
County Mayo short 90 homes as social housing targets missed by 23%
The issue was raised by Cllr Michael Kilcoyne at the last meeting of Mayo County Council where he questioned management on the shortfall.
'You achieved 77% of the target in a county where we have over 200 people in emergency accommodation. I think it's a reasonable question to ask, why did you miss the target by so much?'
His question was aimed at the Director of Services Tom Gilligan, who stated that Mayo County Council did deliver on its targets. However, the shortfall arose in contributions from the Approved Housing Bodies (AHBs).
Under the Housing For All plan, local authorities are responsible for 60pc of new-build social houses, while AHBs are responsible for the remaining 40pc. Housing can be built directly by a local authority or an AHB, alternatively it can be delivered through turnkey, the purchasing of new housing units from private developers.
'In Mayo our target was 395 houses. The council itself, and through turnkey, delivered 63% of that, a total of 250. The AHB sector for that three-year period delivered 38 units, and 16 units were delivered through part five,' said Mr Gilligan
Part five refers to a part of the planning legislation that allows local authorities to purchase a percentage of land for housing development where planning permission has already been granted. They can purchase up to 20pc of the land at market value and use it to deliver social and affordable housing.
Mr Gilligan continued, 'The reality is that in the last three years or so, the council itself delivered. The AHBs did not deliver. I've raised this on numerous occasions, outlined it to the members, and I've also raised it with the department. Unfortunately we have a very low level of activity here in relation to AHBs.'
In response to this, Cllr Kilcoyne said: 'Over the three-year period, the number of houses - whether it was the man on the moon, Santa Claus, the council or the AHBs who built them - were 90 short.'
Speaking to the Irish Independent after the meeting, Cllr Kilcoyne expanded on this remark:
'I don't need excuses, I just want it corrected and done. It seems to me the local authority always has somebody else to blame except themselves. Management in Mayo County Council always puts forward whatever is necessary to avoid taking the blame,
'I regard the excuse given as a flimsy excuse. The fact is, the management of Mayo County Council, for whatever reason, missed their target by 90 houses. You can blame everybody else, the storm, Christmas, the weather, or the man on the moon. At the end of the day they are the housing authority.'
The Irish Independent also spoke to Mr Gilligan after the meeting. He reiterated that the council is responsible for 60pc of new-build social houses, they delivered 63pc of their target, and 77pc of the overall target was achieved.
'Unfortunately, the delivery levels in Mayo by the AHB sector have not yet reached the scale required to meet our ambitious housing targets. We remain committed to achieving our targets overall and working with various stakeholders in order for that to happen,' he said.
Mr Gilligan pointed out that western counties are not attracting the same attention from large-scale AHBs as those on the east coast,
'As regards the large AHBs, they have concentrated on the urban centres and the larger local authorities, particularly on the east coast. I would say it's a situation where the population demand is higher, the economies are of scale, developments are viable and there is greater access to infrastructure services,
'Rural and regional areas like Mayo, Sligo and Leitrim often fall outside their core delivery focus, which is regrettable.'
The statistics show that in Sligo, 55pc of its 270 house target was met. Of the 149 houses that were built, 29 were delivered by AHBs. Meaning they produced only 19pc of their 40pc build target.
In contrast, Meath had a target of 832 houses but built 1,405, achieving 168pc of its target. Of these, AHBs produced 682 houses. In Laois, the target was 359 houses, but 670 were built, smashing the target by 187pc. AHBs produced 395 of these houses in Laois. For comparison, Mayo's overall target for 2022-2024 was also 395.
Mr Gilligan raised the issue with the Department for Housing, he said that it has been acknowledged by them,
'I'm hopeful that as part of the new Housing For All plan that will be coming out in September, there will be more emphasis on the larger AHBs and they will develop and build more houses here in the west of Ireland,
'There is a huge need here, we have the same housing crisis as the rest of the country.'
He noted that housing bodies Tuath and Co-Operative Housing Ireland are working on projects in the county, but mentioned it would be great to get other large-scale AHBs such as Respond and Clúid, to turn their attention to Mayo.
