
Edinburgh chef who started own restaurant at 23 now one of 'Scotland's best'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
An award-winning Edinburgh founder chef has discussed the difficulties of being a young restaurateur in the capital's vibrant hospitality sector.
Jun Au, from Polwarth, admits he was never any good at school when it came to academics and so he knew he wanted to do something more 'physical.'
At age 18 he set his sights on becoming a chef and honed his art working in the kitchens on Castle Terrace and the Green Store on Victoria Street before its closure. After earning a degree in hospitality, he ventured into the world of PR, representing several businesses in London.
But when the Covid pandemic hit, the PR firm lost all of their clients which led to him moving back to Edinburgh with some saved up cash. Feeling there was nothing to lose, he decided to launch Pomelo at the age of 23 on Strathearn Road.
Now in his current location on Sciennes Road, the 27-year-old has tasted success, earning an Acorn award as well as being named "Best Asian Chef in Scotland' by the Asian Catering Federation and one of CODE 30 under 30 in 2025.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sentstraight to your messages.
'I would say it was the best time for us to start out,' he said. 'Lockdown started relaxing and people were allowed outside again, and with us being a new eatery, we drew them in.
'We rode that wave of enthusiasm but I was quite naive having never run a business before. It was a steep learning curve. You have a lot to think about as a small business such as staffing costs, taxes and your bills."
It has not been all plain sailing, with Jun arguing more needs to be done to help the sector during a period of rising costs. 'The biggest difficulty of running a restaurant in Edinburgh is monetary,' he said. 'Prices are skyrocketing and on top of that you have high rents, taxes and growing wages.
'I know they have to find a difficult balance but hospitality is one of the largest employers in the country. They have put a burden on restaurant owners and small businesses have a lot of pressure on them."
'My advice to anyone starting out is be flexible and nimble so you are able to switch things up when costs rise.'
Jun does not feel his youth has held him back and credits his staff and family for helping making the venture a success.
'For me I was never a party person,' he said. 'I liked to be by myself and now I like to be with my wife and dog.
'The people around me made a lot more sacrifices. My staff work long hours to support the business and my wife is my biggest supporter.
'She is my front of house manager who handles all the admin which I don't have the capacity to deal with. She sacrifices so much which means a lot to me.
'My parents have also put so much effort in, with my mum continuing to help out with the accounting. My chef team is also amazing. It is so hard to find competent people who really want to work and have a passion for that work.'
Winning an Acorn and being recognised by his peers was important for Jun as he admits he suffered from impostor syndrome during the early days.
'When you are as young as I am, you can be a little scared or concerned you are doing the right thing,' he said. 'You definitely have to be really passionate about when starting out as you work a lot of hours.
'I am very not calm at all. But I see my anxiety as an advantage, I never switch off and I do not know if that is a super power however if it is, then it is the worst one you can have.'
Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
Jun describes Pomelo as creating a menu inspired by the three chefs' heritage. At present there is a Chinese, Filipino and Maltese chef who all borrow from their own life experiences and childhoods.
Jun grew up in a Chinese family who explored their culture through food, whether it was his mother cooking in the kitchen or his grandmother passing down recipes. He believes has created a space where diners can have fun exploring fusion cuisine.
Things like the Pomelo chicken sandwich, which is made using a pineapple flavoured brioche style bun with a cookie-like crust on top, filled with fried chicken, encapsulates perfectly what Jun and his staff are all about.
'I would say we are fun,' he said. 'The menu is really inspired by our childhoods and our heritage while also focusing on produce that is in season.'
Pomelo is open for brunch and dinner bookings. To visit Pomelo's website, click here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Holyrood 2026 will test voters' trust in public spending
READ MORE Speaking to journalists, Ian Murray said the increased settlement raised fundamental political questions ahead of the 2026 election. 'The question then becomes, who do you trust to spend that?' he said. 'The record of the SNP Government of the last 18 years has not been beneficial in terms of how they would spend it. 'In fact, I think there will be broad support for the view that the £4.9bn that they got in the budget last year has not been spent wisely either. 'So this is an incredible investment. It is the largest settlement in the devolution era. We promised to end austerity, and we have.' (Left to right) Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray and Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband leave Downing Street (Image: Stefan Rousseau) In total, the Scottish Government's resource budget will rise by £2.4bn per year from April 2026, while its capital funding will increase by more than £510 million annually over a slightly longer period. However, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison warned that despite the uplift, the real-terms increase in day-to-day funding was just 0.8% annually — below UK departmental averages — and amounted to £1.1bn less than if it had matched UK departmental spending. The Scottish Government will respond to the announcement in the medium-term financial strategy on June 25, the Finance Secretary said. Speaking to journalists in Holyrood, the SNP minister said there had been a deterioration in relations with the Treasury. She said that despite repeated requests, devolved governments were refused a meeting with Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. 'I have to say, in recent weeks, the lack of engagement around the Spending Review has been a concern,' she said. 'Ourselves, the Welsh and Northern Irish governments asked for a meeting with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to talk about the details of the Spending Review and we were not given one because he was too busy in departmental meetings and negotiations with UK departments — and then pops out the end of that to meet with us. 'I do not think that is good enough and it went down really, really badly.' (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA) In their analysis, the Fraser of Allander Institute also queried Labour's claim that the block grant would increase by £9.1bn over the Spending Review period. They said that figure was based on a flawed baseline and assumed there would be no funding increase otherwise. 