
Why is the future of Ukraine's Donbas region becoming a key issue in peace talks?
Those demands will set a tense backdrop to a potential meeting between Putin and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. The latter said he was ready for a trilateral meeting with Trump and Putin, after he held a friendly meeting with the US president in the White House on Monday.
'We're going to work with Ukraine. We're going to work with everybody, and we're going to make sure that if there's peace, the peace is going to stay long term. This is very long term,' Trump said after Monday's meeting.
But territorial disputes, such as Putin's demands for the Donbas, will pose a major challenge for mediators.
The Russian leader demanded that Ukrainian forces withdraw from Donetsk as part of any ceasefire deal, and said he would be prepared to stop fighting on the rest of the frontline if Kyiv gave in to the demand and addressed the 'root causes of the conflict'.
The Ukrainian president has said that Putin wants to take the remaining 30 per cent of the eastern region, which has been the location of some of the fiercest battles in the three-and-a-half-year war.
But losing Donetsk would give Russia control of almost all of the Donbas, the collective name for Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland, which has been long coveted by Putin.
Last week, Zelensky vowed that Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned that Putin could use it as a springboard for a future invasion.
However, sources close to the meeting told The Independent that the dramatic move appears to have been endorsed by Mr Trump as a means to bring an end to the war.
As Kyiv fights to keep the Donbas from Trump's so-called 'land swap' deal, here's all you need to know about the region.
Where is the Donbas?
Situated along Ukraine's eastern border, the Donbas takes its portmanteau name from 'Donets Basin', a further abbreviation of 'Donets Coal Basin', in reference to the coal basin along the Donets Ridge and River.
The Donbas stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, two large regions of Ukraine that have been on the front line of the war that followed Russia's invasion.
How long has it been occupied?
The Donbas has been partially occupied by Russia since 2014, around the same time that Putin annexed the Crimean peninsula. Russian-backed separatists broke away from the Ukrainian government to proclaim the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk independent 'people's republics' and, as a result, Moscow captured more than a third of Ukraine's eastern territory.
Russia classes inhabitants of the Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Luhansk People's Republic, the Donetsk People's Republic, and the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as subjects of the Russian Federation. Ukraine insists these territories are part of Ukraine.
It is believed that around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region, according to Reuters. Approximately 6,600 sq km is still controlled by Ukraine, but Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities such as Pokrovsk.
A key strategic region in the war
The hyper-industrialised Donbas economy is dominated by coal mining and metallurgy. The region has one of the largest coal reserves in Ukraine. When conflict broke out in 2014, Ukraine's coal-mining enterprises saw a 22.4 per cent decline in the production of raw coal compared with 2013, according to the Kyiv Post, showing the country's reliance on Donbas as an energy powerhouse.
But as well as its economic significance, Donbas has been described as a 'fortress belt' by the Institute for the Study of War in terms of its strategic value. Donetsk forms the main fortified defensive line across the front line, stretching through Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and Kostiantynivka.
'Ukraine is holding a key defensive line across Donetsk,' says Elina Beketova, a fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, describing a 'fortified zone buildup over years because the war began 11 years ago'. She adds that Russia hasn't been able to break through since 2014, and has lost many people there. The entire region is heavily mined, and Ukrainian troops have been preparing it for years.
'It's not just trenches, it's a deep, layered defence with bunkers, anti-tank ditches, minefields, and industrial areas built into the terrain. The area includes dominant heights, rivers, and urban zones that make it extremely hard to capture,' explains Beketova.
She says that losing this fortified line would have 'catastrophic consequences' for Ukraine, as it holds back Russia's advancement into central and western parts of the country. 'The front would shift approximately 80km west, and Russia would gain open ground – flat steppe with no natural barriers – giving it a direct path towards Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro.'
What Zelensky has said about the Donbas
Zelensky has repeatedly rejected calls from Russia to give up the Donbas.
In response to Putin's request that Ukraine withdraw from eastern Donetsk, Zelensky vowed that his people would 'never leave' the Donbas, and warned that Putin's troops could use it as a springboard for a future invasion.
