FTC Issues Sweeping Demands to Media Rating Firms Over Industry Ties
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is investigating media credibility firms about their industry relationships, requiring organizations to hand over information about operations, finances, and communications, The New York Times first reported, and ADWEEK has independently verified.
The FTC has issued Civil Investigative Demand letters-which, like subpoenas, require recipients to produce documents and respond to inquiries-to organizations including Media Matters for America, as first reported by The New York Times last week, and the news rating company Ad Fontes Media, ADWEEK has independently confirmed.
The development highlights a broader pattern of heightened scrutiny by the U.S. government in recent years toward the advertising industry. Last year, a congressional investigation determined that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a leading advertising coalition, colluded in a politically motivated effort to suppress right-wing media by steering ad dollars away from outlets like Fox News, Breitbart, and The Daily Wire. The House Judiciary Committee said at the time that GARM "likely violated federal antitrust laws."
In one letter issued on May 20, obtained by ADWEEK, the FTC demands the organization produce information about its operations and methodologies, finances, internal and external communications, and complaints or allegations about its work from January 1, 2019 to the present.
In the 21-page letter, the government also demands details about the organization's relationships with 13 other "entities that purport to track, categorize, evaluate, or rate news sources, outlets, websites, content, or other entities for 'misinformation,' 'hate speech,' 'false' or 'deceptive' content, or similar categories." According to the letter, these organizations include media rating firm NewsGuard, trade associations the World Federation of Advertisers and the Interactive Advertising Bureau, adtech vendors DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science, as well as watchdog organizations Check My Ads Institute and the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
To ensure compliance with the CID, the FTC "requires a search of all documents in the possession, custody, or control" of the organization. The government demands that the requested information and answers be submitted by June 19.
"They're requesting pretty much anything pertinent to our business since we started," Ad Fontes Media CEO Vanessa Otero, who received a letter from the FTC, told ADWEEK, adding that the demands are "excessive" and "overzealous."
"Typically, for a subpoena or a discovery request in a civil trial, parties have to be actually charged with something or actually be sued in order to have to submit to these heavy demands that are very intrusive on your business,' she said. 'And that's not the case with a Civil Investigative Demand, because the DOJ, FTC, FCC, and some other agencies have very broad power to do pre-litigation investigation. It can be very onerous on companies…and it can be very discouraging to people's activities or their speech."
Ad Fontes Media said it will comply with the FTC's demands, Otero said.
Media Matters also received a CID, it confirmed, and is under active investigation by the FTC.
An FTC spokesperson declined to comment, noting that the agency's "communications with external parties are nonpublic."
The letter reviewed by ADWEEK was issued by the FTC's mergers division, prompting speculation that the CID letters may be part of a larger investigation concerning Omnicom's planned acquisition of IPG. In March, the FTC issued a second request for information concerning the proposed transaction.
Following the government's scrutiny into GARM last year, X-under the leadership of polarizing billionaire owner Elon Musk-sued the organization over similar allegations, accusing the group and its backer, the World Federation of Advertisers, of operating as gatekeepers that pressure brands into boycotts of sites like X under the guise of brand safety. GARM shuttered days after the lawsuit was launched.
Musk has also sued Media Matters. In his lawsuit, Musk alleges the group knowingly manipulated data to push a damaging narrative about X after it published research highlighting racist and antisemitic content on X. The organization snapped back with a lawsuit of its own in March.
