
No duty of care: Torres Strait Islander Uncles lose their climate case against the Australian Government
There were high hopes, but today brought a bitter blow for the Torres Strait Islander plaintiffs at the centre of a groundbreaking climate case.
"My heart is broken for my family and my community," Uncle Pabai Pabai, from Boigu, said. "Love has driven us on this journey for the last five years, love for our families and communities. "That love will keep driving us. " Uncle Paul Kabai, Saibai Traditional Owner, said he was in shock because he had expected the decision to be in the Islanders' favour. "This pain isn't just for me, it's for all people, Indigenous and non-Indigenous who have been affected by climate change," he said.
"What do any of us say to our families now?"
In a much-anticipated decision handed down in Cairns, the Federal Court ruled against the Uncles' claim – that the Australian Government had been negligent by failing to take stronger action on climate change. While accepting many of the key facts that the Uncles had presented to the court regarding the devastating effects human-induced climate change has had on the Torres Strait Islands, Judge Michael Wigney ruled that it was not enough to prove their case of negligence against the Australian Government. It's a devastating outcome for the claimants and for communities across the Torres Strait who are already living with the daily impacts of climate change. Saibai Elder Aunty McRose Elu, who gave evidence during the case, said she was feeling deep grief. "It is a moral loss for the government, not for us - we are the winners," she said. "Where is the duty of care from the government? "We will be the first climate refugees in Australia – I am burdened with that heaviness. "What will I say to my grandchildren about this decision? It's their future not mine.
"We will keep on fighting."
From homes threatened by rising tides, to the erosion of sacred sites and cultural heritage, Traditional Owners have long argued that their future is at risk. But today, the court ruled the Government has no legal obligation to act. In making his decision Justice Wigney said there was no doubt that the inhabitants of the Torres Strait Islands are far more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change than other communities in Australia. "They understandably feel powerless when it comes to protecting themselves against climate change and its impact on their islands and traditional way of life," he said.
"There could be little, if any, doubt that the Torres Strait Islands and their traditional inhabitants face a bleak future if urgent action is not taken to address climate change and its impacts."
Nonetheless the judge ruled that the Uncles had not proved their case to satisfy the common law of negligence. "The reality is that the law in Australia as it currently stands provides no real or effective legal avenue through which individuals and communities like those in the Torres Strait Islands can claim damages or other relief in respect of harm that they claim to have suffered as a result of governmental decisions ... including in respect of the responses to climate change," he said. "... That will remain the case unless the law in Australia changes ... "Until then, the only real avenue available to those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders involves public advocacy and protest and, ultimately, recourse via the ballot box." Justice Wigney found that when the former Coalition Government set Australia's greenhouse gas emissions targets in 2015, 2020, and 2021, it failed to give any genuine consideration to what the best available science indicated was required for Australia to play its part in the important global objective enshrined in the Paris Agreement of significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In a joint statement Indigenous Australians Minister Malarndirri McCarthy and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen said they understood the Torres Strait Islands are vulnerable to climate change and that the Commonwealth was considering the judgment.
"We're continuing to turn around a decade of denial and delay on climate, embedding serious climate targets in law and making the changes necessary to achieve them," their statement said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Labor commits $1.3bn to counter-drone capabilities
The Albanese government is earmarking $1.3bn over the next decade for counter-drone capabilities as part of a program to protect Australia from 'future threats'. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are central to 21st century warfare and only becoming cheaper, smaller, smarter and deadlier. It is part of Project Land 156 which involves the creation of systems that can find and stop enemy drones. Announcing the funding on Tuesday, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said Labor had already issued contracts 'totalling $38.7m to 20 vendors', nearly doubling the number initially awarded in July. Australian companies make up 14 of the vendors. 'Under those contracts, and accelerated testing, at least 120 of the world's most capable threat detectors and drone-defeating technologies will be rapidly introduced into use,' Mr Conroy told the Queensland Media Club. 'The technology is evolving rapidly and we are moving with it. 'So, today, I can reveal that the Albanese Government has set aside $1.3bn for acquisition of counter-drone capabilities over the next 10 years.' He said the Albanese government would 'announce further counter-drone acquisitions in the very near future as part of Land 156' and that small and medium-sized enterprises 'are at the heart of this project'. 'I can also reveal that under Land 156, we have adopted a continuous modernisation model,' Mr Conroy said, calling it 'critical'. 'It means that the investments we make today … can help protect against potential future threats.' He went on to say that in Ukraine 'we've observed that it when it comes to drones, the cycle of adaptation and counter adaptation is around three to six months'. 'So, through Project Land 156, the (Australian Defence Force) will continually upgrade and refresh capabilities to address emerging drone threats,' Mr Conroy said. The $1.3bn will come from the $10bn already committed to the program over the next decade. Mr Conroy said it would ensure Australia stayed ahead 'in the uncrewed capability race'. Though, he also said it was 'not just about defence bases and defence assets', but that there were civil uses too. He pointed to the 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games as an example. The focus on drones comes as tensions simmer in the Indo-Pacific. The Trump administration has warned of an 'imminent' threat from China, saying Beijing was eyeing a move on Taiwan as early as 2027.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Opposition attacks Albanese government for 'badly mismanaging' Israel ties as feud exposes deep divisions over Palestine
