logo
Appointment of the acting minister Cachalia: A matter of presidential authority and constitutional compliance

Appointment of the acting minister Cachalia: A matter of presidential authority and constitutional compliance

IOL News15-07-2025
Anda Mbikwana is a PhD candidate and a municipal finance and leadership in governance expect, he writes in his personal capacity.
President Cyril Ramaphosa's appointment of Professor Firoz Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police, following the placement of Senzo Mchunu on special leave, presents a significant constitutional law question that warrants careful examination.
The central issue is whether the President's action complies with the constitutional framework governing ministerial appointments, particularly the distinction between regular ministerial appointments and the delegation of ministerial functions.
Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution provides the President with the authority to "select no more than two Ministers from outside the National Assembly." This provision establishes a clear numerical limitation and procedural requirement for appointing individuals who are not Members of Parliament to ministerial positions.
Section 98 states: "The President may assign to a Minister any power or function of another Minister who is absent or otherwise unable to fulfil the functions of office." This section contemplates the temporary reallocation of ministerial responsibilities between existing Ministers.
The constitutional analysis reveals a potential lacuna in the framework. Section 91(3)(c) makes no express provision for "Acting Ministers" - it only addresses substantive ministerial appointments. Section 98, conversely, only permits the assignment of functions to existing Ministers, not to individuals outside the cabinet structure.
Professor Cachalia's appointment presents several constitutional challenges:
Absence of Constitutional Authority: There is no explicit constitutional provision authorising the appointment of an "Acting Minister" who is not already a substantive Minister. Misapplication of Section 98: The section requires the assignment of functions to "a Minister" - a constitutional office that Cachalia does not hold. Circumvention of Section 91(3)(c): The appointment appears to bypass the formal requirements for appointing Ministers from outside the National Assembly.
The constitutional concern is compounded by an institutional presumption of legality. The legal fraternity's assumption that presidential decisions are inherently constitutional represents a classic appeal to authority fallacy. Constitutional supremacy requires that all exercises of public power, including presidential appointments, conform to constitutional requirements regardless of the office holder's status.
The appointment raises broader questions about the separation of powers and the rule of law. If the President can effectively create ministerial positions without following constitutional procedures, it undermines the constitutional framework designed to limit and structure executive power.
For the appointment to achieve constitutional compliance, the following procedure should be followed:
Formal Ministerial Appointment: Cachalia should be appointed as a Minister under Section 91(3)(c), either to an existing portfolio or to a specifically created ministry. Function Assignment: Once properly appointed as a Minister, the President could then assign him the functions and duties of the Police Ministry under Section 98.
Allowing this appointment to stand without a proper constitutional foundation could create a problematic precedent, potentially enabling future presidents to circumvent constitutional limitations on ministerial appointments through the device of "Acting" positions.
Most constitutional democracies with similar Westminster-derived systems maintain strict distinctions between substantive and acting appointments, typically requiring either explicit constitutional authorisation or limiting acting appointments to existing office holders.
The Constitutional Court's emphasis on constitutional supremacy and the rule of law suggests that informal or assumed powers cannot substitute for explicit constitutional authority. The Court's approach in cases involving executive power has consistently emphasised adherence to constitutional procedures.
Immediate Considerations
Legal Challenge: The appointment presents grounds for constitutional challenge, particularly regarding the scope of presidential power and constitutional compliance. Parliamentary Oversight: Parliament should exercise its oversight function to examine the constitutional basis for the appointment. Academic Scrutiny: Legal scholars should engage with this issue to clarify the constitutional framework governing ministerial appointments.
Long-term Implications
Constitutional Amendment: Consider whether the Constitution requires amendment to provide clear authority for acting ministerial appointments. Judicial Clarity: The courts may need to guide the scope of presidential appointment powers and the requirements for temporary ministerial arrangements. Institutional Safeguards: Develop clearer protocols for ensuring constitutional compliance in executive appointments.
Conclusion
The Cachalia appointment highlights a significant gap between constitutional requirements and executive practice. While the President's intention to ensure continuity in police leadership during a period of crisis is understandable, constitutional compliance cannot be sacrificed for administrative convenience. The legal fraternity must engage with this issue to uphold constitutional supremacy and ensure that all exercises of public power conform to constitutional requirements.
The case serves as a reminder that in a constitutional democracy, even well-intentioned executive actions must comply with constitutional procedures. The assumption that presidential decisions are inherently legal represents a dangerous departure from constitutional principles that could undermine the rule of law if left unchallenged.
This matter requires urgent attention from the legal profession, Parliament, and potentially the courts to ensure that South Africa's constitutional framework is properly implemented and respected.
Anda Mbikwana is a PhD candidate and a municipal finance and leadership in governance expert, he writes in his personal capacity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ramaphosa can fire Mchunu and reappoint him if he is cleared, MK lawyers argue in ConCourt
Ramaphosa can fire Mchunu and reappoint him if he is cleared, MK lawyers argue in ConCourt

Eyewitness News

timean hour ago

  • Eyewitness News

Ramaphosa can fire Mchunu and reappoint him if he is cleared, MK lawyers argue in ConCourt

JOHANNESBURG - Lawyers for the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party have argued that President Cyril Ramaphosa could fire Police Minister Senzo Mchunu amid the damning allegations against him and reappoint him if he is cleared. The party and its leader, former President Jacob Zuma, have taken Ramaphosa to the apex court over his decision to place Mchunu on special leave, appoint an acting police minister and institute a judicial commission of inquiry. ALSO READ: Zuma's lawyers accuse Ramaphosa of abusing Constitution This was prompted by an explosive media briefing by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, where he made allegations of a crime syndicate in Gauteng involving law enforcement, the judiciary and politicians. The MK Party's lawyer, advocate Anton Katz, has pointed out for the Constitutional Court that the country's supreme law had made clear provisions for an acting president but none for an acting minister. He said that the president only had the power to appoint and dismiss a minister, not suspend. "So the president says: 'I need a good police service while this minister is under investigation. Its not that I'm punishing him, it's just that I don't want him to be part of my Cabinet. What's wrong with that?'" Katz said that the decision to fire Mchunu dis not have to be permanent. Ramaphosa's lawyers are expected to rebut this point in their arguments.

