From Clouds to Compliance: How Vape Kit Advertising is Evolving Online
The vaping industry has undergone massive growth over the last decade, carving out a substantial niche in the global nicotine market. As vape kits became more advanced, stylish, and accessible, so too did the methods used to market them—particularly online. However, with rising concerns around youth vaping and public health, governments and regulatory bodies have introduced new standards and tightened advertising regulations. These changes are redefining how vape products are presented on the internet.
In this blog, we'll explore the evolving landscape of online advertising standards for vape kits, what prompted these changes, how brands are adapting, and what it all means for marketers and consumers alike.
In a world driven by technology, users crave products that combine performance, durability, and sleek design. One such standout is the Hayati pro max plus 6000, which redefines expectations with its cutting-edge features and user-focused design. Engineered for those who demand excellence, it offers extended functionality without compromising on style or convenience. Whether you're on the go or relaxing at home, this device adapts to your lifestyle effortlessly. With a seamless interface and long-lasting capabilities, it's more than just a gadget—it's a reliable companion for daily living. Experience modern efficiency like never before with this groundbreaking innovation.
When vape kits first entered the scene, they were marketed as smoking cessation tools, offering smokers a 'healthier' alternative. Over time, the market exploded, with stylish designs, countless flavors, and celebrity endorsements contributing to a surge in popularity—particularly among young adults and teenagers.
Much of this growth was driven by digital marketing. Brands utilized influencer partnerships on platforms like Instagram, flashy banner ads, email campaigns, and even TikTok videos to reach a wide audience. However, this aggressive and often youth-targeted advertising triggered alarm bells for public health officials.
Several factors converged to force a regulatory overhaul of online vape advertising: Youth Vaping Epidemic: Studies showed dramatic increases in teen vaping, prompting regulatory agencies like the U.S. FDA and the UK's ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) to take action. Youths were being exposed to appealing flavors, sleek product imagery, and influencer content glamorizing vaping.
Public Health Concerns: Though often promoted as safer than smoking, vaping isn't without risk. The long-term health effects are still being studied, and misleading advertising raised concerns about downplaying potential harms.
Policy Pressures: Lobbying from health groups and stricter national policies created legal obligations for companies to revise their marketing strategies, especially when it came to advertising across borders.
Platform Accountability: Social media giants and search engines came under pressure to restrict or ban vape advertising to prevent exposure to underage users.
The new landscape for vape kit advertising online varies by country, but several core principles are being adopted globally:
One of the primary regulatory shifts involves age-gating content. Vape ads must now be shown only to verified users over the legal smoking age, usually through platforms with age restriction tools. This includes mandatory pop-ups on websites, requiring users to input their birthdate, or even implementing third-party verification tools.
Regulators have cracked down hard on influencer marketing. Vape brands can no longer partner with influencers whose audiences include significant numbers of underage users. In some jurisdictions, all lifestyle imagery (such as someone appearing cool, trendy, or athletic while vaping) is banned outright, since it may glamorize the habit.
Flavors like 'Unicorn Milk' or 'Cotton Candy Crush' once dominated vape marketing because of their appeal. Today, many regions have banned the use of such names in online ads, considering them too enticing for minors. Ads must use plain, factual language and avoid descriptors that sound like treats or desserts.
Major digital platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Google, and TikTok have imposed outright bans on paid vape advertisements. Even organic content is closely monitored, and any content deemed promotional can be flagged or removed. Brands must now walk a fine line between educating adult users and unintentionally promoting products.
In line with tobacco advertising rules, many countries now require prominent disclaimers on vape-related content. These may include messages like 'This product contains nicotine, which is a highly addictive substance' or information about health risks. Failure to include these can result in content takedowns or financial penalties.
For multinational vape brands, online advertising must now comply with the rules of each region they operate in. That means crafting multiple versions of content and ensuring their display settings respect local restrictions—a complicated but necessary process for global marketing teams.
Despite these changes, vape brands are finding creative and compliant ways to maintain visibility: Content Marketing : Brands are investing more in educational blogs, how-to guides, and product comparison articles that deliver value to users while steering clear of promotional language.
: Brands are investing more in educational blogs, how-to guides, and product comparison articles that deliver value to users while steering clear of promotional language. SEO and Organic Search : With paid ads limited, SEO has become critical. Companies are optimizing websites for relevant keywords to attract adult users through organic search.
