US Obliterated Iran Nuclear Sites, US Prez Trump Claims, Praising B-2 Pilots
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump is reiterating his claim that the US "obliterated" Iranian nuclear sites during targeted strikes on June 22, citing an assessment by the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC). The IAEC reported that the US strike destroyed the Fordow nuclear site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable.
In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday (local time), Trump noted the assessment made by IAEC on the Fordow nuclear site in Iran, where Israel's primary nuclear regulatory authority stated that the US' strike had "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable."
Trump stated, "Israel just stated that the Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED! Thank you to our great B-2 pilots and all others involved!"
Trump's claim is based on an assessment by the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC), which stated that the US strike destroyed the Fordow nuclear site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable.
According to the IAEC, the combined US and Israeli strikes have set back Iran's nuclear weapons development program by many years. The commission noted that the devastating US strike on Fordow destroyed the site's critical infrastructure, making the enrichment facility inoperable.
The IAEC assessment reads, "We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, have set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years."
"The devastating US strike on Fordow destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable... The achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get access to nuclear material," the IAEC read.
Trump's repeated remarks on the US destroying Iran's nuclear sites and causing a major setback to its nuclear development programme have gained much pace following a CNN finding that suggested that the strikes did not destroy nuclear sites in Iran as claimed by the US President or his administration.
The findings, first reported by CNN, citing seven individuals briefed on the assessments, noted that the early evaluation from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) suggested that the attacks only caused a temporary disruption, possibly setting Tehran's nuclear program back by a few months.
CNN further reported that the findings based on a battle damage assessment by US Central Command contradict public claims made by US President Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who asserted that the US "completely obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities.
As per CNN, citing intelligence sources, the centrifuges in Iran's nuclear facilities remain mostly functional, and enriched uranium stockpiles were likely moved before the strikes.
The conflict between Iran and Israel began on June 13 when Israel launched a large-scale airstrike targeting Iranian military and nuclear facilities under "Operation Rising Lion". Iran responded by launching "Operation True Promise 3", a campaign involving missile and drone attacks against Israel's infrastructure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What happened when missiles rained down in Israel: An account from Indians working there
On June 13, when Israel attacked Iran, the Indian embassy in Israel informed its citizens, many of them workers, on how to respond in case of an attack. 'If we were on the road, we had to lie down with both arms on the head; if we were on a bus, we had to stop and rush to the nearest bunker; and if we were at work, we had to rush to the basement,' said Basav Ram, a 30-year-old construction worker from Haryana's Jind. 'In our initial months, the Iron Dome (Israeli interceptor) was a wonder to us. We would gaze at the interceptions, but this time, it was a whole new ball game.' Ram, since he landed in Israel's Tel Aviv and moved to Netanya in April 2024, has seen the two countries attack each other over four times. However, this time, the attacks were more intense, he said. Around 6 am on June 13, his phone rang, warning him of an attack. 'First, we got a warning message, then an alarm rang, then a red alarm activated, which shut the phone off except for the blaring sound. The sirens from speakers outside accompanied this. We rushed to the bunker outside our building. Once inside, we were safe. Had buildings fallen on top of it, it would still not have collapsed,' he said. Ram rushed to such bunkers twenty times in the '12-day war', as US President Donald Trump calls it. From June 13 to 23, when a ceasefire was announced, Iran's ballistic missile attacks claimed 28 lives in Israel while Israel killed over 600 Iranians, including their top military brass. The Indian citizens in Israel include thousands employed by various companies through India's National Skill Development Corporation after it received a demand for 10,000 construction workers from Israel's Population and Immigration Authority for four roles — formwork, iron bending, plastering and ceramic tiling in November 2023, a month after Israel's attack on Gaza began. The NSDC has sent workers from Uttar Pradesh and Haryana so far under a government-to-government (G2G) agreement. Ram said he wanted to go home, but the embassy did not order an evacuation. 'I could not go individually because I could not get a vacation and was unsure of whether I would get a visa to re-enter if I left. Many of us from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Haryana were discussing this. Everyone was scared, but we were more scared to go. The contract was for five years, and we want to make a name for ourselves. We came with a dream, and I could not go before it was fulfilled,' Ram said. 'I was constantly thinking of my family when explosions were ringing out around us. Ghar, galiyaan, gaon, sab yaad aayi.' Whenever his employer gave them a day off, the message came with a sense of foreboding. 'It was an omen that the day ahead would see attacks. The defence system intercepted all the missiles, but the explosions left us terrified. When my mother called worried, I would tell her the visuals broadcast by Indian media were fake,' he said. Ram said he will go home for a month this year and hopes to get married before returning. 