logo
[Wang Son-taek] Making America graceless again

[Wang Son-taek] Making America graceless again

Korea Herald16-04-2025

I like America. I received my master's degree in the US and worked three years as a Washington correspondent for YTN, a cable TV news channel in Korea. During that time, I can say that I saw the country up close — its people, institutions and ideas. But more than just familiarity, I was impressed by what America stood for: liberal democracy, diversity, freedom and economic opportunity.
For decades, the United States was not just a superpower but a world leader. Its soft power was rooted in principles that elevated it above the politics of might. It inspired nations and gave hope to those living under oppression. But over the past decade, that image has changed.
When Donald Trump declared his presidential candidacy in 2015, many dismissed him as a sideshow. But as his influence grew, so did the damage to America's reputation. Since Trump entered the political arena, the US has transformed — not of renewal, but of regression. The shift has been painful to watch for those who saw in America a leader, not a bully.
Trump's slogan, "Make America Great Again," was intended to rally support by invoking a lost golden age. However, the idea that America is no longer great is implicit in that message.
That claim doesn't hold up to facts. Before Trump took office, America was still the world's leading economy. Its military power was unmatched. The dollar remained the global reserve currency. Its technological innovation is still the envy of the world. Culturally, American films, music and universities maintain unparalleled international influence. What part of this reflects a fallen America?
What Trump meant by "greatness" was not leadership through values but dominance through force. He confused respect with fear and cooperation with weakness. His rhetoric targeted allies as adversaries and framed global engagement as a zero-sum game. Instead of elevating America, he diminished its moral authority. One of his most damaging claims is that other nations no longer respect the United States. This view may appeal to domestic pride, but it misunderstands diplomacy. In the international system, states interact as sovereign equals. Respect is not demanded; it is earned — through consistency, trust and principled leadership.
Trump's behavior undermined the respect he claimed to restore. He suggested buying Greenland from Denmark, treating it as a real estate transaction. He dismissed Panama's sovereignty in remarks about the canal. He spoke of directly managing the Gaza Strip, showing disregard for Palestinian autonomy. These are not making America great but graceless again.
Worse still was his approach to America's allies. Trump accused partners such as Germany, Japan and South Korea of exploiting the US security commitments. He questioned the value of long-standing alliances like NATO. However, this view ignores the reality that these alliances are strategic assets.
The US military presence abroad supports stability in key regions, enables rapid crisis response, and serves as a deterrent against potential adversaries. It also deepens US influence and helps secure trade routes and supply chains. To frame this as exploitation is to misunderstand both history and strategy.
Equally misguided was Trump's economic nationalism. He launched trade wars under the banner of fairness, but his policies often hurt the people they claimed to protect. Tariffs on steel, aluminum and Chinese goods disrupted global supply chains and raised costs for American consumers. Farmers, manufacturers and small businesses were all caught in the crossfire.
Trump treated trade deficits as evidence of defeat. But it is common sense that deficits reflect complex factors like investment flows, currency valuation and consumption patterns — not simply unfair trade. The US helped build the rules-based global trading system, which benefited more than anyone for decades. With its advanced industries and global capital reach, America thrives when markets are open. Protectionism may sound patriotic, but it isolates the US and weakens its competitive edge.
It is true that America has made mistakes on the world stage. The 2003 invasion of Iraq, for example, severely damaged US credibility. Unlike the war in Afghanistan, which responded to a direct attack, the Iraq war was based on flawed intelligence and launched without broad international support. It destabilized the region, cost hundreds of thousands of lives and generated deep skepticism about American leadership.
The 2008 financial crisis further exposed vulnerabilities. It triggered a global recession triggered by reckless financial practices within the US. Millions lost homes and jobs. Trust in American economic stewardship was shaken — not by foreign adversaries but systemic failures at home.
Yet, rather than learn from these lessons, Trump doubled down on grievance and fear. Why? The answer lies in domestic politics. Since the Cold War ended, the US has lacked a common external enemy. Without it, political polarization intensified. Identity politics deepened.
Trump capitalized on this divide, crafting a message that blamed outsiders — foreigners, immigrants, global institutions — for America's internal problems. In doing so, he sacrificed the very values that once made America admired: openness, generosity, fairness and accountability. He mocked allies, praised autocrats and treated diplomacy as a personal contest. His policies offered no real solutions — only spectacle and division.
Perhaps most alarming is the durability of his influence. Trump may resist acknowledging his failures, but the costs of his approach are increasingly evident. America's alliances have been strained. Its global standing has declined. Its ability to mobilize international cooperation — on climate, security or pandemics — has been weakened. If the US is to reclaim its role as a global leader, it must reverse course.
That requires more than just policy shifts. It requires reaffirming core American principles: democracy, diversity, rule of law and constructive engagement with the world. There is still hope. America's institutions remain strong. Civil society is vibrant. Its partners are still willing to cooperate. Though America was imperfect, it was principled, built alliances and promoted peace. That is the America we loved. And that is the America the world still hopes to see again.
Wang Son-taek is an adjunct professor at Sogang University. He is a former diplomatic correspondent at YTN and a former research associate at Yeosijae. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bills to probe Yoon, wife pass National Assembly
Bills to probe Yoon, wife pass National Assembly

