Posts target former South Korean first lady with misleadingly blurred image
The clip shows Kim holding a blurred object to her mouth, with superimposed text that reads: "Kim Keon Hee chain-smoking in a hospital room" and "[She] continues to chain-smoke."
The 25-second video does not contain any footage of Kim smoking. Instead, it features individuals repeating unverified claims that a hospital employee saw Kim smoking after she was admitted to the Asan Medical Center in Seoul on June 16 for what local media described as "severe depression" (archived here and here).
Kim is currently under investigation for multiple alleged crimes, including a suspected stock-rigging scheme tied to Deutsch Motors, the receipt of a luxury Dior handbag, interference in candidate nominations ahead of the 2022 parliamentary by-elections, and influence-peddling in a major highway rerouting project (archived here and here).
Image
Screenshot of the misleading video thumbnail shared on YouTube, with an orange X added by AFP
The same video was widely shared by multiple Facebook users critical of Kim.
Comments left in the misleading posts indicated several users believed the image genuinely showed Kim lighting a cigarette.
"Wonder who captured this video, they must have risked their life," one user wrote.
Another said: "Caught red-handed, the hospital should kick her out."
The image, however, is not from a hospital room -- nor does it show Kim smoking.
A reverse image search on Google found the photo is a manipulated still from news footage published on YouTube on January 11, 2023 by the South Korean broadcaster YTN.
In the original footage — timestamped at 1:10:57 — Kim is seen using chopsticks to eat "tteok", Korean rice cake, during a visit to a traditional market in Daegu (archived link).
In the doctored version, the rice cake and chopsticks have been obscured and blurred to create the appearance of Kim holding a cigarette.
Image
Screenshot comparison between the doctored image shared on YouTube with an orange X added by AFP (left) and a corresponding still from the original YTN news footage of Kim's visit to a market in 2023
Kim's visit to the market in Daegu at the time was widely reported by local news outlets, many of which carried similar footage of her eating rice cakes (archived here and here).
Newsis, a Korean news agency, also captured a photo of Kim eating a rice cake from a similar angle as the YTN footage (archived link).
AFP was unable to independently verify the claim that Kim was seen smoking inside the hospital. No images or video footage have emerged to support the allegation.
Kim has frequently been the subject of misinformation online, which AFP has previously debunked.
Reality TV show
Days after an altered image of Kim Keon Hee circulated, supporters of the rival camp shared a doctored image of First Lady Kim Hea-kyung, falsely claiming it also showed her smoking (archived link).
But a reverse image search on Google led to a YouTube video posted by South Korean broadcaster SBS on July 18, 2017 (archived link).
The clip is from a 2017 reality TV show that featured the first couple when President Lee Jae-myung was still mayor of the northwestern city of Seongnam.
Image
Screenshot comparison of misleading post (left) with orange X added by AFP and YouTube video from SBS
In the original video, Kim Hea-kyung is holding chopsticks, with the tips lightly touching her mouth. But in the doctored image, her hand and the chopsticks were blurred.
Her husband has been a frequent target of misinformation, which AFP has previously debunked here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Sweden jihadist jailed for life over Jordan pilot burned alive
The Swedish court was the first to try a person over the infamous killing which sparked outrage around the world. Judge Anna Liljenberg Gullesjo said "the investigation has shown that the defendant was at the execution site, uniformed and armed, and allowed himself to be filmed." Although video evidence showed that another man lit the fire, the judge said the "defendant's actions contributed so significantly to the death of the victim that he should be considered a perpetrator." Krayem, who is serving long prison sentences for his role in the Paris and Brussels attacks in 2015 and 2016, was given a life sentence for "serious war crimes and terrorist crimes" On December 24, 2014, an aircraft belonging to the Royal Jordanian Air Force crashed in Syria. The pilot, Maaz al-Kassasbeh, was captured the same day by IS fighters near the central city of Raqqa and was burned alive in a cage sometime before February 3, 2015, when a slickly-produced video of the gruesome killing was published, according to the prosecution. Gullesjo said Krayem's actions consisted of "guarding the victim both before and during the execution and taking him to the cage where he was set alight while still alive." The court also awarded compensation to the parents and siblings of the Jordanian pilot, amounting to 80,000 Swedish kronor ($8,200) each. Prosecutors have been unable to determine the exact date of the murder, but the investigation has identified the location. The 32-year-old jihadist remained silent throughout the hearings, which lasted between June 4 and June 26, though segments from interrogations with Krayem conducted during the investigation were read out and played during the trial. The fact that the defendent did not speak did not "significantly impact the ruling, as the prosecution presented solid evidence, and the investigation was thorough," Gullesjo told AFP. No remorse According to his lawyer, Krayem insisted he had spent only 15 to 20 minutes on-site, unaware of what was going to happen until he saw the cameras. "This verdict somewhat comforts the family," the pilot's brother Jawdat al-Kassasbeh, who was a civil party to the case, told AFP. "We thank Sweden and the impartial Swedish judiciary for their efforts in pursuing this case," the brother added. His lawyer lamented in court that Krayem showed no empathy or remorse for his actions. "Most people who witnessed what Maaz went through would undoubtedly need lifelong, or at least long-term, treatment to overcome the trauma that this causes in a normal individual," Mikael Westerlund told the court. The pilot's brother had travelled from Jordan for the trial to testify to the pain, still raw, that he shares with his loved ones. "Krayem, on the other hand, does not seem to have been traumatised, but inspired. Inspired to continue his terrorist activities, which led him to participate in and then be convicted of terrorist acts in Europe," Westerlund added. Krayem, who is from Malmo in southern Sweden, was sentenced to 30 years in prison in France for helping plan the November 2015 Paris attacks and to life imprisonment in Belgium for the 2016 attacks at Brussels' main airport and metro station. On March 12, France agreed to hand him over to Sweden for nine months, the time needed for the investigation and trial. He must be returned to France by December 27 at the latest, the Stockholm court said Thursday.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
