In NYC mayoral race, a political star emerges out of fractured Democratic Party
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Democratic leaders badly want to win over young voters and minority groups in the coming 2026 and 2028 elections — two groups they have struggled to mobilize since the Obama era — but they also need moderate Democrats and independents who often recoil from far-left positions.
Advertisement
'It really represents the excitement that I saw on the streets all throughout the City of New York,' said Letitia James, the New York attorney general. 'I haven't seen this since Barack Obama ran for president of these United States.'
That Mamdani had such success while running on a far-left agenda, including positions that once were politically risky in New York — like describing Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip as genocide and calling for new taxes on business — may challenge the boundaries of party orthodoxy and unnerve national Democratic leaders.
Advertisement
His views on Israel are likely to force some national Democrats into an uncomfortable position, said David Axelrod, a native New Yorker and Obama's chief strategist. But he said that Mamdani's relentless focus on economic affordability resonated widely and could be a playbook for the party's success as well.
'There is no doubt that Trump and Republicans will try and seize on him as a kind of exemplar of what the Democratic Party stands for,' Axelrod said. 'The thing is, he seems both principled and agile and deft enough to confront those sort of conventional plays.'
The primary results raised questions about how Democrats on the national level would react. Would they embrace Mamdani as a next-generation leader of the party who can articulate a resonant economic message in a way that former vice president Kamala Harris failed to do in November? Or would they distance themselves from his democratic socialist ideas and move more directly toward the center to court independent voters?
The enthusiasm that Mamdani generated among a swath of New Yorkers looking for fresh leadership called to mind the insurgent campaigns of Senator Bernie Sanders in the 2016 presidential race and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in her upset victory in a 2018 House primary.
All three are democratic socialists, a once fringe movement popularized by Sanders that calls for reining in the excesses of capitalism and curbing the power of the wealthy.
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, both of whom endorsed Mamdani, remain popular progressive figures but have had only limited impact on changing the Democratic Party's agenda and messaging.
Advertisement
A key question is how the Democratic donor class and business community, which was already unsettled by Mamdani's rise, will react to his apparent victory. Business leaders may flock to his rivals in the general election in November, or try to use super political action committees to stop him.
In the meantime, other Democratic elected officials are likely to be questioned on whether they agree with his positions.
'It's a national election, not just a New York City election. People are going to be watching,' said James Carville, a longtime Democratic strategist. 'Everybody will have to weigh in one way or another. Everybody is going to be asked, do they support him.'
Even before Mamdani addressed his supporters early Wednesday morning, Republicans were gearing up to caricature him.
The National Republican Congressional Committee gleefully declared Mamdani the 'new face of the Democrat Party.' Senator Rick Scott of Florida predicted on social media that more New Yorkers would be fleeing to his state. And Representative Elise Stefanik of New York sent a fund-raising appeal Tuesday saying her 'stomach was in knots,' calling Mamdani a 'Hamas Terrorist sympathizer.' (Mamdani has defended pro-Palestinian slogans like 'globalize the intifada.' He has said that he supports an Israel with equal rights for all its citizens, but has not said if it has a right to exist as a Jewish state. He has emphatically denied accusations that he is antisemitic.)
As recently as last month, few people expected Mamdani to beat Cuomo, 67, who benefited from near universal name recognition, a deep war chest, and the endorsement of party heavyweights like former president Bill Clinton.
Advertisement
But the embrace of the party establishment may have done Cuomo no favors in a race that appeared to be marked by a deep hunger for change. The 33-year-old progressive upstart now faces a tough task: Defeating Mayor Eric Adams and a Republican opponent.
'Voters are not happy with the national party establishment and want to focus on building a movement,' said Basil Smikle, a professor at Columbia's School of Professional Studies. 'I think that's key here. Mamdani created a movement around his candidacy.'
Mamdani ran a relentless and cheerful campaign focused on affordability in a city that has grown too expensive for an expanding circle of residents, with zippy videos and catchy tag lines like 'freeze the rent' and 'free buses' that told voters he cared first about their wallets.
That kitchen-table focus actually mirrored economic messaging that some in the center of the party have also urged Democratic candidates to embrace. Many Democrats were frustrated that did not occur with former president Joe Biden and Harris during the 2024 election.
