logo
I want Gemini to be my DJ in YouTube Music

I want Gemini to be my DJ in YouTube Music

Stephen Headrick / Android Authority
Imagine having your very own DJ in your pocket, ready to mix your favorite songs at a moment's notice. No, not your dad's 3-5 second crossfade, but instead a completely customized mix that makes the two songs you're transitioning between meld together like they were designed that way by the artists themselves. That's the idea behind Apple Music's upcoming AI-powered AutoMix feature, which is coming with this fall's iOS 26 release.
As a former Spotify user and now years-long YouTube Music user, this is the first time I've even batted an eye at one of Apple's few Android apps. I'm not really a big fan of the old-school cross-fade functionality, but this is different. Google is consistently adding Gemini-powered features across all of its verticals — including in the main YouTube app — but so far, we haven't seen much of this AI prowess in YouTube Music. AutoMix is a seemingly small Apple Music feature with big implications, and I have some ideas on how Google can bring its super-powered Gemini experience into its music app.
What music streaming service do you use?
1 votes
Spotify
0 %
Apple Music
0 %
YouTube Music
100 %
Other (let me know in the comments)
0 %
I don't use a music streaming service
0 %
DJ Apple, spin that track!
Apple first announced AutoMix back in June at this year's WWDC, its annual developer's conference. In its own words, this feature uses 'time stretching and beat matching to deliver continuous playback and an even more seamless listening experience.' Marketing jargon aside, there is a clear difference that you can hear with AutoMix enabled when compared to the standard cross-fade. Details on how the feature works are sparse, but shortly after the iOS 26 developer beta was released, videos of AutoMix in action quickly began circulating on all the major social media platforms. For me at least, I was intrigued the moment I heard it in action.
Because AutoMix is not a database of pre-mixed songs and is instead powered by AI, the mixing experience can vary from user to user. Occasionally, the mixes are pretty underwhelming — remember, this is still just a beta software — but more often than not, it doesn't just work, it sounds magical. It adds an entirely new dimension to your music listening experience. I would note here that right now, AutoMix seems to work best when the two songs are from a similar genre or have a similar number of beats per minute. That said, I'd imagine this will only improve in the future.
AutoMix isn't an entirely new concept. In fact, Spotify released their own take on this feature years ago under the exact same name. It, too, appears to use beat matching to determine the best way to transition between songs, but from examples I've seen and user commentary I've read, Apple's take appears to be a more advanced version. Perhaps advancements in AI also allow for an overall better mixing experience.
YouTube Music needs to join the party
I've been a YouTube Music convert for years now, and all in all, I've been very happy with the service. First and foremost, it's included with YouTube Premium, which is one reason I believe Google's subscription is one of the most high-value subscriptions out there. And to Google's credit, YouTube Music has frequently improved its service, adding new features and making the user interface more appealing and user-friendly.
Google has added Gemini-powered capabilities to just about every corner of its software universe. From YouTube to Google Workspace to Android devices and most everything between, you will likely find some sort of Gemini-enabled feature. And it's not like we haven't seen Google dabble in the world of music, either.
Stephen Headrick / Android Authority
Google is adding Gemini everywhere. Is YouTube Music next?
Google needs to join the personal DJ party, and this is just the beginning of what they could do with the power of Gemini. AutoMix honestly seems like a small addition as I write about it, but I can't emphasize enough how different it feels to listen to music with this mixing enabled. It makes for such a satisfying listening experience, and I am more than confident in some form of Gemini powering Google's version of this.
Let's take this a little further than this relatively small AutoMix feature. How else could Gemini enhance my music streaming experience? Look no further than Spotify DJ, a feature that's already been around for a few years in Spotify land. Essentially, Spotify is using AI to generate playlists according to what you already listen to, and it has helped my colleague discover a lot more new music than he used to. Imagine Google's take on this: a Gemini Live-like DJ that you can talk back and forth with and really fine-tune your taste to find the most relevant music possible.
Stephen Headrick / Android Authority
YouTube Music already has playlists created by AI, based on your text input. Time to take it to the next level with a Gemini Live-like experience.
Here's the thing: Google is already doing most of the heavy lifting that this type of feature would require. It already has a feature in the Google Discover feed called Daily Listen, where two AI-powered 'podcast hosts' serve up a daily short-form podcast with news and information relevant to your interests. And it works incredibly well. Creepy well, if you ask me. And Google already generates playlists based on text input. Gemini could just connect these dots together more efficiently.
Since this is a Gemini Live-like experience, why not just hum something into your mic and have DJ Gemini generate a playlist of songs solely based on the vibes of whatever you're humming. That sounds both incredible and incredibly doable with the power of Gemini. I feel like we're only scratching the surface here, and yet, as I already stated, much of this is already being done by Google elsewhere in its services. Now, the YouTube Music team just needs to package this all up for its platform.
Is Apple's DJ good enough to make me ditch YouTube Music?
Switching music services isn't exactly fun. The app's algorithms take time to learn your preferences, and YouTube Music has years of my listening data now, so it has gotten pretty good at suggesting the right music (and podcasts…yes, I use this app for podcasts, too) at the right time.
Is Apple's AutoMix feature enough to convince me to switch? Only time will tell, especially because we don't yet have clarity on whether or not this will be an iPhone-only feature, or if it will eventually make its way over to our green bubble world. Since it's an AI-powered feature, Apple may decide AutoMix can only work on Apple devices and Apple's chips; I'm not saying it's not possible for them to bring it to Android, I just wonder whether Apple will use on-device AI as a reason to keep AutoMix exclusive to its devices. That said, I tested the feature out on an iPhone 14 Pro, which doesn't have access to Apple Intelligence, so I would guess that they'll bring it to their Android app at some point, and maybe even as soon as this fall when AutoMix officially launches.
Apple Music on iOS 26 beta, with AutoMix enabled
Apple Music on Android 16 beta, with no AutoMix option in sight
For now, I'm sticking with YouTube Music. I'm really confident in Gemini at this point, and it's only getting better. Bringing more AI into YouTube Music is the logical next step for the evolution of the platform. I remember when Google first launched Gemini — remember Bard? — I was really unsure what to make of Google's AI. The transition from Google Assistant was really rocky at first, too. But Gemini has gotten really good, and more importantly, the way it has been integrated into Google's services has become extremely powerful. I use it a lot throughout my day. I think it's only a matter of time before we see an AutoMix-like feature introduced in YouTube Music, most likely alongside other more advanced Gemini-based features.
Follow
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

