USC Researchers Claim "Ocean-Safe Solution" Could Replace Traditional Plastics And Save Millions Of Marine Species From Extinction
using seashell minerals and citric acid polymers. 🛡️ The new material, known as POC-CC , offers a sustainable and ocean-safe solution to traditional plastics, reducing microplastic pollution.
, offers a sustainable and ocean-safe solution to traditional plastics, reducing microplastic pollution. 🔬 Extensive testing showed that POC-CC is biocompatible and maintains the pH of ocean water, with potential applications in various consumer products.
and maintains the pH of ocean water, with potential applications in various consumer products. 🌍 This innovation represents a significant step forward in the quest for sustainable materials and could influence future industrial practices worldwide.
As the world grapples with the overwhelming challenge of plastic pollution in our oceans, a team of researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) is offering a glimmer of hope. Led by Eun Ji Chung, the team has developed a biodegradable, ocean-safe plastic alternative that promises to significantly reduce the impact of plastic waste on marine ecosystems. Drawing on her background in biomaterials, Chung and her colleagues have engineered a material using seashell minerals and citric acid polymers, potentially setting a new benchmark in sustainable materials science. The Urgent Need for Ocean-Safe Plastics
Plastic pollution is a dire environmental concern that continues to endanger marine life across the globe. According to UNESCO, plastics make up 80 percent of all ocean pollution, with an estimated 8 to 10 million metric tons entering the oceans each year. This alarming statistic has galvanized researchers and environmentalists to seek viable alternatives to traditional plastics. The USC Viterbi School of Engineering team, led by Chung, has identified a promising solution in the form of a natural substance found in seashells.
The new material, which integrates calcium carbonate from seashells with a biodegradable polymer known as poly (1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) (POC), offers a sustainable alternative that is both robust and ocean-friendly. POC is already FDA-approved for certain medical applications, underscoring its safety and effectiveness. Chung's team is hopeful that this innovation will reduce the reliance on traditional plastics and mitigate their harmful impact on the environment.
'US Eco-Sheets Crush Plastic Giants': Ultra-Strong Bacteria Fabric Shakes Up Every Household and Industry With a Sudden Wave of Unstoppable Innovation From Biomedical Polymers to Sustainable Solutions
Chung's foray into sustainable plastics builds on her earlier work with biodegradable medical polymers. During her graduate studies, she explored the use of polymers derived from citric acid, a compound found in citrus fruits, for medical applications such as sutures and tendon repair devices. Chung's innovative approach involved adding calcium particles, similar to those found in bones, to enhance the material's properties.
Building on this foundation, Chung hypothesized that the calcium carbonate in seashells could serve a similar purpose. This led to the development of the POC-CC material, a novel plastic alternative that is both biodegradable and suitable for industrial applications. The material's sticky texture, akin to gum, becomes robust and plastic-like when heated and cured. This has enabled the creation of prototypes such as beverage holder rings, offering a tangible glimpse into the material's potential uses.
'Living Mushrooms Could Power Your Phone': This Stunning Breakthrough Might Replace Plastic and Rechargeable Batteries Forever Testing the Material's Durability and Environmental Impact
To ensure the material's viability, the research team conducted extensive tests to evaluate its durability and degradation in marine environments. By synthesizing POC-CC with varying concentrations of calcium carbonate, the team assessed factors such as weight degradation and the material's impact on ocean water pH over six months. Their findings revealed that higher POC content accelerated degradation, while the addition of calcium carbonate maintained water pH levels.
One of the standout features of the POC-CC material is its biocompatibility. Unlike conventional plastics, which can harm marine life, POC-CC does not introduce harmful microplastics into the ecosystem. Tests involving green algae (Scenedesmus sp.) confirmed the material's compatibility with marine microorganisms, showcasing its potential as a safe alternative. The team is already working on a second-generation version that promises even faster degradation, further enhancing its environmental credentials.
