New Mexico Supreme Court requests parties file written arguments in Bishop's lodge wastewater case
The New Mexico Supreme Court issued an order Wednesday requesting all the parties involved in a wastewater disposal dispute in Tesuque submit written arguments by May 19.
The court's decision follows an April 22 emergency petition submitted by attorneys representing nonprofit Protect Tesuque to halt a proposed permit for treated wastewater from Bishop's Lodge hotel and 82 adjacent homes in Tesuque Village.
New Mexico Supreme Court asked to weigh in on Tesuque wastewater conflict
Protect Tesuque argued that the New Mexico Environment Department wrongly applied state environmental laws in the permitting process, and asked the state's highest court to intervene.
In the motion, attorneys for the nonprofit argue that NMED's permitting policies unequally enforce limitations in liquid waste laws between smaller and larger permits (more than 5,000 gallons of liquid waste per day), which they say amounts to a constitutional violation because it ignores state environmental laws.
Tom Hnasko, the attorney representing Protect Tesuque, said the court could have denied the petition without further argument.
'They obviously want to see what the Environment Department and Bishop's Lodge have to say about the matter,' he said.
Attorneys for both Bishop's Lodge and the New Mexico Environment Department requested the state's justices deny the petition, and filed documents last week saying they intended to file further arguments.
'The New Mexico Environment Department remains confident in its legal position that Bishop's Lodge's wastewater treatment system is subject to state ground and surface water quality regulations. NMED has consistently found that the facility meets or exceeds all applicable state water quality standards. Due to ongoing litigation, we are unable to comment further at this time,' said Drew Goretzka, a spokesperson at the New Mexico Environment Department in a written statement Wednesday.
Representatives for Bishop's Lodge or its parent company, Juniper Capital, did not respond to emailed requests for comment Wednesday afternoon. The hotel and its parent company maintain that the proposal to treat sewage is safe, noting that it installed a new wastewater treatment plant in 2024 'designed to meet or exceed all local and national water quality standards.'
The draft permit is scheduled for a May 19 hearing before the New Mexico Environment for additional testimony, which at this time, remains in place.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27-06-2025
- Yahoo
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Tesque wastewater July 8
Mark DeCamp, with nonprofit Protect Tesuque, stands outside of the Roundhouse on Jan. 30, before a Senate Conservation Hearing. (Austin Fisher / Source NM) The state's highest court will hear arguments in early July over a legal challenge to sewage disposal in Tesuque Village, as residents contend that state regulators' permitting actions were unconstitutional. New Mexico Supreme Court asked to weigh in on Tesuque wastewater conflict In an order issued last week, the New Mexico Supreme Court set a date for arguments on July 8. The hearing allows the justices to ask questions of attorneys, said Tom Hnasko, an attorney representing residents, with a brief 20-minute window for arguments. At the center of the dustup is the New Mexico Environment Department's nod for a proposed permit for plans to dispose of treated wastewater from Bishop's Lodge, a luxury resort, and adjacent homes. The permit allows for the discharge up to 30,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater into a new low-dose disposal field using a treatment plant installed in 2024. The current state permit allows Bishop's Lodge to dispose of about half that across two disposal fields on the property. Residents objecting to the permit coalesced into the nonprofit Protect Tesuque, which claims the disposal method threatens to pollute drinking wells downstream. Tesuque Village, with a population of about 1,000 people, relies on private wells and septic tanks. In April, attorneys representing Project Tesuque submitted an emergency petition that claimed the state's process amounted to a constitutional violation by unequally enforcing limitations in liquid waste laws between smaller and larger permits. In court documents, The New Mexico Environment Department requested the court dismiss the proceedings, saying the claims did not meet the threshold of an emergency, needlessly interrupted the permitting process and that the water was treated to exceed state and federal quality standards. '[Bishop's Lodge] Santa Fe has the best available technology wastewater treatment facility on site that treats wastewater so thoroughly that the wastewater can be recycled and reused… to irrigate food crops,' the response stated. Administrative proceedings for the permit's approval started in May, but were delayed following an order from the New Mexico Supreme Court to pause the hearings until the court weighed in. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
10-06-2025
- Yahoo
Bishop's Lodge wastewater permit process on hold until further action from state Supreme Court