The federal opposition has accused the Albanese government of mismanaging the Australia-Israel relationship after a spiralling diplomatic row sunk ties to new lows. Both countries have issued visa cancellations against each other in a tit-for-tat retaliation, after the Albanese government decided to recognise Palestinian statehood. Israel revoked the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority, after the Albanese government cancelled an Israeli lawmaker's visa. Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Michaelia Cash said the decision to cancel the visa of Israeli MP Simcha Rothman had triggered 'escalating diplomatic consequences'. The federal opposition has accused the Albanese government of mismanaging the Australia-Israel relationship after a spiralling diplomatic row sunk ties to new lows. 'The Albanese government has badly mismanaged this relationship at a time when careful diplomacy is more important than ever,' Ms Cash said. 'Instead of maintaining trust with Israel - one of our closest democratic allies - Labor has recklessly inflamed tensions and undermined Australia's credibility. The government cancelled Mr Rothman's visa, claiming he made inflammatory remarks that would jeopardise the safety of the Australian Islamic community. 'The Coalition has serious concerns about the Albanese government's reasons for cancelling the visa of Israeli parliamentarian Simcha Rothman,' Ms Cash said. 'It is extraordinary that Home Affairs documents, as reported in the media, reveal the stated reasons for blocking Mr Rothman's entry into Australia was in part his advocacy for the elimination of Hamas.' The Australian newspaper revealed on Tuesday that Mr Rothman was denied his visa over concerns his presence could spark counter-protests. Internal Home Affairs documents said his calls to eliminate Hamas would be considered 'inflammatory and concerning', according to the report. This comes despite the fact that Hamas has been listed as a terrorist organisation responsible for murdering thousands of innocent civilians. 'To suggest that calls for the destruction of Hamas are 'inflammatory' or grounds for visa cancellation is absurd,' Ms Cash said. She lamented that the government had 'badly mismanaged this relationship at a time when careful diplomacy is more important than ever'. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley also condemned the handling of the issue, saying the rejection of Mr Rothman's visa was 'a very unusual thing'. 'I really regret the way that the relationship between the Albanese government and the government of Israel is deteriorating,' Ms Ley told reporters on Tuesday. 'Israel is a liberal democracy in the Middle East, and we should be supporting them as that liberal democracy. 'It's a very unusual thing to refuse a visa, and I haven't seen explanations from Tony Burke that actually explain what is going on here.' Ms Ley did not confirm whether she believed Mr Rothman should be allowed into Australia, but said the reasons for his denial need to be made public. 'We need the Minister for Home Affairs to explain… disagreeing with the Albanese government is not a reason to refuse a visa,' she said. The opposition's attack followed Foreign Minister Penny Wong calling Israel's move to revoke Australian visas as an 'unjustified reaction' to recognising Palestine as a state. 'At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel,' Ms Wong said on Tuesday. 'This is an unjustified reaction, following Australia's decision to recognise Palestine.' Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar confirmed that the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority had been revoked. Like many countries, Australia maintains an embassy to Israel in Tel Aviv and a representative office to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank city of Ramallah. The row has left Australia more deeply entangled in the Middle Eastern conflict, with both sides trading blame and domestic opinion divided. Polling for The Sydney Morning Herald showed only 24 per cent of voters supported recognition of Palestine regardless of who held power in Gaza. Thirty-two per cent favoured waiting until Hamas was removed or Palestine recognised Israel's right to exist. Forty-four per cent opposed any change to Australia's current position.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Liberal backbencher Garth Hamilton says Australia should pay jobless migrants to leave Australia
Queensland MP Garth Hamilton says Australia should consider paying jobless migrants up to $9000 to leave the country as a way of curtailing rising immigration levels. The Liberal backbencher said the policy was not politically divisive, and said similar approached had worked in 'left-wing governments in the EU' like France, Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Quoting figures between $6000 to $9000, he said the payment would 'give people a pathway home' and labelled the move as a 'reasonably compassionate and fair approach'. 'The reality is, a lot of migrants who are coming over here aren't finding work, they aren't finding their housing,' he told 2GB on Tuesday. 'They aren't finding that things were as rosy as they'd hoped because of the high immigration policies that we've employed, things haven't quite been working out.' He said high immigration was impacting housing availability, rent, lines at hospitals and schools and warned Australia needed to 'address it now'. Speaking directly on the housing crisis, he said: 'We're not going to build our way out of this problem'. Mr Hamilton said an urgent response was warranted, given that any cuts to immigration would not 'solve the immediate problem now and today'. 'If all we do … is just cut the rate of immigration, that'll help a bit down the track, but it won't solve the immediate problem now and today,' he said. 'And I want to point out, this isn't some right wing solution. All of the governments that deploy this are pretty much left wing, France, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium. 'So this is about left or right. This is about putting the citizens of the country first'. Net overseas migration decreased by 16.7 per cent in 2023-24 to 446,000, however figures remain significantly above pre-Covid rates of 247,620 recorded in December 2019. While a Dutton-Coalition government went to the May polls pledging to slash net overseas migration by 100,000, Labor has forecast a decline to 225,000 in 2026-27. As it stands the Coalition are yet to cement their policy position on immigration amid a review into the area.