Australia court rules partly against Apple, Google in Epic Games lawsuit
SYDNEY (Reuters) -An Australian court found the smartphone app stores of Apple and Google-owned Android were uncompetitive, local media reported on Tuesday, in a partial victory for Fortnite game developer Epic Games against the tech giants.
Amid a years-long legal dispute brought by Epic against the dominant smartphone makers in several jurisdictions around the world, Australia's federal court found the phone makers' app stores had no protections against anti-competitive behaviour, the reports said.
Epic Games had claimed Apple and Google's fees for downloads of its games were too high, and that the phone makers made it impossible for users to download its alternative app store.
The Australian judgment, which ran to 2,000 pages, was not released by the court on Tuesday, but media said a judge's summary included the finding that the smartphone companies had not intentionally breached the law.
In a post on X, Epic said the Australian court "just found that Apple and Google abuse their control over app distribution and in-app payments to limit competition".
Epic is a U.S.-based games studio with backing from China's Tencent.
"The Epic Games Store and Fortnite will come to iOS in Australia!" the Epic post said. "This is a WIN for developers and consumers in Australia!"
Apple said in a statement it welcomed the court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, but strongly disagreed with its ruling on others.
"Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate," the California-based tech giant said.
A Google statement said the company welcomed the court's rejection of some Epic Games claims but "we disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape".
"We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Companies embrace in-person interviews to dodge the chatbots
If you're a knowledge worker on the job hunt, you might want to upgrade your interview wardrobe to include pants. Why it matters: Companies are bringing back in-person interviews after years of virtual hiring since the pandemic. That's because artificial intelligence — which is upending the labor market — also makes it easier for candidates to cheat. During a technical interview on Zoom, where interviewees might previously have done a quick Google search, they now have access to sophisticated chatbots that can feed them answers off camera. In-person interviews also eliminate concerns over AI-enabled scammers impersonating workplaces or applicants. Driving the news: Google, Cisco and McKinsey have brought back face-to-face interviews during some part of recruiting and hiring, the Wall Street Journal reported. Recruitment firm Coda Search/Staffing in Dallas estimated that in-person interview requests among its clients have increased from 5% last year to 30% this year, the WSJ reported. What they're saying: "We are making sure we'll introduce at least one round of in-person interviews for people, just to make sure the fundamentals are there," Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in June on Lex Fridman's podcast. The intrigue: AI plays a growing role in the job application process for both prospective employees and employers. Applicants are using AI to fine-tune resumes and write cover letters, while recruiters use AI tools to filter through candidates. In some cases, the interviewer is AI-generated. Our thought bubble, from Axios' Megan Morrone: There's been a steady bot arms race between job seekers and hiring managers.
Gizmodo
27 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Sam Altman and Elon Musk Trade Barbs Over Who Is More Full of Shit
In happier times, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Tesla CEO Elon Musk were buddies and business partners, but their bromance notoriously turned sour a long time ago. For the past several years, the two have very publicly hated each other and taken every opportunity they can to dunk on one another's business pursuits. This week, Altman and Musk's animosity spilled out into public view again, as the two attempted to determine who was the biggest liar. The whole kerfuffle was predictably kicked off by Musk, who instigated the fight by claiming that there was some sort of corporate conspiracy to keep apps like Grok from hitting #1 on the App Store. 'Apple is the gateway to the Internet for half of America,' Musk posted on Tuesday. 'They are making it impossible for any other AI company to succeed by relentlessly promoting OpenAI in every way possible!' Onlookers were quick to point out that there was substantial evidence to the contrary. Indeed, several community notes appended to Musk's tweet pointed out that other AI apps—such as DeepSeek and Perplexity—had managed to climb to the top of the App Store this year, a fact that would seem to disprove Musk's theory of an OpenAI bias. Not long after Musk's tweet, Altman decided to jump into the fray: 'This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like,' the AI CEO said. 'You got 3M views on your bullshit post, you liar, far more than I've received on many of mine, despite me having 50 times your follower count!' Musk replied, in a post whose tenor seemed to resemble that of a petulant 8th grader. Altman shot back with a challenge: 'Will you sign an affidavit that you have never directed changes to the X algorithm in a way that has hurt your competitors or helped your own companies? i will apologize if so.' An X user jumped into the thread and asked Grok what it thought of the argument. Humorously, Grok appeared to agree with Altman: 'Based on verified evidence, Sam Altman is right. Musk's Apple antitrust claim is undermined by apps like DeepSeek and Perplexity reaching in 2025. Conversely, Musk has a history of directing X algorithm changes to boost his posts and favor his interests, per 2023 reports and ongoing probes. Hypocrisy noted.' Not long afterward, the X account for ChatGPT shared Grok's tweet, writing: 'good bot.' Musk subsequently sought to explain why Grok would ever say such dastardly things about its creator (newsflash: it's the news media's fault): 'The fact that Grok is allowed to say false defamatory statements about me and they don't get blocked or deleted (which would be easy to do) speaks to the integrity of this platform,' the billionaire claimed. 