eBay Inc. (EBAY)'s Algorithims Are Working, Says Jim Cramer
eBay Inc. (EBAY)'s Algorithims Are Working, Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

eBay Inc. (EBAY)'s Algorithims Are Working, Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) is an eCommerce retailer whose shares have gained 47% year-to-date. Most of these gains are due to an 18.3% jump in July after the firm's second-quarter earnings report. The results saw eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) beat analyst second-quarter revenue and EPS estimates of $2.64 billion and $1.30 by posting $2.73 billion and $1.30, respectively. The firm's third quarter revenue guidance of $2.69 billion and $2.74 billion also overshot analyst estimates of $2.66 billion. Here's what Cramer believes about eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)'s strong performance: 'Now one David, that I know that you will remember from the old days that really is putting on a good show, would be eBay. They've got their mojo back. It's up 15%, they had very good numbers, and I salute them. They hung in and now their model is working. They've got the algos working so to speak. And a lot of people upgraded it. That's to me, better focus, better focus.' Copyright: rawpixel / 123RF Stock Photo Earlier, Cramer discussed eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)'s marketplace and shifting sentiment: 'There's no real theme to the other stocks on the list… eBay's a real shocker. It's come a long way to get back on this list. Now, I've watched this stock get carved up for ages, but now it looks like eBay has stopped being a whipping boy, and people are feeling comfortable buying merchandise second-hand. Has a partnership with Facebook's Marketplace, which has spurred real growth for the company. I like that, by the way, that marketplace section.' While we acknowledge the potential of EBAY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

If You Invested $10K In Meta Platforms Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?
If You Invested $10K In Meta Platforms Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If You Invested $10K In Meta Platforms Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) owns and operates several prominent social media platforms and communication services, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. It is set to report its Q3 2025 earnings on Oct. 29. Wall Street analysts expect the company to post EPS of $5.95, down from $6.03 in the prior-year period. According to Benzinga Pro, quarterly revenue is expected to reach $45.87 billion, up from $40.59 billion a year earlier. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. If You Bought Meta Platforms Stock 10 Years Ago The company's stock traded at approximately $94.06 per share 10 years ago. If you had invested $10,000, you could have bought roughly 106 shares. Currently, shares trade at $761.15, meaning your investment's value could have grown to $80,922 from stock price appreciation alone. However, Meta Platforms also paid dividends during these 10 years. Meta Platforms' dividend yield is currently 0.28%. Over the last 10 years, it has paid about $3.05 in dividends per share, which means you could have made $324 from dividends alone. Summing up $80,922 and $324, we end up with the final value of your investment, which is $81,246. This is how much you could have made if you had invested $10,000 in Meta Platforms stock 10 years ago. This means a total return of 712.46%. In comparison, the S&P 500 total return for the same period is 262.27%. Trending: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— What Could The Next 10 Years Bring? Meta Platforms has a consensus rating of "Buy" and a price target of $819.38 based on the ratings of 41 analysts. The price target implies more than 7% potential upside from the current stock price. The company on July 30 announced its Q2 2025 earnings, posting revenues of $47.52 billion, beating the consensus estimate of $44.58 billion. The company reported EPS of $7.14, above the consensus of $5.79 per share. Total revenue was up 22% on a year-over-year basis. Family daily active people climbed 6% year-over-year to 3.48 billion. Ad impressions jumped 11% year-over-year and average price per ad increased by 9% expects Q3 revenue to be in the range of $47.50 billion to $50.50 billion, better than the consensus estimate of $45.87 billion. Given the historical stock price appreciation and expected upside potential, growth-focused investors may find Meta Platforms stock attractive. Furthermore, they can benefit from the company's modest dividend yield of 0.28%. Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. Image: Shutterstock This article If You Invested $10K In Meta Platforms Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now? originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio

Airbnb's Brian Chesky: We're Open to Partnering With AI Chatbots
Airbnb's Brian Chesky: We're Open to Partnering With AI Chatbots

Skift

time16 minutes ago

  • Skift

Airbnb's Brian Chesky: We're Open to Partnering With AI Chatbots

Airbnb's Brian Chesky is close to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, but that doesn't mean that Airbnb will necessarily distribute its inventory through Altman's ChatGPT. Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky said during the company's second-quarter earnings call Wednesday that it is still "feeling out" the possibility of working with the big AI chatbots like ChatGPT, which he called "an incredibly compelling product." "We're certainly open to" integrating with major AI Chatbots, which could be a source of lead generation for Airbnb, Chesky said. Unlike which has partnerships with OpenAI, Amazon Web Services and Microsoft and sees generative AI chatbots as a new distribution channel, Airbnb has made no decisions yet about selling stays, Services or Experiences through major AI assistants. AI Chatbots Are

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store