David Shor, a Democratic researcher and strategist who worked with the leading pro-Harris super PAC, Future Forward, wrote on the social platform X that Mamdani was 'a great example of how far you can go if you genuinely center your campaign in an engaging way around the issue that voters overwhelmingly say in surveys they care the most about.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
24 minutes ago
Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON -- One key unsettled issue stalling progress on President Donald Trump's big bill in Congress is particularly daunting: How to cut billions from health care without harming Americans or the hospitals and others that provide care? Republicans are struggling to devise a solution to the health care problem their package has created. Already, estimates say 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage under the House-passed version of the bill. GOP senators have proposed steeper reductions, which some say go too far. 'The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts, and I think that's problematic,' said GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senators have been meeting behind closed doors and with Trump administration officials as they rush to finish up the big bill ahead of the president's Fourth of July deadline. Much of the package, with its tax breaks and bolstered border security spending, is essentially drafted. But the size and scope of healthcare cuts are among the toughest remaining issues. It's reminiscent of the summer during Trump's first term, in 2017, when Republicans struggled to keep their campaign promise to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, only to see the GOP splinter over the prospect of Americans losing health coverage. That legislation collapsed when then-Sen. John McCain famously cast a thumbs-down vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is determined to avoid that outcome, sticking to the schedule and pressing ahead with voting expected by the end of the week. 'This is a good bill and it's going to be great for our country,' Thune said Wednesday, championing its potential to unleash economic growth and put money in people's pockets. The changes to the federal health care programs, particularly Medicaid, were always expected to become a centerpiece of the GOP package, a way to offset the costs of providing tax breaks for millions of Americans. Without action from Congress, taxes would go up next year when current tax law expires. The House-passed bill achieved some $1.5 trillion in savings overall, a large part of it coming from changes to health care. The Medicaid program has dramatically expanded in the 15 years since Obamacare became law and now serves some 80 million Americans. Republicans say that's far too high, and they want to shrink the program back to a smaller size covering mainly poorer women and children. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans are 'trying to take away healthcare from tens of millions of Americans.' Democrats are uniformly opposed to what they call the 'big, ugly bill.' Much of the health care cost savings would come from new 80-hour-a-month work requirements on those who receive Medicaid benefits, even as most recipients already work. But another provision, the so-called provider tax that almost all the states impose to some degree on hospitals and others that serve Medicaid patients, is drawing particular concern for potential cuts to rural hospitals. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said several senators spoke up Wednesday during a private meeting indicating they were not yet ready to start voting. 'That'll depend if we land the plane on rural hospitals,' he said. States impose the taxes as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics decry the system as a type of 'laundering' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide the health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the provider taxes at current levels, while the Senate proposal goes deeper by reducing the tax that some states are able to impose. 'I know the states are addicted to it,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. But he added, 'Obviously the provider tax needs to go away.' But a number of GOP senators, and the hospitals and other medical providers in their states, are raising steep concerns that the provider tax changes would decimate rural hospitals. In a plea to lawmakers, the American Hospital Association said the cuts won't just affect those who get health coverage through Medicaid, but would further strain emergency rooms 'as they become the family doctor to millions of newly uninsured people.' 'And worse, some hospitals, especially those in rural communities, may be forced to close altogether,' said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the hospital group. The Catholic Health Association of the United States noted in its own letter that Medicaid provides health insurance coverage for one in five people and nearly half of all children. 'The proposed changes to Medicaid would have devastating consequences, particularly for those in small towns and rural communities, where Medicaid is often the primary source of health care coverage,' said Sister Mary Haddad, the group's president and CEO. Trying to engineer a fix to the problem, senators are considering creating a rural hospital fund to help offset the lost Medicaid money. GOP senators circulated a proposal to pour $15 billion to establish a new rural hospital fund. But several senators said that's too high, while others said it's insufficient. Collins has proposed that the fund be set at $100 billion. 'It won't be that big, but there will be a fund,' Thune said. Hawley, who has been among those most outspoken about the health care cuts, said he's interested in the rural hospital fund but needs to hear more about how it would work. He has also raised concerns about a new $35 per service co-pay that could be charged to those with Medicaid, which is in both the House and Senate versions of the bill. 'Getting the fund is good. That's important, a step forward,' Hawley said. But he asked: 'How does the fund actually distribute the money? Who will get it to hospitals? ... Or is this just going to be something that exists on paper?' A new analysis from the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates the package would result in up to $2.3 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years, a markedly different assessment from other analyses. In contrast, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's dynamic analysis of the House-passed measure estimates an increase in deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade.
