Fighting the climate crisis is vital for national security
For example, arguably the biggest near-term threat to UK security is the 'mass population displacement' that Lt Gen Richard Nugee refers to. About 3.5 billion people live in an arc around Europe, across Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries such as Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. People in these regions are already confronting floods and heatwaves of up to 50C that are making large areas uninhabitable. Rural communities are being forced into conflict and migration, while food production and supplies to cities are being affected.
Russia has already identified this as a strategic way to undermine European democracies. It stokes conflict and weaponises people – for example, pushing a wave of 4 million Syrian war refugees into Europe and Turkey. The payoff has been the rise of pro-Russian rightwing parties across Europe. With temperatures rising much faster than expected, this problem will accelerate during the present parliament. It requires immediate action as there's no way to contain it.
What can we do? The UK has a strong track record of using international aid to promote farming in these vulnerable communities. The best approach is regenerative farming, which produces food, builds resilience to extreme weather and draws carbon out of the atmosphere as it rebuilds soil health. It is a strategy for mitigating, and adapting to, climate change. We must salvage and expand this programme within the remaining aid and climate finance budget.
It is essential to our national security that we fight climate change at home, through decarbonisation, and that we promote regenerative agriculture at home and in frontline countries around Europe.Dr Adam ParrHertford College, University of Oxford
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic
A report by the Institute for Government warns that educational inequalities in England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the COVID-19 pandemic. Pupils in London are outperforming those in other regions, with the attainment gap between the capital and the rest of the country growing since 2019. The disparity in GCSE attainment between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged students has increased, with poor white children particularly affected. The Institute for Government criticised the government for lacking a clear vision or plan to address these growing inequalities, despite commitments to close the disadvantage gap. Experts and politicians are calling for urgent action, including addressing funding disparities and tackling high pupil absence rates, to reverse the decline in educational outcomes.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Where could Putin and Zelensky meet for Ukraine war summit?
Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin could meet for the first time in six years in the hope of ending the Ukraine war - but it remains unclear just where the two leaders will come face-to-face. The White House is in the process of selecting a location for the potential meeting, that has been championed by the US president Donald Trump. A warrant against the Russian president by the International Criminal Court means destinations are limited to countries that are not signees of the Rome Statute. Trump explained to Fox News radio host Mark Levin: "They are in the process of setting it up,' before casting doubt on whether he would even attend such talks. "Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go.' When asked how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, Trump said: "Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts." There has been so far no confirmation from Russia that a potential bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky is being planned. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov told state media on Tuesday that any meeting would have to take place 'step by step, gradually, starting from the expert level and then going through all the necessary stages'. Here are the potential destinations where a summit between Putin and Zelensky could take place: Budapest, Hungary The White House has said they are considering Budapest as a potential venue for talks having spoken to Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban. This wouldn't be the first time Budapest has been a key destination for talks between Russia and Ukraine. In 1994, then US president Bill Clinton met with Russian president Boris Yeltsin and Ukraine's leader Leonid Kravchuk. At the time, Ukraine was given assurances of territorial integrity from the US, Russia and the UK that meant little when Putin launched an assault 20 years later. 'Maybe I'm superstitious, but this time I would try to find another place,' Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on social media. Orban, who remains Putin's closest ally in Europe, has long advocated to open up negotiations with the Russian leader. 'It has been confirmed that the isolation-based strategy has failed,' he said on Tuesday after a meeting with the European Union. 'It has been confirmed that there is no solution to the Russia-Ukraine war on the frontline; only diplomatic efforts can bring a solution.' Geneva, Switzerland Switzerland, famous for its neutrality, has said they would be ready to host Putin for any peace talks on Ukraine, despite being a signatory of the ICC. Foreign minister Ignazio Cassis told Swiss national broadcaster SRF that provided Putin was coming for peace purposes, the country could receive him. "This has to do with our diplomatic role, with international Geneva as (the European) headquarters of the United Nations," Cassis told the broadcaster. French president Emmanuel Macron has mooted Geneva as a potential location for Ukraine peace talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after a meeting between President Trump, Zelensky and European leaders in Washington. Istanbul, Turkey A senior Trump administration official said that Istanbul had also been mentioned as a potential venue for the two leaders to meet, as Talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations have previously taken place in the city. On Wednesday, Turkish leader Tayyip Erdogan spoke with Putin on the phone to discuss Ukraine and the outcome of Putin's summit last week, according to the Kremlin. Moscow, Russia While meeting with Trump, Putin reportedly suggested the rather unlikely location of Moscow for talks with Ukraine. However, both Zelensky and the US were unsurprisingly quick to reject the idea. Minsk, Belarus Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko's spokesperson has said Minsk is ready to mediate a possible meeting between Russia and Ukraine. Bordering Russia and Ukraine, Belarus has maintained close ties with Putin. The country's relationship with Ukraine has deteriorated since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. Where did Zelensky and Putin last meet? Ukraine's leader and his Russian counterpart have not met in person since 2019, when they met in Paris to discuss an end to fighting in the Donbas region. The Normandy Format Summit, arranged by French, German, Russian and Ukrainian diplomats, took place in Zelensky's first year in office after he became president earlier that year. Agreements were made to disengage troops from areas of the Donbas region by the end of March 2020 and a roadmap was agreed for elections in occupied regions of Luhansk and Donetsk, with plans to reintegrate the territory back into the rest of Ukraine. But following the talk, the two countries continued to disagree on issues relating to the war-torn region.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homeowners could be hit with new tax as Chancellor aims to fill ‘£41 billion shortfall'
A Treasury minister has not ruled out hitting owners of high-value houses with capital gains tax (CGT) when they sell their family home. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reported to be considering ending the current exemption from CGT for primary residences as she seeks ways to raise cash in the face of dire warnings about the state of the public finances. Such a move would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. The Times reported that under the proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold. The threshold is still under consideration but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973, the newspaper reported. Treasury minister Torsten Bell declined to rule out hitting people selling their homes with CGT, insisting any potential changes were matters for the Chancellor and would be set out at a budget. Asked to rule out the move, the pensions minister told broadcasters: 'Working people and people's living standards is what this Government is all about. 'We've seen wages rise more in the first 10 months of this Government than the first 10 years of the last Conservative government. 'But of course, as you know, questions for tax are for the budget and they're for chancellors.' Ending primary residence relief could deter people from selling their homes, slowing the housing market and could have a particular impact for older people looking to downsize. The Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money. The scale of the challenge facing her in the autumn budget was illustrated by the NIESR economic think tank warning this month that Ms Reeves is set for a £41 billion shortfall on her self-imposed rule of balancing day-to-day spending with tax receipts in 2029-30. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at the Chancellor's 'disastrous economic mismanagement' and said the Government was 'stuck in a doom loop of low growth and higher taxes'. She said: 'We should be cutting spending, cutting taxes, and backing the makers who keep our country going.' Any move to hit expensive properties would be likely to impact more heavily on London than other parts of the country. Analysis by Rightmove suggested 10.9 per cent of homes for sale in the capital would exceed a £1.5 million threshold, compared with 1.6 per cent outside London. Rightmove's Colleen Babcock said: 'In essence, this would predominantly be a tax on the most expensive areas of London and the South East. 'The London market is already feeling the effects of taxation more acutely than other parts of England, and this is likely to deter some moves at the upper end.'