'A much more insightful — though perhaps less cheery — conclusion from looking at the Scottish Fiscal Commission's forecast is that by 2028–29, funding will be £0.7bn lower than their central estimate published on 29 May.' In the Spending Review, the Chancellor confirmed funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture project at St Fergus, a £250m redevelopment of Faslane naval base, and the reversal of a cut to a £750m AI supercomputer at Edinburgh University. Ms Reeves also confirmed £25m for the Inverness and Cromarty Firth Freeport, and funding for hydrogen production projects at Cromarty and Whitelee. There was also the announcement of a new local growth fund, with investments in up to 350 deprived communities across the UK — including Kirkcaldy High Street and seafront. 'We are renewing Britain,' Ms Reeves told MPs. 'I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it. This Government's task, my task as Chancellor, and the purpose of this spending review is to change that, to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs and on their high streets. 'The priorities of this spending review are the priorities of working people, to invest in Britain's security, in Britain's health, and to grow Britain's economy so that working people are better off.' The Chancellor outlined £190bn in extra spending on the day-to-day running of public services and £113bn on investment. The health service in England was the biggest winner in terms of day-to-day spending, increasing in real terms by 3% a year. That will result in substantial consequentials for the Scottish Government. As expected, defence also saw a significant boost, with spending rising to 2.6% of GDP by April 2027. The Chancellor also promised significant savings on asylum, including a commitment to end spending on hotels for asylum seekers by the end of the parliament. This, she told MPs, would save £1bn. READ MORE The sheer scale of the spending, and a promise to stick to her fiscal rules, led to speculation that Ms Reeves would need to hike taxes in the autumn budget. In his response in the Commons, Mel Stride, the Conservative shadow chancellor, said the spending rise was 'not worth the paper that it is written on'. 'This is the spend now, tax later review, because [she] knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes, and a cruel summer of speculation awaits.' In a round of media interviews, Ms Reeves defended her plans and rejected claims she would need to increase taxes. The Chancellor told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out at last autumn. 'We are not spending a penny more or a penny less than the envelope that we set last autumn. 'So all of this is fully funded. I said at the budget last year, and I repeated again in the spring statement in March, that public services now needed to live within the envelope that we have set. 'That has meant difficult conversations, it has meant difficult decisions, but we have stuck to that spending envelope that we set out in the budget last year.' Most government departments have been asked to find 5% in efficiency savings by 2028–29. Some, like HMRC, face targets as high as 13%. The Scotland Office, grouped with other smaller departments, is expected to contribute to a £296m cut across the UK — but no breakdown has been provided on how much of that will fall on Mr Murray's own department.

The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Funding for Scottish projects is a bribe to sweeten the nuclear pill
We will also get funds for the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire, which was ready to establish a world-first pilot more than a decade ago, but was refused funding by Westminster in spite of support from the oil companies agreeing to the use of their pipelines and depleted wells, and at a time when its success might have saved Longannet. This project site was also bypassed when funding was allocated instead to two sites in England and was left on the back burner. READ MORE: Scottish Government 'short-changed by £1bn by Rachel Reeves' However, I wonder even now if it will actually go ahead. I may be becoming a conspiracy theorist, but I suspect these two funding offers are the bribe to sweeten the pill of Scotland providing the facilities for the Westminster intention to increase the nuclear components of their defence plans and to base them at Faslane, as far from London as possible. I believe that is precisely the purpose of the funding to 'upgrade' to that site and will be the first recipient project to be undertaken. Thereafter, it is not beyond possibility that 'changing fiscal circumstances' might still see the other two cancelled, again. I firmly believe that the majority of Scots already consider that having nuclear capacity so close to our largest city makes us a first-strike target and want them removed. If it is safe enough on that site, then somewhere on the Thames in the periphery of London should be equally safe. Of course, when the upgrade is completed, the redundant subs etc will then quickly be added to the rotting hulks at Rosyth and radioactive material buried somewhere in the north of Scotland. Are we happy to host yet more, more powerful nukes, attack submarines and such dangerous material anywhere in Scotland? If not, independence is the only way to avoid it, and soon! L McGregor Falkirk BRITAIN is paying interest of more than £100 billion a year to banks and other lenders, on money borrowed to finance the ever-increasing gap between our national income and expenditure. Overspending has been a feature of our economy for many years, but is now being exacerbated by an ageing population, defence spending, immigration, and net zero. Chancellor Reeves clearly grasps this, but accumulated government debt – some £3000 billion – and the £100bn of annual interest it demands can never be reduced by domestic measures such as taxation. READ MORE: SNP say 'cuts in every detail' of Rachel Reeves's Spending Review The time has come to grasp the real problem, which is that the private banking system creates the public money supply – at interest – when government itself should be creating that money for public undertakings, free of interest. This would vastly improve our circumstances, as well as giving government real control over money and policy, rather than the contorted fiscal juggling needed at present to accommodate the banks. Doing this would not be easy, but would definitely mark the economic turning point of the century. A word in bankers' ears is the long-overdue first step. Just to tell them that their fun of lending money created from thin air is over, and the fiscal boot is about to be moved to the other foot, before it all ends in tears. An independent Scotland, on the other hand, could issue its own money – to be used