
Concrete tradie Jason Mark Lambert accused of duping 28 clients and not paying bills
Police prosecutor Steve Hickey said Lambert offered concreting and landscaping services on Facebook and also answered requests for services wanted.
Contact was made, and quotes were given for complainants from around the Bay of Plenty and Waikato, including Hamilton, Huntly, Te Awamutu, Kihikihi, Ngaruawāhia, and Tauranga.
Lambert often sought a 40% deposit before work started, which was paid into a bank account nominated by him. On two occasions, cash was paid.
'Evidence will be given that the defendant, on most occasions, did not complete any work.'
Complainants will refer to messages or conversations they had with Lambert, and some would also produce photos.
Other times, a small amount of work was done before Lambert was accused of offering 'multiple excuses for not returning to the properties'.
As the relationships broke down, refunds were sought, but none were given.
Lambert used four different bank accounts for the complainants to put deposits into, but he was not named as an owner of any of the accounts.
'Viewed separately, it could be argued that each of these failed transactions are a civil breach of contract,' Hickey said.
'The prosecution case is that due to the number and regularity of the failed transactions, the behaviours displayed by the defendant and the lack of compensation, the defendant never intended to fulfil the work as agreed, therefore deceiving the complainants into paying the deposit sought.'
Hickey said once police got involved, it was clear to officers that Lambert 'intended to cause a loss to these people'.
'There wasn't any bad faith'
Co-defence counsel Johnathan Myers said all but one complaint related to 2020 and 2021, when the country was struck by Covid-19, lockdowns, and supply chain issues.
He denied there was any bad faith by his client in entering into contracts.
'Mr Lambert entered in good faith and Mr Lambert had every intention to complete the work.
'However, while Mr Lambert was not new to concreting work, he was new to running his own business and all the pitfalls that come with that.
Concrete contractor and fraud accused Jason Mark Lambert pictured in the Hamilton District Court this week. Photo / Belinda Feek
Myers said 2020 and 2021 'were some of the most challenging years'.
The defence counsel said the police had tried to elevate the allegations beyond what they were, 'a civil dispute about contract work'.
He reminded the judge that she would need to be sure that Lambert made false representations or that he was reckless as to whether they were false, and that there was an intention to deceive the victims, and that he was aware that some loss was likely to occur.
'I saw him featured on Fair Go'
Gerald Fieten dealt with Lambert in October 2018 when he was suggested as a contractor to do a small concreting job at his rental property at Murphy Lane, Taupiri.
He was given Lambert's details by a Versatile garage representative after asking for a recommendation to do a small concreting job.
'We asked him if he could do it, and he said he could do it. He had a look at the job and texted us a quote.'
That quote was $2800, of which he asked for a 60% deposit.
Fieten paid $1500 and was told it would be done a couple of days later.
'Did he?' Hickey asked.
'No, he didn't,' Fieten replied.
Lambert asked him to pay the remainder of the money in December, but Fieten refused, because the job still hadn't been completed.
'I didn't think it was wise to do that.'
By February 2019, Fieten began asking for his deposit back, and Lambert agreed, but nothing was ever paid.
Lambert's co-counsel, Kerry Hadaway, put to Fieten that Lambert had visited the property and prepared the area for work.
'He didn't get it ready. I had to get it ready myself,' Fieten said.
'Didn't Mr Lambert put the timber edging in?' Hadaway asked.
'No,' he replied.
'Didn't he box the area and get it ready for concreting?' she asked.
'No,' he said again.
He also rejected her suggestion that Lambert had spent four hours at the property.
'But you can't be sure of that because you didn't live there,' she put to him.
'I can be sure of that because I put the boxing down myself to get the job done,' he replied.
He eventually made a complaint to the police after seeing Lambert featured on Fair Go in 2021.
'He never, ever paid'
But it's not just clients who were unhappy. The court heard Lambert also failed to pay his bills.
Karl Sinclair, of Kowhai Hire, testified that initially, when Lambert hired goods from him in early 2020, he paid each time.
'He seemed like a real nice guy, trustworthy guy at the time.'
However, by March of that year, the payment of invoices stopped.
'He just continued to hire quite a bit in a short period of time, probably like two months or whatever.
'They were not paid for.
'It was never disputed that he didn't owe the money, but they were never paid.'
The total money owed from three unpaid invoices was about $4000, Sinclair said.
He said Lambert was always good at responding to requests for payment, but he 'never, ever paid'.
'He told me again and again over different times that he would pay.
Sinclair eventually sent the claim off to the debt collectors, but then finally realised 'it's a waste of our time'.
The trial is set down for three weeks.