'After the contract ends, I will go back and give the CET (common eligibility test for group C jobs). With a job at home, things will be immensely better. By then, I would have saved enough to sustain my family till I secure a posting,' he said. Currently, he earns around Rs 1.2 lakh a month, of which around 1 lakh is sent home every month. 'I can't leave my parents to poverty at this age,' Ram said. Gurdeep from Haryana, who lives in Lod, 15 km away from Jerusalem, said the surveillance during the war was scaled up. 'A few Indian labourers posted videos of the attack on social media. Soon, the embassy informed us not to take videos. They said action will be initiated against us. Every conversation and message is documented, even this call over WhatsApp,' he claimed. Gurdeep had left Jind for a construction job, which was terminated after three months. 'I was moved to the bakery by the same contractor, so the agreement remained the same,' he said. While the war waged, Gurdeep could not get a day off. 'If the siren went off, we would rush to the bunker under the bakery,' he said. His day shift is from 6 am to 6 pm, while the night shift is from 6 pm to 6 am, which he alternates between every week. 'When the sight of a truce was not near, I made sure my wife knew nothing about the attacks. I told my brothers to keep her away from the news,' he said. The last attacks in 2024 had left the family petrified, he said. Another labourer, on condition of anonymity, claimed they have been asked not to respond to posts of Palestinians on social media. 'We cannot be seen sharing or even interacting with content on Gaza. We rarely see any posts, and if we do, we have to ignore them. The embassy has also warned us of this,' he claimed. Shankar Dayal, who went to Israel in June 2024, said that although he was selected for tiling work at a construction site, he was placed on a road brick-laying stint. 'Several people have to leave because of this, and I have been shuttling between different jobs ever since,' he said. Dayal said long hours and heavy labour made him reconsider his decision. 'I want to go back to India. Jhagda chal raha hai yahan baar baar. Sabko jaan pyaari hai. If I had a better job, I would have been able to endure it better,' he said. Aiswarya Raj is a correspondent with The Indian Express who covers South Haryana. An alumna of Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, she started her career at The Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current position, she reports from Gurgaon and covers the neighbouring districts. She likes to tell stories of people and hopes to find moorings in narrative journalism. ... Read More
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Usman Khawaja declines interview with Australian radio in protest of journalist's sacking for pro-Gaza post; CA react
Usman Khawaja declined an interview with Australian broadcasters SEN Radio, in a quiet but pointed protest against the station's controversial sacking of veteran cricket journalist Peter Lalor earlier this year. Australia's Usman Khawaja walks off the field(AP) According to The Sydney Morning Herald, Khawaja, who scored a steady 47 runs on the opening day of the first Test against the West Indies at Kensington Oval, was approached after stumps by team media manager Cole Hitchcock to record an interview with SEN commentators Adam Collins and Bharat Sundaresan. However, Khawaja respectfully declined, telling the broadcasters he would not be participating. The situation said the decision stemmed from Khawaja's objection to Lalor's abrupt removal from SEN's cricket coverage in February 2025, during Australia's tour of Sri Lanka. Lalor's dismissal reportedly followed internal concerns over his social media activity, which included reposts highlighting Israeli airstrikes on Gaza and the release of Palestinian prisoners. The move drew criticism at the time, including from Khawaja, who publicly defended Lalor via Instagram, writing: 'Standing up for the people of Gaza is not antisemitic nor does it have anything to do with my Jewish brothers and sisters in Australia, but everything to do with the Israeli government and their deplorable actions... Pete is a good guy with a good heart. He deserves better.' Khawaja's decision not to speak with SEN on Wednesday is seen as a continuation of that stand. While declining the interview, he is understood to have apologised directly to Collins and Sundaresan, making it clear his issue was not with the commentators themselves but with the network's handling of Lalor's departure. Khawaja won't face any action from Cricket Australia The report adds that Khawaja is unlikely to face any vacation from Cricket Australia (CA) as Media obligations during a match or immediately after play are optional, and players are permitted to decline them at their discretion. Lalor, who is currently covering the series for Cricket Et Al, expressed gratitude for the gesture. 'Usman is a man of principle whose support I valued greatly when I was dismissed and whose ongoing support I appreciate,' Lalor said in a statement. In a detailed post earlier this year, Lalor revealed the circumstances surrounding his dismissal, stating that SEN CEO Craig Hutchison told him his social media activity had drawn complaints and that some listeners felt 'unsafe' hearing his voice on air. 'I was told there were accusations I was antisemitic, which I strongly objected to,' Lalor wrote. 'I said I didn't want anyone to feel unsafe. Of course I care... But so is Gaza. It's an awful situation.' Hutchison was present at the ground in Barbados on day one, hosting sponsors, but has not commented publicly on Khawaja's protest. SEN is the only Australian broadcaster covering the West Indies tour on the ground, with ABC Radio absent from the Caribbean for this series.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Zelenskyy's clothes have become talking point again... this time at Nato Summit