In response to Cllr Kilcoyne's criticism that the council was placing blame elsewhere, and his description of the AHBs explanation as a "flimsy excuse', Mr Gilligan said:
'I'm not into the blame game myself, it's not about trying to portion blame or demonise anyone in the sector. We really do want to work collaboratively with housing bodies to deliver,
'Cllr Kilcoyne is right, we do have a housing crisis, we do have people on our housing list, we have people who are in emergency accommodation and we want to provide long term sustainable housing for people. We all have to get involved in order to make that happen,
'If you look in relation to a tripod, we are one leg of that. We need the other two legs as well. The AHBs and part five.'
In county Leitrim, AHBs produced zero houses between 2022 - 2024, but the county still managed 98pc of its 82 house target. Leitrim County Council built 73 houses meeting 89pc of the 60pc target. The remaining seven houses were delivered through part five.
Cllr Kilcoyne called on Mayo County Council to take responsibility for housing delivery. The statistics from Leitrim suggest their council took on the responsibility Cllr Kilcoyne believes is needed in Mayo.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Councillors call for review of planning ‘loophole' after leaked file indicates IPAS development for Mayo town
The motion, tabled by Cllr Deirdre Lawless at the council's monthly meeting, was brought forward after a leaked document suggested the property, which had been promised to reopen as a four-star hotel, had been earmarked for use as an International Protection Accommodation Services (IPAS) centre. Cllr Lawless told colleagues that a time bound agreement had been in place between the building's owner and Mayo County Council to house those seeking international protection. She asked if this arrangement was now 'null and void'. Director of Services Tom Gilligan confirmed that no such agreement exists. 'I know that the owners had initially looked in relation to using the hotel for it,' he said, 'but they are committed, as far as I'm aware at this stage, to turn it into a hotel for local tourism.' Despite that assurance, councillors raised broader concerns about how developers can change a building's use, through section five of the Planning and Development Act 2000, in turn avoiding the full planning permission process. Section five allows individuals or developers to seek a formal declaration from their local planning authority to determine whether a proposed development qualifies as exempt under certain criteria. If deemed exempt, the development can proceed without requiring formal planning permission. Unlike ordinary planning applications, which involve public notices and opportunities for residents to object or appeal, section five exemptions are made internally by planning authorities and do not require full permission. Cllr Lawless criticised the system: 'The ordinary person must apply through the planning system for planning permission, it can be really lengthy and very costly on the individual, on families and on couples. Yet these property developers and business owners, many of them registered outside of the state, they're not in county Mayo, can bypass our planning laws.' She told the council about planning company Forbairt Órga Teoranta Ltd , stating that it had received €19.5 Million from the Department of Integration to house those seeking international protection since mid 2022. According to Cllr Lawless, the company has also submitted section five applications for developments in Ballina, Ballyhaunis, and is applying for another in Killala. 'These companies are making millions off the taxpayer, and the taxpayer is being treated like a mushroom, we are being kept in the dark,' she said. Cllr Marie Thérese Duffy stated that section five exemption loopholes need to be reviewed nationally: 'There's a lot of profiteering happening all over Ireland and there's a lack of information within communities around our country and there's a lot of anger too.' A motion to revoke section five was raised last year by Deputy Paul Lawless, who was a councillor in Mayo at the time. Mayo County Council wrote to the Minister for Housing but but Cllr Lawless told the Irish Independent that no reply was received. Director of Services for Planning, Catherine McConnell, clarified that a section five is a declaration, not a permission. 'We receive section five declarations for a wide variety of developments or uses. In the case we are talking about here, applications are for the use of the building. 'Could this building, if used for this purpose, be exempt' - That's what they are asking, it's not granting permission for anything, it does not confer any authority to use it. It still goes back to the department to decide its use,' she explained. If a section five is granted, the final decision on whether a property can be used for certain purposes, like an IPAS centre, remains with the International Protection Office within the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, not the local council. The Irish Independent contacted the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration in relation to the development in Knock. They responded saying: 'The Department has not received an offer of international protection accommodation at this location and is not considering it for use.' The building in Knock is confirmed for restoration as a four-star tourist hotel, but councillors want written confirmation from the Minister to prevent any future reconsideration of the site for asylum accommodation. Speaking to the Irish Independent, Cllr Lawless said there had been no response from the Minister yet, she called for an end to planning circumvention and for community engagement to be key to all planning permission applications. 'Individuals must apply through the planning system and are subject to serious scrutiny, often being rejected planning permission over small details. Meanwhile, property developers can completely change the demographic and population of a village or town overnight and do not have to notify the public. This is wrong and unjust. This government needs to close this loophole immediately and create a system that is equal and fair to all citizens of the land.'


