The White House's favorite source of pro-Trump news is … the White House's YouTube channel
The White House Wire was launched at the end of April on the official WH.gov page, around the time that the Trump comms team began ramping up its war on the mainstream journalists and outlets who covered them critically. At that time, they'd revoked the Associated Press' credentials after the outlet refused to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America.' Two months after its launch, Jim Nielsen, a web developer and founding engineer at the data analytics company Quadratic, ran an analysis on the links that the Trump administration has been selecting to shape their narrative. (Or, as Nielsen put it, 'what kind of links they're considering as 'real news''.)
Surprisingly, YouTube was the top linkout, followed by Fox News, The Post Millennial, and Fox Business. Also on the list: social media sites such as X.com (in 6th place) and Trump's own Truth Social (8th place), and one mainstream outlet (Reuters in 7th place.)
According to an Axios story written during the launch, the Wire was intended to emulate The Drudge Report, both in layout and in purpose: a regularly-updated page of links to a curated selection of media content, along with headlines that were edited in a way that shaped a pro-Trump narrative. 'It's a place for supporters of the president's agenda to get the real news all in one place in a shareable and readable format,' a White House official told Axios at the time, calling it a 'one-stop shop for news' and a potential hub for MAGA influencer content.
Notably, for all the talk about having influencers as major players on the platform, nearly all of the YouTube link outs on the site go directly to the White House's content. Some of them are livestreams, some of them are taped official remarks, while others are short, slickly edited videos about whatever is on the President's agenda — perhaps a sign that no matter what influencers might say to praise them, there's no better message than the one that's shaped directly by the White House itself.
And even the links that go outside the MAGA media ecosystem have some Trumpian editorializing in the headlines, too. For instance, a New York Post headline on Thursday characterized the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill Act as a 'bruising struggle', reflecting the intraparty revolts and GOP defections throughout the process. On the White House Wire, the link to the Post's story glossed over it and declared in all caps: 'THE ONE, BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL HEADS TO TRUMP'S DESK'. (The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.)
Ever since his 2021 removal from Twitter and Facebook, Trump and his political apparatus have invested heavily in building out their own media infrastructure – from the websites, to the code, to the servers themselves – in order to retain complete control over their messaging without the threat of deplatforming. Truth Social, for instance, is wholly owned by Trump, meaning no other investor or shareholder can remove him for posting controversial content – one of the reasons he declined to return to Twitter after Elon Musk bought the company and rebranded it as X.
Trumpworld has also tried to reduce their reliance on right-wing media outlets over the years, which have not been as reliably loyal as they'd prefer. Fox News, for instance, became the subject of Trump's hatred after they were the first to declare that he'd lost Arizona in the 2020 presidential election; Breitbart nearly became blacklisted after it was revealed that its chairman Steve Bannon was leaking to reporters during his stint in the White House. Cribbing the Drudge Report's format is simply part of their pattern: Matt Drudge, the site's primary curator and a major power player in right-wing media, became a vehement anti-Trumper and frequently uses the Drudge Report to criticise the president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location originally appeared on Athlon Sports. President Donald Trump's relationship with the UFC is well-documented. He has attended multiple events, and fighters like Conor McGregor have visited him at the White House, reinforcing the alliance between the MMA promotion and his political brand. The UFC's massive popularity, especially among younger male demographics, makes it a centerpiece for Trump and his supporters, who include the UFC's CEO and President, Dana White. Advertisement Now, Trump has floated a bold and unconventional idea to celebrate America's upcoming 250th anniversary: a UFC championship fight on the White House grounds. Donald Trump and Dana WhiteEd Mulholland-GettyImages During a speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Trump revealed his desire for a large-scale event featuring a UFC fight with up to 25,000 spectators as part of the "America250" festivities. 'Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there,' Trump said. While the announcement energized Trump's supporters, the feasibility and appropriateness of hosting a violent combat sport on White House property were clearly not in the president's consideration. The White House has never before been used as a venue for a pay-per-view sporting event, let alone a sport with a fan base as rowdy as MMA. Advertisement Overlooked in his proclamation were the logistical hurdles, including Secret Service approvals and crowd control, that could make the plan more aspirational than practical. The UFC's involvement adds another layer of controversy. While the organization has grown into a mainstream sports powerhouse, it has also faced criticism over fighter pay, benefits, and overall dwindling quality. As of now, the proposal lacks concrete details, and the idea is likely nothing more than mere political theater. Given Trump's history of controversy, however, the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out. Related: The UFC Could Be On The Verge Of A Huge Partnership Related: Dana White & Mark Zuckerberg Announce UFC-Meta Partnership: Enhanced Fan Experience, But at What Cost to Fighters? This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 4, 2025, where it first appeared.
Business Insider
39 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Europe's top negotiator says it's impossible to get a trade deal done by Trump's July deadline
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said it was "impossible" to reach a detailed trade deal by President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline. Von der Leyen said the US and European Union were aiming for a July 9 "agreement in principle" trade deal, which would be light on details. She was speaking at a press conference in the Danish city of Aarhus on Thursday, at a European Union summit to mark the start of Denmark's six-month-long EU presidency. "It's a huge task because we have the largest trade volume globally between the European Union and the United States, 1.5 trillion euros, very complex and a huge quantity," she said. She added, "Indeed, what we are aiming at is an agreement in principle. Because I mean, such a volume in 90 days, an agreement in detail, impossible." The European Union was one of the hardest hit by the slew of tariffs Trump announced on April 2, seeing a tariff rate of 20%. Responding to the tariffs, Von der Leyen said in an April statement on X that Trump's tariffs were a "major blow to the world economy" with "dire" consequences for millions of people. Trump later issued a 90-day pause to allow for trade negotiations, and all of the US's trade partners were subject to an interim 10% tariff rate. In February, months before the April 2 tariffs, Trump ordered a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, and the EU retaliated with tariffs on 26 billion euros, or $28.4 billion, worth of US goods. In May, he floated raising the EU's tariff rate to 50% from June 1, saying the group was "very difficult to deal with" and the US's trade negotiations with the EU were "going nowhere." However, Trump retracted the threat after a call with Von der Leyen. He said she had requested an extension on the June 1 deadline. "I agreed to the extension — July 9, 2025 — It was my privilege to do so," Trump wrote on Truth Social on May 25. On May 26, Paula Pinho, a spokeswoman for the European Commission, said in a press conference that Von der Leyen and Trump had "agreed both to fast-track the trade negotiations and to stay in close contact." Representatives of the European Commission and the White House did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.