The New Mexico Supreme Court on Monday ordered the state Environment Department to halt its wastewater discharge permit process for Bishop Lodge until justices take further action on a matter that continues to cause spirited debate in Tesuque. A community group called Protect Tesuque opposes a request by the luxury resort north of Santa Fe for a new permit for its wastewater treatment plant; the group petitioned the court in April to halt the permit process, arguing the Environment Department should apply a more stringent law when considering the request. A two-day public hearing was held last month on the draft permit as part of the Environment Department's administrative process, drawing numerous people who presented arguments on both sides of the issue. A hearing officer is expected to make a recommendation to Environment Department Secretary James Kenney, who will have the final say. Bishop's Lodge has built a new plant on its property to treat wastewater and an on-site leach field to discharge the treated effluent. But the plan has drawn sustained pushback from residents concerned about the proximity of the leach field to Little Tesuque Creek. Protect Tesuque's petition argues the Environment Department should apply the state's liquid waste regulations rather than ground and surface water protections. The legal argument from Protect Tesuque involves the testing of Bishop's Lodge's discharge for contaminants. The group's attorney, Thomas Hnasko, has argued the Environment Department is applying the 1967 New Mexico Water Quality Act to discharges greater than 5,000 gallons a day, rather than the 1971 Environmental Improvement Act. Bishop's Lodge representatives argue the resort's plan to use the leach field is environmentally sound and will comply with state and federal environmental standards. Treated water will be used for irrigation on the property during parts of the year. The state filed a motion asking the Supreme Court to dismiss Protect Tesuque's "request for stay." Legal counsel for the Environment Department could not be immediately reached for comment Monday evening. Jorge Armando Estrada, a spokesperson for the Environment Department, wrote in a previous email, 'The New Mexico Environment Department remains confident in its legal position that Bishop Lodge's wastewater treatment system is subject to state ground and surface water quality regulations. NMED has consistently found that the facility meets or exceeds all applicable state water quality standards."
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
As temperatures rise, New Mexico heat-rule champions push back against delay
Conservation Voters New Mexico Climate and Energy Advocate Justin Garoutte urged the New Mexico Environment Department to 'hold strong' on worker protections against heat, both indoors and outside, as the the department annouced a delay and revision of its proposed heat rule later this year. (Danielle Prokop / Source NM) Environmental and labor advocates expressed concerns during a news conference Monday about the New Mexico environment department's decision to extend the timeline for a proposed rule to protect workers from heat-related illness and injury. The delay comes as forecasts predict another warmer-than-average summer. NMED cited rising temperatures and increased heat-related injuries and deaths when it announced the proposed rule earlier this year. Under the original timeline, the rule could have taken effect as early as July. Its provisions include: required rest periods during hot temperatures; access to adequate shade, air-conditioning and water; and employer tracking of heat-related injuries. Amid rising temperatures, NM officials propose workplace protections NMED's revised schedule pushes hearings into the fall and 'leaves another summer where our workers are vulnerable to extreme heat in New Mexico,' Conservation Voters New Mexico Climate and Energy Advocate Justin Garoutte said. A Friday state news release said the delay 'will allow for continued outreach and stakeholder engagement throughout the summer and fall, ensuring broader participation and input in the rulemaking process.' More than 600 public comments have already been submitted on the proposed rule, according to Source NM's review. These include opposition from industry groups representing livestock, landscapers, oil and gas, restaurants, county governments and utilities. The New Mexico Chamber of Commerce, for instance, asked for clarifications on how the rule would be applied across several industries and wrote: 'We urge regulators to reject this rule as there is not sufficient data to justify any of these rules. Good employers protect their employees, but mandating all industries to follow one blanket rule will not work.' Eleven New Mexico Democratic senators, however, issued a letter supporting the new standards and noted that 'public comment opposed to the rule include a great deal of unscientific claims, compounded with echoes of the federal administration's ideological bent to oppose all government action.' During Monday's news conference, Garoutte said advocates for the rule are 'committed to getting through a rule that's as strong as possible' and 'we are here today to push back on industry groups who are claiming it's too hard, too fast and too burdensome.' In the meantime, 'we hope that our employers will use this time to put in place the commonsense protections detailed so well in the proposed rule,' he said. 'Every day that passes without this rule is another day that people across our state are exposed to dangerous and sometimes deadly working conditions.' Six other states — Maryland, California, Nevada, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington — have adopted statewide regulations to reduce heat stress in the workplace. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