Belinda Feek is an Open Justice reporter based in Waikato. She has worked at NZME for 10 years and has been a journalist for 21.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Prominent Auckland businessman pleads not guilty to fraud charges
Photo: Supplied / Ruth Kuo A prominent Auckland businessman has appeared in court on fraud charges. The man appeared in the Auckland District Court on Wednesday morning. He was given interim name suppression after pleading not guilty to deceptively obtaining more than $350,000 The maximum penalty for the charge was seven years in prison. The man was remanded on bail until his next appearance in October. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Man jailed for abuse of 11-year-old girl
A woman has told the man who sexually abused her when she was 11 his offending has affected her so greatly she will continue to "cry until there are no tears left". "At the time I didn't know anything about sex or assault. At the time I knew it felt wrong — he persuaded me that it felt right. He was a trusting adult that told me it was right," she said as Paulo Dias was sentenced in the Christchurch District Court last week. "I feel like a part of me was taken away. I don't feel safe any more. I don't trust people the way I used to. Sometimes I feel angry." The victim, 19, who was aged 11 at the time, was in tears as she addressed Dias in court. "I built a wall around my life. I feel I have been stripped of my safety. I lost self-motivation. He made me so confused — he turned it all around to make it all my problem." Dias, who was known to the victim, abused her on two occasions several years ago, but continues to deny his offending, despite being found guilty by a jury. The victim's stepmother addressed the 59-year-old, telling him her stepdaughter had at times lost the will to live. "She has shown maturity and bravery through the years; we wish this is something she never had to endure. "There is no question that imprisonment is a price to pay for the damage you have caused to an innocent child and her family." The girl said she felt uncomfortable the first time Dias abused her, but he "kept reassuring me that it was all right, that it was the right thing to do and that it was our secret". On the second occasion, she told him to stop, but he ignored her. The victim realised what happened was wrong when she attended a Keeping Ourselves Safe seminar at school. Judge Michael Crosbie said the victim confronted Dias after the seminar, but he laughed at her. The judge said Dias was found guilty in March by a jury of two charges of unlawful sexual connection. It was the second jury trial Dias had faced, the victim and her family attending and giving evidence on both occasions, after the jury at the first one were unable to agree and verdicts were not returned. The judge acknowledged the victim's bravery in coming forward. "In no small way you will encourage others to come forward. I know the justice system is far from perfect, we have tried to make it easier over the years," he said. Judge Crosbie sentenced Dias to four years and six months' jail. Dias was also placed on the Child Sex Offenders Register as part of his sentencing. Where to get help In an emergency, call police 111 Need to Talk? Free call or text 1737 any time to speak to a trained counsellor, for any reason. Victim Support 0800 842-846 Rape Crisis 0800 883-300 Safe to talk 0800 044-334 By Al Williams


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Conservative Party Of New Zealand To Advocate For Steve Howley
Conservative Party Law & Justice Spokesman Stephen Taylor says the party is supporting Steve Howley, the West Auckland lawn mowing contractor who was publicly accused by Maori Party President John Tamihere of defacing the Maori Party Tamaki Makaurau candidate's by-election signs in a Facebook post that went viral. Stephen is also the director of Litigation Support Services, an agency that supports Self-Represented Litigants to navigate the New Zealand judicial system, and will lead this advocacy in support of Mr Howley. 'Having met with Mr Howley, and after hearing his story, it is appalling to me that a private individual can be going about his business, only to be falsely accused of doing something that he hasn't done, and become the victim of a viral "dog-whistle" attack against himself, his business, and his family, as has happened to Mr Howley' says Mr Taylor. 'Having reviewed the relevant legislation, it is very clear to me that Mr Tamihere's reported action against Mr Howley, would meet the various criminal thresholds for a posting of a harmful digital communication causing serious emotional distress under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015'. "I will be approaching the Waitemata Police on behalf of Mr Howley regarding this matter, and walking them through these criminal thresholds, which themselves meet both police prosecutorial evidential and public interest guidelines for Police to be able to consider progressing with a prosecution against Mr Tamihere for posting a digital communication causing harm to Mr Howley'. 'Mr Howley reports that he did nothing wrong - in the process of cleaning his own defaced company signs, Mr Howley was photographed by a passerby in the vicinity of a Maori Party Election sign which had been similarly defaced. This person jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Mr Howley was defacing a the Maori Party sign, and somehow their photo and the corresponding post reached Mr Tamihere's Facebook page, and was allegedly shared at least 140 times, and attracted hundreds of comments. A number of these comments were allegedly threatening to Mr Howley to such an extent that Mr Howley feared for his safety, and declined to go back to work for several days, costing Mr Howley a significant loss of income, introducing service delays for Mr Howley's clients, and resulting in negative physical and psychological health effects upon Mr Howley, owing to the stress and trauma resulting from the alleged action of Mr Tamihere against Mr Howley'. 'In addition, Mr Howley allegedly had photos of his children lifted from his personal Facebook page and reposted onto Mr Tamihere's Facebook page'. 'In the material I have seen, I believe that the veracity of the available evidence in this matter can be reasonably sustained, and the Police should have no problem advancing this matter to a criminal prosecution'. 'However, if the Waitemata Police Prosecution Service decline to prosecute this matter, despite the overwhelming evidence that criminal thresholds for posting a digital communication causing harm against Mr Howley have been met, then the Conservative Party of New Zealand will assist Mr Howley in filing a private prosecution in this matter, under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015,' says Mr Taylor.