: With paid ads limited, SEO has become critical. Companies are optimizing websites for relevant keywords to attract adult users through organic search. Email Marketing (With Restrictions) : While not immune to regulations, email marketing remains one of the last direct communication channels. Brands must ensure recipients are age-verified and have consented to receive messages.
: While not immune to regulations, email marketing remains one of the last direct communication channels. Brands must ensure recipients are age-verified and have consented to receive messages. Retail Partnerships and Affiliate Marketing : Many brands are leveraging licensed resellers or affiliate marketers with established compliance protocols to promote their products.
: Many brands are leveraging licensed resellers or affiliate marketers with established compliance protocols to promote their products. Packaging as a Marketing Tool: As advertising shifts away from flashy visuals, packaging design has taken center stage. Clear, mature, and informative labeling now plays a significant role in brand identity.
Advanced algorithms and AI moderation tools are being deployed by tech platforms to enforce advertising policies automatically. These tools can flag inappropriate content, detect influencer-brand relationships, and monitor language use in real-time.
At the same time, vape brands are also using technology to stay compliant—integrating age-verification software, geo-blocking tools, and content management systems to ensure the right audiences see their content.
As technology evolves and research into vaping continues, the advertising landscape is likely to keep shifting. Several trends to watch include: Increased Global Harmonization : Regulatory bodies may begin to adopt more unified international standards for vape advertising to prevent regulatory arbitrage.
: Regulatory bodies may begin to adopt more unified international standards for vape advertising to prevent regulatory arbitrage. Transparency and Public Reporting : Companies may be required to report their digital marketing practices and compliance efforts more openly.
: Companies may be required to report their digital marketing practices and compliance efforts more openly. Rise of Harm Reduction Narratives : Expect a pivot in messaging—from glamorization to harm reduction. Brands will increasingly emphasize their role in helping smokers transition from cigarettes in a more medically responsible tone.
: Expect a pivot in messaging—from glamorization to harm reduction. Brands will increasingly emphasize their role in helping smokers transition from cigarettes in a more medically responsible tone. Emergence of Niche Platforms: As mainstream social networks restrict vape content, niche forums or closed communities could become key hubs for adult user engagement.
The online advertising standards for vape kits are evolving rapidly—and for good reason. While the industry continues to serve adult smokers seeking alternatives, it must also meet growing demands for ethical marketing and public health responsibility.
For brands, this means adapting to a new era of transparency, compliance, and creative restraint. For consumers, particularly adults who vape, it means being presented with clearer, more honest information.
As the digital advertising world rebalances, the vape sector has a chance to reinvent itself—not as a trend, but as a regulated industry that respects both its users and its social impact.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
America might finally make childbirth free
is a policy correspondent for Vox covering social policy. She focuses on housing, schools, homelessness, child care, and abortion rights, and has been reporting on these issues for more than a decade. As politicians grapple with declining birth rates, the financial burden of giving birth in America — where privately insured families face out-of-pocket costs of nearly $3,000 on average — has captured widespread attention. Last month, when news broke that the Trump administration was considering $5,000 baby bonuses for new parents, comedian Taylor Tomlinson captured the national frustration: 'That's like spritzing a volcano with a water gun.' A recent viral TikTok showing one mother's $44,000 hospital bill shocked viewers worldwide, underscoring the uniquely brutal pressures facing American families. Now, a rare bipartisan solution could directly address at least the problem of expensive childbirth. The Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act, introduced in the Senate last week, would require private insurance companies to fully cover all childbirth-related expenses — from prenatal care and ultrasounds to delivery, postpartum care, and mental health treatment — without any co-pays or deductibles. (Medicaid, which insures roughly 41 percent of American births, already covers these costs.) The bill was introduced by Republican Sens. Cindy Hyde-Smith (MS) and Josh Hawley (MO), and Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (VA) and Kirsten Gillibrand (NY). A companion bipartisan version is expected in the House soon, with Democratic Rep. Jared Golden (ME) among the forthcoming cosponsors. Perhaps most striking are the bill's endorsees: organizations that typically find themselves on opposite sides of reproductive health debates. Supporters include the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association, and the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs, alongside prominent anti-abortion groups including Americans United for Life, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, Students for Life, and Live Action. While the White House has not yet weighed in, Vice President JD Vance championed the idea during his Senate tenure. He publicly called the free childbirth proposal 'interesting' in January 