How to tell if a song was made by AI or a human
Is it The Velvet Underground or Velvet Sundown? The fictitious rock group, Velvet Sundown – which comes complete with music, lyrics and album art generated by artificial intelligence (A) – is stoking debate about how the new technology is blurring the line between the real and synthetic in the music industry, and whether creators should be transparent with their audience. Computer software is widely used in music production, and AI is just the latest tool that disc jockeys, music producers and others have added to their production pipeline. But the rise of AI song generators such as Suno and Udio is set to transform the industry because they allow anyone to create songs with just a few prompts. While some people do not care whether they're listening to AI-generated music, others might be curious to know. If you encounter a new song that leaves you wondering whether it's 100 per cent made with AI, there are some methods that could reveal how it was created. Do a background check If you're wondering who's behind a song, try some old-fashioned detective work. The 'most obvious cues' come from 'external factors,' said Manuel Mousallam, head of research and development at streaming service Deezer. Does the band or artist have social media accounts? Lack of a social presence might indicate there's no one there. If they do exist online, examine the kind of content they post, and how long it goes back. Is there any sign that the artist or band exists in real life? Are there any upcoming concerts and can you buy a ticket for a gig? Is there footage of past concerts on YouTube? Has an established record label released their singles or albums? Try going to the source. Song creators often – but not always – publish their generated tunes on the Suno or Udio platforms, where they can be found by other users. The catch is that you'll have to sign up for an account to get access. Users can look up songs by track name or the creator's handle, and browse genres and playlists. But it can still be difficult to spot a song, especially if you don't know the name of the song or creator. Song tags Deezer has been flagging albums containing AI-generated songs, as part of its efforts to be more transparent as it battles streaming fraudsters looking to make quick money through royalty payments. The Deezer app and website will notify listeners with an on-screen label – 'AI-generated content' – to point out that some tracks on an album were created with song generators. The company's CEO says the system relies on in-house technology to detect subtle but recognisable patterns found in all audio created by AI song generators. The company hasn't specified how many songs it has tagged since it rolled out the feature in June, but says up to 18 per cent of songs uploaded to its platform each day are AI-generated. Check the lyrics AI song tools can churn out both music and lyrics. Many serious users like to write their own words and plug them in because they've discovered that AI-generated lyrics tend to be bad. Casual users, though, might prefer to just let the machine write them. Bad rhyming schemes or repetitive lyrical structures might be a clue that a song is not man-made, but it's subjective. Some users report that Suno tends to use certain words in its lyrics like 'neon," 'shadows' or 'whispers'. If a song includes these words, it's 'a dead giveaway' that it's AI, said Lukas Rams, a Philadelphia-area resident who has used Suno to create three albums for his AI band Sleeping with Wolves. 'I don't know why, it loves to put 'neon' in everything'. No easy answers AI technology is improving so quickly that there's no foolproof way to determine if content is real or not, and experts say you can't just rely on your ear. 'In general, it can be difficult to tell if a track is AI-generated just from listening, and it's only becoming more challenging as the technology gets increasingly advanced,' said Mousallam of Deezer. 'Generative models such as Suno and Udio are constantly changing, meaning that old identifiers – such as vocals having a distinctive reverb – are not necessarily valid anymore'.
AFP
8 hours ago
- AFP
Old video of Cambodian homes gutted by fire falsely linked to border clashes
"Justice for Cambodia #ThailandStartedTheWar," reads the caption of a TikTok video shared on July 25, 2025. Khmer-language text superimposed on the clip says, "At noon I will shoot back for the people". The video, which was viewed more than 27,000 times, shows several buildings that appear to have been damaged by fire and people picking through the rubble. It surfaced a day after a long-standing dispute over contested border temples boiled over into open combat on Thailand and Cambodia's 800-kilometre (500-mile) boundary (archived link). Both sides blamed each other for firing first, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station hit by at least one rocket (archived link). The two countries signed a truce on July 29, after five days of strikes that killed at least 43 people on both sides. Image Screenshot of the false TikTok post captured on July 31, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The video was also shared in similar posts on Facebook and YouTube. But the clip does not show the aftermath of a Thai attack on Cambodia. Kampong Chhnang fire led to the same video shared on Facebook on July 10, two weeks before the latest border clashes (archived link). Even though the Khmer-language post makes no mention of it, most comments on the post link the clip to the Cambodia-Thailand conflict. Several users, however, said it shows the aftermath of a fire that occurred in the Kampong Chhnang province in 2023. Subsequent keyword searches led to more posts and a report by local media outlet Khmernote that contains similar photos about the fire that broke out on March 12, 2023 (archived here and here). The Khmernote report links to a verified Cambodian national police Facebook page showing more photos of the damage caused by the fire (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the false post video (left), the photo from Cambodian police (top right) and a social media video about the fire (bottom right), with matching elements marked by AFP AFP has also debunked other false claims linked to Cambodia-Thailand conflict.
