Citi Reverses Course on Firing of Japan Trader Five Years On
Citigroup Inc. revoked the firing of a senior trader in Japan as part of a wrongful dismissal settlement following years of wrangling over problematic trading practices in the bank's Asia unit.
Ken Ohtaka's dismissal was rescinded after the two sides reached an agreement last month, according to a copy of the settlement seen by Bloomberg News. Ohtaka, Citigroup's ex-Japan agency trading head in Tokyo, rejected a confidentiality clause in the settlement so that he can talk openly about what he describes as a 'global witch hunt in search of scapegoats' that triggered several firings.
The internal probe launched in 2018 by law firm Clifford Chance was 'flawed,' and its outcome felt 'predetermined' in order to pin the blame for questionable practices on a group of Asia equity sales traders, Ohtaka said in a phone interview.
Ohtaka 'suffered great mental distress as a result of being unilaterally fired by the defendant without any disciplinary reason,' according to court filings for his wrongful dismissal lawsuit. Terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.
Citigroup said the bank took appropriate action in line with procedures when personal conduct failed to meet its high standards.
'All Citi investigations are conducted based on facts and evidence, with assistance from independent experts as needed,' a Hong Kong-based spokesperson said in an email. The bank 'has implemented significant remedial measures to strengthen our compliance and internal controls to address this legacy issue, and continues to enhance its processes to reflect best market practices and to meet regulatory expectations.'
Clifford Chance in Hong Kong said the firm doesn't comment on client matters.
Ohtaka's settlement is the latest chapter in a saga that began when Hong Kong's securities regulator found that traders in Citigroup's Asia markets division had at times misrepresented the bank's own stock positions on trades as client interest for more than a decade. In essence, the regulator concluded, they had indicated there was customer demand to buy and sell specific stocks when it didn't exist.
The Securities and Futures Commission said that the 'pervasive dishonest behaviour' went as far back as 2008. The regulator faulted Citigroup for internal control deficiencies and poor management oversight, and fined it about $45 million.
After the SFC began reviewing the trades, Citigroup launched its own probe, just months after Ohtaka joined the firm in 2018. The review eventually led to Ohtaka's firing in late 2020, following the dismissal of a dozen traders in Hong Kong and Singapore the previous year. In Tokyo, six traders either quit on their own or were given the option to resign to avoid being fired, according to Ohtaka. Four others were disciplined, resulting in bonus cuts, he said.
The bank declined to comment on specific cases.
Ohtaka, 58, was among several former employees who sued the bank over their dismissals. Ian Weir, an ex-sales trader for Asia-Pacific markets based in London, agreed to settle his case before a London tribunal in October. Citi denied in its submissions to the tribunal that Weir was unfairly dismissed. In December, former equity sales trader Cindy Lui won her wrongful dismissal suit before Hong Kong's Labour Tribunal.
During the probe by Hong Kong regulators, Ohtaka said he assured his Japan team that they had fully complied with local financial regulations and internal bank policies, and that the inquiry shouldn't extend to Tokyo.
In the midst of the probe, he was appointed chair of Citigroup Global Markets Japan's execution governance committee. He said he tightened equity-execution rules, including revising several operational protocols to better protect clients and staff. The Hong Kong office rejected some of the measures as too restrictive and growth-stifling, Ohtaka said.
The bank declined to comment on the alleged Hong Kong measures from more than five years ago.
Ohtaka was fired for allegedly misleading clients into thinking there were natural buyers for two stocks. Citigroup alleged he posted a single batch of 87 so-called indications of interest, or IOIs, that were tagged 'order in hand natural,' even though there wasn't a corresponding client order. That's according to the bank's termination letter seen by Bloomberg News. IOIs are preliminary expressions of trading demand from buyers and sellers in certain stocks.
Ohtaka said he never received IOI training, and denied posting and uploading the low-volume batch. The judge in the wrongful dismissal case found it implausible he intentionally misrepresented the orders as real demand. The judge said the IOI post in question didn't violate regulations and the dismissal constituted an abuse of rights.
The court ruled that Ohtaka's employment contract is valid and Citigroup didn't have cause to terminate him. The court ordered the bank to compensate him with salary that he would have earned until the time of the judgment, plus interest.
Citigroup filed an appeal and threatened to fire Ohtaka again if the judge affirmed the lower court's ruling, according to a Nov. 1 letter from the bank seen by Bloomberg News.