'This Plastic Melts in the Ocean': Japanese Scientists Reveal a Radical Material That Could Finally End the Global Pollution Crisis Future Applications and Implications
The potential applications for this groundbreaking material extend beyond beverage holders. Chung envisions its use in a variety of products, including biodegradable straws that offer a more sustainable alternative to bamboo, paper, and reusable metal straws. Such innovations could play a key role in reducing the environmental footprint of everyday consumer products.
This research, funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the USC Sea Grant Program, represents a significant step forward in the quest for sustainable materials. By harnessing the properties of natural compounds, the USC team is paving the way for a new era of environmentally friendly plastics. As the research progresses, the implications for industries worldwide could be profound, offering a viable path to reducing plastic pollution.
As the quest for sustainable alternatives to traditional plastics continues, the work of Eun Ji Chung and her team offers a promising avenue for reducing ocean pollution. Their innovative approach not only addresses a critical environmental issue but also challenges industries to rethink their reliance on conventional materials. How might these advancements in biodegradable materials influence future regulations and industry practices on a global scale?
This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies.
Did you like it? 4.5/5 (29)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge
But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released Wednesday, challenges that conclusion -- finding the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan. The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP it will have "further information to share soon" -- a move that would almost certainly be seized upon by climate-change skeptics. Both the original authors -- who have acknowledged errors -- and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth. - Influential paper - It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others. AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 percent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. "That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 percent is a very big number," scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP. When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. "When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'" Hsiang said. "We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making." The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on Wednesday uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. "We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next," Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while "there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community," the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. - Undeniable climate impact - Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed. She told AFP the correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are "extremely bad" regardless of the Kotz-led study, she said, and "greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over." "Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption," she also noted. Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 "as soon as we became aware of an issue" with the data and methodology. "We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon," he told AFP. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. "One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science."
France 24
15 hours ago
- France 24
Space race: US aims to beat out China and Russia with nuclear reactor on the Moon
US Transportation Secretary and acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy has made installing a nuclear reactor on the Moon a top priority, Politico reported on Tuesday. The former Fox News host issued a directive to NASA staff on Thursday, describing the mission as a "second space race" – one he clearly hopes will end, like the first one in 1969, with the United States ahead of its rivals. Duffy set a firm deadline: 2029. That's when he wants the first nuclear reactor launched to the Moon, according to The New York Times. The goal is to get there before China and Russia, which have announced joint plans to build their own nuclear generator on the Moon in the early 2030s. Last May, Beijing and Moscow signed a memorandum of understanding to cooperate on building a reactor to be the primary power source for an 'international' lunar base, a facility the two countries are planning together. Washington now fears that if Russia or China arrives first, it could declare a 'keep-out zone', effectively limiting others from setting up operations nearby. The race to build a lunar nuclear reactor is tied to broader ambitions to establish a long-term human presence on the Moon. Washington's Artemis programme and the joint Sino-Russian project both foresee permanent bases, which would require more power than the short Apollo-era missions of