
Hewlett-Packard lost hundreds of millions in Autonomy acquisition, judge rules
The company claimed at a nine-month trial in 2019 that Mr Lynch inflated Autonomy's revenues and 'committed a deliberate fraud over a sustained period of time', which it said forced it to announce an 8.8 billion dollar (£6.5 billion) write-down of the firm's worth just over a year after the acquisition.
In a ruling in 2022, Mr Justice Hildyard said the American firm had 'substantially succeeded' in their claim, but that it was likely to receive 'substantially less' than the amount it claimed in damages.
He said that Autonomy had not accurately portrayed its financial position during the purchase, but even if it had, HPE would still have bought the company, but at a reduced price.
A hearing was then held last year to decide the amount that Mr Lynch must pay in damages, before the businessman died aged 59 along with his 18-year-old daughter, Hannah, and five others when his yacht, the Bayesian, sank off the coast of Sicily last August.
On Tuesday, Mr Justice Hildyard ruled that HPE suffered losses amounting to £697,876,753 through the purchasing of Autonomy, some of which is set to be paid by Mr Lynch's estate.
He also ruled that Mr Lynch's estate is liable to pay part of around 47.5 million dollars in damages, which is worth around £35 million.
Some of the money is due to be paid by Sushovan Hussain, Autonomy's former chief financial officer, who was also sued by HPE.
He was convicted in April 2018 in the US of wire fraud and other crimes related to Autonomy's sale, and was sentenced to five years in prison.
While he has since settled HPE's claim, he could still be required to pay damages.
A further hearing to deal with matters including interest, currency conversion and whether Mr Lynch's estate can appeal against the decision is set to be held in November.
Handing down his ruling, Mr Justice Hildyard expressed his 'great sympathy' for Mr Lynch's family, calling his death a 'tragedy'.
He said: 'It is a source of anxiety to me that I have to deliver a judgment that will inevitably cause further stress on those involved.'
In the 197-page ruling, he said he considered that HPE's claim 'was always substantially exaggerated' and that the five billion dollars figure claimed 'was not based on detailed analysis'.
Following the ruling in 2022, Mr Lynch, who was also the founding investor of cybersecurity giant Darktrace, was extradited to the US in May 2023 to face criminal charges after his removal was approved by the then-Home Secretary Priti Patel.
He was cleared of accusations that he orchestrated a fraud and conspiracy over Autonomy's sale in the US in June 2024, and was celebrating the acquittal on his yacht at the time of his death.
In a statement written before his death, issued posthumously by his representatives on Tuesday, Mr Lynch said: 'Today's High Court ruling reflects that HP's original five billion dollar damages claim was not just a wild overstatement – misleading shareholders – but it was off the mark by 80%.
'HP acquired Autonomy for 11.6 billion dollars and today's judgment is a view that Autonomy's actual value was not even 10% below the price HP paid.
'This result exposes HP's failure and makes clear that the immense damage to Autonomy was down to HP's own errors and actions.
'An appeal process will be considered later this year.
'The English civil case included hearsay evidence from the US and we were never able to question or cross-examine those witnesses.
'This is in direct contrast to the rights of defendants in the US legal system.
'When in the US criminal trial we were able to cross-examine the relevant witnesses, a very different story emerged. Why is the English legal system so trusting?'
A spokesperson for HPE said: 'We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute.
'We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined.'
