logo
Retired SC justices sign San Beda statement urging VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial

Retired SC justices sign San Beda statement urging VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial

GMA Network06-06-2025
'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read.
Professors at the San Beda University Graduate School of Law have asked the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte.
Among them are retired Supreme Court Associate Justices Adolf Azcuna and Jose Vitug, and graduate school dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino.
Their statement came a day after more than 100 members of the faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law made a similar call for the Senate to hear the articles of impeachment against the Vice President.
'We, professors of the Graduate School of Law of San Beda University, in our individual capacities, respectfully urge the Senate of the Philippines to proceed with the trial of the Vice President in accordance with Article XI of the Constitution,' the San Beda law professors said in their statement.
The members of the faculty said, 'Article XI is clear that when the verified complaint is endorsed by at least one-third of the members of the House of Representatives, trial by the Senate must thereupon proceed.'
'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read.
The statement said that accountability is crucial to the workings of a government that should be able to earn the respect and trust of citizens. The trial is a measure of accountability.
'The problem with government, and the resulting lack of public trust in it, has to do with deficits in measures of accountability,' it said.
'We therefore urge the Senate to convene as ordained by the Constitution and to proceed with the impeachment trial of the Vice-President,' it added.
On Thursday, over 100 members of the UP College of Law faculty called on the Senate to start the impeachment trial and "let the truth unfold."
In an open letter, the faculty members called on the Senate to comply with the constitutional duty to "forthwith proceed" with the trial.
"Respectfully, a dismissal at this point would be deemed by the Filipino people as effectively engineered by the Senate's own delay and an abdication of its constitutional role in impeachment," it read.
The faculty members also stressed that the 19th Congress should not preempt whether the trial should continue. It said this should be left to the 20th Congress.
"For the Senate to decide for the 20th Congress would be undemocratic, contrary to the very rationale underlying the 'non-continuing body' argument," the letter read.
The members stressed that a dismissal would mean an abandonment of the Senate's tradition as an august chamber and will alter the country's system of checks and balances.
"It will also undermine the people's trust in the Senate as an independent and impartial institution before which the highest officials of the land may demonstrate and prove their fealty to the principles of accountability, public service, and democracy," it said.
Section 3(4) of Article XI, which states: In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. –Jiselle Anne C. Casucian/NB, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House vows to abide by SC ruling on MR for Sara's impeachment
House vows to abide by SC ruling on MR for Sara's impeachment

GMA Network

timea day ago

  • GMA Network

House vows to abide by SC ruling on MR for Sara's impeachment

The House of Representatives will abide by the Supreme Court's decision should it rule against its motion for reconsideration (MR) on its decision to declare the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. 'Hindi 'ho namin susuwayin 'yan, susundin namin 'yan. The House will not cause the constitutional crisis. The reason, the catalyst for the constitutional crisis will never be caused by the House,' House prosecution spokesperson Atty. Antonio Bucoy said at a news forum in Quezon City on Saturday. House Deputy Speaker Janette Garin, likewise, said the lower chamber will abide by the Supreme Court's ruling should it stand with its decision to declare Duterte's impeachment as unconstitutional. 'Definitely, kasi obligasyon namin sa taumbayan tutukan ang mga problema without bypassing accountability and working for whatever is in the interest of the general public,' Garin said. 'A constitutional crisis should not have a place in a… I think the Philippines is in the top 2 happiest people in the world, so talagang hindi siya dapat na mangyari,' she said. Voting 13-0, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, deeming that the Articles of Impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. Moreover, magistrates ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. In its appeal before the high tribunal, the House argued that the fourth impeachment complaint, signed off by 215 House members, is the only initiated impeachment case against the Vice President because it met the Constitutional requirement of the complaint being endorsed by at least one-third of the House members, which allowed the House to transmit the Articles of Impeachment straight to the Senate en route to the impeachment trial, bypassing Committee deliberations. ''Yung motion for reconsideration ay hindi ho para pagpuna, hindi po ito para itakwil. Ito ay para tawagin ang kanyang pansin upang magsumamo na bisitahin niyong muli ang inyong desisyon na sa palagay namin at inilahad namin sa aming motion for reconsideration ay mali mula letrang A hanggang letrang Z,' Bucoy said. 'Wait and see' Asked what the House's next course of action would be should the SC junk its MR, Garin said that 'hearing the legal luminaries in the House… klaro sa kanilang pananaw na talagang may basehan 'yung motion for reconsideration so we put it at that.' 'Let's wait and see what happens in the next months… I leave it to the members of the 20th Congress… Kasi sa ngayon lahat naguusap usap… These are things that we need to balance and we need to discuss…and come up with concrete statements,' Garin said. On the Senate's move to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte, Bucoy said, 'Hindi kami susuko na di porke't archived na ay susuko na kami.' 'Meron pang chance na dinggin pa kami. Sinabi nga ni Speaker: 'The House will not bow down.' Hindi ho kami sumusuko na sana maliwanagan ang Supreme Court at sana tumugon at sumunod ang Senado,' he said. Three motions for reconsideration have been filed with the SC against its ruling. The first was filed by some of the individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Duterte, followed by the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives. The third motion was filed by the 1Sambayan coalition, including Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration with the SC on its ruling. They asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments. —VAL, GMA Integrated News