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Waterford train services to be disrupted by major flood prevention works
Works from late August to early 2026 will affect some off-peak morning rail services, Mondays to Thursdays. The flood prevention works will be undertaken by contractors for Waterford City and County Council (WCCC) and will address the recurring flooding issue which has occurred over many years at this location and ensure the railway service is climate resilient into the future. As well as ensuring rail services are no longer impacted by flooding, both to the existing station and the new Plunkett Station from 2027, the works will allow a new electrical signalling system to replace the mechanical system which has been in place, and reinstate track capacity and routes to and from Waterford. The company is advising customers that the flood defence works will necessitate disruption to some off-peak rail services on Monday to Thursday mornings over a total of six months, from late August onwards, excluding the Christmas season. Waterford North Quays public transport elements are funded by the Department of Transport through the National Transport Authority (NTA). What do the flood defence works involve? The flood defence system will comprise a combination of sheet piled walls, impermeable trenches and an extensive drainage network with two associated pumping stations. This infrastructure is to be installed from Sally Park in the west to east of the new Plunkett Station and Transport Hub, over a 1.1km length. The specific works on the Western Flood Defence Wall which will require service impacts are over an 800 metre section, from the western end of the main Plunkett Station platform to east of the Waterford West signal cabin. Due to the depth to rock, the sheet piles are up to 25m in height and 0.6m wide and will be installed generally along the low watermark line. The wall line is located 5m to 7m from the passenger track. The flood defence wall will be installed from the River Suir, by means of two large barges and a piling rig. Service impacts from works Iarnród Éireann has worked with WCCC and BAM, the main contractor, throughout the project to minimise disruption to rail services and to identify the optimum approach to these works. 'On detailed review of the works, due to the potential to foul the line, Iarnród Éireann has identified that line closure is required and unavoidable,' said a spokesperson. 'This will be during the lifting and placing of piles due to their length, the working environment and the proximity to the railway. 'The agreed work programme seeks to balance the timescale for delivery of the flood defence system with avoiding disruption to the busiest rail services on the route.' The work dates will occur from August 25 to November 27 this year, and from January 5 to March 26, 2026. Works will take place from 8am to 2.30pm on Mondays to Thursdays during the those dates. As a result, the following service alterations will apply: the 7.20am and 10.15am Dublin Heuston to Waterford will terminate at Kilkenny, with bus transfers from Kilkenny to Thomastown and Waterford The 11am and 1.05pm Waterford to Dublin Heuston will have bus transfers from Waterford and Thomastown to Kilkenny, and train from Kilkenny to Heuston. The 9.45am Limerick Junction to Waterford will terminate at Carrick-on-Suir with bus transfer from Carrick-on-Suir to Waterford. This ensures that only two of eight services each way daily between Waterford and Dublin are affected Mondays to Thursdays, and that weekends are unaffected. It will also ensure that full services operate throughout December and the New Year period, crucial for city centre traders and tourism. Follow Independent Waterford on Facebook Iarnród Éireann chief executive Jim Meade said: 'The Waterford North Quays project is a transformative one for Waterford and for public transport serving the city. 'As well as delivering a new integrated transport hub incorporating a relocated Plunkett Station, it will resolve the recurring flooding issues which have disrupted rail services to and from Waterford for many years. 'This is a trend which has worsened with the impact of climate change, so it is far-sighted to incorporate these works in the wider programme. 'We welcome Waterford City and County Council's commitment to the protection of key public transport infrastructure, and thank them and their contractors for the proactive engagement which has been core to the Waterford North Quays programme. 'While any disruption is regretted, we believe the programme strikes the right balance between the needs of rail customers and the efficient delivery of these crucial flood defence works.'


