House Speaker Mike Johnson Opposes War Powers Vote After Attack On Iran
WASHINGTON ― House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doesn't think the House should vote on a resolution aimed at curtailing President Donald Trump's powers to wage war against Iran without approval from Congress.
'I don't think this is an appropriate time for a war powers resolution, and I don't think it's necessary,' Johnson told reporters at the Capitol on Monday.
Democrats have characterized the strike on Iran as yet another Trump power grab, since the Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war. Johnson pointed out presidents have been authorizing military strikes on their own for years under their constitutional authority as commanders of the armed forces.
'President Obama went on an eight-month campaign bombing Libya to take down the regime there. I never heard a Democrat balk about any of that. And suddenly now, they're just up in arms. It's all politics. This is not a time for politics,' Johnson said.
The 1973 War Powers Resolution law requires the president to consult with Congress when engaging U.S. forces in hostilities and allows fast-track procedures for votes on resolutions terminating U.S. involvement in armed conflicts.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) in the House, along with Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) in the Senate, last week introduced resolutions that would terminate hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Democratic leaders still haven't coalesced, however, after Trump authorized bombing raids against Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities over the weekend. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for a war powers vote while House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) declined to say Monday if he supported the Khanna-Massie measure.
'Haven't taken a look at it,' Jeffries said in response to a question from HuffPost.
Still, Jeffries faulted Trump for failing to seek approval from Congress or even briefing lawmakers in advance of its attack on Iran. He said the House could consider a war powers resolution ― 'whether that's the one that has already been introduced or others that may subsequently be introduced' ― after hearing from administration officials in a classified briefing scheduled for Tuesday.
'Not a scintilla of evidence to date has been presented that I have seen to justify the notion that there was an imminent threat to the United States of America,' Jeffries said. 'If the administration has evidence to the contrary, come up to present it.'
Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, testified in March that as far as the intelligence community could tell, 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,' but Trump said over the weekend Gabbard was wrong.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Running a low-turnout Georgia runoff election could cost $100 per vote
ATLANTA (AP) — Miller County Election Supervisor Jerry Calhoun says he's not sure anyone will vote in an upcoming Democratic primary runoff. After all, the southwest Georgia county only recorded one vote in the June 17 Democratic primary for the state Public Service Commission among candidates Keisha Waites, Peter Hubbard and Robert Jones. Two other Democratic ballots weren't counted, probably because voters chose Daniel Blackman, who had been disqualified. Turnout wasn't much higher among Republicans, with 40 votes cast in Commissioner Tim Echols' victory over challenger Lee Muns. 'I'm going to tell you the truth, I'm worried about it for the runoff, but there's nothing I can do about it," Calhoun said of the July 15 Democratic runoff between Waites and Hubbard. Statewide turnout for the primary on June 17 reached just 2.8% of Georgia's 7.4 million active registered voters. That includes more than 15,000 people who likely voted for Blackman and didn't have their votes counted. But the Democratic runoff might struggle to reach 1% turnout statewide. And counties could spend $10 million statewide to hold the election, based on a sampling of some county spending. That could be more than $100 per vote. People who want to change Georgia's runoff system say this election shows how the state spends money only to have decisions made by a fraction of people who voted the first time. 'It's a terrible waste of resources," said state Rep. Saira Draper, an Atlanta Democrat. But key Republicans are opposed to two methods used elsewhere — letting someone win without a majority or using ranked choice voting to determine a majority. In the meantime, some Republican-dominated counties are using a state law to reduce the number of polling places for the runoff. In many states, finishing first is enough to win, even if it's far short of a majority. Georgia is one of only nine states, mostly in the South, that require runoffs. And it's one of only two states, along with Mississippi, that demand a runoff if no candidate wins a general election majority after a partisan primary. Historians say runoffs were created in part to make it harder for Black candidates to win office, giving white voters a chance to unify around a candidate. Georgia legislators in 1995 lowered the threshold to avoid a runoff, requiring a candidate to a earn only a 45% plurality. Republicans changed the threshold back to a majority after a GOP candidate lost a 1996 Senate race. Draper introduced a bill in 2023 to lower the threshold back to 45%, but it went nowhere. House Governmental Affairs Committee Chair Victor Anderson, a Cornelia Republican, is among many who believes a majority is an important electoral mandate. 