Jeremy Sandelson, who was appointed by the court as administrator of Mr Lynch's estate, said he would be 'examining the judgment carefully', including whether to appeal both the 2022 ruling and the judgment on Tuesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Pervert doctor put semen in woman's coffee and kept grisly 'stash' for brews
Nicholas Chapman has been struck off the medical register (Image: Avon and Somerset Police / SWNS) A twisted doctor who put his own semen in a woman's coffee has been struck off the medical register with "immediate effect". Perverted Nicholas Chapman, 57, will now never work in the medical profession again due to the risk he poses to members of the public. The former GP, from Taunton, Somerset, was previously slapped with a community order for a sexual offence after a trial found he'd filled hundreds of 'specimen' samples, before pouring these into the hot drinks of his victim. Giving grim testimony, the victim shared how, after taking a sip of a "salty" tasting coffee, she would pour other beverages away, only to notice a "thick gloopy" substance in the sink. The disgraced GP slipped semen into his victim's drink (Image: SWNS) The victim recalled: "I did not know what it was. I did not suspect it could have been semen at that point. He was then bringing me more drinks - probably one to three cups of coffee a week. "Since that occasion, I tipped them away in the sink - seeing the sort of substance in the sink - it was different size and quantities each time. At least six times I've seen it - I've not drunk it since that first time." She added: "I remember the first time I saw stuff in the sink - he said, 'Did you notice something in your drink? I noticed something in mine, he said. Maybe that was the first time he did it, and wanted to know if I'd noticed. It tasted salty." One year later, in September 2021, she became suspicious once more after coming across Chapman's foul collection of "specimen pots". The victim shared: "I instantly suspected he had been putting semen in them and transporting them into my drink. I was in shock at that point. I noticed in this trouser pocket what looked like one of those bottles." The next time Chapman offered to make her a coffee, the victim "instantly felt ill", and was left "shaking that he had put something in it". This time, she took a sample of the "gloopy" drink straight to the police. Remembering her nerves, she continued: "I felt very jumpy and worried he would catch me with this cup. I put the cup into a bag and dropped the sample off (to the police)." It tested positive for Chapman's semen. The formerly respected doctor attempted to claim that someone else had put his semen sample in the coffee as a 'prank' (Image: SWNS) Chapman, who trained at the University of Cape Town in his home country of South Africa, was arrested after arriving at work. He was then suspended from his position at the Somerset-based health centre, once the allegations came to light. The former doctor had attempted to claim that the collection of samples was due to a "secret" condition that saw him discharge semen during defecation. Although he acknowledged there were at least 10-12 "collections" a month and 140 collections a year that were not flushed down the toilet, he insisted that his masturbation, including at work, had "nothing to do with pleasure - but a painful necessity." Alleging that another person must have put these in the coffee as a "prank that went horribly wrong", Chapman argued: "I don't know why someone did that with my sample - I don't know why someone did it or why." When quizzed as to why he did not seek help for his issue or why there was no note of this on his medical records, Chapman told the court: "GPs are often really bad at managing themselves. However, this defence was dismissed as "absurd". At the trial, the victim also described how "letchy" Chapman had shown her photographs on his phone of his "erect penis" on at least two occasions. She stated: "I thought (the first time) it was a mistake and he must be really embarrassed. The second time I felt like it was on purpose. It made me feel very uncomfortable. It was not until I had seen the pots that I suspected it was semen in my drink. At times, I refused a coffee, but he would do it anyway." His claim to have a 'secret' medical condition was branded 'absurd' (Image: SWNS) When asked in court about these photos, which were seen by two colleagues, Chapman claimed this was an "accident" and that he'd been "mortified". In her victim impact statement, the victim told the court: "I feel betrayed by him, by his actions. He has made me feel powerless. "The devious and cowardly nature has shocked me. If this was a physical attack, I may have at least had a chance to defend myself. I've had to be open about this to my partner and family, but I often feel alone and that no one quite understands. "I hope in the future I am able to put this all behind me and move on with my life. Though I have to accept that the mental and emotional trauma I have suffered throughout this will always remain with me in some way." Back in 2023, vile Chapman was sentenced