While the appeal was stalled, the high court judge in November instructed both sides to attempt to negotiate a settlement and set a Dec. 24 deadline, according to a summary prepared for the court by Ohtaka's lawyer and seen by Bloomberg. Negotiations dragged on until April, partly because Ohtaka refused to accept a confidentiality clause, which is typical in settlements like these. The firing was revoked and both parties agreed to terminate the employment contract, according to the settlement.
Ohtaka offered to take a reduced payout in return for a public apology, according to a court submission by his lawyer. The bank refused, he said. The bank declined to comment beyond its statement.
Ohtaka said he plans to retire from the finance industry and will use the settlement proceeds to help establish a scholarship fund for high-achieving, underprivileged children.
With assistance from Takashi Nakamichi, Hiromi Horie and Katharine Gemmell.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gold prices seen to face a big crash in just two months
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Gold prices may have hit their peak and could decline by 12–15% in dollar terms over the next two months, according to Quant Mutual Fund. 'However, our medium-term and long-term views are equally constructive and we reiterate that a meaningful percentage of your portfolio should be dedicated towards precious metals,' it added. A US-based Morningstar analyst has already forecasted a 38% drop in the next few Tuesday, retail gold prices hovered around Rs 96,960 per 10 gm. With a 3% goods and services tax, the price of 10 gm of gold stood at Rs 99, Chacko, research head of India at World Gold Council, said stability in prices could prompt a resurgence in demand in the world's second-largest consumer of the yellow rise in gold prices is hurting retailers. Gold jewellery sales in India fell 30% to 1,600 kg on average in the past fortnight, according to the India Bullion & Jewellers Association (IBJA), as prices shot up nearly 5%.'In the first fortnight of May, which was followed by Akshaya Tritiya, there was some momentum as prices started falling, touching Rs 92,365 per 10 gm on May 15. But since then, the price of the yellow metal has again started to move northwards, which has dampened the demand,' said Surendra Mehta, national secretary, recent rally was fueled by economic uncertainty, inflation concerns, and geopolitical tensions. Investors turned to gold as a safe asset, particularly amid ongoing trade disputes initiated during former US President Donald Trump's tenure. However, multiple factors could now drive prices downward.
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Punjab YouTuber Jasbir Singh arrested over ‘spying' for Pakistan, has links with Jyoti Malhotra
According to official sources, Jasbir Singh has been found in close association with PIO (Person of Indian Origin) Shakir, also known as Jutt Randhawa—suspected of being part of a terror-backed espionage ring. He also maintained contact with Jyoti Malhotra, a Haryana-based YouTuber previously arrested on charges of spying, and with Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a Pakistani national and expelled official from the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi. Investigators revealed that Jasbir Singh had attended the Pakistan National Day event in Delhi on the invitation of Danish. During this event, he reportedly met several Pakistani Army officers and vloggers. Notably, Singh had visited Pakistan on three separate occasions—once each in 2020, 2021, and 2024.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jostling for space in e-kiranas
HighlightsBindu Fizz Jeera Masala, a home-grown soda brand, leverages quick commerce platforms to compete with global giants like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, achieving significant consumer reach in a rapidly growing market. The quick commerce sector in India saw a tremendous increase in gross merchandise value, reaching $7 billion in 2024, up from $1.6 billion in 2022, with over two-thirds of online grocery orders occurring on these platforms. While quick commerce offers brands a route to discoverability and access to urban markets, it poses challenges with high margin fees, often between 30-45% for smaller brands, impacting long-term profitability. Pepsi/ Coke = Bindu Fizz Jeera Masala. In the high-stakes world of fizzy drinks, this comparison of a home-grown soda brand with the global behemoths may have sounded absurd until a few years ago. But Bindu Fizz Jeera Masala has found a great equaliser and a way to land in consumers' carts — through 10-minute delivery apps . ' Quick commerce helps scale faster, it's a good branding opportunity and helps in easy availability,' says Sathya Shankar, MD of SG Corporates, the company behind House of Bindu — makers of Bindu Fizz Jeera Masala, SipOn Mango and other drinks. Quick commerce is changing the way India shops. A March report by Flipkart and Bain & Company noted that India's quick commerce sector touched a total gross merchandise value (GMV) of $7 billion in 2024, compared to just $1.6 billion in 2022. Over two-thirds of online grocery orders and one-tenth of e-retail spending last year happened on quick commerce platforms, it added. Despite steep listing fees and the challenges of sustaining on platforms such as Blinkit, Swiggy Instamart , BB Now or Zepto, smaller brands, once relegated to the corner of kirana stores or supermarkets, are muscling their way in this cut-throat race for space — and relevance. 