2023, and his office had been preparing bipartisan legislation on the issue last year before being tapped to join the Trump campaign. Notably, Vance's former Senate staffer Robert Orr, who led the childbirth bill initiative, now works for Hawley. Some abortion rights advocacy groups, too, have expressed approval. Kimberly Inez McGuire, executive director at Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity, told me her organization 'proudly supports' the bill. Dorianne Mason, the director of health equity at the National Women's Law Center, said they are 'encouraged' to see the bipartisan effort. A spokesperson for Planned Parenthood Action Fund said the group is still reviewing the bill but 'generally supports legislation to make the cost of maternal health care and parenting more affordable.' Reproductive Freedom For All declined to comment. While questions remain about whether eliminating childbirth costs would actually boost birth rates or reduce abortions — as various supporters hope — there's little doubt it would provide crucial relief to families who have already chosen to have children. The unlikely alliance behind the bill traces back to an unexpected source: a journalist's challenge to the anti-abortion movement. How the free childbirth bill would work The Affordable Care Act already requires insurers to cover essential health benefits, like birth control and cancer screenings, at no cost to patients. This new bill would expand the list of essential health benefits to include prenatal, birth, and postpartum care, and require these services also to be free. The costs would be paid by insurance companies and modest increases in premiums for the 178 million people primarily covered by private plans. On average, premiums would go up by approximately $30 annually, according to an analysis from the Niskanen Center think Mansell, the Niskanen policy analyst who ran the cost modeling, told me he thinks this proposal is the simplest way, on an administrative level, to make birth free. The trade-off, though, is instability: employer-sponsored coverage can disappear just when families need it most, since people often lose their jobs during pregnancy. The bill started with a challenge to the anti-abortion movement The bill to cover childbirth costs under private health insurance has an unusual origin story compared to most pieces of legislation in Washington, DC, and reflects evolving factions within the anti-abortion movement. In early July 2022, shortly after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Elizabeth Bruenig, a staff writer at the Atlantic, published a piece urging the anti-abortion movement to take up the cause of making birth free. 'It's time the pro-life movement chose life,' Bruenig, who identifies as pro-life but opposes criminal bans on abortion, wrote. She recommended expanding Medicare to cover the costs, just as Medicare was expanded to cover dialysis and kidney transplants in the early 1970s. Her article cited examples of staggering medical bills, such as one couple charged $10,000 for delivering in Texas and another $24,000 in Indiana. The piece made waves within an anti-abortion movement that was grasping for its next move after the Supreme Court struck down Roe. 'She was really challenging the pro-lifers on this issue, and we found the idea super interesting,' said Kristen Day, the executive director of Democrats for Life of America. Catherine Glenn Foster, then the president and CEO of Americans United for Life, responded a week after publication, praising Bruenig's piece and adding, 'Making birth free should be table stakes as a political matter. I'll work to advance this.' Democrats for Life and Americans United for Life teamed up, and in January 2023 the two organizations released a white paper, fleshing out the 'Make Birth Free' policy in more detail. The authors thanked Bruenig in the acknowledgements for pushing them to take on the idea, and it was this white paper that caught the eye of Vance in the Senate. John Mize, who succeeded Glenn Foster as CEO of Americans United for Life in January 2024, said the Bruenig article arrived at exactly the right moment. He acknowledges his movement 'missed the mark' by being so singularly focused on banning abortion for so many years. 'I think there's been a little bit of paradigm shift in some of the movement — not by all, by any means — but certainly by some parts' to better support women and families. He pointed to the Blueprint for Life coalition which launched in June 2024 to promote more holistic family policies, and he noted that some anti-abortion groups are newly advocating for policies like expanding the Child Tax Credit and paid family leave. Still, many leading anti-abortion advocates and lawmakers have been leading the push to cut federal spending on programs like child care, food assistance, and maternal health care. The Heritage Foundation called the original proposal to make childbirth costs free an 'unjust wealth transfer' and others protested the risk of more 'socialism' in health care as too great. When Bruenig's piece was originally published, she faced fierce pushback from the left. Critics felt the article was insensitive, implicitly endorsing the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe, and offering 'fanfic' for a right-wing movement historically opposed to a robust welfare state. Political science professor Scott Lemieux called the piece 'cringe' and 'embarrassing' and 'deluded.' Others said she was pitching 'forced birth but make it free.' The left-wing backlash ultimately prompted Bruenig to quit Twitter. Bruenig says she never expected much uptake on the idea, but is encouraged by recent changes. 'For the last 10 years or more I have contended that the best way to deal with abortion is on the demand side, by creating a welfare system that gives people an honest choice,' she told me. 