Venus May Be More Earth-Like Than We Thought – And It's Still Moving
A new study of Venus suggests that the deeply inhospitable world may be more like Earth than we thought.
A new delve into archival data collected decades ago suggests that the alien planet has ongoing tectonic-like processes that are deforming its surface and recycling its crust. If this is the case, then the large, round features on the Venusian surface called coronae may be the key that unlocks our understanding of the planet's interior processes.
"Coronae are not found on Earth today; however, they may have existed when our planet was young and before plate tectonics had been established," says planetary scientist Gael Cascioli of the University of Maryland and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
"By combining gravity and topography data, this research has provided a new and important insight into the possible subsurface processes currently shaping the surface of Venus."
Venus doesn't have tectonic plates, like Earth does. Here on our home world, the fragmented plates into which the crust is divided generate a vibrant, active geology and surface features, allowing heat to escape, and recycling crustal material.
Even without tectonic plates, however, the Venusian surface is riddled with evidence of internal activity that pushes up from below and creates deformations. One such feature is the coronae. Coronae look a bit like impact craters, consisting of a raised ring, like a crown, surrounding a sunken middle, with concentric fractures radiating outwards. They can be hundreds of kilometers across.
Scientists initially thought these structures were craters, but closer analysis revealed that they're volcanic in nature. They're thought to be caused by plumes of hot molten material welling up from the planet's interior, pushing the surface upward into a dome that then collapses inward when the plume cools. The molten material then leaks out of the sides of the collapsed dome to form the ring.
Although Venus doesn't have tectonic plates, tectonic activity is thought to exist in the form of interactions between mantle plumes and the lithosphere. The researchers thought that these interactions could be occurring under the coronae.
They developed models to describe different scenarios for the formation of coronae by way of plumes. Then, they compared these models against gravity and topography observations collected by NASA's Magellan probe, which spent several years orbiting and studying Venus in the 1990s.
They used the topography data to identify 75 coronae, and the gravity data to understand what was going on underneath them. The team found that 52 of the coronae cap hot, buoyant plumes of molten material that are less dense than the surrounding material, likely driving tectonic processes.
There are two processes that occur here on Earth that could be taking place under coronae on Venus. The first is subduction. On Earth, that occurs when the edge of one tectonic plate gets slurped underneath the edge of the adjacent plate.
On Venus, it would look a bit different. As a plume pushes upwards, it forces the surface material to spread outwards and collide with other surface material, pushing some down into the mantle.
The other process is lithospheric dripping. As the underside of the lithosphere, or crust, is heated from below, it can start to melt itself, gradually forming oozy drips that are nevertheless cooler and denser than the molten material below, so they eventually break off and fall down into the planetary interior.
We don't know for sure, of course. Between its searing surface temperatures, crushing atmospheric pressure, and acid rain, Venus presents quite a few barriers to exploration. Nevertheless, coronae should, the scientists say, be a major focus for future investigation, not least because of the potential parallels with our own world.
"Coronae are abundant on Venus. They are very large features, and people have proposed different theories over the years as to how they formed," says planetary scientist Anna Gülcher of the University of Bern in Switzerland.
"The most exciting thing for our study is that we can now say there are most likely various and ongoing active processes driving their formation. We believe these same processes may have occurred early in Earth's history."
The research has been published in Science Advances.
The Martian Night Sky Was Seen Turning Green in a Stunning First
JWST Captures Jupiter's Auroras 'Fizzing And Popping With Light'
Survey of More Than 1,300 Stars Uncovers Unexplained Pulses of Light

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
There's a 50/50 Chance the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy Will Merge
The universe might not meet its end for another quinvigintillion years, but our galaxy's fate teeters on a far less certain line. New research shows that there's a 50% chance that the Milky Way and its nearest major galactic neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy, will converge within the next 10 billion years. Previous analyses have made out the convergence to be a sure-fire thing, but it turns out that one dwarf galaxy is recalibrating the scales. Though about 2.5 million light-years currently lie between the Milky Way and Andromeda, the two galaxies are creeping closer to each other. In 1913, astronomer Vesto Melvin Slipher noticed via Arizona's Lowell Observatory that Andromeda (then known as the Andromeda Nebula) was approaching the Milky Way at 186 miles per second. Since then, researchers have not only verified Slipher's math but also found via multiple simulations that Andromeda will someday combine with the Milky Way. One paper from 2021 even proposes that the two galaxies will meet 4.3 billion years from now, with a complete merger taking another 6 billion years after that. But these simulations failed to account for one small yet mighty factor: the Large Magellanic Cloud. Roughly 160,000 light-years from our Milky Way, this dwarf galaxy has long been considered an insignificant part of the so-called Local Group. But in 2015, the beginning of the Survey of the MAgellanic Stellar History, or SMASH, found that the Large Magellanic Cloud was larger and more complex than initially thought. Astronomers have spent the years since sifting through SMASH data for dwarf galaxy secrets. Illustration of a hypothetical merger between the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA, STScI, DSS, Till Sawala (University of Helsinki); Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI) It's for this reason that the latest Milky Way-Andromeda merger simulation actually includes the Large Magellanic Cloud. To cover for every possible uncertainty, an international team of astronomers ran their simulation nearly 100,000 times and found that just under 50% of the time, the Milky Way and Andromeda collided and merged. Alternately dropping different nearby galaxies showed that Messier 33 (the third largest galaxy in the Local Group) made a merger more likely, while the Large Magellanic Cloud reduced the odds of a convergence. That's because the Large Magellanic Cloud pulls the Milky Way out of Andromeda's path, as a comic book hero would pull a civilian off some train tracks. The Large Magellanic Cloud might only get to bask in its glory for a few hundred million years, however. The researchers' simulation showed that the Milky Way will almost certainly collide with the Large Magellanic Cloud in 2 billion years, disappearing the latter galaxy. As observatories gather more data about the universe—and scientists' models inevitably become more advanced—we'll find out whether the Large Magellanic Cloud really will swoop in to save the day. Of course, we won't see the benefit either way. But it will be nice to know whether our galactic home will continue to exist after we're gone.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Budget for NASA Is Absolutely Horrifying