NCOP approves Appropriation Bill, marking a pivotal moment in the 2025/26 Budget process
NCOP approves Appropriation Bill, marking a pivotal moment in the 2025/26 Budget process

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

NCOP approves Appropriation Bill, marking a pivotal moment in the 2025/26 Budget process

The Appropriation Bill was passed by the National Council of Provinces, with 51 votes in favour and nine against. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers The National Council of Provinces (NCOP) on Wednesday passed the Appropriation Bill, concluding the legislative journey of the 2025/26 budgetary process within Parliament. The Bill, the first introduced by the Government of National Unity (GNU), received a generally smooth passage during its consideration earlier in the day. The MK Party and EFF objected to each department budget, while the Freedom Front Plus abstained on the vote of the Department of Employment and Labour. A total of 51 delegates to the NCOP voted in favour of the Appropriation Bill, with support from the ANC, DA, IFP, Freedom Front Plus, Patriotic Alliance, and the UDM. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The EFF and MK Party voted against with nine votes. 'Accordingly the Bill is agreed to in terms of Section 75 of the Constitution,' said NCOP chairperson Refilwe Mtsweni-Tsipane when she announced the voting results. The Bill will now be sent to President Cyril Ramaphosa for assent and government departments allocated funds will start implementing their approved spending plans. ANC MP Cecilia Sylvia Nxumalo said the budget will improve the three priorities of the GNU, support infrastructure development, and allocate funds for the social protection programme. 'We will ensure robust oversight and accountability of allocated funds. We call on all accounting officers to take decisive action against mismanagement of funds and the findings of the Auditor-General should be responded to effectively,' said Nxumalo. DA MP Denis Ryder said the Budget proposals reflected a compromise position that can take South Africa forward. 'What we have today is a product of strong political and technical engagement and application. What we have today is a Budget that deserves a chance to show South Africa what can be done,' said, Ryder, adding that VAT increases were avoided and they have seen a move against tainted ministers. He also said that while no budget was perfect, balancing the many needs and desires of people within limited resources meant that there would always be disappointments. 'This is a symptom of a lack of economic growth. If this Budget is to succeed, it needs a strong focus on the little we have on projects that ignite growth and create jobs for ordinary South Africans while cutting wastage and corruption activities.' Ryder also said it was important that the portfolio committee ensured funds were spent efficiently and the spending reviews were important to do the right thing for the people. MK Party's Mmabatho Mokoena said her party would not pretend the Budget was for the people. 'In reality, it is a lifeline for your corrupt politicians, failing and bloated departments that can never deliver a simple toilet without a scandal. You call it the appreciation bill. We call it a misappropriation bonanza,' Mokoena said. 'The MP Party objects loudly and proudly because we were not sent here to clap for crumbs. We were sent here to hold the line for the poor, the hungry, and the forgotten.' EFF MP Mathapelo Siwisa said they could not agree to an austerity Budget. Siwisa said they made proposals on all departments to express the frustrations and desperation of the people. 'We don't object to the departments' budgets. When we stand up here and reject the proposed Budget, we are not objecting to service delivery. We are objecting to a senseless Budget. This Bill is a mockery to our people as it misses critical funding in basic education, health, road, and water infrastructure,' she said, adding that the Bill should be amended. IFP MP Les Govender said the allocation of budgets to every department was essential. 'If we do not give budgets to those departments, how do we provide services to the very people that I'm surprised that we parties are saying we object to the Budget, but they want services to their people now, here to speak in their interest. 'Now, if you take municipalities, for example, they are the core of service delivery. If you do not allocate budgets to them, how do they give services to our people?' Govender said. Freedom Front Plus MP Tamarin Breedt noted that the majority of spending allocation was to essential services like education, health, and social development. 'The VF Plus remains concerned about value for money. Billions are appropriated, but outcomes remain disappointing, especially at the local government level.'

NCOP approves Appropriation Bill and Eskom debt relief amendment
NCOP approves Appropriation Bill and Eskom debt relief amendment

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

NCOP approves Appropriation Bill and Eskom debt relief amendment

The National Council of Provinces has taken decisive action to bolster South Africa's economic future and address Eskom's financial crisis by passing the 2025 Appropriation Bill and the Eskom Debt Relief Amendment Bill during its plenary sitting on Wednesday. These legislative measures pave the way for government funding and address the financial woes plaguing Eskom, a central player in the nation's energy landscape. The Appropriation Bill holds a critical position within the national budget framework. Under Section 27(1) of the Public Finance Management Act, the Minister of Finance is obligated to table the annual budget before the National Assembly prior to the commencement of each financial year. This year's National Budget, encompassing both the Appropriation Bill and the Eskom Debt Relief Bill, was introduced in May. It follows the recent approval of the Bill in the National Assembly last week, subsequently sending it to the Select Committee on Appropriations for further consideration before returning to the NCOP for final adoption. This crucial Bill authorises the government to utilise public funds across various departments and entities, enabling them to provide essential services and invest in infrastructure projects and social programmes such as healthcare, education, and social grants.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store