catch it online over the next ten months. Many allege this is due to political pressure from the White House. Trump has already tweeted his glee, accusing the host of lacking talent. To which Colbert's response was 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go f*** yourself.' Those last three words well be on many banners today, I'm sure.
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves won't break her fiscal rules, she'll destroy them
For those not paying attention, this Labour Government is turning deception into a fine art. The technique is simple enough: make a pledge that seemingly provides reassurance, then drive a Challenger tank through the pretence, while claiming the literal promise has been maintained. The obvious example is Labour's pledge not to raise the taxes of working people. From the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, to the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, on to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, and any Labour minister being grilled in an interview, the mantra is repeated. Income tax, employee National Insurance contributions and VAT have not been increased – so there have been no taxes raised on working people. The undeniable fact that increases in employers' National Insurance contributions and other taxes result in costs being borne by working people causes no shame, no embarrassment and no admission of a promise being broken. The next big promise to be broken but not betrayed is that the tax and spend plans of Reeves will stay within the fiscal rules she has set herself. By this, the Chancellor means that a responsible government matches its day-to-day spending with its income and only borrows to invest. The latest public borrowing figures have taken a howitzer to this pretence, effectively blowing it out of the water. The deficit for June was £6.6bn higher than the same month last year, while the gap has grown by £7.5bn when you compare this financial year to the previous – and we're only three months in. Andrew Sentance, a former Bank of England economic adviser who served on its Monetary Policy Committee for five years, suggests the 'deficit for 2025/26 [is] heading for £170bn, 5.5-6pc of GDP, even higher than last year – totally unsustainable and over £50bn above the OBR forecast'. Unfortunately for the Government, the many tax rises Reeves announced in her Budget of October 2024 accelerated behavioural responses in the British public to avoid tax increases. The result has been – at best – erratic economic growth, unpredictable tax revenues and a rise in borrowing to meet its everyday commitments. In reality, Reeves is borrowing now to pay for past borrowing and Labour's additional spending that we cannot afford. That is why even the dogs in the street are barking loudly about higher taxes being necessary for her next Budget to stay within the fiscal rules. Were Reeves to abandon her talk of supposed prudence, there would likely be a market response akin to her experiencing skydiving without a parachute. What can the Chancellor do to avoid such a fate? This was signalled in March 2024, when in her Mais Lecture, she revealed an approach to debt financing that would augur greater use of the EU's style of borrowing that, like old Private Finance Initiative (PFI) schemes, could be used to 'invest' in net zero and other politically driven infrastructure. It will keep some beneficiaries in the private sector happy while allowing Labour to claim it is making investments for our future without driving up the debt burden. Bob Lyddon, an international banking and finance consultant, explained her cunning plan in his paper Decoding Rachel Reeves and remains convinced that while tax rises to meet everyday funding will undoubtedly be necessary, the Chancellor will attempt to balance her bromides with honeyed announcements of grand schemes that promise much but deliver little. Reeves signalled how a small amount of 'borrowing for investment' by the Government could be multiplied by having intermediate public entities (like Great British Energy and the National Wealth Fund) borrow as well, and by the resultant schemes also borrowing, this time from investment companies like BlackRock and UK pension schemes. The result will be an Enron-style debt mountain costing 10pc per annum plus the repayments, all falling on the hapless UK business and personal taxpayers one way or another. It is an EU 'bait and switch' that grows off-balance sheet debt that eventually crystallises and has to be paid, just like off-balance sheet PFI still has to be paid. This vision is consistent with Labour's ambition of realignment with the EU and will result in the UK experiencing the same sub-optimal levels of economic growth. It allows Labour to say it is meeting its commitments to splurge great dollops of money into our economy without us feeling the hit. The price would be paid over a 50-year-long commitment that will not immediately result in higher taxes but will drive up the running costs of the public sector. We should be afraid. When Reeves talked up the supposedly halcyon days of Gordon Brown's grandiose public borrowing and especially his use of PFI 'investment' she ignored how it still costs us billions to repay today. The total PFI payments from 1996/97 up to the final transaction not due until 2052/53 are £278.3bn – representing an astonishing 555pc of the £50.1bn capital sum. Of the total of 669 PFI contracts, 588 were under Labour's Blair and Brown governments. An estimate by the Left-leaning Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) priced £13bn of Labour's 1998 PFI-funded NHS capital investment to have a cost of £80bn, and by 2019, it still had £55bn to pay. My money's on Lyddon being right, meaning Labour's next big political double-cross will be to say its fiscal rules are being met when she's driving that tank right over them. While she distracts us with carefully composed doublespeak about the need to increase taxes (because Reeves knows no other way to make her numbers add up and will not be allowed to cut spending), hidden borrowing will be conjured up, too. Ultimately, that will mean yet further tax rises for our grandchildren and their children too. Whether or not our economy or our people can bear it, we shall never know – for none of us are likely to be around to see the carnage.