Korea Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Bills to probe Yoon, wife pass National Assembly

Bill on suspected interference in investigation of Marine's death also passed; Presidential office says 'there is very little reason' to veto them The ruling Democratic Party of Korea-controlled National Assembly on Thursday passed contentious bills mandating special counsel probes into charges and scandals surrounding former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife, Kim Keon Hee. Three probe bills reintroduced by the Democratic Party were approved during a parliamentary plenary vote held in the afternoon. One pushes to launch a permanent special counsel to investigate 11 charges tied to Yoon's failed martial bid in December; another seeks to mainly investigate Kim's alleged inappropriate interference in the People Power Party's candidate nomination process in previous general and by-elections as well as her luxury bag scandal; the third looks into the allegations that the Yoon administration interfered in the military's investigation into a young Marine's death in 2023. All three bills were passed in a 194-3 vote with one abstention, in a package deal. The move came a day after President Lee Jae-myung, who was the Democratic Party Chair, was sworn into office. He won Tuesday's early election, securing 49.42 percent of the vote against his rival and People Power Party candidate Kim Moon-soo, who saw 41.15 percent. Lee was highly likely to approve and endorse the bills, as an official at the presidential office said, 'there is very little reason' to veto them, with all three 'receiving People's support,' in a press briefing after the plenary vote. People Power Party, which became the main opposition party on Wednesday, highlighted its party line against the passage of the bills ahead of the plenary vote. The majority of the party lawmakers boycotted all three votes. All three bills passed on Thursday had previous versions that were scrapped by former President Yoon's veto power. The bill mandating a permanent special counsel investigation against Yoon will look into 11 different charges tied to his martial law bid, including insurrection and military mutiny. The previous versions of the bill were vetoed and scrapped twice. The latest version expanded the scope of the charges from six to 11. Special counsel candidates will be nominated by the Democratic Party and the minor liberal Rebuilding Korea Party, from the parliament's side. The bill also eases regulations to access presidential archives. It lowers the threshold from the current approval needed from two-thirds of lawmakers or from a high court chief judge to three-fifths of the Assembly or permission from a district court chief judge. The bill concerning the first lady will look into her alleged role in a stock manipulation scandal as well as the inappropriate acceptance of a luxury bag from a Korean-American pastor and election-related scandals involving political broker Myung Tae-kyun. An amendment passed alongside the bills expands the scope of the number of assistant special prosecutors from four to seven and raises the cap on dispatched prosecutors from 40 to 60.

US Treasury keeps Korea on currency manipulation watchlist
US Treasury keeps Korea on currency manipulation watchlist