Extra.ie
4 days ago
- Extra.ie
Exclusive: Budget 2026 to cut several key payments in austerity move
The country is facing its first austerity budget in a decade, top Coalition sources told this weekend. And Fine Gael's much-trumpeted 9% VAT rate cut for the hospitality sector will not be decided until Budget Day and may not happen at all, given the worsening economic situation, a Government minister told Extra. The slashing of the Universal Energy Credit, double child and social welfare bonuses at Christmas and reinstating university tuition fees to €3,000 are all being considered. Tánaiste Simon Harris and Taoiseach Micheál Martin speaking at a press conference for the launch of the Government's Summer Economic Statement and the National Development Plan for the next five years. Pic: Niall Carson/PA Wire It sets the scene for a destabilising summer of discontent over the tighter spending rules being imposed by Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Senior Government sources have publicly denied claims that the next budget will be an austerity budget but, privately, sources at the top of the Coalition say otherwise. Despite this week's announcement of the biggest capital spending programme in Irish history, ordinary families will feel the squeeze due to the elimination of one-off payments which for some are worth as much as €1,000. After years of record spending increases, one minister told Extra: 'The plan is simple. Wait Trump out with a couple of austerity budgets and return to power via a series of generous budgets in the latter half of our term. 'A deal [on tariffs between the EU and the US] is still possible but the overall scenario is frightening. It is all very uncertain. The spat between Trump and Macron [over France recognising the Palestinian state] could add 5% to tariffs.' A Fine Gael minister said last night: 'Let Fianna Fáil and Micheál take the hit for cuts in the first three years and then Simon will take the credit for extra spending in the last two years. 'When we don't have it (money) at the start of a new government we won't spend it. When we have money just before the next election, we'll spend it.' Tensions about the cuts came to the fore this week after a ferocious row broke out between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael over the issue of VAT reductions. Commenting on the public exchanges between the Coalition partners, one source said: 'Willie O'Dea is already on Morning Ireland causing discontent and it is only July.' Cuts in the first three years and then Simon will take the credit for extra spending in the last two years. When we don't have it (money) at the start of a new government we won't spend it. When we have money just before the next election, we'll spend it.' Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Pic: Fran Veale Tensions about the cuts came to the fore this week after a ferocious row broke out between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael over the issue of VAT reductions. Commenting on the public exchanges between the Coalition partners, one source said: 'Willie O'Dea is already on Morning Ireland causing discontent and it is only July.' A senior Coalition source said last night the impending cuts are 'very necessary. There's concern over the long-term consequences of the 37% growth in spending since 2021.' 'The blunt truth is, there has been a lot of waste. We have to spend on political necessities. No more luxuries. There is a need to bring discipline back into spending. Covid led to necessary loosening of the reins, but we need to restore traditional controls. We need to do a few big things well. There is a brave new world out there. We need to ensure spending is efficient,' they said. Another minister noted: 'The Government had no other option. Spending was getting out of control. Every department was starting to resemble the Department of Health. It had to stop.' Another minister last night tried to minimise the scale of any proposed cuts. 'This is not austerity, it's normality. We have to walk our way back from a system of economics that was first driven by Coronavirus and then the first large-scale land war between two states since 1945,' they said, referring to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Another Fine Gael minister noted: 'When it comes to cutting, do you want to be unpopular now or would you prefer to be unpopular in five years' time?' One Fianna Fáil minister warned their Coalition partners: 'Fianna Fáil has no intention of taking the hit for one-off cuts. Fine Gael would be wise to not be too clever. We will not be austerity patsies. The proposed economic challenges we face require a Government that works together or both parties will sink.' Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe speaks to the media outside Leinster House. Pic: Niall Carson/PA Wire/PA Images In an indication of the uncertain international landscape, understands an Oireachtas Committee report into the Occupied Territories Bill will recommend the banning of both the importation of goods and services from territories illegally occupied by Israel in Palestine. The judgment, to be delivered next week, is likely to provoke fury in both the United States and Israel and leaves the Coalition facing a very difficult diplomatic position. Both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have said they are committed to the passage of the Bill but, up to recently, the Coalition's preference was to confine any ban on imports from Israeli settlements to goods. Sinn Féin and the soft left, by contrast, have consistently called for a ban on both. A Bill, forwarded to the Committee for pre-legislative scrutiny in June confining the ban to goods, was called an act of 'diplomatic intoxication' by the US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who said Ireland should 'sober up' and apologise to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Committee now wants the Coalition to go further and ban both goods and services. It is believed such a ban was backed by all members, including Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. The Committee is expected to note it had to proceed without the advice of the Attorney General on the issue of services. It will add to the growing concerns that triggered a major pre-summer Economic Statement clampdown by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.