'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part – our territories are illegally occupied. Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ukraine security, CHIPS, Japan nuclear and Zelenskiy's suit
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Donald Trump says the U.S. may provide air support to guarantee any Ukraine peace deal. Washington explores equity stakes in chipmakers - even those overseas - in return for Biden-era funding. Japan ponders a huge policy change on nuclear weapons, as concern deepens over American security guarantees. And the designer behind Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's suit on his last-minute adjustments. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading Trump says US may provide air support to back a Ukraine peace deal US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants, sources say Trump shock spurs Japan to think about the unthinkable: nuclear arms How a Ukrainian designer helped Zelenskiy dress for Trump diplomacy China's growing nuclear arsenal Recommended Read: Italy hailed a drop in irregular arrivals last year as proof its migration policies are working. One boat's journey shows the dangers of the crackdown.


Scotsman
19 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: Trump is best hope we have of securing peace in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office on Monday (Picture:) A reader suggests Donald Trump may get a peace deal where other leaders have failed Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Trevor Rigg takes Donald Trump to task for being a 'patsy' etc when it comes to Vladimir Putin and Ukraine (Letters, 19 August). This may perhaps be true but, at the moment, a peace deal is still possible and it actually is Donald Trump leading the charge for this. Has Europe, or even our own globe-trotting Prime Minister, managed to influence Putin on their own? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Donald Trump seems to generate hugely negative headlines from some sections of the media but he has good ideas and he appears to get a lot more done for those who voted for him than most other politicians. If Mr Trump is wrong we will all soon know. The alternative to peace is war. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Nato is the answer We didn't really expect Donald Trump to best Vladimir Putin single-handed, did we? Putin is quick to avenge any real or imagined slight. Russians who may have opposed or simply seriously annoyed Putin in some way have then mysteriously fallen out a top floor window or balcony. Or been poisoned. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I'm going into Salisbury tomorrow, where Putin's spies attempted to Novichok Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia. Putin is, in all respects, a ruthless and cold-blooded killer. Trump, neither a man of courage integrity or principle, is verifiably a coward; having faked an injury to avoid the Vietnam draft. But he's not a killer…. Apart from the Quisling Victor Orban, Nato countries are united in how to put Putin in his place. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My own view? Make Ukraine a member of Nato. If Putin doesn't withdraw from all of Ukraine, he will face a Nato he cannot possibly defeat. Doug Morrison, Tenterden, Kent Notable absence The breathless and excited tones of broadcast journalists about the White House jamboree with practically all of the 'old Europe' leaders, Frau Von der Leyen and Paul Rutte of Nato is most revealing. None of them appear to be exercised in the least about their fellow journalists who have been mown down in cold blood by Israel in greater numbers than all other wars on record. As for the politicians, is it merely the case that we are on the side of the people to whom we have made lucrative arms donations? In the case of Britain, it seems there is a never ending flow of cash with no 'tough decisions' needing to be taken other than when it comes to our own people with their fast declining standard of living, already lower than that of the Irish and soon to be surpassed by the Poles and Romanians. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I guess it would be too much for them to caution Trump about his recent green light for Netanyahu to continue the slaughter of the Palestinian people. Marjorie Ellis Thompson, Edinburgh Limits of language James Kelman's remarks on language at the International Book Festival (Scotsman, 19 August), are puzzling: 'Imperial forces' are making writers too timid to use authentic languge, and our culture is in danger. We have here the strange phenomenon of a successful writer, and Booker Prize winner, who seems to have no clue about how language actually works. Of course struggling languages, and Gaelic is among them, remain fascinating. If there are only five speakers left of a language somewhere in the world, academics will get on a plane to go study it. Nationhood, politics, language and culture are all involved with one another. When Germany invaded its neighbours where there were some German speakers, they proceeded to 'Germanicise' the children there. Russia does the same in Ukraine, and the Irish make language part of their republcan struggle. Writers, however, are