Latest news with #YTN
News18
5 days ago
- General
- News18
On Camera: South Korean Navy Patrol Aircraft Spirals Out Of Control Before Deadly Crash
Last Updated: The horriffic video shows the aircraft abruptly losing control mid-air, turning upside down and spiraling before plummeting to the ground. A South Korean maritime patrol aircraft crashed minutes after taking off near a military base in the southern city of Pohang on Thursday, leaving all four crew members onboard dead. According to an official statement by the navy, the P-3 aircraft crashed only six minutes after it left the airfield on a training mission at 1:43 PM (0443 GMT). A horrifying video captures the final moments of a fatal plane crash that claimed four lives. The footage shows the aircraft abruptly losing control midair, turning upside down and spiraling before plummeting to the ground. The plane is seen twirling uncontrollably in the sky moments before crash. Surveillance video captures the fatal crash of a South Korean Navy P-3CK Orion—down just six minutes after takeoff from PohangAll four crew members were killed Anti-submarine patrols are grounded as investigators search for answers — RT (@RT_com) May 30, 2025 Another dramatic footage broadcast by YTN television captured the aircraft flying at a low altitude before sharply banking and crashing, followed by a burst of smoke and flames. The bodies of all four crew members have been recovered, said the navy, adding that no civilian casualties were reported in the incident. An investigation into the crash is also underway. The report also mentioned that authorities have recovered the cockpit voice recorder (CVR), which has recordings of conversations between the pilot and co-pilot. Investigators believe it could provide significant insights into what transpired in the moments leading up to the crash. First Published: May 30, 2025, 22:08 IST
AFP
14-05-2025
- Politics
- AFP
Image of Trump watching South Korean presidential candidate is doctored
"Prime Minister Han Duck-soo is the only candidate who is respected by President Trump," reads the Korean-language caption of an image shared on Facebook on May 8, 2025. The image appears to show Trump looking at a TV screen showing Han launching his campaign for president (archived link). Han has , allowing his conservative People Power Party to field a single candidate against liberal frontrunner Lee Jae-myung (archived link). As impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol's prime minister, Han had assumed the country's interim leadership when Yoon was suspended from office following his short-lived imposition of martial law in December 2024. He resigned as acting president on May 1 to run in the presidential election scheduled for June 3. Image Screenshot of the misleading claim shared on Facebook, captured May 9 Identical claims were shared in multiple Facebook groups supporting Yoon and other conservative politicians. "President Trump looks like he is carefully watching South Korea's election. He probably ordered that Lee Jae-myung be stopped by any means necessary," read a comment on one of the posts. While Trump reportedly asked Han whether he would run for president, the image circulating online is a fabrication (archived link). Old Trump photo A combination of keyword and reverse image searches on Google led to a Washington Post photo showing Trump watching news coverage on a monitor at the White House on November 20, 2020 (archived link). The photo is captioned: "President Trump watches television after speaking to reporters at the White House on Nov. 20." Image Screenshot comparison between the doctored image shared on Facebook (left) and the photo published by the Washington Post (right) The same photo was also used by the Seattle Times and is available on the Getty Images website (archived here and here). A separate keyword search led to footage of Han announcing his presidential bid broadcast by YTN on May 1 (archived link). The still used in the doctored image is shown at the 2:05 mark. Image Screenshot from YTN's broadcast used in the false posts AFP has previously debunked similar images that were doctored to make them appear as if they showed Trump speaking with Yoon or watching news about his South Korean counterpart.
