logo
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat

Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat

Leader Livea day ago

He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan.
China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend.
China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.
'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.'
China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline.
But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'.
Mr Hegseth repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific (Anupam Nath/AP)
Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal.
He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute.
'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said.
He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent.
While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised.
Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case.
In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border.
Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US.
He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US.
At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone.
'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said.
'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.'
The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years.
Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries.
Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk.
'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said.
China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on.
'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said.
Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence.
Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it.
'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said.
'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.'
Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues.
It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending
SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending

Prime Minister Keir Starmer had previously outlined that a 3% spend on defence by 2034 is an 'ambitious' target, a view reportedly still held by some senior Whitehall officials. However, John Healey has said it is now a certainty. The Defence Secretary's comments mean the Labour Government would be committed to spending more than £10 billion extra on defence every year, despite criticism over proposed cuts to public services. In February, Starmer announced that the UK would increase spending on defence up to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027, raiding the international development budget, in a move which was branded by the Scottish Government as 'deeply disappointing'. READ MORE: Scottish minister hits back at Defence Secretary 'student union politics' jibe The SNP MP Dave Doogan said Labour are 'unable to read the room' following Healey's comments that the UK Government will spend 3% of GDP on defence by the next parliament. Doogan (below), the SNP's defence spokesperson at Westminster, said: '3% by 2034 shows how broke the UK is - this is a decade after Labour have taken power. (Image: House of Commons) 'Lead times for new equipment and systems will add further delay to Labour's tardy defence timescales. 'This 'jam tomorrow' defence posture won't fix crumbling defence housing or the lamentable recruitment and retention crisis." He added: 'Ballooning nuclear enterprise costs, so high now the government has delayed issuing the new rolling ten year cost of Trident, will consume much of any new defence cash. 'We are firmly in an era of increasingly contested global ambition and global instability where some traditional allies seem increasingly at odds with European values and ambitions and Labour are unwilling or unable to read the room.' The UK Government's 10-year defence plan on Britain's defence spending, which is due to be announced on Monday, was reportedly due to be published during VE Day week earlier this month but had been delayed because of rows with the Treasury. One source told The Times there had been 'discontent that the Ministry of Defence is using it to push for more defence spending'. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has estimated that reaching 3% of GDP by the next parliament would cost the UK an additional £17.3bn in 2029-30. Doogan's comments come after Healey (below) said Labour's plans to increase military spending are sending a 'message to Moscow'. The UK Government pledged £1.5bn to set up at least six factories and said it would support the procurement of up to 7000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review (SDR), which is to be published on Monday. The new funding will see UK munitions spending hit £6bn during this parliament, with Starmer calling the review a 'radical blueprint'. The Prime Minister also pledged a 'wave of investments' in shipbuilding, drone technology and cyber defences. Healey said the £6bn of investment would 'equip our forces for the future' and 'create jobs in every part of the UK'. 'This is a message to Moscow as well," he told the BBC's Sunday Morning With Laura Kuenssberg programme. "This is Britain standing behind, making our armed forces stronger but making our industrial base stronger, and this is part of our readiness to fight, if required. Healey added that Russia is 'attacking the UK daily' as part of some 90,000 cyber attacks from state-linked sources that were directed at the UK's defence over the last two years.

Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions
Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions

In one of the incidents, seven people were killed and dozens were injured. The first bridge, in the Bryansk region on the border with Ukraine, collapsed on top of a passenger train on Saturday, causing the casualties. Hours later, officials said a second train was derailed when the bridge beneath it collapsed in the nearby Kursk region, which also borders Ukraine. Rescue workers at a damaged bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, which borders Ukraine (Moscow Interregional Transport Prosecutor's Office telegram channel/AP) In that collapse, a freight train was thrown off its rails on to the road below as the explosion collapsed the bridge, acting governor Alexander Khinshtein said on Sunday. The crash sparked a fire, but there were no casualties, he said. Russia's investigative committee, the country's top criminal investigation agency, said in a statement that explosions had caused the two bridges to collapse, but did not give further details. Photos posted by government agencies from the scene in the Bryansk region appeared to show train carriages ripped apart and lying amid fallen concrete from the collapsed bridge. Other footage on social media were apparently taken from inside vehicles on the road, which had managed to avoid driving on to the bridge before it collapsed. Seven people were killed when the bridge collapsed (Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service telegram channel/AP) In the past, some officials have accused pro-Ukrainian saboteurs of attacking Russia's railway infrastructure. The details surrounding such incidents, however, are limited and cannot be independently verified. In a statement on Sunday, Ukraine's military intelligence, known by the Ukrainian abbreviation GUR, said a Russian military freight train carrying food and fuel had been blown up on its way to Crimea. It did not claim the attack was carried out by GUR or mention the bridge collapses. The statement said Moscow's key 'artery' with the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia region and Crimea has been destroyed. Russian forces have been pushing into the region of Zaporizhzhia in eastern Ukraine since Moscow's invasion in February 2022. They took Crimea and annexed it in 2014.

British fighter jets 'to carry nuclear bombs for first time' over Russia threat
British fighter jets 'to carry nuclear bombs for first time' over Russia threat

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

British fighter jets 'to carry nuclear bombs for first time' over Russia threat

British fighter jets could soon carry nuclear bombs for the first time in history as the threat from evil Vladimir Putin against the UK and the West continues to mount British fighter jets could soon carry nuclear bombs for the first time in history as the threat from Vladimir Putin mounts. The UK government is reportedly in talks to purchase jets with the ability to fire nuclear weapons, stepping up its deterrents against Russia and its increasing hostility. This weapons move could be the biggest progression in the UK's nuclear deterrents since the Cold War. The aircraft the government has allegedly set its eyes on are American-made fighter jets that are able to launch gravity bombs, which use up less power and energy than standard nukes and are more popular with the military. ‌ ‌ Defence Secretary John Healey and the head of the armed forces, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, are looking to grow the UK's military capability by purchasing these jets. Sir Keir Starmer has reportedly also thrown his support behind the idea. Talks with the Pentagon over purchasing these combat aircrafts are believed to have taken place, according to The Sunday Times. The government has not confirmed these talks but Healey said the UK had to adjust for the "new era of threat" posed to the country. He told The Sunday Times: "The world is definitely becoming more dangerous. Nuclear risks are rising. We face now, for the first time since the end of the Cold War, seriously increasing risks of state-on-state conflict." ‌ These combat jets could work with the B61, which is a nuclear air-dropped bomb used by the US. The slim and long bomb can slot under fighter jets and be dropped when needed, rather than launched like a missile. This potentially imminent nuclear military development comes after Russia issued a series of threats to the UK in recent weeks. Russia has reportedly put together a secret list of places on dictator Putin's "hit list", supposedly including several UK towns and cities. ‌ Secret documents revealed Russia's nuclear hit list has 32 targets across NATO, including a shipyard in Cumbria, a factory in Hull and a site near Edinburgh. Russia's main target was said to be the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness. Another report suggested other potential locations on the list include Aldershot, Colchester, Portsmouth, Chatham, Tidworth and Salisbury. Putin has previously threatened the UK and other countries but has failed to follow through on any attacks, other than on Ukraine. Despite this, the threats and hostility from Moscow have continued to grow. One of Putin's mouthpieces recently said Russia should wipe the UK off the map in a chilling threat. Sergei Karaganov, one of the dictator's leading military experts, said Britain "won't exist" following a nuclear attack. Karaganov added: "We need to strengthen nuclear deterrence by any means."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store