At the just-concluded Nato Summit, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared more formally dressed than usual since the war with Russia began in early 2022. He swapped his typical military-style outfit for a blazer with a military touch, dress trousers, and a shirt. Back in February, the Ukrainian leader's decision not to wear a suit during a meeting with Donald Trump created a furore read more Zelenskyy set aside his usual military-style clothing for a blazer with a military feel, dress trousers and a shirt, though he skipped the tie. Reuters 'Why don't you wear a suit?' That was the question Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced at the White House a few months ago. This time, at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Ukrainian president appeared in a solid black jacket and shirt, similar to a suit. Notably, Zelenskyy was not part of the main Nato discussions but did have a separate meeting with Trump , where they discussed a list of weapons Ukraine hopes to buy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier, the attention on Zelenskyy's choice of clothes at the White House drew sharp criticism from Ukrainians, most of whom have supported him since Russia's invasion in February 2022. But why were his clothes such a big talking point both before and during the recent Nato summit? And why doesn't he wear a suit? Let's take a look: Why Zelenskyy's outfit became the talking point at Nato summit At the recent Nato summit, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy appeared more formally dressed than he has been since the war with Russia began in early 2022. He set aside his usual military-style clothing for a blazer with a military feel, dress trousers and a shirt, though he skipped the tie. This subtle change caused buzz online and was picked up by the Ukrainian edition of ELLE Magazine, which on Wednesday called it 'visual diplomacy of a new kind'. This was Zelenskyy's first time wearing a suit at a Nato summit. Reuters But caused him to change? One reason could be the weight given to this year's Nato summit. Many media outlets described it as one of the most meaningful meetings in the alliance's 76-year history. Key topics included defence budgets, Russia, and how committed Donald Trump remains to Europe's security, issues that, according to Euronews, made some delegates cautious about displeasing the unpredictable US president. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This was Zelenskyy's first time wearing a suit at a Nato summit, though not the first time since the war began. Earlier in the week, he wore a suit jacket during his meeting in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, where they discussed defence ties and plans for joint drone production. What happened at White House months ago? Back in February, during a meeting with Donald Trump, the Ukrainian leader was questioned by a reporter about his choice of clothing. 'Why don't you wear a suit?' asked Brian Glenn from Real America's Voice. 'You're at the highest level in this country's office, and you refuse to wear a suit.' He didn't stop there. 'Do you own a suit?' Glenn went on, adding, 'A lot of Americans have problems with you not respecting the dignity of this office.' Zelenskyy responded briefly: 'I will wear costume after this war will finish.' The word 'costume' translates from kostyum, the Ukrainian term for a suit. He then made a light jab at the reporter. 'Maybe something like yours, yes. Maybe something better, I don't know,' he said, drawing laughter from those present. 'Maybe something cheaper.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the exchange in the Oval Office, Glenn posted online, saying he had 'extreme empathy for the people of Ukraine' but claimed Zelenskyy's lack of formal dress showed 'his inner disrespect' towards the US. The reporter who asked Zelensky if he owned a suit, Brian Glenn, is from the pro-Trump network Real America's Voice and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend. He got one of the rare Oval Office interviewer spots after the White House blocked the Associated Press — Drew Harwell (@drewharwell) February 28, 2025 Supporters of the Ukrainian leader soon responded by sharing wartime photos of Winston Churchill in casual attire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Not long after the clash, Zelenskyy was asked to leave the White House, as ties between the two countries hit a rough patch. However, this week's meeting between the two leaders appeared far more positive. Zelenskyy also thanked Trump and the US, and spoke of his hopes for 'real peace' between Ukraine and Russia. US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a meeting in The Hague, Netherlands. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Reuters 'I had a long and substantive meeting with President Trump. We covered all the truly important issues,' Zelenskyy wrote on social media. 'I thank Mr President, I thank the United States. We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people.' Why Zelenskyy doesn't wear a suit Zelenskyy's clothing choice is meant to reflect his role as Ukraine's commander-in-chief and a visible gesture of unity with the country's armed forces. Elvira Gasanova, the designer behind the Damirli brand, often seen on Zelenskyy, told Politico, 'When world leaders see Zelenskyy in military style, it is a signal — 'Ukraine is at war and I am part of this fight'.' She said that his look is a commitment, even when meeting someone like Trump. It shows support for both civilians and soldiers caught in the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In times of peace, suits are usually a symbol of diplomacy, routine meetings, and political normalcy. But Ukraine, Gasanova said, is still in crisis. 'The president shows that the war is still going on, that the country is still in a struggle,' she said. His decision to stick with his wartime outfit during the White House visit received strong backing at home, according to The Kyiv Independent. Military attire also carries a deeper meaning. As Euronews reported, uniforms are often linked to strength and leadership. Worn by generals, war veterans and statesmen, they can convey a sense of credibility and authority.