stuck with the language as it is, and how it is evolving. Their job is to communicate, whatever the economic and political forces acting on the language, which they do not lead. Therefore, if James Kelman cannot get himself published in the UK, he should perhaps think this through, and find out how language works. Crawford Mackie, Edinburgh Soft power Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Each August, Edinburgh becomes a global meeting point, drawing artists, cultural leaders, and audiences from more than 70 countries. Scotland's festivals are not just a celebration of creativity, they are a demonstration of the UK's internationalism in practice and a powerful expression of soft power. The British Council played a founding role in establishing the Edinburgh International Festival in the aftermath of the Second World War. Then, as now, the aim was clear: to build mutual understanding and foster reconciliation through cultural exchange. Nearly 80 years on, that mission remains critical. At a time of heightened global tension and rising authoritarianism, international collaboration through the arts strengthens the UK's reputation as an open, connected and trusted partner. This summer alone, the British Council is supporting cultural representatives from more than 34 countries participating in Edinburgh's August festivals. From supporting Ukrainian artists at the Fringe, launching a new season connecting UK-to Brazil and connecting Lebanon to the Art Festival, we're helping build bridges through culture. The impact is measurable: last year's work led to 27 new international collaborations. These are not one-off moments; they are long-term relationships that expand the reach of UK culture and reinforce the UK's global standing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At a time when global engagement is under pressure, the UK should continue to invest in the cultural spaces and platforms that best embody its values. Whether through festivals, artistic exchanges or international collaborations, these efforts demonstrate the UK as it aspires to be seen – creative, outward-looking, and committed to partnership across borders. Scott McDonald, Chief Executive, British Council Counter culture In commenting on the ineffectiveness of the church when judged against a business model, Doug Morrison (Letters, 18 August) apologises that he may offend believers. As a Christian, I am not offended. He is simply defining the church in accordance with the values of our society, which affirms the primacy of the individual and assumes fulfilment comes through satisfying personal needs and desires. But that has never been the purpose of Christianity. At the centre of Christ's teaching is the call to turn from self-centredness and, through Jesus himself, to restore our relationship with God, our creator. Until the early 20th century, schools in Scotland taught the Westminster Shorter Catechism, which begins: 'Man[kind]'s chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever.' This reflects the biblical truth that our primary purpose is not self-fulfilment but to honour God and find lasting joy in Him. Falling attendances tend not to be an issue for those churches which preach this counter-cultural message. Indeed there is evidence of growth particularly among young people who seek a deeper truth beyond the prevalent superficiality and hollow ideologies that surround them. George Rennie, Inverness, Highland Too little too late Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government has just confirmed an MOD report of a Serious Category A nuclear leak at Faslane between 1 January and 22 April this year. Now they tell us. Loch Long was contaminated in this latest leak. Is it still? Can we believe anything the Ministry of Defence tells us? How long was it before they even told the locals? There must be some worried people who live around and in Faslane or went sailing in the loch in spring. Does the Westminster government care? Not a bit. Scotland needs to protect itself and to do that, we need to govern our own country and to have any hope of doing so, love them or not, we'll have to vote for the SNP and get behind them. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Who wants Scotland to be treated as the UK's nuclear dumping ground? Not me! Elizabeth Scott, Edinburgh Banned books Cast your mind back to 2011. The National Library of Scotland staged a Banned Books exhibition. The then National Librarian and chief executive of the National Library of Scotland, said: 'Over the centuries many books have been burned, censored or challenged by the state and religious authorities, and society itself, because their contents did not conform to the political, religious or moral codes of their day. 'Libraries such as the National Library of Scotland have a vital role in freedom of expression and speech, allowing everyone to explore knowledge and ideas now and into the future. 'Our exhibition presents an opportunity for visitors to learn more about censorship… with a view to encouraging informed discussion and debate around these issues.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So – a major change in political code since then? And the library itself is now a censor? It's 'wheest no more' for me. When two major, historic institutions in our capital city seem to have fallen victim to political correctness on steroids, it's time for a silent majority to speak out. Let us have informed debate, with all sides of opinion allowed freedom of expression. Let's keep it calm, and avoid personal attacks. As one who campaigned for a Scottish Parliament, and felt honoured to be a member of the Constitutional Convention which helped shape it, it breaks my heart to feel so out of touch with the current political code. Moyra Forrest, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman


Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump abolishes ‘silly season' – and summer holidays are off
Congress is on holiday, much of Washington DC has emptied out, and journalists should be writing about waterskiing dogs or celebrity sightings to keep the news machine ticking over during 'silly season'. That kind of summertime ennui is a distant memory now that Donald Trump has returned to power. A senior administration source told The Telegraph that the 79-year-old president abruptly ditched a planned August break to push forward with Ukraine peace talks. 'Two weeks were blocked out for him to be at Bedminster [the president's New Jersey golf club] but he decided to cancel it,' said the official. Instead, last week he flew to Alaska to meet Vladimir Putin, his Russian counterpart, on Monday he hosted Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, and seven European leaders at the White House, and in between he has taken over policing of Washington and signed executive orders on everything from 'debanking' to overhauling scientific research. The result is a continuation of the president's 'flood the zone' strategy to governing, a bump in his poll ratings, and no rest for anyone else in his team. Some staffers have had to repeatedly postpone their own plans for a holiday, or quietly make do with a snatched day off here or there. There is no silly season this year, according to David Urban, a former Trump campaign adviser and confidant. 'He's killed it off,' he said. 'There is no downtime in this administration.' This weekend the president is expected to stay at the White House, at a time when members of Congress and their staffs escape Washington's sticky summer season, and when diplomats head for their holiday homes. One member of staff described how their own plans for a summer break had been thwarted three times by the president changing his schedule at the last minute to fit in more travel. 'But it's worth it,' they added. Craig Shirley, the presidential historian, said Mr Trump was in a hurry to push through his agenda as time ticked down on his second and final term. Past presidents might not be seen in the capital for the whole of August, he added. 'But I think it really depends on what is going on at the time,' he said. 'Trump is dealing with multiple crises right now so it makes more sense to stay close to the White House even with all the modern communications he has – the image of being seen at the White House is very important.' That's not to say it has all been work and no play for the president. A five-day working trip to Scotland last month was centred around his two golf courses, but included agreeing a European Union trade deal and a sit-down with Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister. And last weekend he managed to fit in two trips to his golf course in Virginia despite only getting back from Alaska in the early hours of Saturday morning. 'Many staff on Air Force One were sleeping on the way home, not President Trump. He was awake and working the entire flight,' said Karoline Leavitt, his press secretary. Mr Trump called Mr Zelensky and a string of European leaders as he flew back from the summit. He arrived back at the White House at 3am. Ms Leavitt added: 'President Trump is the hardest working man in politics, and he literally works around the clock, as evidenced by his being here at the White House in the Oval Office 12 to 15 hours a day, going up to the residence immediately to continue working throughout the night.' This August stands in contrast to his first summer in the White House, when he took a 17-day 'working vacation' at Bedminster, contrary to even his own advice. 'Don't take vacations. What's the point? If you're not enjoying your work, you're in the wrong job,' he wrote in his 2004 book, 'Think Like a Billionaire.' There are signs that his strategy is paying off. A poll published on Monday suggested he had seen a bump in his approval rating after his Alaska summit with Putin. An InsiderAdvantage poll conducted over the weekend found that Mr Trump has the backing of 54 per cent of respondents, with 44 per cent saying they disapproved of his performance. That 10-point net approval rating is up from two points in July, when the survey was last conducted. Mr Urban said there was plenty more work to be done. Thoughts were now turning to promoting the 'big, beautiful bill,' Mr Trump's signature domestic policy agenda, ahead of next year's midterm elections, he still had dozens of appointees that needed to be approved by the Senate, and then there was the matter of peace in Ukraine. 'There's no rest for the weary,' he said.