'To actually win an election you should receive, in one form or fashion, at least 50% plus one of the vote. And so I am not in favor of a plurality system," said Anderson, whose committee oversees election legislation. Another option would be letting voters rank their choices and determining the winner using second or third choices. That's the system New York City voters are using to elect a mayor. Scot Turner, a former Republican state representative who champions that system, said turnout is typically lower for runoffs, silencing voters who don't return. He said ranked choice voting would broaden participation, ensure a majority chooses the winner and save money. 'It's a tweak of our existing system that maximizes turnout and lowers cost,' Turner said. 'Because we see these massive drop-offs in turnout for runoffs, those are disenfranchised voters. Their votes are tossed as if they never were cast.' Georgia issues ranked-choice ballots to military and overseas voters. But many Republicans oppose expansion, with the Georgia Senate passing bills to ban its further use. What some counties are doing is limiting the number of polling places for the runoff. State law allows a county to open only one polling place for a primary runoff if fewer than 1% of a county's registered voters cast ballots in the initial primary. That's likely to apply to some Republican-dominated counties. A few rural counties, including Miller County, already operate only one voting location. Cherokee County, with nearly 208,000 active voters, announced Friday that it would open only one polling place after fewer than 2,000 people cast ballots in the Democratic primary. Elections Director Anne Dover said the decision would cut the cost of the runoff in half, saving about $70,000. Travis Doss, president of the Georgia Association of Voter Registration and Election Officials, said Friday that as many as 20 counties are considering that option.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Monday's Mini-Report, 6.23.25
Today's edition of quick hits. * A 6-3 ruling from SCOTUS: "The Supreme Court on Monday made it easier for the Trump administration to deport convicted criminals to 'third countries' to which they have no previous connection. The court in a brief unsigned order put on hold a federal judge's ruling that said those affected nationwide should have a 'meaningful opportunity' to bring claims that they would be at risk of torture, persecution or death if sent to countries the administration has made deals with to receive deported immigrants." * 'Devastating' was overstating matters: 'Iran's military said it targeted America's Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar with a 'devastating and powerful' missile attack today in retaliation for the U.S. attack on three of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to a statement from the IRGC published by Iranian-state media Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.' * A dubious denial: 'A senior Qatari official denied reports that Qatar was given an explicit tip-off that the Iranians were launching an attack on Al Udeid Air Base.' * The Strait of Hormuz: 'One way that Iran could potentially retaliate for the American strikes on three of its nuclear sites, analysts say, would be to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for oil and gas. In meetings at the White House, senior military officials have raised the need to prepare for that possibility, after Iranian officials threatened to mine the strait, a narrow 90-mile waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. Such a move could pin any U.S. Navy ships in the Persian Gulf, American military officials say.' * In Ukraine: 'President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine visited Britain ... just hours after a major Russian drone and missile attack on Kyiv killed at least nine people and injured over 30. The attack was the latest in a series of deadly and intensifying Russian strikes on Ukraine. But concerns are growing in Kyiv that such assaults are drawing less attention and condemnation from Western allies as their focus shifts to the Middle East and the U.S. entry into the Israel-Iran war.' * On a related note: 'Russian President Vladimir Putin suggested during an economic forum that the 'whole of Ukraine' belongs to his country, even though Russia only controls about a fifth of Ukrainian territory.' * Kilmar Abrego Garcia's fate: 'A federal judge on Sunday rejected the Justice Department's bid to detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia pending his federal criminal trial in Tennessee, citing the importance of due process while noting that he could still separately be held by immigration authorities.' * Keep a close eye on this one: 'China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early Friday, 61 of which crossed the central line in the Taiwan Strait that unofficially divides the sides, an unusually large number as tensions remained heightened in the region. It wasn't clear why so many planes were scrambled between late Thursday and early Friday, as tabulated by Taiwan's Defense Ministry. The planes were sent in two separate tranches, it added.' * A startling headline from last week: 'Alaska just hit a climate milestone — its first-ever heat advisory.' * VOA's precarious future: 'The Trump administration sent layoff notices on Friday to more than 600 employees at Voice of America, a federally funded news organization that provides independent reporting to countries with limited press freedom.' * In related news: 'In a hearing Monday to determine the future of Voice of America, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth scolded the government for not complying with his preliminary injunction from April.' See you tomorrow. This article was originally published on
Politico
35 minutes ago
- Politico
Thomas Massie says he'll withdraw war-powers measure if Iran-Israel cease-fire holds
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens Friday but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a person familiar with the conversations who was granted anonymity to discuss them tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flash points between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
