logo
Germany's far-right AfD designated 'extremist' by intelligence agency

Germany's far-right AfD designated 'extremist' by intelligence agency

Yahoo02-05-2025

Germany's domestic intelligence agency said on Friday it has designated the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a confirmed "right-wing extremist" organization that "disregards human dignity" and threatens democracy.
The new classification, which gives the agency broader surveillance power over the AfD, is the result of a comprehensive review, the findings of which are laid out in a 1,100-page internal report.
It comes just days before Germany's new conservative-led government is set to take office under future chancellor Friedrich Merz.
The agency, called the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), said there was concrete evidence that the party pursues efforts that threaten Germany's democratic order, pointing to its anti-immigrant rhetoric.
"The party's prevailing understanding of the people based on ethnicity and descent is incompatible with the free democratic basic order," the agency said.
Specifically, it said the far-right AfD considers German citizens with roots in predominantly Muslim countries to be unequal citizens.
The report said it saw evidence of "ongoing agitation" by the party against refugees and migrants, citing statements by AfD politicians in internal communications, speeches and social media, ranging from "deportation creates living space!" to "every foreigner in this country is one too many."
Party under surveillance
Three regional branches of the party - in the eastern states of Thuringia, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt - have already been classified as confirmed right-wing extremist organizations.
The national party, which soared to a second-place finish in February's general election, was previously given "suspected" extremist status by the agency. The AfD unsuccessfully challenged that designation in court.
The courts upheld the "suspected" classification in May 2024, allowing the BfV to have the party under surveillance, enabling it proportionate use of party informants, image and sound recordings.
The designation as a "confirmed" right-wing extremist organization lowers the threshold for such surveillance measures.
AfD dismisses decision
The party's co-chairs, Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla, described the move as a serious blow to democracy.
"The federal government has only four days left in office. The intelligence agency does not even have a president anymore," they wrote in a press statement.
"The associated targeted interference in the democratic decision-making process is therefore clearly politically motivated," Weidel and Chrupalla said, adding that the party would take legal steps.
In later comments, Chrupalla claimed that the agency had not presented any evidence to justify its assessment.
"If one is supposed to correct one's mistakes and would like to do so, then one has of course to know what the specific allegations are," he said.
Outgoing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser earlier emphasized that the BfV's decision was independent and not politically motivated. "There has been no political influence whatsoever on the new report," she said in a statement.
The agency is tasked not only with counter-espionage and investigating terrorist activities, but also with identifying and naming groups that oppose the democratic order - principles that include human dignity, democracy and the rule of law.
Designation sparks discussion over party ban
Surveillance by the BfV has no connection to bans on political parties, which can only be requested from the Constitutional Court by one of Germany's houses of parliament or the government itself.
But with Germany's mainstream parties already grappling with how to treat the AfD opposition during the next legislative period, the new designation has rekindled the debate over banning the party.
Lawmakers from several mainstream parties have already suggested that the classification could be a step in that direction.
Outgoing German Chancellor Olaf Scholz of the Social Democrats (SPD) urged caution, however.
"I am against a hasty decision and will therefore not say that this is what we should do," he said of a potential ban.
Rubio criticizes classification
The new designation also drew attention from abroad, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio slamming the move as "tyranny in disguise."
"What is truly extremist is not the popular AfD - which took second in the recent election - but rather the establishment's deadly open border immigration policies that the AfD opposes," he said in a post on X. "Germany should reverse course."
Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev also criticized the "strong words" used against a parliamentary party.
"Apparently, the CDU/CSU, SPD and other German party trivia consider those with higher ratings to be extremists," he wrote in a post on X.
Russia has been cultivating ties with the AfD and other far-right parties in Europe for several years. The AfD has repeatedly shown itself friendly towards Russia.
From the fringes
Founded in 2013 as an anti-euro party, the AfD quickly shifted direction as nationalist and far-right figures rose to prominence, prompting many of its original members to depart.
The party gained significant momentum during the 2015 refugee crisis, when hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers entered Germany.
In the 2017 federal election, the AfD emerged as the third-largest party in the lower house of parliament, securing 12.6% of the national vote before dropping to 10.4% in 2021.
It experienced a big rebound in this year's parliamentary election, doubling its support to 20.8% following a campaign that featured open support from tech billionaire Elon Musk.
Despite its nationwide gains, the AfD's strongest support remains concentrated in eastern Germany.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flashback: Biden repeatedly equated Islamophobia and antisemitism amid surge in attacks on Jews
Flashback: Biden repeatedly equated Islamophobia and antisemitism amid surge in attacks on Jews

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Flashback: Biden repeatedly equated Islamophobia and antisemitism amid surge in attacks on Jews