at Gloucester Crown Court 2023 after being found guilty of one count of engaging in sexual activity without consent for making the victim "ingest his semen" on September 13, 2021. Jurors found the disgraced doctor not guilty of a second count of the same charge, which was allegedly committed between September 12, 2020, and September 12, 2021. This was during the period when the victim "thought" there might be something wrong with the coffee, but no official testing had taken place. It was determined that there had been 'no evidence of apology, reflection, insight or remediation from Dr Chapman in respect of his conviction' (Image: SWNS) Chapman, previously regarded as an experienced and well-respected medic, has now been struck off after his conduct was heard at a tribunal by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS), held between June 23 and July 8, 2025. The tribunal looked at allegations that Chapman had, on one or more occasions between the years 2016 and 2021, engaged in conduct against Ms A - 'that constituted sexual harassment, was sexually motivated and was an abuse of his senior position.' The tribunal also examined allegations that, in 2021, Chapman had given Ms B a cup of coffee that contained semen, the charge he was convicted of. It was asserted that there had been 'no evidence of apology, reflection, insight or remediation from Dr Chapman in respect of his conviction.' In reference to the conduct against Ms. A, the tribunal "found proved" that Chapman had shown the victim images of an erect penis. It was "found proved" that he had shown her pictures of "unclothed women and/or that were pornographic in nature". It was also accepted that Chapman had asked Ms A if she'd found him on a dating app, before asking why she had not found him, and suggesting she should "look for [him]" on the app. In approximately 2020, it was "found proved" that Chapman kissed Ms A on the lips and, in May 2021, hugged and touched her bottom, the tribunal determined. MPTS Chair, Mr Jonathan Storey, concluded that Chapman's erasure from the medical register 'was the only sanction that would mark the seriousness of his misconduct and conviction.' Mr Storey stated: 'Erasure would send a message to the medical profession and to the public that this type of behaviour was unacceptable.' During his previous sentencing, His Honour Judge Rupert Lowe told Chapman: 'Mr Chapman, you are an intelligent professional of previous good character with good references. However, people did not know what you did in private. 'Your defence at trial was absurd and unnecessary. Your claims were implausible and contradictory. You told the police a ridiculous story of having semen on your hand and admitted to masturbating at work. 'You then shifted your story about testing for a medical condition. The truth is, you masturbated at work as you had a high sex drive. The impact on your career and personal life has been considerable. You have brought that on yourself.' In addition to a 12-month community order, Chapman was also subjected to a 10-year restraining order preventing him from contacting the victim, plus a five-year notification order. He also had to pay court costs totalling £3,500. If you've been the victim of sexual assault, you can access help and resources via or by calling the national telephone helpline on 0808 802 9999 Do you have a story to share? Email me at


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Social media companies not doing enough to protect England players from racism, says FA chief
Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Social media companies are still not doing enough to prevent England players from suffering racist abuse online, according to FA chief executive Mark Bullingham. Lionesses defender Jess Carter revealed before England's semi-final against Italy that she had received 'vile' and "abhorrent" racist abuse during Euro 2025. It came four years after Bukayo Saka, Marcus Rashford and Jadon Sancho were sent racist abuse after missing penalties in England's Euro 2020 final defeat to Italy. open image in gallery Jess Carter was sent abuse on social media during Euro 2025 ( Getty ) Bullingham said the FA thought 'things would improve' following the Euro 2020 final, after conversations with social media platforms, but believes there has not been enough progress. The FA are working with the UK police following the abuse received by Carter and Bullingham said they want government regulator Ofcom to use the powers it now has under the Online Safety Act 2023 to 'hold social media companies to account' following the abuse. Under the Online Safety Act, social media platforms have a duty to protect users from harmful content such as racism and Ofcom are responsible for enforcing the legislation if there are breaches. 'We did think things would improve [after 2021] and we lobbied very hard together with Kick It Out and other representatives in football to make sure the online harms act came through,' Bullingham said. 'I think we would have liked it to have been stronger in some cases – if you look at the specific areas like 'legal but harmful'. There's a real risk that if we're not firm in how the act is implemented, it won't be as strong as we hope. 