Time of India
29-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Kim Soo Hyun faces 3 billion KRW lawsuits, could be hit with up to 30 billion KRW in damages amid controversy
Kim Soo Hyun's challenges appear to be ongoing. Once celebrated as South Korea's highest-paid actor, he is now reportedly facing financial difficulties following allegations of an underage relationship involving the late actress Kim Sae Ron. Adding to his troubles, two companies that previously signed him as a brand ambassador are now suing him for damages. The companies reportedly seek compensation of 3 billion KRW (approximately 2 million USD). Kim Soo Hyun faces new lawsuits Kim Soo Hyun is facing mounting legal and professional setbacks. Two companies that once tapped him as the face of their brands have now taken legal action, demanding he return his endorsement fees and pay additional damages. The lawsuits are reportedly worth around 3 billion KRW, or roughly 2 million USD. Meanwhile, a third company is said to be weighing its options, with concerns over public trust potentially leading to a contract termination, according to YTN. Despite being one of the most sought-after endorsers in South Korea—with deals spanning 15 brands and individual contracts ranging from 1 billion to 1.2 billion KRW (about 696,000 to 835,000 USD)—Kim's advertising career is now under pressure. Legal experts speak out Legal expert Park Sung Woo from Woori Law Firm notes that companies are often hesitant to sue high-profile figures like Kim Soo Hyun first. However, once one lawsuit is filed, it can trigger others, creating a ripple effect. This could lead to more legal actions against Kim Soo Hyun, increasing the financial burden, up to 30 billion KRW, on him and his agency, Gold Medalist. Kim Soo Hyun's drama Knock Off postponed amid his controversy In another blow to his career, Kim Soo Hyun's upcoming Disney+ drama Knock Off has been put on hold indefinitely. Industry insiders say that if the project ends up being cancelled altogether, the actor could face massive financial penalties—anywhere from 18 billion to 180 billion KRW in potential damages. Background of the controversy Controversy surrounds Kim Soo Hyun due to allegations about his past relationship with the late actress Kim Sae Ron. The Bloodhounds actress' family claims he was involved with her when she was underage, sparking widespread criticism. YouTube channel Garosero, known for celebrity exposés, dropped some bombshell accusations against the actor, which fueled the backlash, leading several brands to drop him. In response, Kim Soo Hyun held a press conference denying the allegations, stating any relationship occurred after Kim Sae Ron turned 19. He attributed leaked messages suggesting otherwise to manipulation and submitted them for forensic analysis. Despite his efforts, public opinion remains divided, with some questioning the sincerity of his emotional response. For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.
Hype Malaysia
29-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Hype Malaysia
Actor Kim Soohyun Sued For RM8mil By Advertisers Over Recent Controversies
After causing damage to brands and companies' image with his recent scandal, Korean actor Kim Soohyun (김수현) was hit with his first lawsuit from an advertiser. Not only that, but more companies might soon follow suit. According to reports, two companies, A and B, had recently filed lawsuits against Kim Soohyun and his agency, Gold Medalist. The two companies had advertising contracts with the star and are now seeking the return of modelling fees and damages. While the exact amount is unknown, the combined amount that A and B are seeking as compensation reportedly exceeds KRW 3 billion (approximately RM8.6 million). More advertisers are also expected to join the legal battle against the actor. Another company, C, is considering filing a lawsuit against Kim Soohyun, citing breach of trust as the grounds for terminating their advertising contract. The company is seeking either the return of modelling fees or penalties. Before his scandal, the 'Queen of Tears' actor was reportedly one of South Korea's highest-paid actors and advertising models. A South Korean lawyer explained the situation, saying, 'Kim Soohyun has signed advertising model contracts with 15 brands, each valued between KRW 1 billion (approximately RM2.9 million) and KRW 1.2 billion (approximately RM3.6 million). Usually, companies are reluctant to make it known that they were the first to file a lawsuit against a model. However, once one company files a lawsuit, more will join.' There were previous allegations that the actor would face lawsuits for breaching contracts with his recent controversies. However, this is the first instance of an advertising company directly suing Kim Soohyun and his company. There's no telling how much the actor will be sued for. However, based on the figures, the total amount involved in the entire lawsuit could exceed KRW 10 billion (approximately RM30.1 million). We're sure these companies have their reason for taking Kim Soohyun to court. What are your thoughts on this? Source: YTN
![[Wang Son-taek] Making America graceless again](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F04%2F16%2Fnews-p.v1.20250416.e777c3f041f049408d73b159a9a88a5c_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Wang Son-taek] Making America graceless again](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
16-04-2025
- Politics
- Korea Herald
[Wang Son-taek] Making America graceless again
