ICC Uncovers War Crimes in Darfur Amid Ongoing Conflict
The ICC's investigation highlighted targeted sexual violence against women and girls from specific ethnic groups as a particularly alarming issue. The conflict erupted in April 2023 between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), resulting in what the UN describes as 'devastating civilian casualties.'
ICC Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan expressed the difficulty in finding words to convey the suffering in the region. The UN Security Council tasked the ICC with investigating crimes in Darfur two decades ago. Since then, the ICC has opened multiple investigations into war crimes and genocide dating back to July 2002.
In 2023, the ICC initiated a new probe following the resurgence of civil war, with investigators interviewed victims who fled to neighboring Chad to escape the violence. Khan noted an 'inescapable pattern of offending' and emphasized the team's commitment to translating these crimes into evidence for prosecution. Escalating Humanitarian Crisis
Allegations of war crimes have persisted over the past two years, as the US determined in January 2025 that the RSF and allied militias committed genocide. The RSF denied these claims, labeling the situation a 'tribal conflict' in Darfur.
Reports from the UN indicate worsening conditions in the region, since armed encirclement by RSF forces has cut off civilians in El-Fasher from aid. Targeted attacks on hospitals and humanitarian convoys have exacerbated the crisis, while food and water remain deliberately withheld.
An escalating famine grips the region as UNICEF reported that over 40,000 children received treatment for severe acute malnutrition between January and May 2025, more than double the number from the same period last year. Sheldon Yett from UNICEF stated, 'Children in Darfur are starving by conflict and cut off from the very aid that could save them.'
In the last two years, more than 150,000 people have died in the conflict, and approximately 12 million have been displaced. Khan warned, 'We should not be under any illusion—things can still get worse.'
Short link :
Post Views: 12
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Shelling by RSF kills 17 in besieged Darfur city
PORTU SUDAN: Sudanese paramilitary forces shelled North Darfur's besieged capital El-Fasher on Saturday, killing at least 17 civilians and injuring 25 others, a medical source said. Speaking anonymously for safety reasons, the source at El-Fasher Hospital said these numbers only account for those who reached the hospital, adding that others were buried by their families, unable to access medical centers due to ongoing security challenges. Since May last year, El-Fasher has been under siege by the Rapid Support Forces, which have been battling Sudan's army since April 2023. According to the local resistance committee — one of hundreds of volunteer groups documenting atrocities during the conflict — the attack involved heavy artillery shelling by the RSF across several residential neighborhoods. • The conflict has effectively divided Sudan, with the army controlling the north, east, and center while the Rapid Support Forces hold much of Darfur and parts of the south. • Last year, famine was declared in three camps near El-Fasher, including Abu Shouk and Zamzam. • Aid agencies say thousands of families trapped in El-Fasher are at 'risk of starvation.' The bombardment began early on Saturday and continued well into the afternoon, the committee said in a statement, describing the assault as one of the deadliest recent attacks on the city, resulting in numerous casualties and severe damage to property and infrastructure. A few kilometers to the north, paramilitaries also shelled the famine-stricken Abu Shouk displacement camp, killing several civilians, including a community leader, and injuring at least 20 people, according to the camp's Emergency Response Room, which has been coordinating frontline aid throughout the war. Following the RSF's loss of Sudan's capital, Khartoum, to the army in March, El-Fasher and nearby displacement camps have been targeted in renewed attacks. In April, a major RSF offensive on the nearby Zamzam camp displaced tens of thousands, many of whom sought refuge in El-Fasher. Fighting has also intensified in the neighboring Kordofan region, with the International Organization for Migration reporting that around 3,000 people were displaced from the town of Kadugli in South Kordofan in just five days last week due to ongoing violence. The war between Sudan's army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions, and triggered what the UN calls the world's largest displacement and hunger crisis. The conflict has effectively divided the country, with the army controlling the north, east, and center while the RSF holds much of Darfur and parts of the south. Last year, famine was declared in three camps near El-Fasher, including Abu Shouk and Zamzam. The UN has warned that the crisis would extend into the city itself by May, although a lack of data has so far prevented an official declaration of famine. This month, the World Food Programme said thousands of families trapped in El-Fasher are at 'risk of starvation.' According to the WFP, prices for staple foods like sorghum and wheat — used to make traditional flatbreads and porridge — are up to 460 percent higher in El-Fasher compared to other parts of Sudan. Markets and clinics have been attacked, while community kitchens that once fed displaced families have largely shut down due to a lack of supplies, the UN agency added. Nearly 40 percent of children under five in El-Fasher are now acutely malnourished, with 11 percent suffering from severe acute malnutrition, according to UN figures. Malnutrition has already claimed 63 lives — mostly women and children — in just one week in El-Fasher, a senior health official said last week. At the city's largest community kitchen, organizers say children and women arriving show clear signs of malnutrition, including swollen bellies and sunken eyes. The humanitarian crisis is being compounded by a cholera outbreak that is sweeping through overcrowded displacement camps. Doctors Without Borders, or MSF, said on Thursday that Sudan is experiencing its worst cholera epidemic in years, fueled by the ongoing conflict. Over the past year, close to 100,000 cholera infections have been recorded, resulting in more than 2,400 deaths. The outbreak's current epicenter is in Tawila, roughly 70 kilometers west of El-Fasher. MSF said that cholera has claimed at least 40 lives in Sudan's Darfur region just in one week.
Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
More of the same in Afghanistan as Taliban mark four years since return
The Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 2021 for the second time. Since then, the former insurgents have consolidated their grip on power, excluded women and girls from public life, stamped out internal dissent and external challengers, and gained debut recognition as the country's official government from Russia, a permanent member of the UN Security Council. The Taliban govern through decrees, but Afghans have aspirations and needs that cannot be fulfilled through edicts and ideology. Climate change, an increasing population, and severe cuts to foreign aid will test the Taliban's ability to lead and not just rule. Here are five things to know about the Taliban as they start their fifth year in power: The supreme leader has cemented his legacy Kandahar-based Hibatullah Akhundzada has led the Taliban from insurgency to authority since his appointment in 2016. But transition and status are peripheral to what he has wanted for the past 20 years: establishing an Islamic system. Central to this vision was his ratification last year of the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Law, which codifies many aspects of Afghan life, including who people can befriend. In June, Akhundzada said the Taliban had fought and sacrificed themselves for the implementation of Islamic law. It was obligatory to follow the leadership's commands and directives, he added, and everyone was required to act within the bounds of this obedience. His supporters emphasize his superior religious authority to issue decrees. The higher education minister went one step further in April, equating criticism of Akhundzada with blasphemy and saying obedience to him was a divine order. 'He (the leader) decides what moves and what doesn't move, what happens and what doesn't,' said Ibraheem Bahiss, a senior analyst with Crisis Group's Asia program. The Taliban's internal differences are buried deep There were pockets within the Taliban that initially advocated lifting bans on women and girls, or at least modifying them, to allow greater global and financial engagement. Akhundzada and his circle withstood such pressure, however, and the Taliban government has emerged from its isolation to develop diplomatic ties and raise several billion dollars every year in tax revenues to keep the lights on. Power brokers, like Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani, have been weakened. Since November, Akhundzada has had direct control over Afghanistan's weapons and military equipment, sidelining the Interior Ministry and the Defense Ministry, which is run by Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob, whose father founded the Taliban. Haqqani, whose uncle was killed in a high-profile suicide attack last December, used to take swipes at the leadership. Not anymore. Haqqani, who heads a powerful network of his own, cannot start a fight with the Kandahar faction and win. Political deputy Sher Abbas Stanikzai rebuked Akhundzada in January, stating the education bans had no basis in Islamic law, or Sharia. He left Afghanistan shortly afterwards and remains outside the country. He denies reports that he fled or faced arrest had he stayed. Akhundzada has put Islamic law at the heart of his leadership, while also putting his leadership at the heart of its implementation. 'He's made himself indispensable, and the entire movement is beholden to him,' Bahiss said. There's no sign of change for Afghan women and girls Russia's recognition of the Taliban sends a 'deeply troubling' message, said Zahra Nader, the editor-in-chief of the Afghan women-led newsroom Zan Times. 'It tells the Taliban they can continue to suppress women's rights and commit systematic human rights violations without facing consequences. They are being rewarded for it. This move is a slap in the face to Afghan women.' There is opposition to the Taliban's policies, but people are fearful because no powerful alternative exists, she said. The Taliban 'took the country by force and maintained control' through violence. Women took to Afghanistan's streets in protest after the takeover, but these were met with retaliation. 'The absence of visible protest should not be mistaken for acceptance,' said Nader. 'It reflects the extreme risks people face for dissent. The resistance is still there, quiet, private, and simmering, but public expression has been crushed through fear and force.' The Taliban insist that women's rights are protected. Nader says that, although there is 'little faith' that the country's rulers will change their policies, women are preparing themselves 'emotionally and intellectually' for a future beyond the Taliban. 'That hope, that this brutality will not last forever, is what keeps many of them going. These women do not believe the regime will change its stance on women's rights.' Regional ties are transactional It's not trust or shared values that define the Taliban's relationships. Afghanistan borders six countries, many of which are trade partners and also balk at being lectured by the West on rights and freedoms. Landlocked Afghanistan is sandwiched between the Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia, making it strategically located for energy-rich and energy-hungry nations. The Taliban's bilateral relations proceed on common ground: borders, water, transit, and security. Anti-migrant rhetoric, especially in Europe, could increase diplomatic engagement as political parties in the West seek to placate their supporters. The UK-based International Institute for Strategic Studies said the Taliban's broader diplomatic interactions were eroding the 'non-recognition' approach of the West and ushering in 'creeping normalization.' The Taliban feel comfortable in the region and have found an acceptable way of operating, while the region has adjusted to their presence. 