'There's been, for better or worse, a shift in the way Republicans are thinking about these kinds of in the center, and I'm very impressed to see some uptake on the idea.'She says she's not surprised there was criticism, but was writing for 'people who are persuadable when it comes to what the pro-life movement should be about.' She added that she embraces the 'pro-life' label despite opposing abortion bans because 'I don't think the pro-ban people should get to decide what counts as pro-life policy or philosophy.' The political road ahead Bill supporters are cautiously hopeful about the road ahead for the legislation. The timing reflects converging forces that have created an unusual window for bipartisan family policy. President Donald Trump's election, combined with growing concerns about declining birth rates, has coincided with a shift among some conservatives toward more proactive family policies. Meanwhile, Democrats see an opportunity to advance maternal health goals. The legislation also benefits from political cover on both sides. Republicans can champion it as pro-family policy that potentially reduces abortions, while Democrats can support it as expanding health care access. Crucially, because it doesn't require new government spending but instead redistributes costs through the existing private insurance system, it sidesteps typical fights over federal budget increases. But challenges remain. The upcoming reconciliation process will test whether Republicans prioritize fiscal restraint or family policy when forced to choose. And while Vance previously supported the free birth idea, the administration faces pressure from fiscal conservatives who view any insurance mandates as market interference. Not all conservatives will be thrilled at the idea of tinkering with the Affordable Care Act or facing accusations of supporting socialized medicine. Bill supporters hope the momentum for pronatalist policies might help to combat those kinds of criticisms, though other conservatives have pointed to falling birth rates in places with single-payer health care, the legislation has attracted support from heavyweight conservative intellectuals. Yuval Levin, the director of social, cultural, and constitutional studies at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote a policy brief earlier this year urging Congress to embrace making childbirth free, even if it doesn't affect birth rates. 'Substantively and symbolically, bringing the out-of-pocket health care costs of childbirth to zero is an ambitious but achievable starting point for the next generation of pro-family policies,' he Brown, a family policy analyst at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center tells me he thinks it's 'the right instinct' to share the costs of parenting more broadly across society, though he hopes it does not 'distract from more broad-based efforts to help parents' such as a larger Child Tax Credit. Mize, of Americans United for Life, has been in 'the planning phases' of working with the White House on family policy. He thinks once the reconciliation bill is done, Republicans and Democrats could either retreat to their camps ahead of the midterms or decide to work together on achievable wins. 'You could see level-headed people say, 'Hey, this is one opportunity for us to put a feather in our cap and say that we're working on a bipartisan basis with our constituents,'' he said.A Senate staffer working on the bill, who requested anonymity to more candidly discuss their plans, said their intention is to move the bill through normal order and attach it to a must-pass legislative package. Both Hawley and Kaine sit on the Senate HELP committee, which holds jurisdiction over the bill. Rep. Golden, who is working on preparing the House version, said they're hoping to introduce their bill within the next week or two.'While some debates over what that should look like can be complicated or contentious, this idea is simple and powerful: Pregnancy and childbirth are normal parts of family life,' he told Vox. 'So, insurance companies should treat it like the routine care it is and cover the cost, not stick people with huge medical bills. That's the kind of simple, commonsense reform that anyone can get behind. '
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
TriSalus Life Sciences Announces Chief Financial Officer Transition With Appointment of David B. Patience
DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: TLSI) (the 'Company'), an oncology company integrating novel delivery technology with standard of care therapies and its investigational immunotherapeutic to transform treatment for patients with solid tumors, today announces the appointment of David B. Patience as Chief Financial Officer, effective July 1, 2025. Mr. Patience succeeds James Young, who stepped down for personal reasons effective May 30, 2025. Dan Giordano, Vice President of Finance for TriSalus, will serve as acting Chief Financial Officer during the transition period. Mr. Young remains available to the Company to support an orderly transition. 'We are thrilled to welcome David to our leadership team,' said Mary Szela, President and CEO of TriSalus Life Sciences. 