Bradford traders reflect as historic markets close for good
Kirkgate Market opened in the 19th Century and Oastler Market in the 1930s, and both were important destinations in the years before online shopping saw footfall decline.On 28 June, they will shut and will eventually be demolished to make way for 1,000 new homes as part of a regeneration scheme.Traders have instead been offered stands at the new Darley Street Market, and many told the BBC they were optimistic about moving to a more modern space.
Kamran Ali, 35, has been repairing watches at Finesse Jewellers for the last 12 years.The jewellers has been based at Kirkgate Market for more than 30 years, but will move to Darley Street after the weekend. "Bradford needs something to bring people back," Mr Ali said. "The new market is, hopefully, going to help."At the same time I'm sad, because some people here are not going to go to the new market."
This sentiment was echoed by Lynn Hodgen, who was teasing her neighbour Mr Ali from her perfume stall while he was being interviewed. "They are your family, at the end of the day," Ms Hodgen, 59, said. "It's sad they're not coming with us, but it's still exciting to go and be in the new one."
One of those not joining Mr Ali and Ms Hodgen is 67-year-old Altaf Hussain. He started selling children's clothes at Kirkgate Market in 1973, shortly after arriving in the UK from Pakistan. Mr Hussain was offered a spot in Darley Street, but said it was too small for his business. "It was so busy at one time," he told the BBC, reflecting on the market's glory days in the 1970s and 80s. "It was good before, but gradually after the 90s it started changing a lot, because everything was going online."
Halimah Patel, 23, grew up playing around Kirkgate Market while her parents ran Essentials Hardware."It was always a nice place to come, a nice environment. It was really busy and it's really sad that it's quietened down in the last few years."Many of the stores that her family used to own have closed, but have not been replaced.She said that the closure of a café across from the shop in December saw footfall drop dramatically. Their family has now taken over a launderette, which they said was a more reliable source of income.
At Oastler Market, the views of the traders were similar. Vinesh Chauhan, 33, works at A&J Shoe Repairs, a family business based at the market since 1987. It was set up by his parents."I've got mixed emotions really," Mr Chauhan said. "I am looking forward to a new fresh start in the new market."Since I've been a little boy, I've known this place A-Z really."There's been a lot of shops here, but slowly they've all just gone."It's sad to be leaving because I've known this place all my life."
Khalid Mahmood, 68, set up Solly's Fruit and Veg - named after his father - in 1994. "It's sad," he said. "I'm really going to miss it here."We've been here 31 years and since starting here we've had really good days."But now it's very quiet here and we have to go to the new site, where it will hopefully be more busy because it's near to the banks and the Broadway shopping centre."His son Imti, 42, who has been working at the market for more than 15 years, added: "It's quite odd really, because we've been here for so long and serviced the community for such a long time."But, as traders, I think we're all very excited to go to a brand new market, which is a little bit more central in location to the city. "Over the years, we've found the top end of the centre, where this market is, has been quite difficult for consumers to get to."All the consumer and retail interest has shifted towards Broadway and the bottom end of town, so I think it's quite an exciting prospect that we are going to be more central."
The Darley Street Market scheme was approved by Bradford Council in July 2018, but has since been beset by delays. After seven years, the market is set to open for its first weekend on 12 July.It has been designed with spaces for eating, drinking and live entertainment as well as traditional stalls.Councillor Alex Ross-Shaw, Bradford Council's executive member for regeneration, planning and transport, said: "Darley Street Market has always been significantly more than a simple like-for-like replacement of the markets it's replacing."It helps modernise our retail offer, but it also reshapes the city centre with a new market square."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Premier League sets summer transfer record 11 days before window shuts
The Premier League 's total expenditure during the summer transfer window has reached a record £2.37bn after Leeds completed the £18m signing of Noah Okafor from AC Milan. Data from shows that top-flight clubs have already surpassed the previous record of £2.36bn – which was set in 2023 – and have already spent over 12 per cent more than last summer, when the total was 'just' £1.97bn. And with 11 days until the window closes and some potentially huge deals still to be signed, the league is on course to surpass the £2.5bn mark after deadline day on 1 September. Premier League spending dwarves that of Europe's other leagues, with the league's clubs spending more on transfers this summer than all of Serie A, Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and La Liga teams combined, according to the BBC. Serie A has the second-highest spend at the time of writing, with a total of £783m as of 18 August. Champions Liverpool have headlined Premier League spending, with the Reds completing over £200m worth of deals including spending £69m on Hugo Ekitike and a move for Florian Wirtz that could become a British record of £116m if all add-ons are met. In addition, the Reds saw a bid worth £110m for Alexander Isak turned down earlier this month. Elsewhere, Manchester United paid up to £73.7m for Benjamin Sesko and up to £71m for Bryan Mbeumo, while Arsenal are on the verge of a £67.5m deal for Eberechi Eze. Six clubs have broken their own transfer records this summer, with Nottingham Forest, Bournemouth, Brentford, Burnley and Sunderland joining Liverpool in paying a record sum for a player. Plenty of Europe's top clubs have been active in the market too, with Atletico Madrid having spent over £150m and clubs including Juventus and bayer Leverkusen surpassing the £100m mark. The biggest signing outside of the Premier League was Bayern Munich's capture of Luis Diaz from Liverpool, in a deal worth £65.5m.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