Earlier this year, the Trump administration revealed its proposed budget for NASA's fiscal year 2026, indicating brutal cuts of unprecedented proportions are coming. Now, the agency has released new data about the proposal, painting a dire picture of its future. As SpaceNews reports, the documents reveal that thousands of jobs would be cut, and dozens of science missions would be on the chopping block. The cuts — which would drag the budget to its lowest point since 1961, SpaceNews points out, when adjusted for inflation — would result in the firing of roughly one-third of all civil servants. The budget would also slash the space agency's science budget in almost half, "nothing short of an extinction-level event for space science and exploration in the United States," as Planetary Society chief of space policy Casey Dreier told Ars Technica in March. The extent of the proposed cuts is truly baffling, with the Trump administration basically looking to give up on space science altogether in favor of militarizing the Earth's orbit and sending humans to Mars. The so-called "skinny" budget would result in the cancellation of several key space exploration missions, including NASA's Mars Sample Return mission. Other Earth observation programs would also be ripped up, including missions to monitor the planet's gravity field or study tropical cyclones, per SpaceNews. The budget would also cancel planned missions to explore the surface of Mars, as well as existing operations such as OSIRIS-APEX, which is headed to an asteroid called Apophis. While NASA's next major landmark space observatory, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, wouldn't be entirely canceled, it would be allocated less than half of its previously outlined budget. Meanwhile, the space agency would be doubling down on establishing commercially funded ways to get to the Moon and Mars, highlighting the Trump administration's sometimes-cozy relationship with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, whose space company is bound to reap the benefits. The budget would clear up north of $1 billion for projects connected to sending humans to the Red Planet, indicating the president is willing to closely follow Musk's lead. The proposed 2026 fiscal year budget is now headed to Congress, where it's likely to meet ample opposition. "No one is eager to cut NASA science," Dreier told SpaceNews. "No one is out there openly defending and saying that this is a great idea." In short, if it were to make it through Congress unaltered — which is unlikely, since the agency is supported by many lawmakers — Trump's NASA budget could deal the country's leadership in space an existential blow, allowing adversaries, most notably China, to race ahead. "It sends a signal that America is stepping back from leadership in virtually every science area, including NASA," former NASA associate administrator for science John Grunsfeld told PBS. "The proposal for the NASA science budget is, in fact, cataclysmic for US leadership in science." "What we see is a full-scale assault on science in America," representative George Whitesides (D-CA) added. "It is probably the biggest attack on our scientific establishment in history." "It's a poorly wielded chainsaw," he added. More on NASA's budget: NASA Disgusted by Elon Musk's Disrespect
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Strawberry Moon to rise over Britain next week, but it will be in an odd place
This month will see the full Strawberry Moon burst into fruit in the UK's skies, but in a rather unusual place. The first full Moon of summer will be unusually low in the sky due to the recent 'lunar standstill', which means the Moon appears low in the sky when it is due south and due to the proximity to this month's Summer Solstice. The Strawberry Moon will be quickly followed by the Summer Solstice - the longest day of the year - which will peak on Saturday 21 June 2025 at 3:41 am The Moon will appear lower in the sky due to last December's 'major lunar standstill', an event that occurs every 18.6 years and means the moon reaches its most extreme positions on the horizon. This means the Moon's path across the sky is longer: 'major lunar standstills' occur when the tilt of the moon and the tilt of the Earth coincide. Moons also always appear lower in the sky around the summer solstice. Nasa said: 'On the summer solstice the Sun appears highest in the sky for the year. Full Moons are opposite the Sun, so a full Moon near the summer solstice will be low in the sky.' In Scotland, people are gathering this month at the standing stones in Callanish to witness the 'lunar standstill' from among the stones erected on the Isle of Lewis from 3,000BC. Pete Lawrence of BBC Sky at Night Magazine says, 'This evening and into the morning of 11 June, the full Moon is very low when due south. 'This is near a 'major lunar standstill', the lowest Moon in an 18.6-year lunar cycle. The Moon will appear bigger because it is near the horizon, which makes people perceive it as larger, relatively speaking. Lawrence says that June 11 is 'a perfect chance to experience the Moon illusion, which makes the low full Moon appear much larger than it really is.' The Moon illusion occurs when the Moon is near the horizon, and makes our satellite appear much bigger. The phenomenon has been known since ancient times but is still not fully understood. The full Moon will peak on the morning of 11 June at 8.44am, but the Moon will appear full for the nights either side of that as well. Full moons roughly line up to the months of the year (the word 'month' comes from the word 'moon'). Because extra days were added to some calendar months to make the year add up to 365 days, months do not line up perfectly with full Moons. The names we use for full Moons today (such as 'cold Moon', 'wolf Moon' and 'harvest Moon') come to us indirectly from Native American traditions Nasa's Gordon Johnston wrote: 'In the 1930s the Maine Farmer's Almanac began publishing 'Indian' names for the full moons, tying these names to the European months. Nasa said that June's full Moon is 'the Strawberry Moon, a name that comes from the relatively short season for harvesting strawberries in the north-eastern United States.' Around the world, June's full Moon is also known as the Flower Moon, Hot Moon and Planting Moon.