'David's strong expertise in capital markets and proven track record of financial leadership and operational execution will be invaluable and play a crucial role as we drive our next phase of growth. On behalf of our leadership team, I also thank Jim Young for his service and contributions. We wish him the best in his future endeavors.' Mr. Patience joins TriSalus from Accelerate Diagnostics, where he served as CFO since 2023. He brings extensive experience in leading strategic product portfolio planning, in-depth market analysis of organic and in-organic portfolio opportunities and technical and commercial feasibility analysis of partnerships, mergers and acquisitions. Prior to his time at Accelerate, Mr. Patience held positions with Morgan Stanley's Investment Banking Division, Continental Advisors equity group, and various financial research roles at Nuveen Investments. Mr. Patience holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Colorado Leeds School of Business and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. About TriSalus TriSalus Life Sciences ® is an oncology focused medical technology company seeking to transform outcomes for patients with solid tumors by integrating its innovative delivery technology with standard-of-care therapies, and with its investigational immunotherapeutic, nelitolimod, a class C Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, for a range of different therapeutic and technology applications. The Company's platform includes devices that utilize a proprietary drug delivery technology and a clinical stage investigational immunotherapy. The Company's two FDA-cleared devices use its proprietary Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery™ (PEDD) approach to deliver a range of therapeutics: the TriNav ® Infusion System for hepatic arterial infusion of liver tumors and the Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion System for pancreatic tumors. The PEDD technology is a novel delivery approach designed to address the anatomic limitations of arterial infusion for the pancreas. The PEDD approach modulates pressure and flow in a manner that delivers more therapeutic to the tumor and is designed to reduce undesired delivery to normal tissue, bringing the potential to improve patient outcomes. Nelitolimod, the Company's investigational immunotherapeutic candidate, is designed to improve patient outcomes by treating the immunosuppressive environment created by many tumors and which can make current immunotherapies ineffective in the liver and pancreas. Patient data generated during early Pressure-Enabled Regional Immuno-Oncology™ (PERIO) clinical trials support the hypothesis that nelitolimod delivered via the PEDD technology may have favorable immune effects within the liver and systemically. The target for nelitolimod, TLR9, is expressed across cancer types and the mechanical barriers addressed by the PEDD technology are commonly present as well. The Company is in the final stages of data completion for a number of phase 1 clinical trials and will begin exploring partnership opportunities for development. Forward Looking Statements Statements made in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the benefits and potential benefits of the Company's PEDD drug delivery technology, TriNav ® system and nelitolimod investigational immunotherapy, and the Company's ability to execute on its strategy. Risks that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include risks associated with clinical development and regulatory approval of drug delivery and pharmaceutical product candidates, including that future clinical results may not be consistent with patient data generated during the Company's clinical trials, the cost and timing of all development activities and clinical trials, unexpected safety and efficacy data observed during clinical studies, the risks associated with the credit facility, including the Company's ability to remain in compliance with all its obligations thereunder to avoid an event of default, the risk that the Company will continue to raise capital through the issuance and sale of its equity securities to fund its operations, the risk that the Company will not be able to achieve the applicable revenue requirements to access additional financing under the credit facility, the risk that the Company will not become profitable on its expected timeline, if at all, the risk that the reported financial results will differ from the estimates provided in this press release, changes in expected or existing competition or market conditions, changes in the regulatory environment, unexpected litigation or other disputes, unexpected expensed costs, and other risks described in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the heading 'Risk Factors.' All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made and are based on management's assumptions and estimates as of such date. The Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made except as required by law.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘The Wire' actor says his son was ‘thrown 300 feet' during Henry County tornado
An 18-year-old remains in the intensive care unit after a tornado destroyed his family's home in Henry County. The family identified him as Malachi Chaney. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Tray Chaney, Malachi's father and an actor best known for his role on 'The Wire,' was also injured. He is now at his son's bedside. He told Channel 2 Action News on Friday morning that Malachi has several broken ribs and a fractured bone in his face. "I wish it was me that was in ICU rather than him. I don't want him experiencing no pain," Tray Chaney wrote in an emailed statement. Chaney also posted a video on his Instagram page detailing the harrowing experience. 'My son was thrown 300 feet out of his room,' he said. The National Weather Service will have survey teams out in Henry County on Friday. The NWS told Severe Weather Team 2 Meteorologist Ashley Kramlich that it appears the tornado occurred less than half a mile from the path of an EF-0 tornado in April of this year. RELATED STORIES: Stay weather aware: More strong to severe storms possible Friday Tornado touches down in Henry County, 18-year-old critically injured Tornado watch vs tornado warning: What is the difference, what safety plan do you need [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