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Mamdani For Mayor? Here's How His Platform Could Impact Workers Across NYC
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 19: Mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani, visits the Recess Juneteenth ... More Kickball tournament on June 19, 2025 in the borough of Brooklyn in New York, New York. A community organization, Recess, hosts a kickball league that starts on the Juneteenth holiday that mixes culture, party and sports. (Photo by Stephanie) In an unexpected win, 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani became the presumptive Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, declaring a victory over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist, was able to galvanize young voters, with one of his key issues being the city's affordability crisis. Some of Mamdani's key proposals include city-owned grocery stores in each borough, higher taxes on the wealthiest 1 percent, as well as corporations, rent freezes for almost a million New Yorkers, expanded protections for immigrant New Yorkers, and free child care for children between six weeks and five years old. Mamdani also proposed free fares for city buses. 'I vote in every election, but this one felt different,' shared Donna Dockery. Dockery, a clinical psychologist and anti-racism educator based in Brooklyn, says the possibility of a better New York City is what motivated her to vote for Mamdani. 'I was hopeful for a significant change in leadership to positively alter the city's future.' Clinical psychologist and anti-racism educator, Donna Dockery In the fall, Mamdani may have stiff competition, running against incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and possibly Cuomo, if he decides to run as an independent. If Mamdani wins in November, he will be the city's first Muslim and Indian-American mayor. How could a Mamdani win impact workers across the city? Gig worker protections Mamdani received the support of Los Deliveristas Unidos, a group that advocates on behalf of the 65,000 app-based delivery workers in New York City. Mamdani promised to strengthen licensure requirements for delivery apps, expand resources to support the 80,000 'Black, brown and immigrant' delivery workers, improve street infrastructure and expand NYC's Department of Transportation's e-bike program, among other things. Mamdani also highlighted how the misclassification of delivery workers, rideshare drivers, and other gig workers as independent contractors prevents them from being entitled to the rights, benefits, and worker protections they deserve. A push from Mamdani for more gig worker equity could set a powerful precedent for other cities. Improved quality of life A major cornerstone of Mamdani's campaign has been affordability. By 2030, he wants to raise New York City's minimum wage to $30 an hour. Many have also lauded Mamdani's promise of free city bus fares. 'As a freelance photographer in New York City, the biggest challenge is balancing inconsistent income with the high cost of living,' shared Daniel J. Vasquez. Vasquez is the co-founder of Studio 3KBK and Frame of Mind Project. 'Fare-free public bus service would open up a lot for me and my daughter. I'd be able to do more locally without weighing every ride against my budget—running to 125th for her groceries, getting her to gymnastics at Wendy Hilliard, and then back to Riverbank for tennis or summer camp, all without stressing about swipe limits.' Photographer and co-founder of Studio 3KBK, Daniel J. Vasquez Rent affordability has played a significant role in driving residents out of the city. 'Housing is the key issue for most low-income and moderate-income New Yorkers,' said Leah Goodridge. Goodridge, who is Brooklyn-born-and-raised, is an attorney and former member of the NYC Rent Guidelines Board. She went on to share, 'People can't afford rent, and many are shut out of the homebuying market…either because the homes are too expensive, or they are nudged out by cash buyers. Mamdani's approach to housing is to tackle affordability head on with a rent freeze for rent-stabilized tenants. That's great.' Attorney and former member of the NYC Rent Guidelines Board, Leah Goodridge Many of the programs proposed by Mamdani are aimed at improving the quality of life for New Yorkers. There is a wealth of studies that indicate that when one's basic needs are met, well-being increases. When New Yorkers don't have to worry about affordability, whether in the form of rent increases, the exorbitant price of food, the ballooning cost of childcare or steadily rising transportation costs, their quality of life increases and they can show up to work as happier, more whole and fulfilled beings. A Mamdani win could signal a transformative shift for workers all across New York City.
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump's Bill Slashes the Safety Net That Many Republican Voters Rely on
From the start of his second term, President Trump has bet that he can appeal to low-income voters while slashing safety net programs on which many of those voters depend. The enormous tax-and-spending bill he is trying to push through Congress is a high-stakes test of that proposition, a gamble that Mr. Trump can retain the loyalty of his blue-collar supporters despite moves that could harm their immediate economic self-interest. As approved by the House, the legislation cuts hundreds of billions of dollars in food benefits and removes nearly 11 million people from the health care rolls, while offering large tax cuts skewed to the rich and adding trillions to the national debt. Senate Republicans are considering a similar measure, with bigger Medicaid cuts and smaller reductions in nutritional aid. Whether Republicans succeed in passing the bill — and whether voters punish them for lost assistance — could affect next year's congressional elections and determine the long-term size and strength of the social welfare system. Once mostly aimed at the indigent, aid programs were often derided by conservative critics as Democratic handouts for minority groups in urban areas. But some benefits now reach up the income ladder to working-class households, which Republicans increasingly court. Enrollment has roughly doubled in two decades in Medicaid and food stamps (formally, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP). The Affordable Care Act, signed in 2010 by President Barack Obama, subsidized households up to 400 percent of the poverty line, and pandemic-era subsidies, which expire this year, went higher. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