HMRC mounts clampdown on pensions tax relief claims
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is increasing scrutiny of higher earners' pension tax relief claims in order to collect more revenue. The tax office announced on Thursday that from 1 September it will no longer be accepting requests for pension tax relief over the phone as part of a crackdown on incorrect claims. Instead, individuals will have to submit requests online or by letter. The change could also mean some individuals are 'asked to provide evidence where it would not previously have been required'. HMRC said this was to 'protect taxpayers' money' after an internal review found some workers were making incorrect claims for pension tax relief. You can save a maximum of £60,000 a year into your pension and benefit from tax relief. Basic-rate taxpayers automatically get 20pc relief added to their pot but higher earners paying 40pc or 45pc tax may need to claim the extra tax relief via self-assessment. The tax office undertook a review into claims for up to £10,000 of relief and found that around one third of requests were for an incorrect amount. HMRC said that common mistakes included individuals claiming relief who were not higher-rate taxpayers getting their pension contributions wrong, and claiming relief for pensions that were under a 'net pay' arrangement so the worker had already received the full relief. In most cases, higher earners do not need to request extra tax relief because workplace pension schemes generally use a 'net pay' system. Under this arrangement, the employee receives tax relief via the payroll at their highest marginal rate so there is usually no need to claim extra relief. Higher earners should claim tax relief if their pension provider uses a 'relief at source' arrangement, so only 20pc is claimed. Personal pensions generally use 'relief at source' arrangements. About 80,000 claims for Personal Pension Relief (PPR) are submitted to HMRC every year. The announcement comes amid speculation that Rachel Reeves could cut the tax-free pension lump sum to raise more than £2bn a year. The Telegraph understands the idea is to feature on an extensive list of money-raising proposals that civil servants will present to the Chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget, as she battles a hole in the public finances of up to £50bn. Helen Morrissey, of stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdown, told the Financial Times that preventing savers from claiming tax relief over the phone could 'present an issue for people who don't have online access and doing it by letter may well be quite a lengthy process'. An HMRC spokesman said: 'We're lowering the threshold to ensure that people claim the right amount of relief and protect taxpayers' money. This comes after we conducted a review which revealed that many claims below the current evidence threshold were incorrect.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
WH Smith's US adventure is now stuck in an accounting hole
This is how, in retail-land, to shatter your credibility with investors in one short statement: confess to a significant overstatement of profits related to the recognition of payments from suppliers. This stuff is sensitive – witness the upheaval after an episode at Tesco a decade ago – and basic. While it is normal for retailers to receive payments from suppliers related to the volume of goods sold, or promotional activity, accounting rules are strict. The sums must be booked as they are earned. In a multi-year agreement, payments cannot all be taken upfront. WH Smith's last annual report was also clear that the principle should be straightforward to put into practice: 'The level of complexity and judgment is low in relation to establishing the accounting entries and estimates, and the timing of recognition.' Thus a £30m profits overstatement in WH Smith's North American division – 'largely due to the accelerated recognition of supplier income' – is enormous in the context of the size of the operation. The estimate of headline trading profits in the unit this year has been slashed from £55m to £25m. Group-wide profits should still arrive at £110m this year because the UK operation – think shiny shops in airports and railway stations, rather than the now-sold dusty high street stores – is still bigger. But the 42% fall in the group's share price on Thursday, equating to almost £600m in terms of stock-market value, still looks more than justified. North America was meant to be the gleaming growth opportunity for WH Smith. The promise, after the sale of its UK high street shops, was for a pure 'global travel' retailer with a single-minded focus on expanding its presence. Its US business takes in a tech and gadget format, InMotion, plus stores for other retailers. About 40 shops were opened in US airports last year on the way to making the division 'an increasingly significant part of the group', as Carl Cowling, the chief executive, put it. At least for now, the expansion plans are intact and it's just a question of correcting the accounting errors and waiting for Deloitte, a freshly appointed independent reviewer, to run a forensic check on all the supplier contracts. Well, let's see. These types of accounting cock-ups rarely become smaller on closer inspection and the affair raises questions that Cowling, chair Annette Court and the board haven't begun to address. For starters, WH Smith investors will want a comprehensive account of how the financial controls could have failed so badly that more than half this year's promised profits from the US could evaporate in one swoop. Then they will want to know the degree to which the US operation is dependent on supplier payments. What would returns look like without them? As Peel Hunt's analyst said: 'Bigger questions remain about the margin structure of the US businesses.' Come back in November for WH Smith's full-year numbers and its complete version of what went wrong. Until then, the shares – now at the lowest in a decade – look like dead money. The US rollout plan requires projections shareholders can believe.