'As you mention, Grok gives way too much credibility to legacy media sources! This is a major problem and we're working to fix it,' Musk said, seemingly hinting that his chatbot is due for another lobotomy. Musk later replied to ChatGPT's post with a screenshot purporting to show Altman's chatbot stating that Musk was more trustworthy than Altman. Musk has been accused many times of having rigged his social media platform in favor of his own preferred content. A study published last year claimed to show evidence that conservative content was being algorithmically amplified on X. In a similar vein, Altman shared an article on Tuesday that claimed Musk had 'created a special system [on X] for showing you all his tweets first.' 'I hope someone will get counter-discovery on this, I and many others would love to know what's been happening,' Altman wrote. 'But OpenAI will just stay focused on making great products.' Musk later retaliated. 'Scam Altman lies as easily as he breathes,' the billionaire posted, re-sharing a post from another user that had pointed out allegations that Altman was a liar. Gizmodo reached out to Altman via OpenAI, to Musk via Tesla, and to Apple. When it comes to who is winning the AI war, the answer is clearly: Altman. Despite recent stumbles (GPT-5 has been hailed by many as a piece of shit) and advances from competitors (the genAI space has become notably more crowded since the first days of ChatGPT), OpenAI remains one of the most powerful and well-positioned AI companies on the market. By contrast, Musk's xAI has made a name for itself largely by promoting the kooky personality of its chatbot, Grok. xAI is growing, however. Recent reports show that the company is burning through cash as it attempts to stand up its own expanding AI infrastructure. Despite all the money and resources that both men and their companies have managed to accrue, they don't seem to have created chatbots that can decide which man is more trustworthy.
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Debt Reaches $37 Trillion Years Before Expected
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. government's gross national debt has climbed past $37 trillion, a record-breaking milestone that underscores the rapid growth of America's fiscal obligations and the mounting cost pressures on taxpayers. The Treasury Department confirmed the figure Tuesday in its latest daily financial report — a level reached years ahead of pre-pandemic projections. In January 2020, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that gross federal debt would not surpass $37 trillion until after fiscal year 2030. However, a combination of unprecedented federal borrowing during the COVID-19 pandemic and more recent spending measures has pushed the nation to that threshold far sooner. The pandemic, which began in 2020, prompted both the Trump and Biden administrations to approve trillions in emergency relief to stabilize a shuttered economy and aid recovery. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, look on as President Donald Trump makes an announcement about Apple with Apple CEO Tim Cook in the Oval Office, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025, in Washington.... Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, look on as President Donald Trump makes an announcement about Apple with Apple CEO Tim Cook in the Oval Office, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025, in Washington. More Associated Press That borrowing surge has continued into 2024. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump signed into law a Republican-backed tax cut and spending package that the CBO projects will add $4.1 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Wendy Edelberg, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the legislation ensures "we're going to borrow a lot over the course of 2026, we're going to borrow a lot over the course of 2027, and it's just going to keep going." Fiscal policy experts warn that the consequences are far-reaching. Michael Peterson, CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, cautioned that sustained borrowing drives up interest rates, increasing costs for households and businesses while crowding out key federal priorities. "It creates a damaging cycle of more borrowing, more interest costs, and even more borrowing," Peterson said. The Government Accountability Office lists several impacts of rising federal debt on everyday Americans: higher mortgage and auto loan rates, reduced business investment leading to lower wages, and costlier goods and services. The pace of debt accumulation has also quickened dramatically. The U.S. hit $34 trillion in January 2024, $35 trillion in July, and $36 trillion in November — meaning each additional trillion has been added roughly every five months. According to the Joint Economic Committee, another trillion could be added in just 173 days at the current rate. Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, urged lawmakers to act swiftly. "Hopefully this milestone is enough to wake up policymakers to the reality that we need to do something, and we need to do it quickly," she said. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