I like America. I received my master's degree in the US and worked three years as a Washington correspondent for YTN, a cable TV news channel in Korea. During that time, I can say that I saw the country up close — its people, institutions and ideas. But more than just familiarity, I was impressed by what America stood for: liberal democracy, diversity, freedom and economic opportunity. For decades, the United States was not just a superpower but a world leader. Its soft power was rooted in principles that elevated it above the politics of might. It inspired nations and gave hope to those living under oppression. But over the past decade, that image has changed. When Donald Trump declared his presidential candidacy in 2015, many dismissed him as a sideshow. But as his influence grew, so did the damage to America's reputation. Since Trump entered the political arena, the US has transformed — not of renewal, but of regression. The shift has been painful to watch for those who saw in America a leader, not a bully. Trump's slogan, "Make America Great Again," was intended to rally support by invoking a lost golden age. However, the idea that America is no longer great is implicit in that message. That claim doesn't hold up to facts. Before Trump took office, America was still the world's leading economy. Its military power was unmatched. The dollar remained the global reserve currency. Its technological innovation is still the envy of the world. Culturally, American films, music and universities maintain unparalleled international influence. What part of this reflects a fallen America? What Trump meant by "greatness" was not leadership through values but dominance through force. He confused respect with fear and cooperation with weakness. His rhetoric targeted allies as adversaries and framed global engagement as a zero-sum game. Instead of elevating America, he diminished its moral authority. One of his most damaging claims is that other nations no longer respect the United States. This view may appeal to domestic pride, but it misunderstands diplomacy. In the international system, states interact as sovereign equals. Respect is not demanded; it is earned — through consistency, trust and principled leadership. Trump's behavior undermined the respect he claimed to restore. He suggested buying Greenland from Denmark, treating it as a real estate transaction. He dismissed Panama's sovereignty in remarks about the canal. He spoke of directly managing the Gaza Strip, showing disregard for Palestinian autonomy. These are not making America great but graceless again. Worse still was his approach to America's allies. Trump accused partners such as Germany, Japan and South Korea of exploiting the US security commitments. He questioned the value of long-standing alliances like NATO. However, this view ignores the reality that these alliances are strategic assets. The US military presence abroad supports stability in key regions, enables rapid crisis response, and serves as a deterrent against potential adversaries. It also deepens US influence and helps secure trade routes and supply chains. To frame this as exploitation is to misunderstand both history and strategy. Equally misguided was Trump's economic nationalism. He launched trade wars under the banner of fairness, but his policies often hurt the people they claimed to protect. Tariffs on steel, aluminum and Chinese goods disrupted global supply chains and raised costs for American consumers. Farmers, manufacturers and small businesses were all caught in the crossfire. Trump treated trade deficits as evidence of defeat. But it is common sense that deficits reflect complex factors like investment flows, currency valuation and consumption patterns — not simply unfair trade. The US helped build the rules-based global trading system, which benefited more than anyone for decades. With its advanced industries and global capital reach, America thrives when markets are open. Protectionism may sound patriotic, but it isolates the US and weakens its competitive edge. It is true that America has made mistakes on the world stage. The 2003 invasion of Iraq, for example, severely damaged US credibility. Unlike the war in Afghanistan, which responded to a direct attack, the Iraq war was based on flawed intelligence and launched without broad international support. It destabilized the region, cost hundreds of thousands of lives and generated deep skepticism about American leadership. The 2008 financial crisis further exposed vulnerabilities. It triggered a global recession triggered by reckless financial practices within the US. Millions lost homes and jobs. Trust in American economic stewardship was shaken — not by foreign adversaries but systemic failures at home. Yet, rather than learn from these lessons, Trump doubled down on grievance and fear. Why? The answer lies in domestic politics. Since the Cold War ended, the US has lacked a common external enemy. Without it, political polarization intensified. Identity politics deepened. Trump capitalized on this divide, crafting a message that blamed outsiders — foreigners, immigrants, global institutions — for America's internal problems. In doing so, he sacrificed the very values that once made America admired: openness, generosity, fairness and accountability. He mocked allies, praised autocrats and treated diplomacy as a personal contest. His policies offered no real solutions — only spectacle and division. Perhaps most alarming is the durability of his influence. Trump may resist acknowledging his failures, but the costs of his approach are increasingly evident. America's alliances have been strained. Its global standing has declined. Its ability to mobilize international cooperation — on climate, security or pandemics — has been weakened. If the US is to reclaim its role as a global leader, it must reverse course. That requires more than just policy shifts. It requires reaffirming core American principles: democracy, diversity, rule of law and constructive engagement with the world. There is still hope. America's institutions remain strong. Civil society is vibrant. Its partners are still willing to cooperate. Though America was imperfect, it was principled, built alliances and promoted peace. That is the America we loved. And that is the America the world still hopes to see again. Wang Son-taek is an adjunct professor at Sogang University. He is a former diplomatic correspondent at YTN and a former research associate at Yeosijae. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