"Businesses have rights to not advertise next to stuff they find crappy,' Otero told ADWEEK. 'And no one is colluding with anybody about this."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas' GOP congressional delegation meets to discuss redrawing districts ahead of midterms
Republicans from Texas' congressional delegation met at the U.S. Capitol Monday night to discuss a proposal to redraw the lines of their House districts, GOP Rep. Pete Sessions said. Emerging from a meeting attended by most of the 25-member GOP delegation, Sessions said there was 'a lot we don't know,' including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would be in favor of the idea. Abbott has the lone authority to call members of the Texas Legislature back to Austin for a special session, which would be required to carry out the rare and extraordinary move of reshaping the state's political boundaries in the middle of the decade, years before the next census in 2030. Sessions, a Waco Republican, told reporters the delegation has scheduled another meeting to discuss the issue further and 'share data,' but declined to give further details beyond confirming that President Donald Trump would not be attending. The meeting came shortly after The New York Times first reported that Trump's political team has been urging Texas political leaders to examine how they could redraw some of the state's 38 U.S. House districts to help preserve the GOP's narrow majority in the lower chamber in the 2026 midterms. Sessions emphasized that Republicans, in weighing whether to push for a mid-decade redistricting battle, should consider how it would impact 'the entire delegation.' 'We want to make sure all of our members, even those that are brand new, have an opportunity to see this for what it is,' Sessions said, declining to say whether he was concerned specifically about stretching Republican districts too thin by moving voters around to maximize the GOP's advantage. Other Republicans exiting the meeting — including Reps. Chip Roy, Michael McCaul, Beth Van Duyne and Dan Crenshaw — did not directly answer any questions about the meeting. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Disclosure: The New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas' GOP congressional delegation meets to discuss redrawing districts ahead of midterms
Republicans from Texas' congressional delegation met at the U.S. Capitol Monday night to discuss a proposal to redraw the lines of their House districts, GOP Rep. Pete Sessions said. Emerging from a meeting attended by most of the 25-member GOP delegation, Sessions said there was 'a lot we don't know,' including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would be in favor of the idea. Abbott has the lone authority to call members of the Texas Legislature back to Austin for a special session, which would be required to carry out the rare and extraordinary move of reshaping the state's political boundaries in the middle of the decade, years before the next census in 2030. Sessions, a Waco Republican, told reporters the delegation has scheduled another meeting to discuss the issue further and 'share data,' but declined to give further details beyond confirming that President Donald Trump would not be attending. The meeting came shortly after The New York Times first reported that Trump's political team has been urging Texas political leaders to examine how they could redraw some of the state's 38 U.S. House districts to help preserve the GOP's narrow majority in the lower chamber in the 2026 midterms. Sessions emphasized that Republicans, in weighing whether to push for a mid-decade redistricting battle, should consider how it would impact 'the entire delegation.' 'We want to make sure all of our members, even those that are brand new, have an opportunity to see this for what it is,' Sessions said, declining to say whether he was concerned specifically about stretching Republican districts too thin by moving voters around to maximize the GOP's advantage. Other Republicans exiting the meeting — including Reps. Chip Roy, Michael McCaul, Beth Van Duyne and Dan Crenshaw — did not directly answer any questions about the meeting. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Disclosure: The New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bannon Wants Special Counsel Probe Into Musk's Contracts and Drug Use
Steve Bannon has called for a special counsel investigation into Elon Musk's lucrative federal contracts and the extent of his drug use. The MAGA civil war between the two former Trump administration figures continued over the weekend on Sunday Night with Chuck Todd, with Bannon—who already suggested deporting the South African-born tech billionaire—saying Musk should face further consequences. 'I think there have to be formal investigations,' Bannon told the former Meet the Press anchor during a discussion about SpaceX and Starlink, Musk's satellite Wi-Fi service. SpaceX should be nationalized, Bannon reiterated, adding that he shared the White House's reported security concerns about Starlink being installed there. When Todd asked who would be leading such investigations, Bannon replied that 'the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything.' 'Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily. Investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon replied. In May, The New York Times reported that Musk's drug use, which Trump speculated had a role in their blow-up last week, frequently involved ketamine, as well as Adderall, ecstasy and mushrooms. Musk, The New York Times also reported, was alerted to drug tests at SpaceX ahead of time. The White House has refused to say whether Musk was drug tested during his time as de-facto head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. On Sunday, Bannon agreed with Todd when he said that Musk 'never would have passed a security clearance as must a mid-level staffer.' Also on Todd's show, Bannon took issue with a March report that Musk, who has extensive business interests in China, was expected to receive a briefing about potential U.S. military action in that country. 'Why would you need a briefing at a highly classified level, in the tank, at the Pentagon on the China war plan?' asked Bannon, who called Musk an 'agent of influence.' For his part, Musk has described Bannon as a 'communist r-tard' and a 'criminal.' Bannon spent four months in prison last year for defying a Jan. 6 House Committee subpoena. In February, he pleaded guilty in state court to one felony count of scheming to defraud donors to his We Build the Wall fundraising campaign. Four years prior, Trump had pardoned Bannon amid his indictment in federal court over that campaign.