
QLDC's Shotover Consent Applications Going Direct To Environment Court
Provisions for public notification around the applications remain in place.
ORC's Manager Consents Alexandra King says ORC received a letter from QLDC on 27 June 2025 requesting the two applications for resource consent (RM25.206 and RM25.177) be directly referred to the Environment Court – which can be done under section 87D of the Resource Management Act (RMA).
'The ORC has granted QLDC's request for direct referral of those applications to the Environment Court.
A factor in reaching this decision is that public notification of the applications will proceed. This will happen once some outstanding information being sought from QLDC across both applications has been received [due by 11 August] and assessed,' Ms King says.
'It's a pragmatic decision and this approach ensures security of the public notification process and the opportunity for public participation is based on having complete and accurate information, and is consistent with the requirements of the RMA,' she says.
In its 27 June letter to ORC, QLDC put forward several reasons to ORC for direct referral to the Environment Court, including that the referral would save all parties 'considerable time and money'.
The QLDC letter noted there is 'significant public interest' given the consents being sought came from activities associated with the use of emergency works and direct referral to the Environment Court would enable a more efficient and effective determination, especially given the significant resources and issues in play.
QLDC's letter also said that whether ORC held a hearing or the Environment Court, either result was 'very likely to be appealed irrespective of the outcome'.
Ms King says ORC will continue to process the applications in accordance with the RMA and reiterated ORC will publicly notify the applications, as had been requested earlier by QLDC, following receipt of the requested, additional information; due in by 11 August.
QLDC has applied for two resource consent applications (RM25.206 and RM25.177).
These applications include the following activities:
Divert the Shotover River to ensure the discharge is always going to running water.
Disturb the bed of the Shotover River to create and maintain a diversion channel.
Discharge consent for remobilising sediment from the Shotover River when creating the channel.
Discharge treated wastewater to the Shotover River from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Disturb the bed of the Shotover River for the purpose of installing a riprap outfall structure.
Ms King says ORC continues to closely monitor the Shotover treatment plant site and continues to undertake its regulatory role.
*Background
Two abatement notices are in place and 10 infringements have been issued since the start of 2024. Five of these infringementnotices have been issued this year (2025) relating to issues that happened on site towards the end of 2024.
All the (5) new notices that have been issued, relate to the alleged discharge of contaminants (namely treated wastewater) to land on the Shotover Delta in circumstances which may result in contaminant (or any other contaminant entering water; namely groundwater), the Shotover River and/or Kawarau River.
Following conclusion of a more than year-long investigation of the Shotover site, ORC decided on 23 February to apply to the Environment Court for an Enforcement Order - under section 316 of the Resource Management Act 1991; to have QLDC abide by its consent conditions.
The Enforcement Order application was made because of issues around QLDC's consent compliance, mainly related to the performance of the Shotover plant's ground disposal field; where treated wastewater from the plant was expected to soak through the ground and not to pond.
Following the application to the Environment Court and subsequent mediation process, there is now an Enforcement Order still in place relating to the Shotover site.
(An Enforcement Order is a court issued directive requiring certain actions to be taken within set time frames to fix a problem).
NB - There is further supporting material / documents now available on the dedicated Shotover web page Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant https://www.orc.govt.nz/consents-and-compliance/compliance/shotover-wastewater-treatment-plant/
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Industrial users demand electricity market reform amid rising prices
Bridget Abernethy, the chief executive of the Electricity Retailers and Generators Association, argues that major disruption to the electricity market structure is the 'last thing we [New Zealand] can afford' As a major energy user and economic contributor, we would argue the opposite – New Zealand cannot afford the status quo to continue. Taking a 'we'll be right' attitude to nine years of price increases for wholesale users has had negative impacts for all consumers. Citing a 'decade of flat electricity prices' for household consumers, Abernethy notes a short-term period of marginal increases is inevitable. What is missing from this statement is that electricity costs have been anything but flat for wholesale users, with spot prices increasing 3.5 times in nine years. (Index graph– Averaged Spot Market Real Time Pricing with forecast to April 2026). How can this disparity between retail and wholesale pricing occur in a properly functioning market? Could it be because residential consumers would demand earlier political intervention if their bills skyrocketed to the same degree as that of wholesale consumers? We accept that inter-year volatility will increase with the rise in intermittent renewables. However, it is not the main factor hurting large industrial users – it is this rising average price that cannot be insulated by hedging forward. Hedging contracts are now unaffordable for most large users because futures hedge prices are linked to the rising spot prices. The wealth transfer from large industrial users to generators over the past decade in the form of inflated prices has not resulted in investment into more net supply. The market has not created sufficient incentives to build new generation ahead of when it is needed. Pan Pac general manager Tony Clifford at the Whirinaki plant. Photo / Warren Buckland Instead, generators have sat on approved RMA (Resource Management Act) consents and continued to profit at the expense of business. We have seen the impact on manufacturers in regional areas no longer able to operate profitably. Residential consumers are then affected through loss of employment and services, while the economy and our communities suffer. Blaming the shortage of gas as a driver of rising prices is overstating its impact. Electricity generation from gas makes up less than 10% of all electricity generated. While prices would have increased because of gas shortages, we dispute the premium over the relationship to the gas costs. Independent analysis of generator margins shows at least $38/MWh of increases cannot be explained by gas or ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) charge increases. In summary, the gas shortage should not be impacting the electricity pricing to the extent claimed. However, the shortage of gas has been used to justify many years of high profits for generators and large dividend payouts to shareholders (which include successive Governments). These profits have not been reinvested into new generation until the recent threat of market intervention. We are not blaming generators for maximising profit; they are working within the existing market rules that incentivise them to keep the market on the edge, but we do have an issue with them telling only a part of the story to regulators, politicians and the public, that they can do nothing about rising costs and that consumers just have to ride it out. Market regulators and successive Governments have seen this train wreck approaching from a long way off but have chosen to do little. Simply not making a bold decision is a decision in itself.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Resource Management Act changes will allow power plants to be built faster
Energy Resources Aotearoa chief executive John Carnegie. Photo: Supplied / Rob Tucker A group representing big energy producers said changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) will allow power plants to be built faster, and reduce price volatility in the electricity market. Parliament passed the amendment yesterday, which means councils will now need to grant consents for certain energy infrastructure within a year. Energy Resources Aotearoa's chief executive, John Carnegie, told Morning Report that it's great news for electricity consumers - big and small. He said the slow consenting processes previously had added to costs and uncertainty. Carnegie said more he's now expecting faster and more certain consenting processes for both fossil fuel and renewable power generation. It has potential to take price volatility out of the electricity market, and deliver a more resilient system that can better handle unexpected weather he events, he said. Carnegie said while renewables remain the backbone of the electricity system, New Zealand needs more fossil fuel and gas generating plants to "fill the gaps" when hydro, solar and wind outputs are low. He said the country needs to build capacity and not be responding in crisis mode. The tight supply of gas meant more demand for back up power, said Carnegie. When asked about the carbon and environmental costs the changes may bring, Carnegie said New Zealand would otherwise be facing energy scarcity and skyrocketing prices. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.