'I think now it's incumbent on Ofcom to make sure they really do bring those responsible for running social media platforms to account and I haven't seen huge progress in the last couple of years. We would like to see it now.' England defender Lotte Wubben-Moy said she would be joining Carter by stepping away from social media, posting that she would 'not continue to feed the very platform that enables abuse with no consequence'. open image in gallery Mark Bullingham and Sir Keir Starmer with England's players before Euro 2025 ( Getty Images ) The FA joined a mass boycott of social media, led by football players, clubs and leagues in 2021, and while Bullingham did not rule out taking such action again in the future, he pointed that it is down to regulators to step in. 'I think we'll look at any tool within our disposal, to make a difference,' said Bullingham, who confirmed he had yet to hear directly from any of the social media platforms following the abuse suffered by Carter during Euro 2025. 'I think what you've got now, that's different to before, is you've got the online safety act and online harms act that I think we're very keen to see how Ofcom start implementing measures to bring personal accountability to those that are running social media companies, 'Within that, so I think there are different tools at our disposal now and we'll definitely be pursuing those.' While the FA are working with UK police following the abuse suffered by Carter, many of the hateful posts are likely to have also come from abroad, with Bullingham underlined the challenges in tackling social media abuse by saying that prosecuting anyone outside the UK can be 'really hard and generally really expensive'. He added: 'There's been a lot of focus on taking down content - and I think they [social media platforms] could be much better at taking down content - but more importantly, I think they could be much better at preventing it as well, and then in aiding the prosecution when it happens. So at all stages they need to be better.'


Daily Mirror
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Anna Friel pays tribute to 'amazing' Unforgivable co-star she's now 'a big fan' of
Emmy Award winner Anna Friel is about to showcase her acting talents in BBC's newest drama Unforgivable, alongside a hugely stellar cast Anna Friel is once again returning to screens and Liverpool - a city that she has always held dear after her acting career took off massively following a stint on the hugely popular British soap opera Brookside, in 1993. She played the role of Beth Jordache, portraying the first openly lesbian character in a soap, including the famous kissing scene with Nicola Stephenson, who depicted Margaret Clemence. Since then, she has gone on to achieve huge fame in shows such as Deep Water, Pushing Daisies and also won an International Emmy Award for Best Actress for her part in ITV's Marcella. Now, the critically acclaimed actress, will form part of the incredible cast in BBC's powerful drama Unforgivable. The new 90-minute series penned by the brilliant Cracker screenwriter Jimmy McGovern, sees her take on the role of Anna Mitchell. The story is Liverpool-based and centres around the lives of the Mitchell family who have been dealing with the devastating consequences of grooming and sexual abuse. Anna's brother Joe, played by Bobby Schofield, is the person who has committed the awful crimes and has been released from prison after serving a two year jail term. Alongside Anna and Bobby, Line of Duty actress Anna Maxwell Martin, takes on the role of Katherine, a former nun, who is helping Joe to rehabilitate through therapy. Adolescence star Austin Hayes, stars as Anna's eldest son and David Threlfall, plays the role of Anna's father, who becomes angry after realising she'd reached out to her abuser brother Joe. Each character has a unique role to play with showcasing how sexual abuse can completely ripple through a family as they all attempt to regain a sense of normality after facing the aftermath of such a devastating crime. The drama has landed on BBC's streaming platform this morning at 6am and will air tonight, from 9pm on BBC2, with the compelling story already proving to be a drama not to be missed. Away from the launch of the much talked about feature, Anna Friel has paid tribute to her Unforgivable co-stars and explained what life was really like behind-the-scenes. Speaking about her relationship with the star-studded cast, she had nothing but praise to air for her on-screen peers. In a conversation with BBC, she said: "I loved my scenes with David Threlfall, he became a new friend in my life." The former soap star added: "I hadn't met Anna Maxwell Martin before, but I've always thought she's an amazing actress and it was wonderful to find she's an amazing person. "We didn't have any scenes together apart from in the courtroom, but I'm a big fan. Bobby provides such a complex performance." Unforgivable will air on BBC Two at 9pm this Thursday and will be available on BBC iPlayer from the same day.