As violent instances of antisemitism break out around the country this year, Fox News Digital took a look back at former President Joe Biden's penchant for equating antisemitism and Islamophobia. While the former president rightly condemned hate directed at Jews in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of Israelis and the subsequent war in Gaza, Biden was almost always sure to draw an equivalency with anti-Muslim sentiment. "In recent years, too much hate has given too much oxygen, fueling racism, the rise of antisemitism, Islamophobia right here in America," Biden said, days after the war broke out, in a prime-time address from the White House. He added: "We can't stand by and stand silent when this happens. We must, without equivocation, denounce antisemitism. We must also, without equivocation, denounce Islamophobia." Biden added during a Human Rights Campaign event in October 2023: "We have to reject hate in everything, because history has taught us again and again, antisemitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, they're all connected. Hate toward one group left unanswered opens the door for more hate toward more groups, more often, regularly." Instances of antisemitism spiked to new highs last year, with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) finding in a new report that there were 9,354 antisemitic incidents in 2024, a 5% increase from 2023 and a staggering 926% increase since it began tracking such data in 1979. Trump Admin Cracks Down Antisemitism As Doj Official Exposes 'Violent Rhetoric' Of Radical Protesters Read On The Fox News App The war in Israel initially fanned the flames of antisemitism on campuses in the form of protests, menacing graffiti and students reporting that they felt as if it was "open season for Jews on our campuses." The protests heightened to the point that Jewish students at some schools, including Columbia University, were warned to leave campus for their own safety. Agitators and student protesters flooded college campuses nationwide last school year to protest the war, which also included spiking instances of antisemitism and Jewish students publicly speaking out that they did not feel safe on some campuses. Protesters on Columbia University's campus in New York City, for example, took over the school's Hamilton Hall building, while schools such as UCLA, Harvard and Yale worked to clear spiraling student encampments where protesters demanded their elite schools completely divest from Israel. Antisemitic Violence Erupts In America As Some Invoke Intifada And Target Jews As the protests hit a fever pitch last year, Biden again equated antisemitism with Islamophobia, even though it was clear that Jews were the group being targeted with harassment and violence. "There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. There is no place for hate speech or violence of any kind, whether it's antisemitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans," Biden said from the White House in May 2024 as the protests on college campuses continued. "It's simply wrong. There is no place for racism in America." Biden faced condemnation from conservatives and other critics for not simply denouncing antisemitism as Jews in the U.S. faced protests and instances of antisemitism. Jewish Students Welcome Trump Admin's Crackdown On Antisemitism, Hamas Sympathizers On Campuses "At a time when no college campus is on lockdown over Islamophobia, Joe Biden felt the need to spend as much time in his speech denouncing Islamophobia and 'discrimination against Arab Americans' as he did antisemitism. He is never able to just call out antisemitism," radio host Erick Erickson commented on X in May 2024 as campus protests against Israel raged. "Biden repeats his both-sideisms," veteran James Hutton wrote last year of Biden's previous comments. "Only the Jewish students are being violated. Biden knows that, but he really wants those votes in Michigan." "Biden is incapable of simply condemning antisemitism. Yet another equivocation. This administration is an embarrassment," Kerry Rom, deputy communications director for Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., wrote on X last year. Israeli Columbia Professor Wants Trump To Block Certain Institutions From Receiving Federal Funding This year, the Trump administration is cracking down on antisemitism and attacks on American Jews, which were underscored by a shooting that left a Jewish couple dead on the streets of Washington, D.C., last month outside of a Jewish museum, as well as a terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, last Sunday when an Egyptian national identified as Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly hurled Molotov cocktails at people participating in a solidarity event for Israeli hostages still in Hamas captivity. Soliman's charging documents stated that he "traveled to Boulder, Colorado, in his vehicle with the Molotov cocktails and threw two of the cocktails at individuals participating in a pro-Israel gathering. He also stated that he picked up gas at a gas station on the way to Boulder. He stated that he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead." Biden Administration Launches National Strategy To Combat Islamophobia, Anti-arab Hate Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro – the Keystone State's third Jewish governor – faced his own instance of antisemitism when a suspect set fire to the governor's residence while he and his family were asleep on the first night of Passover. President Donald Trump meanwhile, signed an executive order on "Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism" in January as his administration launched its crackdown on antisemitism. While federal law enforcement officials have arrested individuals allegedly tied to the widespread anti-Israel protests last year, the White House has threatened to end federal funding to universities that allow violent anti-Israel protests and is investigating immigration status of those accused of leading campus protests or carrying out antisemitic article source: Flashback: Biden repeatedly equated Islamophobia and antisemitism amid surge in attacks on Jews

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. "I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear," Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. "I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting." Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose "terrorism-related" and "public-safety" risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had "deficient" screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. "This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States," said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a "stigmatization and criminalization campaign" against Venezuelans.

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday Show Caption Hide Caption What we know now about President Trump's new travel ban taking effect How could President Trump's travel ban or restriction of nearly 20 countries impact you? Here is what we know now. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on June 9, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela — will be partially restricted. Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited the June 1 incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban. 'I caution them not to travel': Expert warns travelers from banned countries to stay home The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the United States a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the United States or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Democratic U.S. lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies. "Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional," said U.S. Representative Ro Khanna on social media on June 5. "People have a right to seek asylum." (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; writing by Mary Milliken; editing by Sandra Maler)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store