the 1970s. "We need a lot of energy for future missions to the Moon," said Simon Middleburgh of the Nuclear Futures Institute at Bangor University in Wales. "To establish permanent Moon bases, we would need to be generating our own water and oxygen." But the question of what kind of energy can be used to meet lunar energy needs is still being debated. "Normally what people might expect is to use solar power," said Ian Whittaker, an astrophysicist at Nottingham Trent University. "But there's a specific challenge on the Moon: the lunar night." That night lasts the equivalent of 14 Earth days, meaning an enormous number of batteries would be required to store enough solar energy to last through it. Such a setup would be costly and extremely difficult to deliver. Nuclear power, by contrast, offers an advantage in energy density. "It's very dense, which means that a reactor the size of a small car could theoretically power a lunar base for around six years without refuelling," Middleburgh said. This has long made nuclear power one of the more practical options. "There was a lot of experimenting during the golden age of space exploration in the 1950s, '60s and '70s, and even back then, nuclear power was already being considered," said Carlo Carrelli, a nuclear energy expert at Italy's national agency for new technologies and sustainable development. "It might sound new to the general public, but it's really not." When it comes to lunar technology, size matters – the smaller, the better. "The typical nuclear installation on Earth is huge, very heavy, and provides so much power," Carrelli said. "You can't deploy something like that on the Moon as you'd need to transport thousands of tonnes of steel and concrete. Plus, it would waste a lot of energy for bases that, at least initially, will be quite small." "For now, research is focused on so-called microreactors that generate kilowatts of power rather than gigawatts, as is the case with Earth-based plants. Such structures can be transported aboard rockets," Whittaker added. NASA has already invested more than $200 million since 2000 into developing such small-scale nuclear systems, though none have yet reached flight-readiness. In 2023, the agency awarded three $5 million contracts to industry partners to study 40-kilowatt reactor concepts, enough to power 30 homes continuously for a decade. No lunar Chernobyl Transporting a scaled-down reactor is not the same as launching a nuclear power plant into orbit, but it is still likely to be an expensive operation. For one, it's unclear how many microreactors will be needed. While a single unit might suffice, backup reactors would be essential in case of failure. Experts told FRANCE 24 said it was impossible to imagine a lunar base without an alternative power source if the lights were to go out. All in all, launching and installing the reactors could cost several billion dollars, factoring in both manufacturing and delivery. But that's not the only challenge. "There will be unique technical problems due to the lack of atmosphere on the Moon," Middleburgh said. "On Earth, heat from nuclear fission is partly dissipated thanks to our atmosphere. On the Moon, we'll need alternative cooling systems." There's also the issue of gravity. "Boiling and other heat-transfer processes don't happen the same way in low gravity, which further complicates reactor cooling," Middleburgh explained. As for the possibility of a nuclear explosion in space, a Chernobyl-style disaster on the Moon is highly unlikely and more the stuff of science fiction. Experts downplayed the risk, citing the lack of oxygen as a key factor that reduces the chances of the types of chemical reactions needed for such a catastrophe. Still, many of these logistical challenges remain – even if, as Carrelli pointed out, "the microreactors themselves are relatively easy and quick to build". A lawless new frontier NASA's 2029 goal may thus seem a bit ambitious. "But not entirely unrealistic, although the early 2030s are more likely," Carrelli said. Washington's eagerness to turn the project into a full-fledged "space race" also makes geopolitical sense. "The geopolitical dimension is arguably more important than the technical challenge of building and setting up the reactors," said Whittaker. The first nation to succeed could gain a lasting advantage. "Everyone wants to be first, because there are currently no laws or treaties governing lunar colonisation," said Whittaker. "It's a bit like colonisation used to be: the first to settle could claim ownership." On the Moon, energy may translate into territory. "The idea is to install the reactors first, then argue that the lunar base must be built nearby, thereby staking a claim on the surrounding area," he added. At present, no rules exist to challenge such behaviour. "My hope as a scientist is that we can act very similarly to how we behaved under the International Space Station," Middleburgh said, where collaboration was key. Whether such a spirit of cooperation remains possible, however, is doubtful given the increasingly tense rhetoric between the United States and both China and Russia.