'What we've seen in the last four years is not real pressure (on the Taliban), but rather normalization and appeasement,' Nader said. 'For those of us watching from inside and outside Afghanistan, this is not just political, it's personal. It's painful. It confirms our fear that the suffering of Afghan women is being sidelined in favor of political interests.' The real test for the Taliban is yet to come Until April, the US was the largest donor to Afghanistan, where more than half of the population relies on aid to survive. But it terminated this emergency assistance due to concerns that the Taliban were benefiting from such aid. Thousands of Afghans, including women, will lose their jobs as nongovernmental organizations and agencies scale back their work or shut down. The loss of jobs, contracts, and the shrinking humanitarian footprint also equate to a loss in revenue for the Taliban. One UN agency said there were 'reputational and staff security risks' where humanitarian agencies were forced to suspend operations due to reduced funding, causing grievances among communities, or after partners couldn't pay suppliers or complete contracts. Aid officials warn that frustration and an increase in tensions will trigger spontaneous violence as people compete for resources and services. The cuts coincide with the mass expulsions of Afghans from neighboring countries, swelling the population and the ranks of the unemployed while also halting the flow of inward remittances. The World Health Organization estimates the population will increase by 85 percent to 76.88 million by 2050. Afghanistan needs to give people food, shelter, and economic opportunities. Thomas Ruttig, from the Afghanistan Analysts Network, recalled meeting a leading Taliban figure in a 'completely rundown' office during the late 1990s. The Taliban fighter told him they could live under those circumstances, but foreigners couldn't. 'What they also say is that Afghans can live under those circumstances, which, to an extent, is true,' said Ruttig. 'They were forced to live under those circumstances and have learned how to cope.' Now their means of coping — houses, land, and some savings — are gone. The Taliban took it for granted that they won the war with the help of Allah and the population, he explained. He added that, although the Taliban were a reflection of Afghans' ambitions, they needed to open up and listen to people's concerns. 'But they know the more they open up, the more they are questioned, and their rule might be undermined.' The Taliban needed to think about whether they wanted to govern the country simply to rule it, said Ruttig. 'Or do we want to rule this country to make Afghanistan a better place to live? That's probably the big question in front of them.'
Saudi Gazette
3 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Saudi Arabia slams Israeli settlement plans near Jerusalem
Saudi Gazette report RIYADH — Saudi Arabia strongly condemned the approval by the Israeli occupation authorities to build settlements around the occupied city of Jerusalem. In a statement, the Kingdom denounced the Israeli foreign minister's statements against the establishment of a Palestinian state. Saudi Arabia regarded these actions as violations of international law, the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and the establishment of their sovereign state, and relevant UN Security Council resolutions, foremost among them Resolution 2234 (2016). This resolution demands that Israel cease settlement activities in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, affirms the illegality of Israel's settlement construction in the territory occupied since 1967, and refers to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice affirming the invalidity of annexing the occupied Palestinian territories and the need to end the Israeli occupation. Saudi Arabia reaffirmed that these decisions and statements are a continuation of the illegal expansionist policies of the Israeli government, obstructing the peace option and posing a serious threat to the possibility of a two-state solution. 'Israel's behavior requires the international community to assume its legal and moral responsibilities to provide protection for the Palestinian people, meet their legitimate rights—including recognition of the Palestinian state—compel Israel to cease its aggression against Gaza, halt its illegal violations in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, and stop crimes against the Palestinian people, particularly those amounting to genocide, while holding perpetrators accountable,' the statement said. Saudi Arabia reiterated its unequivocal rejection of Israeli policies based on settlement, forced displacement, and the deprivation of the Palestinian people of exercising their legitimate rights. It called on the international community—especially the permanent members of the UN Security Council—to take immediate measures to compel the Israeli occupation authorities to halt their crimes against the Palestinian people and the occupied Palestinian territories, and to comply with UN resolutions and international law.