Explanation sought over 'rights violations' of some Pinoys nabbed by ICE
Explanation sought over 'rights violations' of some Pinoys nabbed by ICE

GMA Network

timea day ago

  • GMA Network

Explanation sought over 'rights violations' of some Pinoys nabbed by ICE

NEW YORK—Several U.S. lawmakers are demanding an explanation regarding the alleged mistreatment of Asian lawful permanent residents—including Filipinos—who were arrested by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a letter addressed to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus expressed their concern after several Asian Americans detained by the CBP and ICE were allegedly deprived of their right to legal counsel and due process. The letter cited troubling cases such as that of Filipino Mrs. Lewelyn Dixon, who was detained after living legally in the U.S. for 50 years and Mr. Maximo Londonio, a member of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, who was held in ICE custody for two months following a vacation in the Philippines. 'These cases suggest possible violations of constitutional protections. The U.S. Constitution provides critical due process protections for all persons within the United States, regardless of immigration status," the lawmakers wrote. "The Fifth Amendment protects against actions by the federal government that violate due process, while the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal counsel in criminal cases. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that LPRs are entitled to these same protections,' they added. The letter—signed by fourteen lawmakers—was led by New York Representative Grace Meng, who serves as Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. The lawmakers are requesting an explanation regarding the denial of the right to legal counsel and constitutional protections to those in CBP custody, as well as the total number of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents who have been detained since President Donald Trump took office.

Marcos: Education is the gauge of my admin's success
Marcos: Education is the gauge of my admin's success

GMA Network

time2 days ago

  • GMA Network

Marcos: Education is the gauge of my admin's success

If there's one project that President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. wants to finish before his term ends in 2028, it will be his programs for education. In an interview with GMA Integrated News, Marcos said he is aiming that each Filipino family would have a college graduate. He stressed that the education would be the ''gauge of success of this administration.'' ''Education, 'yung aking sinabi sa SONA na ang bawat pamilyang Pilipino mayroong college graduate o mayroong nag-graduate sa TESDA, bawat pamilyang Pilipino, 'yun para sa akin. Pag nagawa natin ito, successful 'yun,'' Marcos said. (Education, just like what I said during the SONA, each family will have a college or TESD graduate.) The President is confident that this would be doable. He also believed that the country's greatest resource is its citizens. Marcos also said foreigners have a high regard for Filipinos. ''Our greatest resource is our people. Our greatest resource is the human capital of the Philippines. You don't have to look at figures, just talk to foreigners where the Philippines are in their country and what they think of Filipinos and how highly they think of Filipinos,'' Marcos said. ''That's all you need to hear and what are we doing? We should not waste that. We should not waste that,'' he added. In his last SONA, Marcos vowed aggressive actions to address the learning crisis confronting the Philippine education sector, seeking to create a lasting impact for Filipino students, teachers, and families. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store