Korea Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

US Treasury keeps Korea on currency manipulation watchlist

Washington signals potential broadening of forex monitoring policy, raising concerns in Seoul over the roles of public funds South Korea remained on the US Treasury Department's currency-monitoring watchlist updated Thursday, signaling heightened scrutiny over potential currency manipulation accusations. The US Treasury issued the Macroeconomic and Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading Partners of the United States report, maintaining Korea on the monitoring list for extra foreign exchange scrutiny. Korea was first added to the watchlist in April 2016. It was dropped from the list in November 2023 but was reinstated in November 2024. The semiannual currency report assesses the trade balances and currency practices of major US trading partners. Countries are automatically placed on the monitoring list if they meet at least two of three conditions: a bilateral trade surplus with the US of at least $15 billion, a current account surplus exceeding 3 percent of gross domestic product, and forex market intervention — in other words, persistent net purchases of foreign currency. Korea remained on the watchlist for posting a $55 billion trade surplus with the US and recording a current account surplus equivalent to 5.3 percent of its gross domestic product. It did not meet the threshold for forex market intervention, as it had intervened in the market to strengthen the Korean won in 2024 by selling the greenback instead of purposely weakening the local currency. 'Korean authorities reported net sales of $11.2 billion for all of 2024, approximately 0.6 percent of GDP and concentrated in the second quarter of the year,' the report stated. The US Treasury warned against any form of market intervention in the report, underpinning, 'Korea should continue to limit currency intervention to exceptional circumstances of disorderly foreign exchange market conditions.' The currency report, issued for the first time since US President Donald Trump took office, was expected to provide insight into the US administration's stance on exchange rates. As anticipated, the US Treasury signaled plans to enhance its scrutiny of trading partners' currency policies and practices in future assessments. It indicated that it may begin monitoring not only traditional forms of foreign exchange intervention but also other tools that could influence exchange rates for competitive advantage, including the use of capital flow management measures, macroprudential policies and activities by government-affiliated investment vehicles such as pension funds or sovereign wealth funds. This expanded scope raises potential concerns for Korea, where major institutional investors such as the National Pension Service, one of the largest pension funds in the world, and the sovereign wealth fund Korea Investment Corporation, play a significant role in cross-border capital flows. The state-run fund operators are major buyers of dollars on the forex market. When making foreign investments, they buy dollars, which adds pressure on the buying side of the greenback, consequently strengthening the dollar and weakening the Korean won. Though both funds do not share their asset allocation by country, significant portions of the NPS and the KIC's investments are tied to the US. As of December, the NPS holds assets worth roughly $210 billion in the North American stock markets and $30 billion in US bonds, while the KIC operates assets amounting to approximately $125 billion in US shares. Since the US flagged forex policy as a discussion item in trade talks in April, market watchers have speculated that the role of the NPS could become a touchy subject in policy discussions with the country. 'The NPS tripled its advance FX purchase limit to $3 billion from $1 billion per month in September 2024 and expanded its swap arrangement with the Bank of Korea from $50 billion to $65 billion in December 2024,' the report stated, explaining the pension fund operator can borrow dollars from the central bank's reserve for overseas investment. The Finance Ministry announced it will continue communicating with the US Treasury to deepen bilateral understanding. "The Korean government will continue to strengthen mutual understanding and trust on foreign exchange policy through communication with the US Treasury,' the Finance Ministry stated through a press release. "Ongoing forex negotiations between the financial authorities of Korea and the US will be carried out carefully and thoroughly,' the ministry stated, referring to the trade talks between Seoul and Washington. Along with Korea, eight other countries, including China, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam and Germany, were on the monitoring list, with Ireland and Switzerland newly added. The US Treasury further stated that no major trading partner was found to have manipulated its currency in 2024.

S. Korea vows closer talks with US on FX policy following monitoring list status
S. Korea vows closer talks with US on FX policy following monitoring list status

Korea Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

S. Korea vows closer talks with US on FX policy following monitoring list status

The Ministry of Economy and Finance vowed Friday to enhance communications with the United States to strengthen mutual understanding and trust regarding foreign exchange rate policies. The pledge came after the US Treasury Department kept South Korea on its monitoring list for currency practices. Seoul was reinstated on the list in November 2024 after being removed in November 2023 for the first time since April 2016. "We will continue to expand mutual understanding and trust regarding exchange rate policies through regular communication with the US Treasury Department," the ministry said in a press release. "Ongoing discussions between the Korean and US financial authorities on exchange rate issues will also be conducted thoroughly," it added. Currency policy has been one of the key topics in bilateral negotiations related to US President Donald Trump's administration's sweeping tariff measures. In April, the two countries agreed to focus their talks on four categories -- tariff and non-tariff measures, economic security, investment cooperation and currency policy. They aim to reach a "package" agreement by July 8, when the 90-day suspension of Washington's tariff implementation is set to expire. Last month, South Korea's Deputy Finance Minister Choi Ji-young met with US Treasury Assistant Secretary for International Finance Robert Kaproth on the sidelines of the 58th Asian Development Bank Annual Meeting in Milan to discuss currency-related issues. (Yonhap)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store