'Our brands, Chef's Art and Sunbay, are playing in the same field as big FMCG brands . Quick commerce is an exciting channel for the gourmet grocery segment,' says Ajay Mariwala, managing director of Food Service India, maker of ready-to-cook foods, condiments and premixes. 'We're now able to reach the doorsteps of targeted, mid-to-premium households in metro and tier-1 cities without high marketing budgets.' What started as a pure-play grocery model has turned into an entire ecosystem. From chips and tea to lipsticks, toys, smartphones and even air-conditioners — quick commerce platforms are offering customers everything they need. And though grocery still makes up the lion's share, the ground rules remain the same for all categories, say officials. New playgrounds But behind the large product selection and speedy deliveries, a different war is unfolding. 'The battle for shelf space has now transcended to screen space,' says the chief of a mid-sized Delhi-based tea brand, requesting anonymity. 'At least two of our established national rivals are flexing their muscle to keep us out — indirectly.' According to him, the big players sometimes 'offer to co-brand or collaborate on tactical marketing and get more clicks and first-screen access on searches when a consumer is browsing through the platforms'. But getting listed on these platforms is only the start, say industry watchers. Staying visible and scaling up is the real challenge, since in a 10-second scroll window, you're up against 15-plus brands in the same category. 'On top of the listing fee, platforms often ask us to spend on co-branded high-traffic marketing events like Diwali or a big cricket final,' says the chief of a mid-sized Mumbai-based snacks maker, adding that though they don't make a profit through these events, 'it's so important to be seen on screens'. Consumer connect Mayank Shah, vice-president at cookies and snacks maker Parle Products, concurs. 'Co-branding with quick commerce channels, more so during big event days, gets significant traction. You can communicate closely with consumers here which other large channels such as neighbourhood stores or modern trade may miss.' That may be the reason why thousands of mid-sized and smaller brands are flocking to the quick commerce bandwagon — some for strategic short-term windows, others for the long haul. For each, the endgame is the same: Reach, discoverability and access to both affluent and mass-market households alike, as long as they can afford the platform charges and margins. On average, 200-250 new brands onboard these platforms on a monthly basis, says an executive at one of India's leading quick commerce platforms. 'Some stay on for a few quarters, depending on how much they are willing to pay as margin fee and spends on marketing. Some exit after their short-term objectives have been met,' he adds. The big draw? A fast-track route for brands to move beyond their core regional markets to metros and mid-rung urban cities, without the overheads of a physical retail store. 'What would take up to three years, is now happening in shorter windows, to create visibility,' says Sandeep Goyal , MD at Rediffusion. 'This is particularly true for emerging, smaller or regional brands, which want to compete with established names with quicker timelines.' 'While the placements are margin fee-driven most times, they are also guided by long-term relationships between the brands and platforms,' the quick commerce executive pointed out. Margins and maths But instant delivery comes at a cost. The platforms charge margins of anywhere between 10-20% from established players. For mid-sized or smaller ones, the numbers usually go up to 30-45%. 'Quick-commerce platforms often demand margins exceeding 30%, even on lower-priced SKUs, challenging the long-term viability for emerging brands. But we remain optimistic about their potential,' says Indraneel Chitale, managing partner at Pune-based snacks and sweets maker Chitale Bandhu Mithaiwale. This is a common refrain among many mid-sized players, who believe that the economics — while tight — offer strategic benefits. 'The medium covers the cost of reaching newer markets and audiences, which otherwise we would have to incur. Additionally, consumer preferences are easy to test and understand,' says Shankar of SG Corporates, who created Bindu Jeera on a modest Rs 35-lakh investment two decades ago. Calling instant apps a 'lucrative channel for brands to try new products and induce trials', Mariwala adds: '[Even the] Smallest of the SKUs work on this platform, which otherwise can get lost in general and modern trade. Limited selections in each category, focused, measurable communication and real-time feedback make quick commerce the need of the hour for brands like us.' Quick commerce, however, still has to move the needle for most brands' bottom line — the contribution to annual total sales remains at about 10%, with the majority continuing to come from physical stores. 'Quick commerce gives discoverability, neighbourhood physical retail gives profits. It's in our own interest to balance both,' says one of the executives.