Sustainability Times
a day ago
- Sustainability Times
Space Startups Declare "Defense Projects Are Key" To Unlocking Massive Investment And Outpacing Global Competitors In The Race
IN A NUTSHELL 🚀 Space entrepreneurs are shifting focus to defense projects due to uncertainties in civilian space funding. are shifting focus to defense projects due to uncertainties in civilian space funding. 💡 The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program provides initial grants but is limited in scope for startups. program provides initial grants but is limited in scope for startups. 🤖 Artificial intelligence plays a pivotal role in processing data from space sensors and managing satellite traffic. plays a pivotal role in processing data from space sensors and managing satellite traffic. 🌌 Navigating defense contracts is challenging but essential for growth in the evolving space industry. In recent years, the intersection of commercial space ventures and defense projects has emerged as a promising frontier for innovation and funding. As the U.S. government continues to invest heavily in defense-related space initiatives, such as the proposed $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense system, entrepreneurs are increasingly looking to military contracts as a viable path for growth. This shift is occurring amid uncertainties surrounding NASA's budget, which has led some companies to pivot their focus towards defense projects. Shifting Focus to Defense Projects The uncertainty surrounding America's civilian space program has prompted many space entrepreneurs to explore defense projects as a reliable source of funding. The Golden Dome project, akin to Israel's Iron Dome, is one such initiative sparking interest. According to Erika Wagner, a key industry player, 'there's more uncertainty around civil space funding than there's ever been before, and more bullishness on defense space funding than there's ever been before.' This sentiment resonates with many entrepreneurs who see defense contracts as a stable source of revenue. Seattle-based space companies have been notable beneficiaries of this trend. Integrate, for example, received $25 million in funding from the Space Force, while Blue Origin secured $2.4 billion in launch contracts. These investments highlight a broader trend of increased defense spending, which provides a reliable financial foundation for companies involved in defense-oriented space projects. China's Shocking Fuel Breakthrough Uses 'Barely Any Platinum' Yet Delivers More Power Than Most US Military Systems The Role of Small Business Innovation Research Grants For many defense-oriented space startups, the journey begins with grants from the Pentagon's Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. These grants offer initial funding but are often limited in scope. Jeff Thornburg, CEO of Portal Space Systems, emphasizes the importance of moving beyond SBIR grants. 'If it's just cool tech for cool tech's sake, you'll only get through about Phase 1 or Phase 2 SBIRs, and it'll never cross the 'Valley of Death,'' he explains. The 'Valley of Death' refers to the challenging phase where startups struggle to secure additional funding after exhausting initial grants. However, some companies have successfully navigated this challenge by securing additional support through programs like SpaceWERX's STRATFI, which provides access to significant public and private funding. Portal Space Systems and Gravitics are examples of companies that have leveraged such programs to develop innovative solutions, such as sun-powered orbital transport vehicles and orbital carriers for space vehicles. 'Unthinkable Delays' as Fukushima's 880 Ton Nuclear Debris Cleanup Is Pushed Back Another 15 Years in Blow to Global Safety Efforts The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in the space sector, particularly in defense projects. Companies like Planetary Systems AI are utilizing AI tools to process vast amounts of data from space sensors, aiding in automation and decision-making for defense operations. AI is also expected to be pivotal in managing the growing number of satellites in low Earth orbit. As AI continues to evolve, its integration into space technologies could lead to more efficient and effective space traffic management systems. The Seattle area, known for its prolific satellite production, is at the forefront of these developments. The rise of SpaceX's Starlink and Amazon's Project Kuiper constellations illustrates the growing demand for advanced AI-driven solutions in the space industry. Future Prospects and Challenges Space entrepreneurs are optimistic about the potential for long-term growth in defense-related projects. However, challenges remain, particularly in building relationships with the Pentagon and navigating the complex landscape of defense contracts. As Jeff Thornburg notes, 'If you're going to take on the defense customer, and you should probably consider it if you're an entrepreneur out there, you really have to do the homework.' Understanding and addressing the specific needs of defense customers is crucial for success. In addition to defense contracts, space entrepreneurs are exploring new opportunities, such as space mining and AI-driven solutions. These ventures have the potential to transform the industry, but their success will depend on overcoming technical, financial, and regulatory hurdles. The convergence of commercial space ventures and defense projects presents a unique opportunity for growth and innovation. As the industry continues to evolve, key questions remain: How will entrepreneurs navigate the challenges of defense contracts, and what role will AI play in shaping the future of space exploration? These questions will shape the trajectory of the space industry in the coming years. This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.6/5 (23)