internally only at first, in order to be free of the money markets, and have its own central bank to build reserves of foreign currency for international business. Eventually, that Scottish currency would be strong enough to be floated internationally, and the parasitic banking system that takes but never gives would be gone from Scotland. Malcolm Parkin Kinross IT is both comforting and distressing that so many readers of The National appear to hold the same concerns that I have over John Swinney's leadership of the SNP. The grumblings in the party are getting louder, and more and more members are staying away from branch meetings or any campaigning activity – there is no guarantee they will come out during the election campaign. It is interesting that others in the party are discussing forcing Mr Swinney to push for independence, but I really believe his devolutionist mindset is fixed and we'll get the same push that we had under Nicola Sturgeon where independence is only mentioned to gee up the members – but we've all been fooled by this in the past and I don't think it will have any impact if used again. READ MORE: Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership I understand why elected SNP politicians don't want to raise their heads above the parapet – John Swinney has a long history of sticking the boot into those who oppose him – you only have to ask former SNP MSP Campbell Martin about that. So I could see another member doing a Bill Wilson to get enough votes to undermine Mr Swinney's leadership. It is a sad day when you have to look at action to make the leader of the largest pro-independence party in Scotland actually commit to pushing for independence, but that's where we are. I should also hope that there is a massive clear-out of the National Executive Committee – for too long they have been the nodding dogs of the leadership and have completely failed in their role of holding the leadership to account. We don't have too long to sort this problem out, but it needs done or we will see a Unionist coalition running the Scottish Government. Alex Beckett Paisley


South Wales Guardian
7 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Murray asks who Scots voters ‘trust to spend' £9.1bn rise in funding
Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out her spending plans for the next three years on Wednesday, pledging to increase funding for housing and the NHS south of the border – which will have an impact on Scotland. She also announced development funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire, as well as the reinstatement of up to £750 million to build the UK's most powerful supercomputer at Edinburgh University. According to the Treasury, the Scottish Government will see an increase of £9.1 billion over the next three years. In a briefing for Scottish journalists, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said on average, the increase will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year – £2.4 billion of which will be revenue spending up to 2028-29 and around £510 million in capital for the slightly longer period of four years. The funding will take effect from April next year, just weeks before Scots go to the polls in the Holyrood election. In the same briefing, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray asked: 'The question then becomes, who do you trust to spend that? 'The record of the SNP Government of the last 18 years has not been beneficial in terms of how they would spend it. 'In fact, I think there'll be broad support for the view that the £4.9 billion that they got in the budget last year has not been spent wisely either.' He said Wednesday's spending review was 'great' for Scotland. One of the key announcements was confirmation of development funding for the Acorn project. The project – which will store carbon emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea – was repeatedly overlooked by successive UK governments for funding. But asked for clarity on how much cash the project will receive, Mr Jones was unable to say. The 136-page document also said that while the Government supports Acorn, 'a final investment decision will be taken later this Parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'. Mr Murray said: 'We're working with the Acorn partners and have been for some time now about what they need for the development of it and that's what this commitment is for.' The SNP pushed for more detail on Acorn following the announcement. Accusing successive UK governments of having 'dragged their heels' on the project, Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: 'The glaring omission in today's announcement was any detail on the scale of funding and the timescales for delivery, which stands in stark contrast to the £22 billion commitment the Labour Government has already given to carbon capture projects in England. 'Westminster has had 20 years to hammer out the detail on Scottish carbon capture, so it must now deliver meaningful funding and concrete support at pace.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the overall funding increase does not match that of Whitehall departments, claiming Scotland has missed out on more than £1 billion. 'Today's settlement for Scotland is particularly disappointing, with real-terms growth of 0.8% a year for our overall block grant, which is lower than the average for UK departments,' she said. 'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we would have £1.1 billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than £1 billion pounds. 'It is also disappointing that despite apparent briefing to media in advance, we are still awaiting clarity on funding for the vital Acorn project in the north-east of Scotland. 'We made extensive representations to the UK Government on our priorities for the spending review, including calls for an end to spending that bypasses devolution, but there has been limited opportunity to engage with them. 'It appears that the continuation of local growth funding – which fails to match the European Structural Funds it was supposed to replace – will come directly from Whitehall, yet again bypassing devolved governments.' The Scottish Government will respond to the announcement in the medium-term financial strategy on June 25, the Finance Secretary said. But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar praised the spending review as 'game-changing', adding: 'The plans set out today will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland, on top of the record budget settlement delivered in the budget. 'From the Acorn Project to a national supercomputer in Edinburgh to our defence industry, this Labour Government is investing in Scotland's future while the SNP carps from the sidelines.' Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy described the spending review as a 'spend-now-tax-later statement' which will result in the Chancellor 'almost certainly' having to raise taxes.